Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wildlife - Man Conflict
Wildlife - Man Conflict
Wildlife - Man Conflict
Development Team
Prof. R.K. Kohli
Principal Investigator
& Prof. V.K. Garg & Prof. Ashok Dhawan
Co- Principal Investigator
Central University of Punjab, Bathinda
OVERVIEW
Introduction
Causes of human-wildlife conflict
Examples and Case studies
Possible remedies
INTRODUCTION
Earth, the only planet proven to support life (although Mars has also been claimed to do so,
but not yet convincingly proven) is endowed with a wide variety of flora and fauna. Right
from the miniscule algae to the higher plants further to the more complex human beings, the
variety of life forms on the planet never ceases to amaze anyone. In spite of such diversity,
these life forms are interlinked with one another and as such, dependent on each other for
survival. For instance, certain carnivorous species like the felines (tiger, panther, and so on)
feed on other animals like the deer or the boars for survival. Even a large number of human
beings devour delicious delicacies prepared from other animals such as the poultry, lamb, fish
and others. As such, an alteration in the number of one species of living form, may, nay does,
directly and / or indirectly have a bearing on the survival of other species too.
A new concept termed ‘man and wildlife conflict’ also variously referred to as ‘human and
wildlife conflict’. What exactly does this concept signify? The World Wide Fund for Nature
(WWF) has officially defined human and wildlife conflict as ‘any interaction between
humans and wildlife that results in negative impacts on human social, economic or cultural
life, on the conservation of wildlife populations, or on the environment’. The basic idea is
very simple to understand. Generally, humans try not come in contact with wildlife in the
places they dwell, i.e. human settlements are as far away from wildlife as possible. This
serves to prevent either species from harming one another. However, due to an arising need,
such as explosion of the population and exploration of food or other resources, humans may
Wild animals can attack humans and such attacks can be broadly classified as – territorial,
defensive or predatory.
Territorial attack – When wild animals attack other animals or humans that invade or
trespass their territory
Defensive attack – When a wild animal perceives danger from a human and attacks
him/her in order to protect itself
Predatory attack – When a wild animal attacks humans as a prey for food. This is
usually seen among tigers that become too old or injured and hence, cannot prey on
other animals that are too fast or too swift for it. Thus, they begin to prey on humans,
which are easier to hunt than other animals. Such tigers are termed as ‘man-eaters’.
The expansion of urban and rural parts, also increase in requirements of people as a result of
increasing population has led to many settlements coming up near the peripheries of
protected areas, encroaching the forest areas and using it for their own benefit. Moreover,
land is also required for agricultural and horticultural purposes. This is first and most
important cause giving rise to conflict between man and wildlife.
3. Livestock grazing –
Livestock grazing owned by humans in forest areas can affect wildlife in multiple ways.
Firstly, the livestock compete with the wild herbivores for palatable plant species and water,
thus creating a scarcity for the indigenous herbivore population. Secondly, livestock mainly
feed on the young saplings, affecting the regeneration of plant and tree species. Moreover, the
presence of livestock attracts the carnivores, thus exposing them to retaliatory trapping and
killing by humans so as to protect the livestock. Lastly, an increased contact between
livestock and wildlife can aid in the spread of communicable diseases from domestic to wild
animals and vice versa. Scientific studies in the Bandipur Tiger Reserve indicate that the
4. Road kills –
With increase in industrial development, road construction has increased exponentially. The
traffic density in India is estimated to increase at the rate of ten percent annually. Some of the
roads developed to handle this traffic pass through forest areas. Apart from fragmenting the
natural habitat of the wildlife, driving at high speed combined with poor eyesight or poor
reflexes on the part of the animal contribute to a high incidence of road accidents. The
common victims of such accidents are the nocturnal animals such as mouse deer, civet cats,
black-naped hares, leopards and sambars. There have been several reports of tigers, elephant
calves or elephants, chitals, dholes, sloth bears, wolves, blackbucks and other large mammals
killed in numerous road accidents.
Death of an animal in a road accident may indirectly impact the ecosystem immensely. Death
of herbivores may deplete the carnivorous animals of food. Death of a female tiger may
starve her cubs. Thus, various precautionary measures, as discussed later, need to be
implemented to reduce the incidence of such road accidents.
1. Elephants –
The dwindling nature of elephant habitats, both Asian and African elephants, has served as
one of the greatest lessons regarding the dangers of human-animal conflict. Besides poaching,
this has contributed to a significant decline in the elephant numbers in the recent past. The
increasing food demands of an ever growing population has forced humans to expand the
land for agriculture, which often encroaches upon the existing elephant habitats. The
elephants are therefore, squeezed into smaller habitats, which then affects both the parties
involved in the conflict.
Lesser availability of free space for movement and feeding leads to elephants frequently
raiding adjacent crop lands. Besides endangering human lives due to elephant stampede, the
subsequent damage to crops causes huge financial losses to the farmers, thus affecting both
domestic and international agro businesses. The economically vulnerable farmers are the
worst sufferers. For instance, the damage caused by elephants to oil palm plantations and
timber estates in Riau, Indonesia, is estimated to be approximately US $ 105 million per year
(WWF factsheet 2006).
2. Great apes –
Similar to elephants, expansion of human habitations are taking a great toll on the natural
habitats of our ancestors – the apes.
Around Kibale National Park in Uganda, chimpanzees have been reported to raid crops such
as banana, maize, and sugar cane on average 75 times a year. As a protective response,
around 15% of the farmers in this region lay out traps, snares or poisons to kill the crop-
raiders. Similarly, the rapid expansion of oil palm plantations in Sabah (Borneo), Malaysia, in
3. The felines –
The vast majority of big cat species particularly the tigers and the snow leopards have been
the victims of human expansion and encroachment activities. The number of tigers globally
has declined drastically from 100,000 to around 7,000 over a period of 100 years. Similarly,
the habitat of the Central Asian leopard has declined from several million hectares to less
than 8,00,000 hectares the last century. These statistics represent a matter of grave concern
that they actually present.
A significant reason for the decline in the wild cat population has been human animal conflict
that has increased significantly over the past few decades. The feeding of the wild cats on
livestock reared near their habitat leads to their capture and killing in retaliation by humans.
A survey in northern India indicated that over a 14-month period, an average household lost
six animals, valued at almost US$300, with snow leopards responsible for 55 per cent of
these kills. Between 1996 and 2002, eight snow leopards were reportedly killed in one
northern Indian village alone.
The greater one-horned rhinoceros has steadily increased in number from 600 in the year
1975 to about 24000 as of the present across India and Nepal. Nevertheless, as a flip side to
this, destruction of crops and farm produce by the rhinos has also increased, leading to
5. Bears
The spectacled bear is native ot the Andean mountains of Venezuela, Peru, Ecaudor, Bolivia,
Colombia and other countries of Latin America. Increased deforestation in the Andean
mountains has exposed their population to human contact. Moreover, these forests have been
replaced with maize fields which is a particularly favoured food of these bears. As a result,
around 200 bears are killed each year by the farmers as a means to protect their farm produce
and economy. This has threatened the bear species leading to a possibility of extinction.
Another example can be cited of brown bears that were abundantly found in most of the
Northern hemisphere once up on a time. Today, however, they are restricted to the
Carpathian Mountains in the Central and Eastern Europe. This is primarily due to the rapid
economic development in these regions. Brown bears tend to attack livestock, beehives,
orchards and occasionally food storehouses and dustbins, leading to retaliatory actions by the
local farmers. Though the number of brown bears has significantly increased over the past
100 years as a result of re-introduction and conservation programmes, the increased human-
bear conflict does place their population at risk for reduction due to human precautionary
measures.
6. Wolves
Similar to brown bears, the wolverine population in Europe has increased steadily over the
past few decades due to conservation measures and these animals are found in significant
numbers in the European Alps and the Italian Apennine mountains. However, these wolves
are usually blamed by the local farmers for the loss of their livestock, though this is primarily
caused by dogs and not wolves; leading to their shooting in retaliation. Hunters too hunt
POSSIBLE REMEDIES
The solution to human wildlife conflict cannot be carried out at an individual level; it
necessitates the co-operation and co-ordination between different stakeholders and co-
ordinated and regulated measures that should be implemented on a large scale.
1. Improvement of habitat –
The Ministry of Environment should shoulder the responsibility of improving the natural
habitats for the wild animals. Studies should be conducted to indentify the ideal or the best
possible habitat for a particular animal and its living in that particular habitat should be
encouraged. For instance, a recently conducted study (yet to be published) has identified the
Palamau region in Jharkhand, India as a suitable habitat for the Asian elephants. The
availability of food and water in these natural habitats should be augmented so that the
animal excursion into human settlements can be reduced.
3. Training programmes –
The forest officers, police and the local population needs to be trained to avoid human-
wildlife conflict. They should realize the importance of not extending their settlements or
agricultural land deep into the forests and should avoid over grazing of livestock in the forest
4. Technical support –
Infrastructure and necessary medical facilities should be provided in case any wild animal or
human gets injured in case of a conflict. Hospitals should be established, both human and
veterinary to attend to these. Measures should also be taken to rehabilitate the injured animals
in rescue centres and release them back into their natural habitats.
REFERENCES