Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Slide ACAT 03012020 Roadshow
Slide ACAT 03012020 Roadshow
Slide ACAT 03012020 Roadshow
2
Acquisition Categorisation
Kandungan (ACAT)
1. Objektif Roadshow
2. Acquisition Categorisation (ACAT)
3. Pengenalan Apa itu ACAT?
4. Mengapa ACAT?
5. Garis Panduan ACAT
6. Definasi ACAT
7. Enam Sifat Utama
8. Proses Kategori
9. ACAT SCORE CALCULATOR
10. Rumusan 3
1.0 Objektif Roadshow
1. Taklimat pengenalan terhadap inisiatif ACAT bagi
pelaksanaan di peringkat Pewujudan Projek (di
Peringkat Perancangan Kementerian/Jabatan/Agensi)
bagi projek RMKe-12
2. Di akhir taklimat selama 60 minit ini diharap para
peserta akan mengenali kewujudan inisiatif ini.
3. Memahami keperluan untuk melaksanakan ACAT di
peringkat pewujudan projek.
4
MULA DI PERKENALKAN OLEH
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE,
AUSTRALIA .
MERUPAKAN GABUNGAN
PERKATAAN :
1. ACQUISITION - PEMEROLEHAN
2. CATEGORISATION -
PENGKATEGORIAN
5
1. KAEDAH UNTUK MENGKATEGORIKAN
PROJEK MENGIKUT:
a. kerumitan pengurusan projek,
b. kesukaran teknikal,
c. kerumitan penjadualan,
d. kepentingan politik,
e. dan lain-lain.
6
sambungan
7
Carta aliran kerja untuk pemakaian di
peringkat pewujudan projek RMK—12
ACAT
(AP182)
8
Proses Kajian Proses Pelaksanaan
Pengkategorian Kebolehlaksanaan Projek JKR
Projek
Kemasukan
Projek
Pewujudan
Projek Penggunaan •PMs bertauliah
sumber secara •Juru Perunding
A I optimum •Pasukan Projek
II VMS/
KEMENTERIAN C Strategi perolehan -
III GERBANG
& AGENSI A Penyampaian
KERAJAAN LAIN IV NILAI 0
T berkesan
V
Proses dan Peralatan
PROJEK.
1. DEFINISI KATEGORI PEROLEHAN.
2. MATRIKS SOKONGAN DALAM
KEPUTUSAN PROJEK
3. PROSES PENGKATEGORIAN
11
ACAT I
13
sambungan
ACAT III
14
ACAT IV
Relies predominantly on Routine schedule management issues Very low system complexity Very similar to existing system/ equipment Existing companies have supplied almost identical
traditional Project
Management knowledge
Requires the application of routine No hardware and/or critical software No new operation, maintenance and support systems
Contracting arrangements and contracts are traditional and
5 < RM10m project monitoring and control development infrastructure changes needed
[ Very Low] measures. No requirement of systems coordination / Sustainment can fit in an existing SOP
contract management is routine
integration
Highly feasible location and logistic
Relies predominantly on Moderate schedule management issues Low system complexity Very similar to existing system/ equipment Existing companies have supplied similar
traditional Project
Management knowledge
Requires the application of remedial schedule Limited hardware and/or criticalsoftware Slight change needed in operation, maintenance
systems
Contracting arrangements and contracts are
4 RM10m- management measures. development and support infrastructure.
[Low] RM100m with minimum complexity Limited amount of systems coordination / Sustainment can fit in an existing SOP with minimal complex but contract management is routine
integration change
Feasible location and logistic
Relies predominantly on Difficult schedule management matters expected Moderate system complexity Similar to existing system/ equipment Companies have previously demonstrated
traditional Project to arise from time to time Moderate level of hardware and/or software Some operation, maintenance and support capability to develop and produce systems
3 RM100m- Management knowledge Requires the application of difficult remedial development infrastructure changes needed Contracting arrangements and contracts are
RM300m with moderate complexity schedule management measures. Sustainment can fit in an existing SOP with moderate complex and require a high level of contract
[Moderate] Moderate systems coordination / integration.
change management.
Feasible location and logistic with some difficulty
Complex schedule management issues High system complexity Some systems/ equipment different from Individual company capabilities exist but not previously
with competing priorities and persistent High level of hardware and/or software existing / non existence combined to produce required capability
Significant pressure on delivery date(s) development Major operation and Project will challenge extant industry
2
Requires the application of innovative capabilities
RM300m- schedule management initiatives. High systems coordination / integration maintenance infrastructure Contracting arrangements are complex or there is high level
[High] RM500m Difficult location and logistic changes needed of interdependency between a number of
Sustainment may require major changes to commercial arrangements being managed by JKR
an existing SOP
Extremely complex schedule management issues Very high system complexity Most major systems/ equipment different New industry capabilities may need to be
with competing/ conflicting priorities and
persistent high-level pressure on delivery
Very high level of hardware and/or software
from existing / non existence
Significant operation and maintenance
introduced
Project is at the margins of extant industry capability
development
Extensive date(s) infrastructure changes needed maturity levels
1 Requires the application of innovative schedule Very high systems coordination / integration Sustainment could require a new SOP to be Contracting arrangements are highly complex and there is
>RM500m
management initiatives and frequent high- Very difficult location and logistic put in place. very high level of interdependency between a
[Very High] level management intervention. number of commercial arrangements being managed
by JKR
Novel commercial practices required to
undertake the project
17
1. KOS PEROLEHAN ( ACQUISITION COST )
TERMASUK KOS : SISTEM (BANGUNAN,
JALAN RAYA , INFRASTRUKTUR DAN
PERALATAN),
i. tanah
ii. pembinaan
iii. perunding
iv. pengurusan
v. dan kemudahan
18
2. TAHAP KERUMITAN PENGURUSAN
PROJEK ( PROJECT MANAGEMENT
COMPLEXITY )
i. Kerumitan selain daripada yang berkaitan dengan bidang
pengetahuan pengurusan projek tradisional.
ii. Bercirikan persekitaran perlaksanaan projek iaitu:
Persekitaran/keadaan baru
Tidak menentu
Interaksi politik peringkat yang sangat tinggi
19
20
21
22
23
1. PENENTUAN TAHAP ACAT:
i. bukanlah hanya berdasarkan kepada Sains semata-
mata
ii. pertimbangan orang-orang yang mempunyai
pengalaman dan kefahaman tentang ciri-ciri projek.
2. PENILAIAN:
i. lebih mudah sekiranya dilaksanakan lebih awal dalam
kitaran hayat projek.
24
9.0 ACAT Score Calculator
R AW S C O R E A N D W E I G H T
Project Management
10 9 7 3 1 10
Complexity
Schedule 10 9 7 3 1 4
Technical Difficulty 10 9 7 3 1 7
Operations and
10 9 7 3 1 5
Maintenance
Industry 10 9 7 3 1 6
25
Very Very Raw
Attribute High Medium Low Weight
High Low Score
Acquisition x
10 5
Cost
Project x
Management 9 10
Complexity
x
Schedule 9 4
Technical x
9 7
Difficulty
Operations and x
7 5
Maintenance
x Normalised
Industry 7 6
Score
Score 51 316 85
ACAT II
26
ACAT I
95 100
ACAT II
75 94
ACAT III
50 74
ACAT IV
30 49
ACAT V
10 29
27
10.0 Rumusan
28
TAKLIMAT INISIATIF PENGURUSAN NILAI
STRATEGIK (VMS), GERBANG NILAI 0 (GN0) DAN
ACQUISITION CATEGORISATION (ACAT)
30 JANUARI 2020
29