Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sene Sectional Limits Jeffrey1977
Sene Sectional Limits Jeffrey1977
Progress Report
Author(s): C. Jeffrey, P. Halliday, M. Wilmot-Dear and S. W. Jones
Reviewed work(s):
Source: Kew Bulletin, Vol. 32, No. 1 (1977), pp. 47-67
Published by: Springer on behalf of Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4117259 .
Accessed: 14/03/2013 12:41
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew and Springer are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Kew Bulletin.
http://www.jstor.org
INTRODUCTION
All material was taken from herbarium specimens selected (by C. J.) from
the Herbarium of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (K). For scanning
electron microscopy (by M. W.-D.), dry cypselas and unacetolyzed pollen
grains were mounted directly on to stubs using double-sided sellotape, gold-
coated, and photographed at approximately 30, X 100oo,X 300, x1ooo,
x 3000 (cypselas) and x 2-3000 and x 6-7000 (pollen grains) on a Jeol
JSM I scanning electron microscope. For light microscopy, florets and pieces
of leaf were softened by boiling, dissected and mounted in lactic acid,
examined and drawn (by P. H. and S. W. J.) under Nikon SMZ-2 binocular
dissecting and Watson Service monocular compound microscopes. For
transmission electron micrography of sections of pollen grains, we are greatly
indebted to ProfessorJohn J. Skvarla, University of Oklahoma. A list of the
species and specimens studied is deposited in the library of the Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew. Determinations are by the senior author.
RESULTS
I. Characters Studied
I. Cypselasurfaces
Cypselas are glabrous or bear duplex hairs of varying distribution and
density. The hairs vary in length/breadth ratio, shape of the apex, and
13. Inflorescence
Capitula may be (rarely) solitary or in terminal, terminal and upper
axillary or sometimes axillary cymose corymbs, compound corymbs,
compound paniculoid thyrses, or racemiform thyrses.
14. Endothecialcells
Endothecial cells vary from short and thickwalled, with thickenings
confined to the poles of the cells (polar of Drury, 1967), to elongated, thin-
walled, with thickenings along the whole length of the radial walls (radial
of Drury, 1967).
length to completely confluent and covering the whole inner surfaces of the
style-arms.
DISCUSSION
The most important facts to emerge from this preliminary stage of the
study are that intermediate states are always found between the various
character-states of the above characters and that no one character-state is
consistently correlated with any character-state of any other character. As
a result, it is impossible to define groups of species other than on the basis of
syndromes of rather loosely associated character-states and it is also impos-
sible meaningfully to allocate character-states to classes, such as might be
necessary for their scoring for use in numerical analyses. This continuity of
character-states and lack of correlation between states of different characters
is observed, it should be emphasized, in all characters, including those, such
as length and distribution of style-arm papillae, length of anther-bases,
shape and degree of cellular differentiation of the anther-collars, type of
leaf-hairs, distribution of endothecial cell thickenings, and configuration of
the stigmatic surfaces, that at one time or another have been considered by
various authors to be of use in defining genera or groups of genera. The
importance to be accorded to any character-state in the construction of taxa
can, and must be, assessed only by its consideration against the background
of other character-states with which it is associated in any particular species,
and on that basis is to be assessed for that particular species only. Any
attempt at overall weighting of a character-state-or, conversely, at non-
weighting of all character-states-throughout the group as a whole would
ignore both the eclectic nature of the study and the existence of different
character-state syndromes in different species and would therefore be unlikely
to result in a meaningful classification.
iv. Suffrutices or leafy perennial herbs; leaves lobed to entire, hairs non-
uniform or uniform; rays and disc yellow, rays 4-5-veined, with short
biseriate or uniseriate hairs; cypselas hairy, cells short, smooth or sub-
papillose; pappus-hairs slender, 2-celled below apex; anther-collars baluster-
form; anther-bases short, acute.
CONCLUSIONS