Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Optical Emission Spectroscopy Study in The VUV-VIS Regimes of A Developing Low-Temperature Plasma in Nitrogen Gas
Optical Emission Spectroscopy Study in The VUV-VIS Regimes of A Developing Low-Temperature Plasma in Nitrogen Gas
net/publication/233813127
CITATIONS READS
34 2,796
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Investigation of Plasma in Pulsed High-Current Electron Sources and High Power Microwave Devices View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Andreas A Neuber on 21 May 2014.
This article has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text article.
(http://iopscience.iop.org/0022-3727/45/49/495202)
View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more
Download details:
IP Address: 129.118.19.71
The article was downloaded on 03/12/2012 at 15:00
Abstract
The mechanisms leading to the development of an atmospheric low temperature plasma along
a surface under pulsed conditions is of current interest. In the early plasma phase, high energy
photons are a contributing factor to the process of generating electron avalanches resulting in
surface flashover. Since only photons in the vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) regime are energetic
enough to cause step-ionization or direct ionization of atmospheric gases, an experiment has
been set up to enable observations of photons with wavelengths shorter than 200 nm while still
allowing observation up to 800 nm. A spectrum simulation software package has been
developed to allow for temperature analysis on the developing plasma in the VUV region.
Observations below 200 nm revealed a Boltzmann distributed excited state population
corresponding to a temperature of 3.1 eV. Time-resolved emission spectroscopy measurements
of the entire electrode region during the streamer phase of breakdown demonstrate the
presence of molecular nitrogen emission lines from the second positive system. Further
photomultiplier tube measurements of the spark phase showed a rapid decrease in intensity of
the second positive system compared to that of a representative atomic emission line in the
VUV regime. This emission dominates the ultraviolet–visible (UV–VIS) spectrum during the
initial phases of breakdown with little detection of other sources of emission during this phase.
(Some figures may appear in colour only in the online journal)
0022-3727/12/495202+11$33.00 1 © 2012 IOP Publishing Ltd Printed in the UK & the USA
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 (2012) 495202 A Fierro et al
2
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 (2012) 495202 A Fierro et al
3
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 (2012) 495202 A Fierro et al
4
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 (2012) 495202 A Fierro et al
5
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 (2012) 495202 A Fierro et al
6
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 (2012) 495202 A Fierro et al
light emission from 250 to 750 nm is from the nitrogen second rate from the ground state [32] and is thus neglected.
positive system. The faster radiative decay rate and small population under
Boltzmann conditions compared to the ground population of
5. Atomic ground state density the B3 state produce a negligible effect on the C3(v =0) state
population. Additionally, cascade processes from higher lying
It was shown that the intensity of emission from atomic energy states could affect the C3(v =0) state population under
species contributes largely to the observed spectrum in a consideration. However, evidence suggests that these higher
pure nitrogen discharge. As such, it is desired to calculate electronic levels are metastable and/or predissociated [19].
the total number of ground state atomic nitrogen that is Using these simplified equations, it is assumed that the
present after voltage collapse. The photons per second for an rate equations are in equilibrium when the current reaches the
excited transition (in this case the emission line at 149.2 nm) peak (see figure 7) and thus the left-hand side of equations (6)
may be calculated for a measured PMT signal (analogous and (7) are zero. Dividing equations (6) by (7) results in
to figure 7). Under the assumption of complete LTE, the
nn ν̃exc A + Q nN∗
Boltzmann distribution for excited states multiplied by the = ( ) , (8)
Einstein coefficient, equation (1), gives the ratio of photons per n0 νexc à + Q̃ nCstate
second for the excited state and ground state. Consequently, which represents the ratio of atomic ground state to molecular
substituting the measured photons per second into equation (1) ground state densities given the transition probabilities,
and solving for the ground state yields the total number of excitation rates, quenching rates, and excited state densities.
atoms in the ground state. Defining the plasma size to be Using the equation
5 mm in length and 100 µm in width and height results in an
atomic ground state density of 1.1 × 1016 cm−3 . AnN∗ = β ÃnCstate , (9)
However, it is unlikely that our plasma is under complete
LTE due to the transient and non-homogeneous behaviour. with β representing the ratio between the measured atomic
Considerable effort has been made towards determining the and molecular emission lines. Solving equation (9) for nN∗
conditions required for complete LTE or partial LTE (pLTE), and substituting into equation (8) yields
first by [28] and later by others [29, 30] for different plasma
conditions. It is possible for some excited states to be ν̃exc A+Q Ã
nN = β · n0 , (10)
thermalized and follow a Boltzmann distribution defined by νexc à + Q̃ A
a common temperature [31]. As a result, an alternate method
for determining the atomic ground state density was used. The which has been solved for the atomic ground state density, nN .
rate equation for the population of an excited atomic state is Due to the dependence of the atomic ground state density on the
given by excited atomic state quenching rate, a lower bound of atomic
dnN∗ density may be found assuming the quenching rate, Q, is
= nN νexc ne − (A + Q)nN∗ , (6) negligible. Using the ratio of 120 nm and 337 nm from figure 7
dt
(β = 2), and the corresponding excitation rates and quenching
where nN∗ is the excited state density, nN is the atomic ground
rates for the atomic transition and molecular transition, a
state density, ne is the electron density, A is the coefficient for
lower bound is found to be 1.1 × 1017 cm−3 and results in
spontaneous emission, and Q = kq n0 representing the product
a dissociation percentage of 0.43% at atmospheric pressure.
of the quenching rate of the atomic species and ground state
The ratio of the excitation rates depends on the electronic
molecular nitrogen. A second rate equation for the population
temperature and could change rapidly due to the evolution
of the excited molecular species is as follows:
of the electron energy distribution function. However, it
dnCstate was found (using the cross sections shown in figure 8 and
= n0 ν̃exc ne − (Ã + Q̃)nCstate , (7) a Maxwell–Boltzmann velocity distribution) that this ratio
dt
only varies at most by a factor of two for temperatures
with nCstate representing the excited molecular state density between 1 and 8 eV. If an approximated quenching rate is
of the C3(v =0) level, n0 being the molecular ground state assumed (for the 859 nm atomic nitrogen transition [33]),
density, and the other variables representing values similar the dissociation percentage is several percent. Consequently,
to equation (6) except for the excited molecular nitrogen. equation (10) requires accurate knowledge of the excitation and
Equation (7) represents a simplified model for the population quenching rates along with precise calibration of the measuring
of the C3(v =0) state due to the complexity of molecular energy instrument to provide accurate ratios. As such, it is estimated
levels and numerous possible transitions among excited states. that the dissociation percentage is likely within an order of
First, it is assumed that the excitation rate for the C3(v =0) magnitude.
state includes all vibrational levels of the ground state X1 .
Excitation paths through the lower B3 and metastable A3 6. Conclusions
electronic states could also contribute to the C3(v =0) state
population. However, excitation into the C3 state due to The optical emission from a developing low-temperature
collisions between metastable states has a reported reaction plasma in the VUV–VIS regimes has been characterized. A
rate of an order of magnitude slower than the excitation locally developed software package assists in temperature
7
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 (2012) 495202 A Fierro et al
analysis of the developing plasma assuming the excited which serves as normalizing factor for the population densities.
state population is Boltzmann distributed. Time-resolved The transition frequencies, νk = c/λk , and corresponding
emission spectroscopy in the VUV region revealed a non- photon emission rates, Ik , are stored for later use in the
Boltzmann distributed population before voltage collapse program.
which transitioned into a Boltzmann distributed population The emission lines are broadened depending on the
with an electronic temperature of 3.1 eV. environment. Typically, a Lorentz profile is assumed for the
Further investigation of the UV regime indicated the natural line width
dominant presence of the molecular nitrogen second positive
1 δνL
system. Since emission from atomic nitrogen appears later Lk (ν) = , (A2)
than the emission from nitrogen molecules, a two-step process π (ν − νk )2 + δνL2
is believed to be the leading mechanism for the generation
where νk represents the frequency of the line centre and δνL
of excited atomic nitrogen. First, dissociation of nitrogen
the half-width at half-maximum (HWHM). The factor 1/π is
molecules occurs due to electron impact, which is then
chosen such that the integral of the profile is normalized to
followed by a second electron collision that results in excitation
one. If there are few collisions with surrounding atoms or
of the dissociated nitrogen, followed by spontaneous emission
molecules the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of this
of VUV radiation. After voltage collapse, the increase in
profile is simply the sum of the reciprocal radiative lifetimes
current, and thus electron density, leads to the continuous
of the two involved energy levels divided by 2π .
emission of atomic and molecular emission even though the
Depending on temperature and the mass of the atom, mA ,
applied field is collapsed across the gap.
the spectral lines are also Doppler broadened, which leads to
Emission spectroscopy observations in the VIS regime
a Gauss shaped profile
showed only second order interference from the second
positive system. Subsequent streamer imaging using a 2
ln(2) 1 − ln(2) ν−ν k
nanosecond camera gate and UG11 optical filter confirmed that G(ν) = e δνD
, (A3)
virtually all emission between 200 and 800 nm results from the π δνD
nitrogen second positive system. with the Doppler HWHM
Calculation of the number of atomic species after
breakdown has been calculated under the assumption of νk 2kB Tk 1/2
complete LTE using the Boltzmann distribution which yielded δνD = ln(2) ,
c mA
a density of 1.1 × 1016 cm−3 . However, due the transient
and non-homogeneous nature of the developing plasma, an and the speed of light, c.
alternate method to calculate the ground state atomic density Convolving the Lorentz and Gauss profile results in a Voigt
through rate equations yielded a lower bound density of profile which is usually given by the integral
1.1 × 1017 cm−3 .
∞
e−y
2
δνL
V (x) = dy, (A4)
Appendix. Spectral simulation δνD2 π 3/2 −∞ (x − y)2 + a 2
with
The simulation software [34] was developed utilizing well ν0 − ν
known optical emission spectroscopy concepts as they are x = 2 ln(2) ,
δνD
found in [35] and elsewhere. This supplemental appendix
and
serves to describe in further detail the process of calculating δνL
atomic spectra accounting for radiation as well as apparatus a= ln(2) ,
δνD
profiles.
A specific atom or ionic state of an atom is chosen, where ν0 is the line centre in frequency, and νL and νD
and the following parameters are read for each line tabulated represent the HWHM’s of the Lorentzian and Gaussian profile
from [22]: line positions, λk ; energy of upper energy respectively.
levels, Ek , degeneracy of the upper energy levels, gk ; Since an analytical solution for (A4) does not
Einstein coefficient for spontaneous emission, Ak . Assuming exist, historically several algorithms have been developed
Boltzmann distributed energy levels at a temperature T and a to quickly provide a solution involving error function
total number of atoms, N0 , the number of photons emitted per approximations [36].
second for each tabulated transition, λk , is given by Alternatively, modern computers enable discrete convolu-
tion of the Lorentz, (A2), and Gauss, (A3), profiles if the data
Aj gj e−Ej /kB T e are stored in vectors given by the equation
Ik = N0 , (A0)
Q(T )
∞
with the Boltzmann constant, kB , and the partition function (L × G)[i] = L[m]G[i − m]. (A5)
m=−∞
∞
Q(T ) = gj e−Ej /kT , (A1) To provide even faster computation, this point-by-point
j =0 convolution was done using a parallel algorithm on the GPU
8
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 (2012) 495202 A Fierro et al
allowing convolution of vectors with a size in the hundreds of Table A1. Sample data used to produce the emission spectrum
thousands in just a few seconds. produced in figure A1.
After a symmetric Voigt profile centred at zero frequency λ1 λ2 λ3
is calculated, an array containing the desired frequency range
λ (nm) 131.0950 131.9676 132.7924
at an interval of 100 times smaller than the specified FWHM’s
Ej (eV) 13.0332 12.9706 12.9123
is constructed. For any frequency point in this new array, gj 4 4 2
referred to as xi , the distance, i,k , away from the line centre, Aj (106 s−1 ) 17.5 57.6 14.3
νk , is calculated. This distance is translated to an offset Te (eV) 5 σ a (nm) 0.2
from the centre of the Voigt profile array either by solving Tk (K) 5000 γ b (nm) 0.2
(A4) or (A5) and represents a partial contribution of emission mA (amu) 16 c (nm) 0.05
δνL (cm−1 ) 1 Stepd (nm) 0.022 nm
rate to the frequency point xi . The total photon emission
rate per frequency interval at frequency xi is the sum of all a
FWHM of the Gauss apparatus profile.
contributions b
FWHM of the Lorentz apparatus profile.
n c
FWHM of the square apparatus profile.
I˜i = V (i,k )Ik , (A6) d
Wavelength covered by one pixel in array.
k=1
with n the total number of frequency and emission rate pairs spectrum is reduced to a larger step width
from (1); V () is the Voigt profile evaluated at distance
from the line centres νk .
m
I i= I k, (A10)
The spectrum calculated from (A6) is experimentally
k=1
observed only for the case that the spectral apparatus resolution
is much finer than the FWHM of the Voigt profile. In the with m representing the size of the larger step width and
more general case, the spectrum of (A6) needs to be convolved incrementing k by m for every larger interval i. Noting that
with the apparatus profile. Considering a grating spectrograph the ICCD detects photons rather than intensity, the output
in Czerny–Turner configuration, the dispersion is reasonably is typically listed in counts, equation (A10) can be directly
constant in the wavelength domain; for instance, about compared to the experimental spectrum provided that one
2 nm mm−1 for a 1/4 m spectrograph with a 1200 lines mm−1 accounts for the apparatus specific wavelength sensitivity.
grating. The photon emission rate per wavelength interval is Note that for the temperature determination only the shape
given by of the spectra is important. That is, the temperature is varied
c
Iˆi = 2 I˜i , (A7) until a best match is achieved. However, if the wavelength
λi sensitivity as well as the measured solid angle of the apparatus
which ensures that the total photon emission rate is conserved. is accurately known, the number of emitting atoms, N0 , can be
That is, the following integrals need to be equal as well determined from comparing the experimental with the
calculated spectrum from equation (A10).
Iˆ(λ) dλ = I˜(ν) dν. (A8) Three spectral lines and their emission properties are pre-
sented in table A1. The HWHM for the natural broadening
The discretized version of (A8) is utilized as a check that the (δνL ) was chosen to be a constant for all lines regardless of
conversion from the frequency to wavelength domain is done Einstein coefficient for spontaneous emission due to its neg-
correctly. ligible influence on the final profile. In addition, the kinetic
It has been found that the apparatus profile for a Czerny– temperature of the radiating species (Tk ) and mass (mA ) for
Turner spectrograph with entrance slit and intensified CCD the Doppler width are given. Lastly, the generic Gauss (σ ),
camera as readout device can be conveniently expressed with Lorentz (γ ), and square () profile FWHMs values determine
a combination of Lorentz, Gauss, and square profile. Note that the apparatus profile. This data was used as input to the soft-
the associated profile widths are a property of the apparatus ware to demonstrate the process of calculating atomic emission
and not to be confused with the earlier utilized spectral line spectra (figure A1). Figure A1(a) represents the photons per
widths describing properties of the radiating atoms. Typically, second calculated from equations (A1) and (A2). Figure A1(b)
one determines the apparatus profile, S(λ), by measuring an shows the line spectrum due to only natural and Doppler line
isolated line and then fitting the profile parameters such that widths. Note that Tk has been raised to a somewhat excessive
a good match is observed. The apparatus convolved spectrum 5000 K just to be able to observe the linewidth at the depicted
is then calculated by simply convolving the area normalized scale at all. Figure A1(c) shows the final spectrum convolved
S(λ) with the array given in (A7) with the apparatus profile usually used to determine tempera-
ture. Note that the apparatus profile frequently dominates any
∞
Doppler or natural line broadening as it does here.
I i= S(i,k )Iˆk , (A9)
k=1
Acknowledgments
where S() is the apparatus profile evaluated at a distance
from line centre. Since the size of the individual pixels of the This work was supported by the Air Force Office of Sci-
CCD in the wavelength regime is typically much larger than entific Research (AFOSR) through the grant ‘Basic Physics
the wavelength spacing of the spectrum of equation (A9), the of Distributed Plasma Discharge,’ with additional student
9
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 (2012) 495202 A Fierro et al
10
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 (2012) 495202 A Fierro et al
[32] Kossyi I, Kostinksy A, Matveyev A and Silakov V 1992 [34] SpectraPlot.exe, accessed 8-20-2012,
Kinetic scheme of the non-equilibrium discharge in http://www.p3e.ttu.edu/FTP Files/SpectraPlot.zip
nitrogen–oxygen mixtures Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. [35] Thorne A, Litzen U and Johansson S 1999 Spectrophysics
1 207–20 Principles and Applications (Berlin: Springer)
[33] Bischel W, Perry B and Crosley D 1981 Two-photon [36] Pierluissi J, Vanderwood P and Gomez R 1977 Fast calculation
laser-induced fluorescence in oxygen and nitrogen atoms algorithm for the Voigt profile J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat.
Chem. Phys. Lett. 82 85–8 Transfer 18 555–8
11