SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (SBM APAT)

Principle I - Leadership & Governance

Indicators Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

1 6 10
1. In place is a development Plan 2 7
(e.g. SIP) developned
collaboratively by the 3 8
stakeholders of school and 4 9
community 5
Average 0 0 0 0.00
1 6 7
2. The Development Plan (e.g. 2
SIP) is regularly reviewed by the 3
school community to keep it
responsive and relevant to the 4
emerging needs, challenges and
opportunities 5
Average 0 0 0 0.00

3. The school is organized by a clear 1 3 4

structure and work arrangements that
promote shared leadership and
governance and define the roles and
responsibilties of the stakeholders 2 5
Average 0 0 0 0.00
4. A leadership network facilitates 1 4 6
communication between and among
school and community leaders for
informed decision-making and
2 5 7
solving of school community wide
learning problems 3
Average 0.00 0 0 0.00
1 6 8
2 7
5. A long-term program is in
operation that addresses the 3
training and development needs 4
of school and community leaders 5
Average 0 0 0 0.00
Summary of Computation for Principle I 0.00

Validated By:
FLORENCIO P. BERMUNDO
Chief Education Supervisor

rextbarbinsdosorsogonsgod02072020
 SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (SBM APAT)

Principle II - Curriculum and Learning

Indicators Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

1 7 12
2 8 13
1. The curriculum provides for 3 9 14
the devlopment needs of all 4 10 15
types learners in the school 5 11
community 6
Average 0.00 0 0 0.00
1 7 11
2 8 12
2. The implemented 3 9
curriculum is localized to make
it more meaningful to the 4 10
learners and applicable to life 5
and community 6
Average 0.00 0 0 0.00

3. A representative group of 1 4 7
school community
stakeholders develop the 2 5 8
methods and materials for
developing creative thinking
and problem solving 3 6
Average 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
1 6 8
4. The learning systems are regularly 2 7 9
and collaboratively monitored by the 3
community using appropriate tools to
ensure the holistic growth and 4
development of the learners and
community 5
Average 0 0 0 0.00
1 5 8
5. Appropriate assessment tools for 2 6
teaching and learning are continously
reviewed and improved and 3 7
assessment results are contextualized
to the learner and local situation and
the attainment of relevant life skills 4
Average 0 0 0 0.00

6. Learning managers and facilitators 1 4 7

(teachers, administrators and community
members) nurture values and
environment that are protective of all 2 5 8
children and demonstrate behaviors
consistent to the organization's vision,
mission and goals
0.00
 6. Learning managers and facilitators
(teachers, administrators and community
members) nurture values and
environment that are protective of all
7.children
Methods and resources
and demonstrate are
behaviors
consistent
learner to the
and organization's
community- vision,
mission and goals 3 6 9
friendly, enjoyable, safe,
Average and aimed
inclusive, accessible 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
at developing self-directed 1 4 6
learners. Learners are equipped 2 5
with essential knowledge, 3
skills and values to assume
responsibility and
accountability for their own 1 1 1
learning
Average 0 0.00 0 0.00
Summary of Computation for Principle II 0

Validated By:

ALVIN T. ROSARE MARICEL M. DINEROS

Education Program Supervisor Education Program Supervisor

JERRY FIRMANES
Education Program Supervisor

rextbarbinsdosorsogonsgod02072020
Principle III - Accountability and Continuous Improvement

Indicators Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

1. Roles and responsibilties of
accoiuntable person/s and collective 1 3 5
body/ies are clearly defined and
agreed upon by community
stakeholders 2 4 6
Average 0 0 0 0.00
1 3 5
2. Achievement of goals is
recognized based on a collaboratively
developed performance 2 4 6
accountability system; gaps are
addressed through appropriate action 7
Average 0 0 0 0.00
3. The accountability system is
owned by the community and is 1 4 5
continuously enhanced to ensure that
management structures and
mechanisms are responsive to the
emerging learning needs and 2
demands of the community (System
of Processes, Mechanisms and Tools
Accountability) ownership 3
Average 0.00 0 0 0.00
1 8 12
4. Accountability assessment 2 9 13
criteria and tools, feddback 3 10 14
mechanisms and information
collection and validation 4 11 15
techniques and processes are 5
inclusive and collaboratively
developed and agreed upon 6
Average 0.00 0 0 0.00

5. Participatory assessment of 1 3 7
performance is done regularly
with community assessments 2 4
results and lessons learned serve
as basis for feedback, technical 5
assistance, recognition and plan
adjustment 6
Average 0 0 0 0.00
Summary of Computation for Principle III 0

Validated By:
LEAH H. PERAN
Senior Education Program Specialist
rextbarbinsdosorsogonsgod02072020
SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (SBM APAT)

Principle IV - Management of Resources

Indicators Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

1 6 7

1. Regular resource inventory is 2 8

collaboratively undertaken by 3
learning managers, learning
facilitators and community 4
stakeholders as basis for resource
allocation and mobilization 5
2. A regular dialogue for planning
Average
and resource programming, that is
0 0 0 0.00
accessible and inclusive,
continuously engage stakeholders 1 3 4
and support implementation of
community education plans 2
Average 0 0 0 0.00
3. In place is a community-developed
1 4 5
resource management system that
drives appropriate behaviours of the
stakeholders to ensure judicious, 2
appropriate and effective use of
resources 3
Average 0.00 0 0 0.00
4. Regular monitoring, evaluation 1 4 7
and reporting processes of resource
management are collaboratively 2 5 8
developed and implemented by the 3 6 9
learning facilitators and community
stakeholders 10
Average 0.00 0 0 0.00
1 4 6
5. There is a system that manage 2 5 7
the network and linkages which
strengthen and sustain 3
partnerships for improving
resource management
Average 0.00 0 0 0.00
Summary of Computation for Principle 4 0

Validated By:
ABRAHAM H. GREGORY
Education Program Specialist II

rextbarbinsdosorsogonsgod02072020
 Summary of Ratings
II. Validated Practices Using DOD (40%)

Cummulative Scores of
SBM Principles Weight Validators per Principle
Computation Results
Leadership and Governance 30% 0
Curriculum & Learning 30% 0
Accountability & Continuous
Improvement 25% 0
Management of Resources 15% 0
Sub-Total 100% 0

Numerical Rating Scale Description

0.50 - 1.40 Good
1.50 - 2.49 Better
2.50 - 3.00 Best

III. Computation of the Final Rating

Areas Weight Computation Results

Performance Improvement 60% 0
SBM Assessment Score (DOD) 40% 0
TOTAL 100% 0

Interpretation
___________ Developing (Level I)
___________ Maturing (Level II)
___________ Advanced (Level III)

Description of SBM Level of Practice

Numerical Rating Scale Description

0.50 - 1.40 Developing
1.50 - 2.49 Maturing
2.50 - 3.00 Advance

Validated By: REX T. BARBIN

Education Program Supervisor/
Division SBM Coordinator

Noted: Approved:

FLORENCIO P. BERMUNDO JOSE L. DONCILLO, CESO V

Chief Education Supervisor Schools Division Superintendent
rextbarbinsdosorsogonsgod02072020
 SBM Level of Practice Validation Form

I. IMPROVEMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES (60%)

A. ACCESS (45%)
School Year Enrollment Variance % of Increase Rating & Equivalent Points
2018-2019 Baseline
2019-2020 0 #DIV/0! 1 - Marginal at least 1% increase
2020-2021 0 #DIV/0! 2 - Average at least 7% increase
2021-2022 0 #DIV/0! 3 - High at least 10% increase
Average % of increase #DIV/0!
B. EFFICIENCY (25%)
School Year Drop-Out Rate % of Decrease Rating & Equivalent Points
2018-2019 0.0 1 - Marginal at least 25% decrease
2019-2020 2 - Average at least 50% decrease
2020-2021 3 - High (0 drop-out rate)
Average % of Decrease
School Year Completion Rate Variance % of Increase Rating & Equivalent Points
2018-2019 -75 -100.00 1 - Marginal at least 5% increase
2019-2020 -75 -100.00 2 - Average at least 7% increase
2020-2021 -75 -100.00 3 - High at least 10% increase
Average % of increase -100.00
Cohort-Survival
School Year Rate Variance % of Increase Rating & Equivalent Points
2018-2019 -75 -100.00 1 - Marginal at least 5% increase
2019-2020 -75 -100.00 2 - Average at least 7% increase
2020-2021 -75 -100.00 3 - High at least 10% increase
Average % of increase -100.00
Average Efficiency Rating (DR + CR + CSR)/3 0.00
C. QUALITY (30%)
Average Final
School Year Rating Sum (SY1+SY2+SY3) Rating & Equivalent Points
2018-2019 1 - Marginal (65% - 75%)
2019-2020 0 2 - Average (76% - 85%)
2020-2021 3 - High (86% - 100%)
0.00

SUMMARY
CATEGORY WEIGHT Ave. Rating x Weight Numerical Rating Scale
ACCESS 45% 0.0 0.50 - 1.40 (Good)
EFFICIENCY 25% 0.00 1.50 - 2.49 (Better)
QUALITY 30% 0.0 2.50 - 3.00 (Best)
TOTAL 0.00

Validated By:
REX T. BARBIN
EPS/ Division SBM Coordinator

Noted: Approved:

FLORENCIO P. BERMUNDO JOSE L. DONCILLO, CESO V

Chief Education Supervisor Schools Division Superintendent
 Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region V

Sorsogon

The Contextualized SBM Assessment

Process and Tool (SBM APAT)

Name of School: _________________________________

School ID: _________________________________
School Address: _________________________________

Name of School Head: _________________________________

Plantilla Position: _________________________________

_____________________________________________
Date of Assessment Conducted

_____________________________________________
Date of Division Validation
SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (SBM APAT)

Instruction to the Users:

Please indicate the numerical rating on the highlighted portion the extent of SBM
Practice per indicator listed below based on the consensual agreement of the
validating teams after the systematic D-O-D (Document-Analysis-Observation-
Discussion). On the other hand, indicators with no evidence just indicate zero

Rating Scale:
0 No evidence
Evidence indicates developing structures and mechanisms are
1 in place to demonstrate ACCESs
Evidence indicates developing structures and mechanisms are
2 fully implemented and aligned with ACCESs
Evidence indicates developing structures and procedure satisfy
3 quality standards

Illustrative Example

Entries for average of the three levels and total are auto-computed
SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (SBM APAT)

Instruction to the Users:

Please indicate the numerical rating which corresponds to the equivalent points of
the computed average % of increase/decrease. This will facilitate the automatic
computation of performance indicators per category and summary and in order to
determine the numerical rating scale. Kindly refer to the illustrative example below.

Numerical Rating Scale:

0.5 - 1.49 Good
1.50 - 2.49 Better
2.50 - 3.00 Best

Illustrative Example

Please indicate the numerical rating which corresponds to the equivalent points of the computed average
% of increse/decrease