Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Byrne - Literary Analysis
Byrne - Literary Analysis
Emily Byrne
Mrs. Hudak
English III
11 June 2021
Monster or Misunderstood?
“He was the ultimate experiment in Nature Versus Nurture, and she imagined he must be
engaged in a constant battle between what he was and what he wanted to be” (Ione). The idea of
nature vs. nurture is a recurring theme throughout literature. Nature is the influence of genetics,
while nurture is the influence of the environment (McLeod). John Gardner takes the story of
Grendel from Beowulf to provide an alternate perspective, which shows how Grendel becomes a
brute as the result of his environment. Mary Shelley creates Frankenstein as a double-frame
story to give the reader all views on the creature and the effect of his upbringing. The authors of
Grendel and Frankenstein explore the psychological theory of nature vs. nurture to create
monsters whose fiendish behavior could have been circumvented had they been treated more
In introducing Grendel and the creature, the authors describe their nature, which is a
predisposition to evil. Nature is the effect of genetics on how one is perceived based on their
genetic inheritance or other biological factors (McLeod). After his creation comes to life, Victor
Frankenstein describes the atrocious sight in front of him: “No mortal could support the horror of
that countenance. A mummy again endued with animation could not be so hideous as that
wretch” (Shelley 49). Frankenstein refers to his creation as repulsive, and if he cannot see the
beauty, then who will? The creature is susceptible to rejection from the beginning, merely based
on his appearance. The author of Beowulf begins the story with a description of Grendel, saying
Byrne 2
that “He was spawned in that slime,/Conceived by a pair of those monsters born/Of Cain,
murderous creatures banished/By God…” (Raffel 21). Grendel is the product of two monsters
who are the descendants of Cain, a biblical figure known for murdering his brother, Abel. Thus,
the author is saying that Grendel is susceptible to savage behavior based on his genetics. These
opinions, however, came from the stigma that Grendel is “pure, 100% villain—he is a monster,
and he is evil by nature. Gardner takes [Grendel’s] backstory and spins it in a different way by
asking a big question: how can it be fair to inherit wickedness genetically?” (Shmoop). If it is
impossible to inherit wickedness, then can Grendel and the creature be evil by nature? The brutes
may not have the best genetics or family history, but it does not make them villainous. Overall,
When Grendel and the creature tell their perspectives, the impact of nurture and their past
experiences comes into sight. Nurture is the effect that external forces and experiences have on
our personality and future actions (Mcleod). When the Shaper’s song disheartens Grendel, he
approaches the castle. Grendel describes, “drunken men rushed me with battle-axes. I sank to my
knees, crying, ‘Friend! Friend!’ They hacked at me, yipping like dogs” (Gardner 52). Grendel, in
attempting to befriend humans, defends himself while the men attack him. His defense concludes
with the death of at least two men. This action was not evil, but in the eyes of the humans,
Grendel attacked them, becoming a monster. This thought of Grendel’s attack remains, and the
humans label him as an aggressor, not a victim. Grendel realizes that there is no point in
attempting to alter the prejudice of the humans and falls into their stereotype. In Frankenstein,
the creature attempts to become friends with a family. Rather than accept him, they attack the
creature and chase him out of their house. The creature is searching for friendship, but instead,
he finds that “despair had not yet taken possession of [him]; [his] feelings were those of rage and
Byrne 3
revenge” (Shelley 137). The creature needs his friends to receive and embrace him. The
outcome, however, was fury and vengeance: the driving force of a fiend. This incident, along
with many others, turns the creature into a murderous monster. In the beginning, however, the
creature is not virulent, and “while Victor’s creation takes the form of a grotesque-like creature,
the reader discovers, that despite its deformed appearance, the being possesses kindness, intellect
and above all a curiosity concerning the society that surrounds it” (Liou). The creature was not
evil by nature, expressing care and an interest in knowledge. Victor does not breed the creature to
execute and the creature even attempts to avoid this path and stereotype society places on him.
All of humanity did not see him that way, which unfortunately results in his abuse and guides
him towards a dreadful path. Grendel and the creature were not born evil, but their nurture
Grendel and the creature are the results of nurture, not nature, proving that humanity can
avoid their atrocities if society does not provide harsh treatment. With humane treatment, the
brutes will not be as villainous as they resolve to be. After killing Victor’s brother, the creature
finds Victor to explain the events from his perspective. The creature threatens to kill anybody
that Victor loves but is willing to negotiate: “I am content to reason with you. I am malicious
because I am miserable. Am I not shunned and hated by all mankind? You, my creator, would
tear me to pieces and triumph” (Shelley 147). The creature explains that he is evil because he
receives cruelty since he was brought to life. The creature’s inhumanity is the result of
maltreatment. If the humans do not neglect or spurn Grendel or the creature, they will not be as
violent. A scientific study showed that “every child has the potential to become a responsible
adult provided the environment is conducive for his or her development. Therefore, catering to a
given child's needs will facilitate the blooming process” (Sravanti). A child can grow up to be
Byrne 4
benevolent and humane provided the proper environment. Every child has specific necessities.
Not meeting these necessities results in improper child development, which can have
consequences. Similarly, any monster has the potential to become a responsible and kind being.
However, in the wrong environment, the monster can grow to become maleficent. Nurture has a
greater effect than nature because nurture directly influences how one acts as they age, whereas it
is nearly impossible to be born evil. If Grendel and the creature receive ethical guidance, then
The authors of Frankenstein and Grendel manufacture the creature and Grendel, who,
despite being fabricated with the intent of malevolence, search for upright lives before leaning
towards wicked existences. Mary Shelley and John Gardner create characters who are evil in
nature and nurture. However, it is almost impossible to be born evil, and hence, impossible to be
evil by nature. Thus, it is at the fault of nurture that Grendel and the creature behave the way
they do. The use of nature and nurture in Frankenstein and Grendel develops the idea that a
child, or monster, is the result of their environment. Each distinct person requires their unique
habitat to become a responsible adult. The experiences one has, especially while aging out of
Works Cited
Liou, Carter. "Nature Versus Nurture (or How Society Reacted)." The Colby College Community
web.colby.edu/st112wa2018/2018/03/02/nature-versus-nurture-or-how-society-reacted/.
https://www.simplypsychology.org/naturevsnurture.html.
Raffel, Burton. “Beowulf.” Holt Elements of Literature, by Kylene Beers, Holt, Rinehart, and
www.shmoop.com/study-guides/literature/grendel/grendel.
Sravanti, Lakshmi. “Nurture the Nature.” Indian Journal of Psychiatry, Medknow Publications