Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Synthesis Paper Revision 1
Synthesis Paper Revision 1
Synthesis Paper Revision 1
Taylor Crane
Professor Parry
English 2010
In the United States, Criminal Justice System there exists the death penalty, or also
known as capital punishment. Capital punishment is one of the most controversial topics in the
criminal justice system and the united states as a whole. The death penalty was established in
1976 and ever since its introduction to the criminal justice system, there have been numerous
debates on whether or not it is cruel and unusual punishment, moral, and should be abolished
altogether. In 2021 there are still 23 states who are against the death penalty and 27 states who
allow the death penalty. Some of the main controversies surrounding the death penalty include, Is
the likelihood of someone getting executed on death row affected by their ethnicity or other
cultural biases? Are executions from capital punishment moral, is it ethical, and should it
continue to be used in the United States? Is the death penalty an effective form of punishment
against criminals who have committed serious enough crimes? Capital punishment and its
overall effectiveness is a controversial topic on its own, and there are even more controversies
that correspond with it, the cost is a huge turn-off for a lot of people in the United States.
Numerous ethical and racial controversies thicken the plot even more, but capital punishment
remains in the criminal justice system for a reason, it works, but it is not perfect.
There are numerous reasons for capital punishment in the criminal justice system. One of
the main purposes is to deter criminals from committing crimes, serious defined as “the worst of
Crane 2
the worst” is usually the number one reason why an inmate has the potential to get put on death
row and given capital punishment. There are a lot of ways to punish someone for committing a
serious crime, these forms of punishment include but are not limited to, large fines, serving
prison sentences, and getting put into supermax prisons, prisons for the worst crimes, and repeat
offenders. The largest supermax prison is located in Freemont County Colorado. It holds only
336 of the worst inmates in the country yet, has never reached its full capacity of 490 inmates.
Time spent in prison is the most common way to punish a criminal but capital punishment takes
that idea a step further and in a new direction. Nothing scares a human being more than knowing
every day you spend on dearth row might be your last day on earth. Fear is a big part of what
makes capital punishment so effective at deterring criminals from committing such crimes that
“In 1977, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that capital punishment is constitutional and,
since that ruling, most of the death penalty cases have pertained to execution of those convicted
of committing murder. The penalty of death is the most important catalyst to limiting the
imitation of the worst kinds of crimes — principally, murder. According to Procon, “the death
penalty is an important tool for preserving law and order, deters crime, and costs less than life
maintaining not just the idea of justice but to actualizing it through a penalty system is perhaps
the greatest equalizer of those who are willing to push all standards of morality and ethics
through their behavior and blatant disregard for their fellow mankind” (Armstrong, The Hill,
2021) The importance of capital punishment is the criminal justice system is unparalleled to any
other form of deterrence, punishment and everything in between. Most people in the united states
associate the death penalty as a bad thing but in all reality, it is doing much more good than it is
Crane 3
bad. It is keeping convicted criminals away from the innocent public and deterring them from
committing further crimes, it also deters other criminals from making the same mistake as an
inmate who is on death row or being charged with capital punishment. The chargers of capital
punishment can make even the most criminally charged individual quiver in their boots. Capital
punishment is a vital asset in keeping the united states safe and it will remain that way for the
foreseeable future.
While the death penalty has been controversial ever since it was established there is no
doubt that is effective as does has its extreme ways of punishing criminals guilty of the worst
crimes and is also effective in deterring other criminals from going down the same road. There
are so many positives to the death penalty but there are also some serious cons and downsides to
it as well.
There is no question that capital punishment costs a lot of money, there are millions and
millions of dollars spent by taxpayers of the United States that go into not only prisons and
incarcerating inmates but the criminal justice system as a whole. As of July 2020, there are over
159,000 federal inmates in the prison system. Each Inmate costs about 99 dollars a day. The cost
of those 159,000 inmates just in federal prison per year is over 5.8 Billion. That does not include
the cost of inmates in state prison systems, older inmates, or inmates in solitary confinement.
(Spengler 2020) About one in 100 people are in jail, prison, or death row. With the prison system
costing so much money you would think capital punishment would save some money, however;
Maryland has the cost of capital punishment as roughly 42 percent more expensive when
compared to a case ending a punishment with something that is not the death penalty. In 1988
Kansas voted against bringing back the death penalty after people found it would cost more than
Crane 4
11 million. Meanwhile, Florida has estimated that the total expenses of each execution are over
3 million, or about six times the cost of a prison sentence of ‘life without parole. The cost of
capital punishment is one of the reasons almost 45% of the United States does not allow it.
Limiting the death penalty is another solution to the death penalty controversy. The death
penalty is thought to not be ethical, this article helps get that idea out of people’s heads by
limiting the death penalty and not allowing individuals such as juveniles and people with a
history of mental illness to be exempt from being charged with capital punishment and sentenced
to death row. “In 1986, the Supreme Court banned the execution of insane persons and required
an adversarial process for determining mental competency in Ford v. Wainwright (477 U.S. 399).
In Penry v. Lynaugh (492 U.S. 584 (1989)), the Court held that executing persons with “mental
retardation” was not a violation of the Eighth Amendment. However, in 2002 in Atkins v.
Virginia, (536 U.S. 304), the Court held that a national consensus had evolved against the
execution of the “mentally retarded” and concluded that such a punishment violates the Eighth
Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment.” This leads us to the Roper v. Simmons
case of 2007. “On January 27, 2004, the U.S. Supreme Court decided to review whether
executing sixteen and seventeen-year-olds violates the Constitution's ban on 'cruel and unusual
punishment.' The review comes after the Missouri Supreme Court overturned the death sentence
of17-year-old Christopher Simmons. Roper v. Simmons will be reviewed by the justices this fall,
four of whom have called the juvenile death penalty 'inconsistent with evolving standards of
decency in a civilized society.” (ACLU) Because of this, there is a minimum age on which a
juvenile needs to be to be charged with capital punishment and sent to death row. If someone is
under the age of 16 they are not allowed to be charged with the death penalty, despite the severity
Crane 5
of the crime. If an individual is at least 16 and commits a serious enough crime they are then
Capital Punishment is an effective way to punish and deter criminals but it is also very
expensive so what would be the best-case scenario is still deterring future crimes but also being
cost-effective? Keeping the death penalty but only using it when necessary and as a last resort
would be an effective way to keep it and also make it a little more cost-effective. As we know,
the cost of capital punishment is very expensive, which is a con but what happens if a criminal
charged with murder beats his sentence and is released back into the world full of potential future
victims? That would almost ruin the whole point of keeping them away from society in the first
place. I believe the death penalty should stay in the criminal justice system because despite being
very expensive it does its job and it works at deterring crime and overall it works. I do not think
risking innocent people’s lives over money is worth it. Looking at it from my perspective I see
capital punishment as “eye for an eye” If you take someone’s life, who is innocent and has never
done any crime in their life, then you do not deserve to live. If you take a life, yours gets taken in
return. This is not the most ethical nor moral way of looking at it but I think this could be an
effective way of using the death penalty, if the crime is serious enough then it should be used.
Crane 6
Work Cited
ACLU. “Stop Killing Kids: Why It's Time to End the Indecent Practice of the Juvenile Death
https://www.aclu.org/other/stop-killing-kids-why-its-time-end-indecent-practice-juvenile-
death-penalty.
ACLU. “Juveniles and the Death Penalty.” American Civil Liberties Union,
https://www.aclu.org/other/juveniles-and-death-penalty
Armstrong, Williams. “The Death Penalty Remains the Strongest Deterrent to Violent Crime.”
https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/555027-the-death-penalty-remains-the-strong
est-deterrent-to-violent-crime?rl=1.
Ehrenfreund, Max. “There's Still No Evidence That Executions Deter Criminals.” The
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/04/30/theres-still-no-evidence-tha
t-executions-deter-criminals/.
July 2020,
https://www.gobankingrates.com/taxes/filing/wont-believe-much-prison-inmates-costing-
year/.
.
Crane 7