Ilya Kipnis' Defensive Adaptive Asset Allocation - AllocateSmartly

28/05/2020 Ilya Kipnis' Defensive Adaptive Asset Allocation - AllocateSmartly
 About  Subscribe  Managed  Blog  Members
Ilya Kipnis’ Defensive Adaptive Asset

Allocation
FEBRUARY 26, 2019
This is a test of Ilya Kipnis’ “Defensive Adaptive Asset Allocation” (KDA). KDA is a “Meta” model of
sorts, combining successful elements of multiple other tactical asset allocation strategies that we
track.
Results from 1989 to the present, net of transaction costs, follow. Read more about our backtests or
let AllocateSmartly help you follow this strategy in near real-time.
Linearly-scaled. Click for

logarithmically-scaled chart.
https://allocatesmartly.com/ilya-kipnis-defensive-adaptive-asset-allocation/ 1/8
A “Meta” strategy:
AllocateSmartly tracks our own Meta Strategy, a real-time combination of 10 of the top performing
strategies on our site. That means we’re diversifying across many di erent approaches to TAA (what
Newfound Research would refer to as “diversi cation of the how“).
KDA takes a di erent approach to a Meta model, selecting just the most successful elements from
other strategies that we track:
KDA measures momentum across multiple timeframes from 1 to 12-months, with more
recent momentum given more weight. This is identical to the approach taken by Keller and
Keuning’s “Vigilant Asset Allocation” (link: public | members).
It considers both absolute and relative momentum, like traditional “dual momentum”. In
other words, it requires that an asset exhibits both positive momentum and stronger
momentum than other assets.
It uses minimum variance optimization with a “weighted” covariance matrix like ReSolve’s
“Adaptive Asset Allocation” to determine how much of the portfolio to allocate to each asset
(link: public | members).
It uses the “canary universe” concept from Keller and Keuning’s “Defensive Asset Allocation”
to know when to “turn o ” the strategy and move to defensive assets like US Treasuries or
cash (link: members).
Which is the better approach to building a Meta model?
It depends. The more the future resembles the past, the better a model like Ilya’s would be expected
to perform, as it’s selecting the best historical elements from other strategies that we track. The
more the future di ers from the past, the better a model like ours would be expected to perform, as
we’re laying bets across multiple di erent approaches to TAA.
Strategy rules tested:
We’ve deviated slightly from Ilya’s original ruleset in order to t the standardized approach we take
on this site. See calculation notes for more details.
KDA includes three asset universes: an investment, “canary”, and crash protection universe.
Investment universe: US equities (represented by SPY), Europe equities (VGK), Japan

equities (EWJ), emerging mkt equities (EEM), US REITs (VNQ), intl REITs (RWX), int-term
US Treasuries (IEF), long-term US Treasuries (TLT), commodities (DBC) and gold (GLD).
Canary universe: Emerging market equities (EEM) and US aggregate bonds (AGG).
Crash protection universe: Intermediate-term US Treasuries (IEF) and cash.
For all assets across all three universes, at the close on the last trading day of the month,
calculate a “momentum score” as follows:
(12 * (p0 / p21 – 1)) + (4 * (p0 / p63 – 1)) + (2 * (p0 / p126 – 1)) + (p0 / p252 – 1)
Where p0 = the asset’s price at today’s close, p1 = the asset’s price at the close of the previous
trading day and so on. 21, 63, 126 and 252 days correspond to 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.
Note how the momentum score weights more recent months over more distant months.
Interpreting the canary universe: If both canary assets (EEM and AGG) exhibit positive
momentum, allocate the entire portfolio to the investment universe. If only one canary asset
exhibits positive momentum, allocate half of the portfolio to the investment universe and half
to crash protection. If neither canary asset exhibits positive momentum, allocate the entire
portfolio to crash protection.
See Keller and Keuning’s paper Breadth Momentum and the Canary Universe for more on
this idea of a canary universe.
Selecting from the investment universe: Select the 5 assets with the highest momentum score
(i.e. the “top half” of the universe). Discard those with a negative momentum score.
Allocating to the investment universe: Allocate among our 5 (or less) assets according to
minimum variance optimization, using a “weighted” covariance matrix. The covariance matrix
is calculated using 21-day (1-month) volatility, and correlation weighted as follows:
[(21-day correlation * 12) + (63-day correlation * 4) + (126-day correlation * 2) + (252-day

correlation)] / 19
Note that this is the same 1/3/6/12-month weighting used in measuring momentum.
Allocating to the crash protection universe: If crash protection is in e ect, allocate that portion
of the portfolio to intermediate-term US Treasuries (IEF) if IEF is exhibiting positive
momentum, otherwise to cash.
Positions are assumed to be executed at the close. Hold all positions until the last trading day
of the following month.
Well that was a mouthful.
In short, we’re allocating to assets exhibiting the highest positive recent momentum, unless our two
canary assets (EEM and AGG) are warning of impending weakness in risk assets.
Hyperactive (by TAA standards):
Relative to other tactical asset allocation strategies, KDA trades a lot. It has turned over the entire
portfolio nearly 7 times per year (see “annual turnover”), making it the most active TAA strategy that
we track.
That may or not be relevant to you. Our results already include an assumption for transaction
costs/slippage, so if trading in a tax-deferred account, the pain of that frequent trading has already
been baked in. If trading in a taxable account however, it means that KDA is one of the least tax
e cient strategies that we track, with three-fourths of pro ts coming from short-term capital gains.
We track every strategy’s historical tax e ciency for members.
We should also note that, because of this hyperactive trading, our inclusion of transaction
costs/slippage was the biggest cause of discrepancy between our long-term results and Ilya’s,
resulting in about a 1.4%/year drag on returns. You could adjust the results shown here based on
how your own execution costs compare to our 0.1%/trade (0.2% round-trip) assumption.
We could write basically the same thing about a number of hyperactive strategies that we track (ex.
VAA, ADM, AAA), so we’re de nitely not picking on KDA here. It’s just not something we’ve talked
about before, and this seemed like an apt time since our site has a new leader for active trading.
Of course, if you’re a swing trader or the like, you laugh at the idea of 7x portfolio turnover being
deemed “hyperactive”. It’s all relative.
Our take on KDA:
There’s a lot to like about this strategy. KDA combines multiple e ective concepts from other
strategies that we track. In terms of risk-adjusted return (ex. Sharpe, UPI, etc.) it has been one of the
top performing on our site over the last couple of decades.
Possible strategy tweaks (untested, your mileage may vary):
Due to the nature of the min var optimization, KDA will often be very concentrated in just one
or two risk assets. Perhaps setting a hard limit on allocation to any particular asset, or setting
a limit on total portfolio volatility each month, makes sense.
Try to reduce portfolio turnover by reducing the importance of relative (but not absolute)
momentum. For example, once the strategy was already in a given asset, make it harder to
rotate into a similar risk asset (ex. from one avor of equities to another) when both are still
showing positive momentum. Rotating into assets that are expected to be only marginally
better is a major cause of tax ine ciency (read more).
An outside the box idea: To really leverage the Meta model idea and reduce “speci cation
risk”, it would be interesting to see something like what Newfound Research did with
“Diversi ed Dual Momentum” (link: public | members).
For example, rather than use one momentum score of 1, 3, 6 and 12 months to select assets,
build four versions of the portfolio (one based on 1-month momentum, one based on 3-
months, etc.) and weight the nal result. It would result in more assets held at any one time,
but would do a better job sussing out the unique characteristics of short, medium and long-
term momentum.
It’s great to see the TAA community building upon each other’s ideas like this. I’d like to think that our
role both as a central repository for TAA strategies and an independent arbiter of performance,
makes this type of Meta analysis more e ective. When you’re able to compare all signi cant
published TAA strategies on a level playing eld, it’s easier to identify the good ideas.
Thank you to Ilya Kipnis for the opportunity to put this strategy to the test. We generally don’t add a
strategy to our site based on a simple blog post – we usually require something more formal like a
book or paper – but we make exceptions for the top thinkers in quantitative analysis. Ilya is just that,
and we highly recommend you follow Ilya now.
New here?
We invite you to become a member for about a $1 a day, or take our platform for a test drive with a
free limited membership. Put the industry’s best tactical asset allocation strategies to the test,
combine them into your own custom portfolio, and then track them in near real-time. Have
questions? Learn more about what we do, check out our FAQs or contact us.
Calculation Notes:
1. Ilya used actual monthly endpoints to determine the number of days to look back when calculating
the momentum score and covariance matrix, while we used a consistent n-days (1-month = 21-
days, 3-months = 63-days, etc.) We had to make this change because of the unique way we handle
alternative trading days on our site (read more). Both approaches yield similar results, but are not
precisely the same.
2. Ilya represents the Emerging Mkt/Agg Bond canary universe with VWO/BND, while we use EEM/AGG.
This is intentional. Read more about why we conform all strategies to a common set of assets.
3. The minimum variance portfolio will sometimes call for an extremely small allocation to a given
asset. We’ve ignored any position smaller than 2% of the portfolio, and reallocated that position to
other assets (proportionally). This change is necessary because we assume that members are
including the strategy as just one component of their custom model portfolio, meaning a position
size of less than 2% could become impractically small. This change had a negligible impact on
performance.
FILED UNDER: TAA STRATEGIES
 Previous Post Next Post 

We have built a platform to track
the industry's best tactical asset
allocation strategies in near real-
time, and combine them into
custom portfolios.
Learn about what we do or take

our platform for a free test drive.
Search GO
FOLLOW OUR BLOG
  
RECENT POSTS
Adding a 1-Day Lag When Executing TAA

Strategies
Using Aggregate TAA Allocation as a Tool
for Timing the Market
Tactical Asset Allocation in April:
Stubbornly Defensive
Paul Novell’s Flagship Strategy SPY-COMP
Geek Note: How to Properly Lag Monthly
Economic Data
CATEGORIES
Select Category
BUY & HOLD MORE YOUR SPEED?
Check out our sister site dedicated to building

better buy & hold portfolios:
ABOUT US NEW FROM OUR BLOG HELPFUL LINKS STAY INFORMED
We have built a platform Adding a 1-Day Lag When  What We Do Follow the latest research
to track the industry's Executing TAA Strategies  List of Strategies from our blog via Twitter,
best tactical asset May 18, 2020 RSS and email:
 Advanced Features
allocation strategies in
near real-time, and Using Aggregate TAA  Subscribe
  
combine them into Allocation as a Tool for  Managed
custom portfolios. Timing the Market
 Blog
May 5, 2020
Learn about what we do  FAQs
and take our platform for Tactical Asset Allocation  Contact Us
a free test drive. in April: Stubbornly  Member Login
Defensive
May 1, 2020
© 2020 Allocate Smartly. All rights reserved. A liates | Terms of Service | Privacy

Ilya Kipnis' Defensive Adaptive Asset Allocation - AllocateSmartly

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ilya Kipnis' Defensive Adaptive Asset Allocation - AllocateSmartly

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

28/05/2020 Ilya Kipnis' Defensive Adaptive Asset Allocation - AllocateSmartly

 About  Subscribe  Managed  Blog  Members