Eng100 FL Syllabus

Document Code: CAS-F-CS
Document Title: Course Syllabus in ENG100 English

MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Enhancement Course
An Autonomous University Page No.: Page 1 of 13
Lucena City Revision No.: 6
Effectivity Date: 17 August 2020
Prepared by:
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Maria Cecilia M. Jalbuena, MAEd
Professor
QUALITY FORM Reviewed by:
Remedios S. Salazar, MAEd
Department Chair
Approved by:
Claudia Odette J. Ayala, PhD
Dean
UNIVERSITY VISION
In 2030, the Manuel S. Enverga University Foundation is a globally competitive university with high concentrations of talent, excellent teaching environment, rigorous program quality,
sufficient resources, and a culture of collaboration.
UNIVERSITY MISSION
The Manuel S. Enverga University Foundation is a private, non-stock, non-profit, non-sectarian educational foundation with a three-fold function – instruction, research and community
service – offering responsive and alternative programs supportive of national development goals and standards of global excellence.
GOAL
The Manuel S. Enverga University Foundation shall produce graduates who have research-based knowledge, leadership and managerial skills, and professionalism.
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES VISION
In 2030, the College of Arts and Sciences shall be a globally competitive liberal arts and sciences institution with high concentrations of talent, excellent teaching environment, rigorous
program quality, sufficient resources, and a culture of collaboration.
.
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES MISSION
The MSEUF College of Arts and Sciences shall produce competent professionals adequately prepared in the practice of their profession supportive of national development goals and
standards of global excellence.
Prepared by:
Professor
Department Chair
Approved by:
Dean
PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES MISSION

Instruction Research Community
Service
1. Graduates shall have effective communication and teamwork skills, creativity, and critical thinking. ✓ ✓ ✓
2. Graduates shall have skills and capacities to apply theories in various disciplines in accordance with high standards of ethics. ✓ ✓ ✓
3. Graduates shall become successful professionals serving local and international communities. ✓ ✓ ✓
4. Graduates shall have lifelong learning skills to facilitate changes in themselves and in their society. ✓ ✓ ✓
COURSE SPECIFICATION
Course Code: ENG 100

Course Title: English Enhancement Course
This course is a systematic review of basic grammatical structures with emphasis on vocabulary building, spelling, sentence sense, and the
Course Description:
parts of speech. It includes developing sentence effectiveness applicable to the various communicative functions of language.
Prerequisite: None Co-requisite: None
Lecture Contact/Hours per Laboratory Contact/Hours per
Course Credits: 3 3 hours N/A
Week: Week:
Total Contact Hours (for 18 weeks): 54 hours
Prepared by:
Professor
Department Chair
Approved by:
Dean
Student Outcomes and Relationship to Program Educational Objectives:
Program Educational
Student Outcomes Objectives
1 2 3 4
a. Critical, analytical, and creative thinking ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
b. Application of different analytical modes (quantitative and qualitative, artistic and scientific, textual and visual, experimental, observation, etc.) in ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
tackling problems methodically
c. Ability to contribute personally and meaningfully to the country’s development ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
d. Application of computing and information technology to assist and facilitate research ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
e. Problem solving (including real-world problems) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Course Outcomes and Relationship to Student Outcomes:
Course Outcomes
a b c d e
After completing the course, the student must have the ability to:
1. use the resources of the library efficiently; I I I I I
2. demonstrate skills in the use of basic grammatical structures starting with the concept of vocabulary building and ending with the concept of sentence R R R R R
sense and combining pattern with meaning;
3. extract meaning through context clues, structural analogies, selected idiomatic expressions; and R R R R R
4. demonstrate proficiency and skills in the use of the English language in reading, spoken, written, and listened forms. D D D D D
Level: I – Introduced R – Reinforced D – Demonstrated
Prepared by:
Professor
Department Chair
Approved by:
Dean
COURSE LEARNING PLAN
LEARNING EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS METHODS/ ASSESSMENT INDICATIVE

TOPICS MODALITY
OUTCOMES AND REFERENCES STRATEGIES TASKS HOURS
LO: Enhanced Discussion of VMG and PEO Desktop/Laptop computer Synchronous Interactive discussion Q and A 3 hours
awareness about the PowerPoint presentation (via Zoom or Google
VMG and PEO as well Presentation of the Syllabus and Meet)
as course requirements Course Requirements
LO 1.1: Enhanced DEVELOPING LIBRARY AND Desktop/Laptop computer Interactive discussion Online Recitation 3 hours
skills in using library VOCABULARY SKILLS PowerPoint presentation (via Zoom or Google
resources efficiently. Demonstrating Library Skills Synchronous Meet) Online Quizzes
Using Reference Books Villenas, B. N. (2019).
LO 1.2: Improved Using the Dewey Decimal English Enhancement PowerPoint presentation Written exercises
ability extract Classifications System Coursebook (ENG100). Video presentation
meaning through Using the Card Catalog System Lucena City: The Preliminary
context clues, Locating Magazines and Journals University Press. Writing exercises Examination
structural analogies, Synchronous 3 hours
selected idiomatic Using Prefixes and Suffixes Organizational chart of
expression. Employing Context Clues library personnel
Distinguishing Denotation Asynchronous 6 hours
LO 1.3: Improved vs. Connotation Online/Printed modules
ability to demonstrate Using Idioms
skills in the use of Using Homonyms and Words E-journals
basic grammatical with Multiple Meanings
structures starting Illustrating Subject-Verb NEO LMS/Google Meet/Zoom
with the concept of Agreement
vocabulary building Using Prepositions
Prepared by:
Professor
Department Chair
Approved by:
Dean
and ending with the

concept of sentence
sense and combining
pattern with meaning.
CO1: Ability to use the resources of the library efficiently
CO2: Ability to demonstrate skills in the use of basic grammatical structures starting with
the concept of vocabulary building and ending with the concept of sentence sense and Course Assessment: Preliminary Examination
combining pattern with meaning Assessment Tools: Rubrics, Answer Key for Written/Online Examination
CO3: Ability to extract meaning through context clues, structural analogies, selected
idiomatic expressions
LO 2.1: Enhanced DEVELOPING READING Desktop/Laptop computer Asynchronous Interactive discussion Online Recitation 4 hours
skills in prereading, SKILLS PowerPoint presentation (via Zoom or Google
skimming and Meet) Online Quizzes
scanning techniques. Skimming and Scanning Villenas, B. N. (2019). Asynchronous
Locating Key Details and English Enhancement PowerPoint presentation Written exercises 4 hours
LO 2.2: Improved Specific Information Coursebook (ENG100). Video presentation
ability in locating key Locating Implied Main Idea Lucena City: The Midterm
details and specific Drawing Inferences University Press. Writing exercises examination
information and Differentiating Between Fact
finding the main and and Opinion Online/Printed modules
the implied ideas in Making Generalizations
reading texts. E-journals Synchronous 4 hours
LO 2.3: Developed NEO LMS/Google Meet/Zoom

ability in drawing
inferences from
reading texts,
Prepared by:
Professor
Department Chair
Approved by:
Dean
differentiating
between fact and
opinion and making
generalizations from
reading texts.
CO2: Ability to demonstrate skills in the use of basic grammatical structures starting with Course Assessment: Midterm Examination
the concept of vocabulary building and ending with the concept of sentence sense and Assessment Tools: Rubrics, Answer Key for Written/Online Examination
combining pattern with meaning
CO4: Ability to demonstrate proficiency and skills in the use of the English language in
reading, spoken, written, and listened forms
TOPICS MODALITY
LO 3.1: Enhanced DEVELOPING STUDY SKILLS Desktop/Laptop computer Asynchronous Interactive discussion Online Recitation 5 hours
skills in underlining PowerPoint presentation (via Zoom or Google
key points in a reading Underlining Key Points Meet) Online Quizzes
text and taking Outlining Villenas, B. N. (2019).
down notes in a Using Adjectives English Enhancement Synchronous PowerPoint presentation Written exercises 3 hours
lecture. Using Tenses Coursebook (ENG100). Video presentation
Notetaking Lucena City: The Semi-final
LO 3.2: Developed Summarizing University Press. Asynchronous Writing exercises examination
skills in outlining. Writing Sentences 4 hours
Online/Printed modules
LO 3.3: Improved
ability in summarizing E-journals
texts in concise ways
Prepared by:
Professor
Department Chair
Approved by:
Dean
and demonstrating
listening skills. NEO LMS/Google Meet/Zoom
CO3: Ability to extract meaning through context clues, structural analogies, selected Course Assessment: Semi-Final Examination
idiomatic expressions Assessment Tools: Rubric, Answer Key for Written/Online Examination
TOPICS MODALITY
LO 4.1: Enhanced DEVELOPING WRITING Desktop/Laptop computer Synchronous Interactive discussion Online Recitation 3 hours
proficiency in writing SKILLS PowerPoint presentation (via Zoom or Google
effective sentences. Synchronous Meet) Online Quizzes 3 hours
Demonstrating Subject-Verb Villenas, B. N. (2019).
LO 4.3: Developed Agreement English Enhancement PowerPoint presentation
skills in answering When the Subject Follows the Coursebook (ENG100). Asynchronous Video presentation Written exercises 3 hours
essay questions. Verb in a Question Lucena City: The
When the Subject and Verb are University Press. Asynchronous Writing exercises Final examination 3 hours
Separated by Other Words
When the Subject is Compound Online/Printed modules
When the Subject is an
Indefinite Pronoun E-journals
Collective Nouns and Nouns
Ending in –s NEO LMS/Google Meet/Zoom
Using Pronouns
Using Reflexive Pronouns
Using Relative Pronouns
Using Adjectives
Using Verbs
Prepared by:
Professor
Department Chair
Approved by:
Dean
Using Adverbs
Focusing Chart for Essay
Questions
Using Prepositions
Answering Essay Questions
CO2: Ability to demonstrate skills in the use of basic grammatical structures starting with Course Assessment: Final Examination
the concept of vocabulary building and ending with the concept of sentence sense and Assessment Tools: Rubric, Answer Key for Written/Online Examination
combining pattern with meaning
Resit / Re-exam and submission Asynchronous 3 hours
of portfolio
REFERENCES
A. Books
Aaron, J. E. (2007). The Little Brown compact handbook. USA: Pearson Education.
Albrecht, T. L. (1997). Communication in complex organizations: A relational approach. Forthworth: Harcourt Brace.
Ang, J. (2010). English 101: a learning-centered manual in effective study skills, critical reading and engaged writing for the Filipino College student. Manila: Mindshapers.
Aquino, F. O. (1998). Communicative English plus: Textbook with workbook. Makati City: Grandwater Publications and Research.
Aquino, J. G. (2012). Communication Arts 1: Study and thinking skills in English. Manila: Grandbooks Pub.
Baraceros, E. L. (2009). English I: Introduction to college English. Manila: Rex Book Store.
Baraceros, E. L. et al. (2000). English plus grammatical competence towards communicative competence. Manila: Rex Book Store.
Calixihan, J. O. (2007). English for college freshman 1. Mandaluyong City: National Book Store.
Choy, P. (1998). Basic grammar and usage. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.
Dizon, J. R. (2009). Self-instructional modules for college communication arts 1. Manila: Rex Book Store.
Prepared by:
Professor
Department Chair
Approved by:
Dean
Dorothy, P.C., & Clark, G. (2002). Basic grammar and usage (6th ed.). Canada: Heinle & Heinle.
Esguerra, A. V. et al. (2000). Improving basic English communication skills for college freshmen. Philippines: Mutya.
Freeman, D. et al. (2005). International communication through English. USA: McGraw-Hill.
Guiyab, R.G. (2008). Study and communication skills. Quezon City: C&E Pub.
Guiyab-Garma, R. (2007). English communication art 1 (Conversational approach). Mandaluyong City: Books Atbp.
Knight, T. O. (1995). Mastering college reading. USA: Irwin.
Kral, T. (ed.). (1994). The lighter side of TEFL. Washington, DC: USIS English Language Program Division, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs.
Langan, J. (2006). English skills (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Martinez, N. D. (1999). College freshman course: English one. Manila: Eco-Friendly Project.
Merrier, P. (2000). The basic English communication. USA: South-Western Educational Publishing.
Monserrate, L. P. (1994). English for Filipino students book I. Quezon City: Rex.
Opetina, L. N. (2007). Grammar at work for college freshmen. Manila: Mindshapers.
Pascasio, E. M. (1997). Basic English for college. Quezon City: Kalayaan.
Rico-Lopez, M. G. (1998). Everyday grammar: A textbook in English for high school and college. Manila: Rex Bookstore.
Robles, R.D. (2005). Improving grammar skills and more. Manila: Rex Book Store.
Silva, M. N. (1998). Basic grammar in many voices. Illinois: NTC.
Smilkstein, R. (1998). Tools for writing using the natural human learning process. USA: Harcourt Brace.
Stoddard, T. D. (1998). Effective writing: A practical grammar review. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Trajano, M. G. et al. (2000). English plus worktext. Philippines: Mutya.
Uy, C. L. (2007). Macro skills in English. Manila: Mindshapers.
Villanueva, P. M. (2005). Improving your English skills. Mandaluyong City: Books Atbp.
Villenas, B. N. (2014). Headstart. Lucena City: Lucena Quality Printers.
Vinuya, R. V. (1997). College English composition: Textbook with workbook. Makati City: Grandwater.
B. Textbook:
Villenas, B. N. (2019). English Enhancement Coursebook. Lucena City: Lucena Quality Printers.
Prepared by:
Professor
Department Chair
Approved by:
Dean
COURSE EVALUATION
Student performance will be rated based on the following:
Minimum Average
Assessment Tasks Weight for Satisfactory
Performance
CO1 • Written exercises, portfolio evaluation, 40% 30.00%
CO2 • Preliminary examination 30% 22.50%
CO3 • Midterm examination 30% 22.50%
CO4
100% 75.00%
Previous (Midterm) Grade = 100% x 40%
CO1 • Written exercises, portfolio evaluation, critique papers, concept/reaction papers, project papers 40% 30.00%
CO2 • Semi-final examination 30% 22.50%
CO3 • Final examination 30% 22.50%
CO4
100% 75.00%
Present (Final) Grade = 100% x 60%
The following table will be used in giving the final grades:
Percentage Equivalent 74 and below 75-77 78 - 80 81-83 84-86 87-88 89-91 92-94 95-97 98-100
Final Grade 5.00 3.00 2.75 2.50 2.25 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.00
Prepared by:
Professor
Department Chair
Approved by:
Dean
Rubrics will be used for other types of assessment such as return demonstration, simulation, etc.
1 2 3 4 5
BEGINNING DEVELOPING APPRAISING PROFICIENCY PROFICIENT ADVANCE
(Minimal and Limited Evidence of (Some evidence of Achievement) (Adequate Evidence of (Commendable Achievement) (Exceptional Achievement)
Achievement) Achievement)
75 - 77 78 - 80 81 - 83 84 - 86 87 - 88 89 - 91 92 - 94 95 - 97 98 – 100
Aside from academic deficiency, other grounds for a failing grade are:
1. Failing academic standing and failure to take the examination/s
2. Grave misconduct other than cheating
3. Excessive absences/Failure to communicate with the instructor/professor
COURSE POLICIES
a. Student Participation/Attendance
Student participation shall be monitored based on the modality used. There will be 24-hours synchronous sessions and 30 hours asynchronous sessions. Schedule of the synchronous
sessions may be agreed upon by the faculty and students, but no synchronous sessions should be scheduled beyond 12:00 midnight.
b. Submission of Assessment Tasks/Outputs
Submission of assessment tasks and other requirements will be based on the agreement made by the students and faculty. Students can submit their requirements online if they
have connectivity or offline via courier if without connectivity.
c. Academic Integrity
Students are expected to observe the MSEUF Policy on Flexible Learning Academic Integrity in the performance of various activities and outputs as gesture of respect to their own
work and the work of their peers. Corresponding sanction/s may be imposed if student is found guilty of violating the policy on academic integrity.
d. Course Decorum
Students are expected to observe proper etiquette and avoid disruptive behaviors during synchronous sessions.
Prepared by:
Professor
Department Chair
Approved by:
Dean
e. Major Examinations
There will be four major examinations – Preliminary, Mid-Term, Semi-final, and Final Examinations – covering the intended COs. The final examination is the summative assessment
of the COs and will have to demonstrate understanding of the course. The examinations may be conducted online or offline (written or practical) based on the student outcomes.
f. Issuance of Mid-Term Grade
The mid-term grade is issued to students so that formal consultation where students are apprised of their class standing is done to afford them the opportunity to make up and to
cope with the rigors of the course.
g. Course Portfolio
Selected assessment tools are to be compiled and collected before the end of the semester. The selection is based on statistical data gathering (lowest, median, and highest). Learning
tasks and examinations with marks lowest, median and highest must be photocopied and returned to the Instructor/professor for course portfolio keeping.
h. Language of Instruction
Lectures, discussions and documentation will be in English. Written and spoken work may receive a lower mark if the student is deficient in English.
i. Consultation Schedule
For this course, students may consult online with the Instructor/Professor on their agreed time and date. It is recommended that the student set an appointment first to confirm the
Instructor/Professor’s availability.
j. Resit/Re-examination
After the instructor/professor has computed the final grade of the student, and he obtains a failing grade, the student has one chance for a resit/re-examination on the schedule set
by the instructor/professor. Failure to take the resit/re-examination on the announced schedule forfeits the student’s chance.
Course Materials Made Available

Syllabus Laboratory Manual/Sourcebook
Handouts/Lecture Notes/E-files Guidelines, Grading Criteria
Prepared by:
Professor
Department Chair
Approved by:
Dean
REVISION HISTORY
NO DATE REVISIONS
0 June 4, 2012 Initial Release
1 June 2, 2014 Revised to OBE Format
2 June 8, 2015 Revised the contents based on the 2015 Curriculum Mapping
3 January 5, 2017 Added newly acquired library references
4 August 4, 2018 Revised the mission, vision, PEO, and student outcomes
5 January 11, 2019 Revised the format and included course learning outcomes for each period
6 August 16, 2020 Revised the format for flexible learning

Eng100 FL Syllabus

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Eng100 FL Syllabus

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Eng100 FL Syllabus

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Document Code: CAS-F-CS

Document Title: Course Syllabus in ENG100 English

COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES VISION

PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES MISSION

Course Code: ENG 100

Student Outcomes and Relationship to Program Educational Objectives:

Course Outcomes and Relationship to Student Outcomes:

COURSE LEARNING PLAN

LEARNING EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS METHODS/ ASSESSMENT INDICATIVE

and ending with the

LO 2.3: Developed NEO LMS/Google Meet/Zoom

Student performance will be rated based on the following:

The following table will be used in giving the final grades:

Course Materials Made Available

You might also like