Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2017) 90:3301–3315

DOI 10.1007/s00170-016-9614-0

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Bayesian inference-based investment-casting defect analysis


system for industrial application
Amit Sata 1 & B. Ravi 2

Received: 11 January 2015 / Accepted: 13 October 2016 / Published online: 4 November 2016
# Springer-Verlag London 2016

Abstract In spite of the best efforts of foundry engineers, engineers, without any training or customizing, and can there-
many castings contain defects and need to be rejected, fore be applied to any investment-casting foundry.
repaired, or recycled (remelted). This leads to an unnecessary
wastage of production resources, reduced productivity, and Keywords Bayesian inference . Casting . Defect analysis .
delayed supply of parts to customers. The defects can be sig- Investment casting
nificantly reduced by identifying and controlling the relevant
parameters (related to process and composition), through the
application of comprehensive domain knowledge. This is, 1 Introduction
however, a challenging task since the above parameters vary
within a wide range, and it is difficult to determine the specific The modern investment-casting process is widely used for
range of values that should be avoided to prevent the defects. producing near-net shape industrial parts of ferrous and non-
In this paper, we present a Bayesian inference-based method- ferrous alloys used in automobile, aerospace, biomedical,
ology for analysis and reduction of casting defects. The data chemical, electrical, food processing, machine tool, and many
related to process parameters and chemical composition of other industries. It generally involves the following three ma-
alloy, as well as the number of defective castings, is collected jor sub-processes: wax pattern fabrication, ceramic shell prep-
from a foundry. The values of posterior probability of each aration, and metal pouring [12].
input parameter are computed using Bayesian inference to The industrial wax (usually composition of wax (30–
identify the most influencing parameters and the avoidable 70 %), resins (20–60 %), plastic (0–20 %), and other additives
range of their values. The system was successfully tested on (0–5 %)) is injected into accurately machined dies (generally
real-life data obtained from an industrial investment-casting made of aluminum alloys) to prepare wax patterns [20].
foundry, leading to significant reduction in rejection rate of Unwanted material at parting line (flash) of wax pattern is
cast parts. The proposed methodology, implemented using removed, and material is filled into minor surface irregularities
Microsoft Excel, was found to be easy to use by practicing (frazing) to provide a smooth surface. The patterns are cleaned
and assembled to gating systems (sprue, runner, and gate) to
obtain a tree. The assembled tree is then transferred to an
* Amit Sata environmentally controlled room for ceramic shell making.
ameet_sata2000@yahoo.com Ceramic shell making starts with dipping the wax pattern
assembly (generally by hand) into slurry, referred as primary
B. Ravi
b.ravi@iitb.ac.in
coating, which governs the surface finish of the final casting.
This is carried out in controlled environmental conditions,
1
Mechanical Engineering Department, B H Gardi College of
with temperature maintained at 18–25 °C and relative humid-
Engineering and Technology, Kalawad Road, Anandpar, ity at 70–90 %. The slurry is usually a mixture of 300–400-
Rajkot 361162, India mesh-sized zircon flour (typically 75 %) and hydrolyzed ethyl
2
Mechanical Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology silicate or colloidal silica (typically 25 %) as a binder. The wet
Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India tree is sprayed with fine particles of 150–200-mesh-sized sand
3302 Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2017) 90:3301–3315

(usually zircon) to secure the primary coating over the wax


pattern. Then, the shell is alternately dipped in slurry and
sprayed with coarse particles of 30–80-mesh-sized sand to
obtain 5–8 layers of secondary coating. The ceramic mold is
then dried in a controlled environment for 4–8 h, followed by
heating in an autoclave to melt out the wax, referred to as
dewaxing.
The dewaxed molds are baked (usually at 1000 to
1100 °C for 30–45 min) in baking furnace (usually oil
fired) [12]. This burns out any residual wax, strengthens
the mold, and prevents cracking during pouring of mol-
ten metal. The cast metal/alloy is simultaneously melted
in a furnace (usually induction), poured in the pre-
heated ceramic molds, and allowed to solidify. After
the mold cools down, the ceramic shell material is bro-
ken (usually with the help of vibrating machine). The
castings are cut away from the gating system, grounded,
and shot blasted. The castings are sent for inspection,
heat treatment (if needed), and then dispatched.
It is generally observed in industry that about 5–10 %
of the parts produced by investment-casting process con-
tain defects (Fig. 1). The defects include flash (projection
of excess metal perpendicular to surface of casting),
misrun (mold cavity unoccupied by molten metal), ce-
ramic inclusion (entrapment of ceramic particles on sur-
face or sub-surface of casting), slag inclusion (projection
of metal mixed with investment material on surface of
casting), shrinkage (small sponge-liked cavities in the
last solidified section), sweating (irregular metallic pro-
jection on surface of casting), distortion (with respect to
the original shape of casting), and crack (localized dis-
continuity developed from concentrated stress during so-
lidification). The defects, if not detected, influence the Fig. 1 Various defects in investment casting
performance of casting and its service life [18]. Repair
or recycling of the defective castings adds to manufactur-
ing cost and represents wastage of foundry resources. the linear dimensional accuracy (expansion or shrinkage)
The occurrence of casting defects can be prevented by of the ceramic shell, in turn affecting the geometric fidel-
identifying the parameters responsible. This is, however, a ity of castings [5]. Misrun is caused due to low fluidity of
challenging task since several parameters are involved, molten metal, which depends on process parameters relat-
generally related to the material and process for wax pat- ed to ceramic shell making and melting [23]. The param-
tern, ceramic shell, and casting alloy, as listed in Table 1. eters vary in a wide range and are not easy to control.
For example, improper flow of wax pattern in the die Hence, there is a need to identify the most critical param-
causes flash defect in wax pattern, which is exaggerated eters that influence the occurrence of defects, as well as
by primary coating room temperature and humidity [11]. the range of their values to avoid during the process, so
Poor adhesion of ceramic particles in ceramic coating can that the defects are minimized. The approach must be easy
cause inclusions. The coating itself depends on the shell- to implement in industrial practice.
making parameters, such as viscosity, pH, environmental In this work, a casting defect analysis system based
condition (temperature and humidity), duration of coating, on Bayesian inference was developed to analyze and
and final weight of coating. Non-uniform expansion dur- prevent defects in investment castings, by identifying
ing shell backing of the ceramic shell causes cracking, responsible parameters and the avoidable range of their
which is driven by the environmental conditions tuned values. Previous research work in the area of defect
during ceramic shell-making process [27]. The process analysis is presented next, followed by the proposed
parameters related to various sub-processes also affect system and its testing in an industrial foundry.

You might also like