Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Managerial Accounting: Hero Motocorp
Managerial Accounting: Hero Motocorp
MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING
Hero MotoCorp
Introduction:
Automobile industry is over 100 years old. It started in Germany and France, and was aged in
the U.S. in the era of mass production. Vehicle volume, safety, efficiency, choice and features
have grown consistently throughout the history of this industry. It is so synonymous with
industrial development of the 20th century, and so intertwined with its twin wonders, mass
consumption and mass production, that it is being called the "industry of industries."
However, it's not all well in the automotive world. Worldwide, average margins have
dropped from 20% in the 1920s to 5% now, with lots of companies losing their money. This
poor profit margins is seen in the market capitalization of the industry: despite its huge
revenues and employment, the automobile industry accounts for only 1.6 per cent of the stock
market in Europe and 0.6 per cent in the US. There is a large contrast between the lackluster
financial success of the industry and its oversized social role, employment share and political
influence. These facts mask a broad range of financial performance. Toyota, the most
successful car company, has 15 times the market value of General Motors.
Talking about Hero MotoCorp, it is India's biggest motorcycle manufacturer, is the core unit
of the Hero Group midsize conglomerate.
The company's history is closely linked to Japan's Honda Motor. Hero Group, which had
produced bicycles, entered the motorcycle business in 1984 by setting up a joint venture
called Hero Honda. Small motorcycles with 100cc to 150cc engines have brought the
partnership to the top spot on the Indian market.
Hero, who sought to expand abroad, was out of touch with Honda on management policy,
leading to the end of the partnership in 2011. The name of the company was changed to Hero
MotoCorp.
In 2012, Hero MotoCorp partnered with U.S. motorcycle manufacturer Erik Buell to see a
chance for technical synergies. The Indian company has also built up its sales network in both
urban and rural areas, making it a tremendous competitor to Honda.
Nearly 40% of the outstanding shares of the company are held by the founding Munjal
family. Brijmohan Lall Munjal, head of the Hero Group, serves as chairman of Hero
MotoCorp. His son, Pawan Munjal, is the CEO of the motorcycle business and is accelerating
its overseas expansion, including in Africa and South America.
The rationale of the study is to gain a deeper understanding on how the cost
management systems of a company work and how a company is able to cut costs without
major implications. Moreover, the automobile sector represented an easy sector to gather
information.
Literature review:
The company reopened its 3 manufacturing plants in Uttarakhand and Haryana in May 2020.
Operations have also restarted at Global Parts Centre in Rajasthan. However, employees over
60 years and with critical medical conditions were asked to work from home compulsorily.
https://www.thehindu.com/business/Industry/hero-motocorp-resumes-manufacturing-
operations-at-three-plants/article31498942.ece
Hero MotoCorp is planning a tie-up with Harley Davidson, which isn’t doing well in India,
after trying to increase sales for 11 years. According to insiders from the industry, the tie-up
will lead to Hero MotoCorp selling and servicing Harley Davidson bikes along with
accessories. Financial support and backend infrastructure will be provided by Hero.
https://www.business-standard.com/article/automobile/cultural-alignment-a-challenge-as-
hero-looks-to-review-harley-davidson-120120301501_1.html
The market share of Hero MotoCorp rose in the month of October by more than 500 bps. The
Company has led the revival of the domestic two-wheeler industry over the past few months,
amid the significant disruptions in the supply chain of parts, operations and consumer
touchpoints in the marketplace, thanks to the extensive preparation and planning carried out
by the entire Hero ecosystem, including the dealer partners.
http://www.businessworld.in/article/Hero-MotoCorp-Retails-More-Than-14-Lakh-Units-Of-
Two-Wheelers-In-32-Days/18-11-2020-344071/
CSR
They are committed to strategically deploying their CSR expenditures in order to reaffirm
their "social licence to operate" in areas where they operate by improving the social status and
addressing the issues most important to stakeholders.
Hero MotoCorp adheres to all applicable legal protocols and requirements and ensures the
deployment of energy efficient technologies, upgrades of legacy equipment and synergy
between different manufacturing operations.
Hero MotoCorp is strongly focused on expanding its green coverage within the four
walls of the factories, in the offices and beyond the periphery through its CSR initiative.
Investing in renewable sourcing of energy
Hero Motocorp is constantly striving to generate clean and green energy. With the long-
term target of becoming 100% carbon neutral by 2030, Hero MotoCorp is continually
expanding its renewable portfolio through solar power plants.
Products usage
All of their products comply with environmental legislation and frameworks, both locally and
globally.
21X Water positive for the Neemrana facility
• Energy-saving compressed air for the drying of sludge in the press.
• Easy to handle and store.
Material
Their R&D and manufacturing teams are working to improve the quality and performance of
their vehicles while streamlining their material consumption. Preference is given to recycled
or recycled inputs. Aluminium and Steel give us the opportunity to use second-life materials
instead of virgin materials for a few of their components.
Transition from linear economy to circular economy
They have begun to apply the principles of circular economy through reduction-reuse-
recovery initiatives. Their integrated approach to circularity addresses potential risks
associated with shortfalls in the supply of raw materials by minimising dependence on virgin
materials. Design for easy recovery is one such initiative that matures in its eco-system in
products and processes.
Waste
10 | P a g e Group 11 | Section: E
They are committed to improving their waste management initiatives at their facilities on a
regular basis. All plants dispose of waste in compliance with operating permits and hazardous
waste permits. After due validation, they engage with waste disposal facilities/waste
recyclers/cement companies.
As part of their strategic drive to remove hazardous waste from landfill and incineration, a
number of recycling options have been explored and implemented across the organisation.
HAZARDOUS WASTE
All of their units have sewage treatment plants, effluent treatment plants and recycling plants.
They handle all hazardous waste in accordance with local regulations. The amount of
hazardous waste generated in two years is shown in the table below:
NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE
Consists of metal turning and rejected metal or plastic components. The amount of non-
hazardous waste generated over two years is shown in the table below:
11 | P a g e Group 11 | Section: E
Air emissions
In their manufacturing plants, process vents and the use of fossil fuels generate air emissions
of SOx, NOx and particulate matter (PM). They monitor NOx, SOx air emissions and
particulate matter in order to keep emissions below the permissible limits. Their facilities are
equipped with appropriate emission control equipment to stop emissions during operation.
Details of air emissions from manufacturing plants are given in the following table:
In FY20, three of their plants in Dharuhera, Gurgaon and the Global Parts Centerin Neemrana
achieved ZWL diversion certification at more than 99 per cent after certification audit, while
the manufacturing plant in Neemrana has already been certified foriZWL in FY19. ZWL
certification improves the credibility and visibility of an organization's efforts to improve its
environmental impact within the organisation as a whole and its commitment to
sustainability.
12 | P a g e Group 11 | Section: E
Hazardous waste reduction
Improvement:
Installation of an evaporating machine to remove moisture content from the ETP sludge
to zero. It helps us reduce 70% (by weight) of the generation of ETP sludge.
Benefits Waste Reduction:
Reduction of 70% of Haz waste (Moisture reduces from 70 per cent to zero).
Cost Saving:
Reduction in disposal cost by 8.8 lakh/ year.
Other:
Dry sludge is easier to handle and store with less space. Also, energy saved while
disposal in cement plants through co-processing as the sludge has 0 moisture waste.
13 | P a g e Group 11 | Section: E
14 | P a g e Group 11 | Section: E
Comparative analysis:
Balance sheet:
Particulars 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Equity & Liabilities
4 4 4 4 4
Equity Share Capital 0 0 0 0 0
7,91 10,27 11,93 13,08 14,36
Other Equity 3 6 2 0 6
7,95 10,31 11,97 13,12 14,40
Total Equity 3 6 1 0 6
5 6 9 11 14
Non-Controlling Interest 4 7 3 6 1
Non-Current Liabilities
14 20 15 12 4
Borrowings 6 8 0 5 4
22 46 58 61 47
Deferred Tax Liabilities 8 9 2 3 3
12 7 11 12 33
Other Non-Current Liabilities 0 6 9 1 2
49 75 85 85 84
Total Non-Current Liabilities 3 2 1 9 8
Current Liabilities
8 4 7 18 16
Short Term Borrowings 4 0 5 4 6
2,79 3,26 3,37 3,43 3,12
Trade Payables 2 6 5 8 8
35 20 22 29
Other Financial Liabilities 9 3 4 2
1
- Current Maturities' of LTB 3 3 3 2
1,29 49 82 56 69
Other Current Liabilities 6 9 5 1 1
4,17 4,17 4,48 4,40 4,27
Total Current Liabilities 2 7 1 9 9
TOTAL EQUITIES & 12,67 15,31 17,39 18,50 19,67
LIABILITIES 2 2 7 4 4
Assets
Non-Current Assets
3,90 4,49 4,77 4,79 5,78
Property, Plant & Equipment 7 5 1 3 6
12 38 23 38 68
Intangible Assets 9 7 9 5 7
33 10 19 16 20
Capital-Work in Progress 1 4 0 0 5
32 19 11 18 18
Intangible Assets under Development 3 4 6 8 7
94 1,02 1,16 1,70 2,09
Investment 5 5 0 6 8
87 54 96 1,32 1,61
Financial Assets 6 5 4 8 9
7 99 95 1,53 44
Other Non-Current Assets 4 1 4 2 3
15 | P a g e Group 11 | Section: E
6,58 7,74 8,39 10,09 11,02
Total Non-Current Assets 5 1 5 1 5
Current Assets
3,24 4,54 5,59 3,17 4,70
Current Investments 9 4 1 4 9
76 70 96 1,25 1,28
Inventories 2 9 3 0 2
1,28 1,55 1,42 2,74 1,51
Trade Receivables 2 2 7 5 2
17 19 23 30 43
Cash, Bank & Cash Equivalents 9 5 8 4 5
61 57 78 94 71
Other Current Assets 5 1 4 1 0
6,08 7,57 9,00 8,41 8,64
Total Current Assets 7 1 2 3 9
12,67 15,31 17,39 18,50 19,67
TOTAL ASSETS 2 2 7 4 4
16 | P a g e Group 11 | Section: E
7
4,35 4,84 5,29 5,10 4,61
PBT 2 7 4 4 1
1,26 1,33 1,57 1,63 95
Tax 2 9 0 8 2
3,09 3,50 3,72 3,46 3,65
PAT 0 8 4 6 9
( (3 2 2
Less: Share of Minority Interest 4) 8) 2 3 1
3,09 3,54 3,72 3,44 3,63
PAT for Equity Shareholders 4 6 2 4 8
1,39 1,73 1,69 1,89 1,93
Dividend 8 7 8 7 7
Ratio analysis:
Profitability Ratios
Inventory Days 13 16 19
17 | P a g e Group 11 | Section: E
EBITDA Margin saw a decrease from the previous year which shows less earning margin.
Debt to equity ratio saw a decrease from the previous year which shows less debt the
company owes.
Current ratio saw an increase which shows an increase in current assets or a decrease in
current liabilities.
Horizontal analysis:
Balance sheet:
Particulars 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Equity &
Liabilities
Equity Share Capital 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Other Equity 22% 30% 16% 10% 10%
Total Equity 22% 30% 16% 10% 10%
Non-Controlling Interest 189% 26% 38% 25% 21%
Non-Current Liabilities
Borrowings 1117% 42% -28% -17% -65%
Deferred Tax Liabilities 106% 24% 5% -23%
Other Non-Current Liabilities 22% -37% 58% 1% 174%
Total Non-Current Liabilities 350% 53% 13% 1% -1%
Current Liabilities
Short Term Borrowings -4% -52% 88% 144% -10%
Trade Payables 3% 17% 3% 2% -9%
Other Financial Liabilities -43% 10% 31%
- Current Maturities' of LTB -77% 0% -21%
Other Current Liabilities 9% -61% 65% -32% 23%
Total Current Liabilities 5% 0% 7% -2% -3%
TOTAL EQUITIES &
LIABILITIES 19% 21% 14% 6% 6%
Assets
Non-Current Assets
Property, Plant & Equipment 37% 15% 6% 0% 21%
Intangible Assets 27% 199% -38% 61% 78%
Capital-Work in Progress 5% -69% 83% -16% 28%
Intangible Assets under Development -20% -40% -40% 61% -1%
Investment 15% 8% 13% 47% 23%
Financial Assets 21% -38% 77% 38% 22%
Other Non-Current Assets 22% 1245% -4% 61% -71%
Total Non-Current Assets 25% 18% 8% 20% 9%
Current Assets
Current Investments 41% 40% 23% -43% 48%
Inventories -12% -7% 36% 30% 3%
Trade Receivables -7% 21% -8% 92% -45%
18 | P a g e Group 11 | Section: E
Cash, Bank & Cash Equivalents -17% 9% 22% 28% 43%
Other Current Assets -3% -7% 37% 20% -24%
Total Current Assets 13% 24% 19% -7% 3%
TOTAL ASSETS 19% 21% 14% 6% 6%
Other non-current liabilities saw a huge increase in comparison to the previous year.
Intangible assets and borrowing also saw a big increase from the previous year, whereas,
other non-current assets saw a significant decrease from the previous year.
Share of profits of JVs and tax rate saw large deceases in comparison to the previous year.
Other than that, there were small changes noticeable in various heads.
Vertical analysis:
19 | P a g e Group 11 | Section: E
Balance sheet:
2018 2019 2020
Equity &
Liabilities
Equity Share Capital 0.23% 0.22% 0.20%
Other Equity 68.58% 70.69% 73.02%
Total Equity 68.81% 70.90% 73.22%
Non-Controlling Interest 0.54% 0.63% 0.71%
Non-Current Liabilities
Borrowings 0.86% 0.67% 0.22%
Deferred Tax Liabilities 3.34% 3.31% 2.40%
Other Non-Current Liabilities 0.69% 0.65% 1.69%
Total Non-Current Liabilities 4.89% 4.64% 4.31%
Current Liabilities
Short Term Borrowings 0.43% 0.99% 0.84%
Trade Payables 19.40% 18.58% 15.90%
Other Financial Liabilities 1.16% 1.21% 1.48%
- Current Maturities' of LTB 0.02% 0.02% 0.01%
Other Current Liabilities 4.74% 3.03% 3.51%
Total Current Liabilities 25.76% 23.83% 21.75%
TOTAL EQUITIES & 100.00
LIABILITIES 100% % 100.00%
Assets
Non-Current Assets
Property, Plant & Equipment 27.43% 25.90% 29.41%
Intangible Assets 1.37% 2.08% 3.49%
Capital-Work in Progress 1.09% 0.86% 1.04%
Intangible Assets under Development 0.67% 1.02% 0.95%
Investment 6.67% 9.22% 10.67%
Financial Assets 5.54% 7.18% 8.23%
Other Non-Current Assets 5.48% 8.28% 2.25%
Total Non-Current Assets 48.25% 54.53% 56.04%
Current Assets
Current Investments 32.14% 17.15% 23.94%
Inventories 5.53% 6.75% 6.52%
Trade Receivables 8.20% 14.83% 7.68%
Cash, Bank & Cash Equivalents 1.37% 1.64% 2.21%
Other Current Assets 4.51% 5.08% 3.61%
Total Current Assets 51.75% 45.47% 43.96%
100.00
TOTAL ASSETS 100% % 100.00%
20 | P a g e Group 11 | Section: E
Particulars 2018 2019 2020
Revenue from Operations 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Other Income 1.60% 2.00% 2.50%
Total Income 101.60% 102.00% 102.50%
Expenses
Raw Material 66.10% 69.00% 67.80%
Excise Duty 1.90% 0.00% 0.00%
Employee Costs 4.80% 5.20% 6.50%
Other Expenses 11.10% 11.00% 11.90%
Total Expenses 83.90% 85.20% 86.10%
EBITDA 17.70% 16.80% 16.40%
Depreciation & Amortization 1.70% 1.80% 2.90%
EBIT 15.90% 15.00% 13.50%
Finance Expenses 0.10% 0.10% 0.20%
PBT before profits of JVs 15.80% 14.80% 13.30%
Add: Share of Profits of JVs 0.20% 0.20% 0.10%
PBT & Exceptional Items 16.00% 15.00% 13.40%
Exceptional Items 0.00% 0.00% 2.30%
PBT 16.00% 15.00% 15.80%
Tax 4.70% 4.80% 3.30%
PAT 11.30% 10.20% 12.50%
Less: Share of Minority Interest 0.00% 0.10% 0.10%
PAT for Equity Shareholders 11.20% 10.10% 12.40%
Dividend 5.10% 5.60% 6.60%
• Raw material as an expense took around 65-70% of the revenue from operations.
Savings of costs:
LEAP has been launched for the optimization of fixed costs and has focused on material cost
reduction with the objective of ~50 bps of savings per year.
LEAP-II has now been launched Double target LEAP to ~100 bps targeting significant
savings.
Other cost-cutting initiatives include the optimization of fixed costs. Across the plant,
alternative sources for dies/moulds. Avoid duplication of tools and product design
Changes/refurbishments of old tools to name a few. Improvement of the margin is planned
through enterprises such as reinforced after sales/parts, accessories, and merchandise. Total
profitability, on-going programme, managing material and fixed costs, including under non-
operational activities are also helping them to achieve their goals.
21 | P a g e Group 11 | Section: E
There were a lot of green projects which yielded a lot of savings to the company. In order to
decrease costs and increase productivity, advanced cam grinding was introduced. Alternative
process of hobbling that is fine blanking was introduced by Hero MotoCorp. Technological
breakthrough was implemented for gear rolling which led to big reduction in costs. Alot of
innovative technologies were used to reduce various operational costs. To stop the increasing
cost pressure on Hero Motocorp as well as on its suppliers, ACE (achieving cost excellence)
was set up it optimized cost performance.
Conclusion:
Each member of the group had no prior knowledge on cost management system analysis or
sustainability analysis, so it was huge learning curve for each of us. We understood what
decisions the management takes to reduce their costs. It gave us a basic knowledge about that
aspect in the automobile sector.
22 | P a g e Group 11 | Section: E