Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Environmental Studies
Environmental Studies
Submitted by
Satya vrat ojha
11906300
Signature of student:
Student declaration
Environmental studies
Environmental education (EE) refers to organized efforts to teach how natural
environments function, and particularly, how human beings can manage behavior
and ecosystems to live sustainably. It is a multi-disciplinary field integrating
disciplines such as biology, chemistry, physics, ecology, earth science,
atmospheric science, mathematics, and geography. The United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural 0rganisation (UNESC0) states that EE is vital in
imparting an inherent respect for nature amongst society and in enhancing public
environmental awareness. UNESC0 emphasises the role of EE in safeguarding
future global developments of societal quality of life (Q0L), through the
protection of the environment, eradication of poverty, minimization of
inequalities and insurance of sustainable development (UNESC0, 2014a). The
term often implies education within the school system, from primary to post-
secondary. However, it sometimes includes all efforts to educate the public and
other audiences, including print materials, websites, media campaigns, etc.. There
are also ways that environmental education is taught outside the traditional
classroom. Aquariums, zoos, parks, and nature centers all have ways of teaching
the public about the environment.
1. Awareness:
To help the social groups and individuals to acquire knowledge of pollution
and environmental degradation
2. Knowledge:
It is not only the duty of government but also the people to take
active role for protecting the environment, so protecting our
environment is economically more viable than cleaning it up
0nce, it is damaged.
The role of mass media such as newspapers, radio, television, etc
is als0 very important to make people aware regarding
environment.
I believe we can rectify this shortfall is by allowing students to form more personal
reasons to protect their environment. It is good that most environmental science
classes appeal to their goodness of hearts and morals and encourage them to think
about the greater good. But, research has constantly shown that doing this alone has
almost never lead to worthwhile results. 0ne needs to identify a personal stake in any
problem to truly consider any reform. Teachers should enable this by framing
environmental science classes as a space that allows students to form a pers0nal
association to their environment and internalize the problems that plague it.
We can do this by first updating the recommended environmental science books to
discuss relevant problems of the day. For example, many Indian textbooks still talk
about ozone layer depletion as an issue; why is that? After the ratification of the
Montreal protocol in 1987, the 0zone hole over the antarctic has been steadily closing
and is expected to be back to pre-1980s level by 2075. This global issue, as declared
by many, is now solved . These books should rather put more emphasis on specific
national environmental problems rather than just the few popular global ones.
Another way to let them form more personal reasons to protect their environment is to
actually expose them to it. For as far back as I can remember, I have actually never
read much about Indian flora or fauna in my science textbooks. This is true for my
students as well. If they only see the tiger/elephants/rhinoceros as species which are in
dire need of conservation in this country, they are dangerously ill-informed about the
state of India’s biodiversity. They also cannot do much about protecting those
particular species other than contributing financially to their conservation, which is
again a very indirect way of connecting to the cause.
Instead, in most parts of this country, one only needs to look in their own backyards,
or the closest natural habitat to find trees, birds and amphibians among others which
face higher odds of extinction. The benefit of focusing on these species is that they are
easy to observe which requires next to no training, they also possess a certain visual
appeal and, most importantly, the students can actually do a lot to directly contribute
to their conservation. They can participate in the rapidly growing citizen science
initiatives like birdcount.in, indiabiodiversity.org to name a few in this country to
report their presence in a certain location and take part in online discussions about
species identification, perceived threats and reporting of species’ behavior. By doing
this, they not only gain a first-hand experience in the rigors of scientific process and
the difficulties associated with conservation, but there is also a high chance that they
might actually form a personal association with the species they are observing and
become deeply concerned about its problems. This will give them a personal reason to
actively contribute to that species’ conservation and be more mindful of threats that
biodiversity, in general, across this country face. Environmental classes should allow
this to happen by giving space and credit for this kind of experiential learning as a part
of regular class work.
At the end, if there is anything we can learn from the political debates happening
across the world, is that facts are easy to ignore, but experiences are not. We need to
heed to this wisdom and revamp our environmental classes to become more personal
and experiential to encourage students to find more personal reasons to conserve their
environment and progress the country’s environmental efforts in a comprehensive and
fruitful manner.
Problems for environment in India
Possible causes
Some have cited economic development as the cause regarding the environmental
issues. It is suggested that India's growing population is the primary cause of
India's environmental degradation. Systematic studies challenge this
theory. Empirical evidence from countries such as Japan, England and Singapore,
each with population density similar to 0r higher than that of India, yet each
enjoying environmental quality vastly superior to India's, suggests population
density may not be the only factor affecting India's issues.
Major issues
Floods are a significant environmental issue for India. It causes soil erosion,
destruction of wetlands and wide migration of solid wastes.
Major environmental issues are forests and agricultural degradation of land,
resource depletion (such as water, mineral, forest, sand, and rocks), environmental
degradation, public health, loss of biodiversity, loss of resilience in ecosystems,
livelihood security for the poor.
The major sources of pollution in India include the rapid burning of fuelwood and
biomass such as dried waste from livestock as the primary source of energy, lack
of organised garbage and waste removal services, lack of sewage treatment
operations, lack of flood control and monsoon water drainage system, diversion of
consumer waste into rivers, cremation practices near major rivers, government
mandated protection of highly polluting old public transport, and continued
operation by Indian government of government-owned, high emission plants built
between 1950 and 1980.
Air pollution, poor management of waste, growing water scarcity, falling
groundwater tables, water pollution, preservation and quality of
forests, biodiversity loss, and land/soil degradation are some of the major
environmental issues India faces today.
India's population growth adds pressure to environmental issues and its resources.
Rapid urbanization has caused a buildup of heavy metals in the soil of the city
of Ghaziabad, and these metals are being ingested through contaminated
vegetables. Heavy metals are hazardous to people's health and are known
carcinogens.
There is a long history of study and debate about the interactions between
population growth and the environment. According to a British thinker Malthus,
for example, a growing population exerts pressure on agricultural land, causing
environmental degradation, and forcing the cultivation of land of higher as well as
poorer quality. This environmental degradation ultimately reduces agricultural
yields and food availability, famines and diseases and death, thereby reducing the
rate of population growth.
Population growth, because it can place increased pressure on the assimilative
capacity of the environment, is also seen as a major cause of air, water, and solid-
waste pollution. The result, Malthus theorised, is an equilibrium population that
enjoys low levels of both income and Environmental quality. Malthus suggested
positive and preventative forced control of human population, along with abolition
of poor laws.
Malthus theory, published between 1798 and 1826, has been analysed and
criticised ever since. The American thinker Henry George, for example, observed
with his characteristic piquancy in dismissing Malthus: "Both the jayhawk and the
man eat chickens; but the more jayhawks, the fewer chickens, while the more men,
the more chickens." Similarly, the American economist Julian Lincoln
Simon criticised Malthus's theory. He noted that the facts of human history have
proven the predictions of Malthus and of the Neo-Malthusians to be flawed.
Massive geometric population growth in the 20th century did not result in
a Malthusian catastrophe. The possible reasons include: increase in human
knowledge, rapid increases in productivity, innovation and application of
knowledge, general improvements in farming methods (industrial agriculture),
mechanisation of work (tractors), the introduction of high-yield varieties of wheat
and other plants (Green Revolution), the use of pesticides to control crop pests.
More recent scholarly articles concede that whilst there is no question that
population growth may contribute to environmental degradation, its effects can be
modified by economic growth and modern technology. Research in environmental
economics has uncovered a relationship between environmental quality, measured
by ambient concentrations of air pollutants and per capita income. This so-called
environmental Kuznets curve shows environmental quality worsening up until
about $5,000 of per capita income on purchasing parity basis, and improving
thereafterThe key requirement, for this to be true, is continued adoption of
technology and scientific management of resources, continued increases in
productivity in every economic sector, entrepreneurial innovation and economic
expansion.
Water pollution
India has major water pollution issues. Discharge of untreated sewage is the single
most important cause for pollution of surface and ground water in India. There is a
large gap between generation and treatment of domestic waste water in India. The
problem is not only that India lacks sufficient treatment capacity but also that the
sewage treatment plants that are exist do not operate and are not maintained. The
majority of the government-owned sewage treatment plants remain closed most of
the time due to improper design or poor maintenance or lack of reliable electricity
supply to operate the plants, together with absentee employees and poor
management. The waste water generated in these areas normally percolates in the
soil or evaporates. The uncollected wastes accumulate in the urban areas cause
unhygienic conditions and release pollutants that leaches to surface and
groundwater.
According to a World Health Organization study out of India's 3,119 towns and
cities, just 209 had partial sewage treatment facilities, and only 8 have full
wastewater treatment facilities (1992). Over 100 Indian cities dump
untreated sewage directly into the Ganges River.Investment is needed to bridge the
gap between 29000 million litre per day of sewage India generates, and a treatment
capacity of mere 6000 million litre per day.
Other sources of water pollution include agriculture run off and small scale
factories along the rivers and lakes of India. Fertilizers and pesticides used in
agriculture in northwest have been found in rivers, lakes and ground
water Flooding during monsoons worsens India's water pollution problem, as it
washes and moves all sorts of solid garbage and contaminated soils into its rivers
and wetlands.
Air pollution
Air pollution in India is a serious issue with the major sources being fuelwood and
biomass burning, fuel adulteration, vehicle emission and traffic congestion. Air
pollution is also the main cause of the Asian brown cloud, which is causing
the monsoon to be delayed. India is the world's largest consumer of fuelwood,
agricultural waste and biomass for energy purposes. Traditional fuel (fuelwood,
crop residue and dung cake) dominates domestic energy use in rural India and
accounts for about 90% of the total. In urban areas, this traditional fuel constitutes
about 24% of the total. Fuel wood, agri waste and biomass cake burning releases
over 165 million tonnes of combustion products into India's indoor and outdoor air
every year. These biomass-based household stoves in India are also a leading
source of greenhouse emissions contributing to climate change.
The annual crop burning practice in northwest India, north India and
eastern Pakistan, after monsoons, from October to December, are a major seasonal
source of air pollution. Approximately 500 million tons of crop residue is burnt in
open, releasing smoke, soot, NOx, SOx, PAHs and particulate matter into the air.
This burning has been found to be a leading cause of smog and haze problems
through the winter over Punjab, cities such as Delhi, and major population centers
along the rivers through West Bengal. In other states of India, rice straw and other
crop residue burning in open is a major source of air pollution.
Noise pollution
Noise pollution or noise disturbance is the disturbing or excessive noise that may
harm the activity or balance of human or animal life. Noise-wise India can be
termed as the most polluted country in the world. The source of most outdoor noise
worldwide is mainly caused by machines and transportation systems, motor
vehicles, aircraft, and trains. In India the outdoor noise is also caused by loud
music during festival seasons. 0utdoor noise is summarized by the word
environmental noise. Poor urban planning may give rise to noise pollution, since
side-by-side industrial and residential buildings can result in noise pollution in the
residential areas.
Indoor noise can be caused by machines, building activities, and music
performances, especially in some workplaces. Noise-induced hearing loss can be
caused by outside (e.g. trains) or inside (e.g. music) noise.
High noise levels can contribute to cardiovascular effects in humans and an
increased incidence of coronary artery disease. In animals, noise can increase the
risk of death by altering predator or prey detection and avoidance, interfere with
reproduction and navigation, and contribute to permanent hearing loss.
India is not the only country facing environmental issues. Definitely air and water
pollution and climate change are more global issues that require a concerted effort
by all nations to solve. A report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) in "Climate Change Science Compendium 2009", suggests that the
world will be experiencing more of ocean acidification, ice-sheet melting, sea-level
rise, and so-called tipping points in climate effects much sooner than ever thought
off (Parks, 2009). Although environmental issues are global in nature, each country
is in control of its own environment with jurisdiction over its territory and, hence,
should be controlling, monitoring, and enacting regulations in safeguarding its
environment. This is true for India too. The Copenhagen Accord makes it clear that
it is up to individual countries to devise and enforce the regulations necessary to
achieve their national commitments to combat global warming by reducing
greenhouse gas emissions. Because of the country specific role of controlling and
monitoring the environment, it is difficult to enforce environmental standards on
countries from a global perspective, each country should be willing to consider
environmental issues as a probable contributor to the overall global degradation of
the environment and participate in controlling it through its laws and participation
by its industrial sector. In addition, each country could be part of a worldwide
association/organization that uses the global network, technological know-how,
and resources to be a contributing partner to this group in helping the environment
(like the Kyoto Protocol of 1997 and Copenhagen Accord of 2009 on climate
change). When international organizations and non-governmental organizations
(NGOs) try to help individual countries on environmental issues, in some instances
it creates problems. In a research paper funded and supported by the World Bank,
researchers found that in India, the role of international institutions and NGO's
often have difficulty matching their interest with that of the state, especially, when
it comes to human rights standards (Randeria, 2003).
In India, the existing environmental monitoring and control has not succeeded in
reducing the pollutants, GHHs, etc. There is a definite need for India to explore
other approaches in solving the environmental problems. A major concern for
developing countries including India is how to safeguard the environment without
adversely affecting the country's economic growth and employment levels.
According to some researchers there will always be political and economic
constraints on most governments in monitoring and controlling the environment
and at the same time encouraging industries to be vigilant in reducing air and water
pollution (Stuligross, 1999). For countries with success in addressing the
environmental issues an approach that seems to have worked is when the
government and the private sector work together as partners. It is important for the
government to stress and the industry sector to accept the benefits of safe
environmental practices as there are possible financial gains for those firms that
adopt such practices. Research has shown that for manufacturing plants in static
industries with low entry and exit costs, environmental investments do
significantly improve operational performance in terms of cost, quality, and
flexibility (Wiengartne, Pagell, and Fynes, 2012). Regulation alone might not
always work if the external factors do not support or assist the industrial sector.
Compounding this dilemma is the fact that in the area of environmental issues and
the people directly affected by it, it is not clear that everyone understands the role
of the government in bringing about change. Many of them feel that their
livelihoods might adversely affected by the environmental regulations introduced
by the government. In such situations it is far better to work through the people
directly affected by regulations to bring about necessary changes in habits
(Agarwal, 2005). Following are a few examples that demonstrate the limitations of
environmental regulations in improving such issues as emissions of greenhouse
gas, improving air and water quality, reducing the municipal water waste disposal
problems, etc., In a study of the manufacturing sector among the European Union
countries researchers found that a European-wide carbon tax would induce an
unbalanced burden on industries and countries (Bordigoni, Hita, and Le Blanc,
2012). Similarly, in a study by the International Monetary Fund, researchers found
that the post-tax energy subsidies at the global and regional levels are dramatically
higher than previously estimated resulting in adverse effects on the environment
(Coady, et al., 2015). In a similar vein, a research study on the wine industry in
New Zealand found that firms with a higher commitment to exports (external
pressures) were more likely to adopt safe environmental practices (Sinha and
Akoorie, 2010). Policy makers, international organizations, and academicians all
have come to the conclusion that regulation alone is not sustainable in stopping or
even reducing the environmental degradation of our planet. In addition to
regulation, the education and income levels of a country's population seems to have
an effect on the environment. In a study of Indian households on environmental
concerns, education and income showed significant positive association with
people's concerns for the environment (Chatterjee, 2008). Based on the success of
a few countries in managing environmental concerns, it appears that environmental
laws alone are less effective, but when the industry and private sector cooperates
and shares the responsibility with government agencies they seem to result in a
more effective management of the environment. The following studies highlight
the usefulness and importance of the cooperative approach in addressing many of
the environmental concerns facing the world.
There are lot of positive learning outcomes which I have learned after
completion of this project such as that now I am more aware about the
problems which our environment is facing and other lot of issues, now I am
more aware about management by which we can save our environment
through very small small thing in our day to day lives, now I am more aware
about the methods through which I can reduce the pollution which I was
spreading everyday unknowingly.
Also, I have quite enough knowledge about the mistakes people are doing
everyday by which environment is getting affected very badly, also about
the things which we can practice to maintain this beautiful nature healthy.
After completion of this project I realized that our Indian education system
is also lacking somewhere to spread awareness about these issues and
encourage environmental studies, so that upcoming generation should
know the value of this beautiful environment and maintain it healthy and
safe for very long time.
Narendra Modi took the over as the Prime Minister of India in 2014.
And in June that year, recognising the cultural and environmental
importance of the river Ganga, the ‘Namami Gange Programme’ was
approved by the union government. The Centre allocated a total of Rs
20,000 crore to conserve and rejuvenate the river. While there had been
a number of other programmes to improve the state of river Ganga, the
Modi-led government stated that it was approaching the problem
differently. It involved the people living on the banks of the river, and
helped them attain sustainable livelihoods and feel the impact first-hand.
It also roped in grass-root level institutions, including urban local bodies
and Panchayati Raj institutions, to work for the same. Key achievements
of include creating sewerage treatment capacity, river front development
and surface cleaning. The programme is being implemented by the
National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG) at the national level and
State Program Management Groups (SPMGs) at the state level.
Moreover, 63 sewerage management projects are implemented in
Uttarakhand,Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, and West Bengal.
Green Skill Development Programme
While running his candidature for the Prime Minister’s post in 2013,
Narendra Modi, while addressing around 7,000 students in Delhi, had
said that he wants to build toilets before temples. After that, ‘Pehle
shauchalaya, phir devalaya’ became a popular slogan. Implemented as
part of the Swachh Bharat Mission, the government claims to have built
over nine crore household toilets and 32 states or Union Territories have
been declared open defecation-free since October 2, 2014.
CONCLUSION
In coclusion, I want to say that there are lot of
problems around us which are damaging our
environment, there are lot of things which is in our
control, there are lot of things by which we can secure
our environment for us and for our upcoming
generations but still we humans are just taking
advantages of the environment, just being selfish, just
think about our needs. Yes, government are doing
some initiatives but that is not gonna work until we all
get together and save our environment. All species alter
their environment to some extent because they do not live in
isolation from one another. The study of the interactions
between plants, animals and their environment is known as
ecology.
The relationships between plants and animals can be
expressed as food chains and food webs. In both cases the
primary producers are plants and they provide all the energy
within the system (chain or web) by a process called
photosynthesis. The systems can support fewer carnivores
than herbivores because energy is lost from one trophic level
to the next. This idea is shown diagrammatically as the
pyramid of numbers. Because relationships within a food
web are variable and complex we cannot accurately predict
the effect of losing one species from the web.
To develop the knowledge needed to address current and
emerging environmental issues, EPA should undertake
both problem-driven research and core research. Problem-
driven research is targeted at understanding and solving
identified environmental problems, while core research aims to
provide broader, more generic information that will help
improve understanding of many problems now and in the future.
Core research includes three components: understanding the
processes that drive and connect environmental systems;
development of innovative tools and methods for understanding and
managing environmental problems; and long-term collection and
dissemination of accurate environmental data.