GREENSHIP

Process & Overview

Ir. Rana Yusuf Nasir

Director Rating & Technology

June 17th 2010

Balai Kartini
 Green Building :
• Reduce the usage of natural resources :
– Energy
– Water
– Material
• Minimize environment impact :
– Waste
– Site
• Improve indoor health & comfort :
– Reduce SBS
– Increase productivity
 Development Process of GREENSHIP

Compare 8 Rating
System : Rating Rating Analysis Identifying
Identification benchmark &
points
1. Steering Committee
2. Expert Further discussion
3. TAG on benchmark &
4. Technical Advisor points
Draft Greenship :
National Form, Process &
Consensus Manual
 Developing the Rating Tools
• Steering Committee : 9
• Technical Advisor – Dr. John Burnett
– Developing BEAMS – Hkg
– Chief Proffessor Polytechnic Uniersity – Hongkong
– Monthly visit
 Discussion w/ Expert : 10 x  Technical Advisory Group :
 Research Institution  4 times full day discussion
 TPIB  Core Founder : 22
 TPAK
 Industry : 26
 University
 Association  Total : 18 times discussion
 Industry
since October 2009
 Certified Green Buildings
 BREEAM UK 1990
 HK-BEAM 1996
 LEED US 1999
 Green Star Australia
 CASBEE Japan
 Green Mark Singapore
 Green Building Index - Msia
 Esteedama Dubai
 + 20 or more
6
 Developing Process : GREENSHIP Rating Tools
Framework : 17th of June :
-Last Revision Launching Greenship
- Last input version 1.0
“New Building” “New Building”

April May June Jul Aug

Finalizing National Training

Greenship Proff
Draft Consensus

Certification Process
 National Consensus

Respondent List
• Government
• Research Institution
• NGO & International Organization
• Associations (Professionals & Companies)
• Companies (GBCI Member)
• Core Founder involve in TAG
• Universities & Educational Institution
• Others (Media, Banking, Insurance)
 National Consensus

Government
• Departemen Pekerjaan Umum
• Dinas Pengawasan dan penertiban Bangunan
• Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup
• Departemen Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral
• Badan Standarisasi Nasional
• Dewan Energi Nasional
• Dewan Nasional Perubahan Iklim
 National Consensus

Research Institution
• Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi (BPPT)
• Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia
• Puslitbangkim Bandung

NGO
• Wahana Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia
• Yayasan Kehati
• Urban and Regional Development Institute
• Pusat Studi Urban Desain
 National Consensus

Himpunan Desainer Interior Indonesia

Research Institution Himpunan Ahli Elektro Indonesia
Persatuan Insinyur Indonesia
Ikatan Arsitek Lansekap Indonesia
REI
Asosiasi Manajemen Properti Indonesia
Asosiasi Ahli Teknik Hotel Seluruh Indonesia
Ikatan Arsitek Indonesia
Asosiasi Industri Luminer dan Kelistrikan Indonesia
ASHRAE
Himpunan Ahli Teknik Iluminasi Indonesia
Ikatan Ahli Fisika Bangunan Indonesia
Ikatan Ahli Sistem dan Konstruksi Mekanis Indonesia
Ikatan Ahli Teknik Penyehatan dan Teknik Lingkungan
Indonesia
Ikatan Ahli Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia
Asosiasi Kontraktor Indonesia
HAKI
GAPENSI
Inkindo DKI Jakarta
Perhimpunan Cendikiawan Lingkungan Indonesia
Asosiasi AsuransiUmum Indonesia
 National Consensus

A Site D
0.39%
2.35%

2.75%

Setuju
Ragu-ragu
Tidak Tahu
94.51%
Tidak Setuju
 National Consensus

Energy EC
0.00%
Setuju
3.85%

Ragu-ragu
1.54%

Tidak Tahu

94.62%

Tidak Setuju
 National Consensus

Water AC
18.26%

0.00%

Setuju
1.74% Ragu-ragu
Tidak Tahu
Tidak Setuju
80.00%
 National Consensus

Material RC
1.48% 2.22%
5.19%

Setuju
Ragu-ragu
Tidak Tahu
91.11% Tidak Setuju
 National Consensus

Indoor HC
11.51%
1.44%
2.16%

Setuju
Ragu-ragu
Tidak Tahu
84.89%
Tidak Setuju
 National Consensus

2.50%
Bldg E Mgmnt
2.50%

2.50%

Setuju
Ragu-ragu
Tidak Tahu
Tidak Setuju
92.50%
 National Consensus

Overall
Setuju Ragu-ragu Tidak Tahu Tidak Setuju
6%
1%

2%

91%
 National Consensus

Most Commented Rating

1. ASD 2 Community Accessibility
2. ASD 3 Public Transportation
3. ASD 5 Site Landscaping
4. ASD 6 Micro Climate
5. EEC 1 Energy Efficiency Measures
6. EEC 3 Ventilation
7. WAC 6 Water Efficiency Landscaping
8. MRC 2 Environmentally Processed Product
9. IHC 3 Chemical Pollutant
10. BEM Prasyarat-1 Basic Waste Management
 GREENSHIP CATEGORY
• Appropriate Site Development (ASD)
• Energy Efficiency Conservation (EEC)
• Water Conservation (WAC)
• Material Resources and Cycle (MRC)
• Indoor Air Health and Comfort (IHC)
• Building Environment Management (BEM)
TOTAL : 45 CRITERIAS and 101 POINTS
 GREENSHIP Rating Tools

Rating Calculation
Crite-
Rating Category Point %
ria
Appropriate Site Development 8 17 16,8%
Energy Efficiency and Conservation 7 26 25,7%
Water Conservation 7 21 20,8%
Material Resources and Cycle 7 14 13,9%
Indoor Health and Comfort 8 10 9,9%
Building Environmental Management 8 13 12,9%
TOTAL 45 101 100,0%
 GREENSHIP Rating Tools

Required Documents
Rating Category Crite- Bench e-docs Paper
ria mark docs
Appropriate Site Development 8 24 5 9
Energy Efficiency and Conservation 7 13 6 11
Water Conservation 7 16 4 13
Material Resources and Cycle 7 12 10 23
Indoor Health and Comfort 8 10 3 8
Building Environmental Management 8 12 2 20
TOTAL 45 87 30 84
 GREENSHIP Rating Tools

Criteria Difficulties
Difficulties
Rating Category Impleme Asses
Cost
ntation ment

Appropriate Site Development - 3 -

Energy Efficiency and Conservation - 1 1
Water Conservation - - -
Material Resources and Cycle 3 3 1
Indoor Health and Comfort - 3 -
Building Environmental Management 1 2 -
TOTAL 4 12 2
 GREENSHIP Rating Tools

Low Hanging Fruits

1. ASD P1 - Basic Green Area
2. ASD 5 - Site Landscaping
3. ASD 6 - Micro Climate
4. EEC P1 – Electrical Sub Metering
5. EEC 4 – Climate Change Impact
6. WAC P1 – Water Metering
7. MRC P1 – Fundamental Refrigerant
8. IHC 2 – Environmental Tobacco Smoke
9. IHC 4 – Outside View
10. IHC 6 – Thermal Comfort
11. BEM 1 – AP as a Member of Project Team
12. BEM 5 – Submission of Green Building Data for Database
13. BEM 6 – Fit Out Guide
14. BEM 7 – Occupant Survey
 GREENSHIP Rating Tools

GREENSHIP Achievements (Total : 101 points)

Min
Achievements %
Point

Platinum 74 73%
Gold / Emas 58 57%
Silver / Perak 47 46%
Bronze / Perunggu 35 35%

Every Building could be a GREEN building!!! :

- Owner’s commitment
- Budget
 GREENSHIP Rating Tools

Indonesia Context
1. ASD P - Basic Green Area  Refer to Local regulation
2. ASD 5 - Site Landscaping  Use Indigenous Plant
3. EEC P1 - OTTV Calculation  Promote OTTV calculation in
Indonesia
4. WAC 4 - Alternative Water Resources  Rainwater, Wudhu
water and Condensate Water
5. MRC 6 - Regional Material  increase domestic economic
growth
6. BEM 5 - Submission of Green Building Implementation
Data for Database  Collect Green Building database in
Indonesia
Category Reviews
 Green Building :
• Reduce the usage of natural resources :
– Energy
– Water
Irreversible
– Material
Assets
• Minimize environment impact :
– Waste
– Site
• Improve indoor health & comfort :
– Reduce SBS
– Increase productivity
 - Not in - High Compact - Less Travel
-Less Private Car
greenfields
-Public transpor- - High Density -Connectivity
-Within the city/
tation -Life Quality - Walking Distance
urban center

Iwan P-VALUEWORKS /2010

 Site
Development
Criteria
Transport Means Private car based

Urban Context Greenfields/Rural

No of household/population Min density : 1 Large Landed

Level of mix-integration Single use

Transport Means Mass transport

Urban Context Greenfileds/Rural

No of household/population Medium  High density

Level of mix-integration Integrated Mix Use

Development
Transport Means Mass transport
Urban Context Urban Peripheral
No of household/population High density
Level of mix-integration Integrated Mix Use
Development
Transport Means Mass transport
Urban Context Urban Downtown
No of household/population High density
Level of mix-integration Integrated Mix Use
Development
 The Big Differences
Icon Comm Complex - Hong Kong Icon Comm. Complex - Jakarta

Iwan P-VALUEWORKS /2010

Grand Mall Grand Mall
Mixed Use Mixed Use
Private car allowed - limited parking Private Car based – large parking
area structure
MRT Station & City check - in No integration with mass transport
system
Connectivity
PERUMAHAN

SD, SMP,
SMA
AL AZHAR
MASJID
AL-AZHAR
PERUMAHAN

UNIV
AL KOMPLEKS
Gedung Kementerian PU :
AZHAR DEP. PU

TELKOM
• In radius 2 km, 7 public
BPN
MEN
PERA
MABES
facility among 20 on the
list
WALI POLRI
SETNAS KOTA MABES
JKT POLRI
ASEAN SEL

LAP. KANTOR
POLRI PUSAT PLN

PERURI

PERUMAHA
N
KOMERSIAL
KOMERSIA
L
TERMINAL
BLOK M

PUSAT PERDAGANGAN
BLOK M

JALUR MRT
JALUR PEDESTRIAN UTARA
Category Reviews
 Energy Consumption

Energy consumption per Capita is Low, while Energy

Intensity is high
600

500
index (Japan = 100)

400

300

200

100

0
Japan OECD Thailand Indonesia Malaysia North Germany
America
Energy Intensity Energy per Capita

• Energy Intensity • Energy Consumption per Capita

(toe per million US$, 1995 price) (toe per capita)
 Japan : 90,31  Japan : 4,07
 Indonesia : 504,46  Indonesia : 0,535
40
 Energy Eff Index

Energy use in Office Building

Regional Our Intensity Good practices Typical

Typical *) **) **)
OFFICE
200 250 97 178
KWH/m2.yr KWH/m2.yr KWH/m2.yr KWH/m2.yr

*) AMPRI Data 2004

**) Technical Notes Rule of Thumb 24/2003 : BSRIA - UK
 Market / Industry
Transformation

Energy Usage

22%

6%
60%

12%

AC System Lighting Building Transport Others

Source: Green Building Index, 2010

 Current Approach
Estimated Building Cooling Load
Check figures – thumb rule – SQFT/TR
APPLICATION LOWER FLOOR TOP FLOOR
General Office 240 ~ 270 220 ~ 230

Executive Office 260 ~ 280 230 ~ 250

Meeting Room 180 ~ 200 165 ~ 180

Restaurant 170 ~ 190 150 ~ 170

Shopping Mall 150 ~ 170 130 ~ 150

Lobby 250 ~ 280 230 ~ 250

Function Room 150 ~ 170 130 ~ 150

Residence 330 ~ 350 300 ~ 320

Theatre / Cinema 0,003 ~ 0,004 per person

 Cooling Load’s component
– Building Envelope
– Lighting (Natural & Artificial)
– People
– Fresh air & infiltration
– Other load/plug load
 Cooling Load Estimation Sheet
ITEM AREA SUN GAIN/ETD FACTOR Btu/H

SOLAR HEAT GAIN - GLASS

Glass . . . . . . . . . . . . Sqft X . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Glass . . . . . . . . . . . . Sqft X . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Glass . . . . . . . . . . . . Sqft X . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SOLAR & TRANSMISSION GAIN – WALLS & ROOF

Wall . . . . . . . . . . . . Sqft X . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Building Envelope
Wall . . . . . . . . . . . . Sqft X . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Wall . . . . . . . . . . . . Sqft X . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Roof . . . . . . . . . . . . Sqft X . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

TRANSMISSION GAIN – EXCEPT WALL & ROOF

Glass . . . . . . . . . . . . Sqft X . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Partition . . . . . . . . . . . . Sqft X . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

INTERNAL HEAT

People . . . . . . . no. of people X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Lights . . . . . . . HP / KW X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Equipment . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

OUTSIDE AIR . . . . . . . CFM X . . . . (TD – F) X 1,09 . . . . . . . . . . . .

SUB-TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . .

Safety Factor . . . . % . . . . . . . . . . . .

ROOM SENSIBLE HEAT . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other
LATENT HEAT

People . . . . . . . no. of people X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Appliances . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

OUTSIDE AIR . . . . . . . CFM X . . . . (w – grain/lb) X 0,68 . . . . . . . . . . . .

SUB-TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . .

Safety Factor . . . . % . . . . . . . . . . . .

ROOM LATENT HEAT . . . . . . . . . . . .

Safety Factor . . . . % (ducting & pipng loss) . . . . . . . . . . . .

GRAND TOTAL HEAT . . . . . . . . . . . . = . . . TR

 Market / Industry
Transformation
Cooling Load

Building Envelope Lighting People Fresh Air Others

Source:
SNI 03-6389-2000 tentang Konservasi Energi Selubung Bangunan pada Bangunan Gedung
 OTTV Calculation

OTTVi = a.[(Uw x (1 – WWR)] x TDEk + (SC x WWR x SF) + (Uf x WWR x DT)

Heat Conduction Heat Conduction Solar Heat Gain

through Walls + through Windows + through Windows

OTTV total =
( OTTV 1 x A1) + (OTTV2 x A2) + .......+ (OTTVi x Ai)
A1 + A2 +.....+ Ai
Building Envelope
Building Envelope
 Parameter
OTTV Simulation
Unit Base Bldg OTTV = 40
Designed Building
OTTV = 35 OTTV = 30
KWH % KWH % KWH %

Main AC Plant
Estimated Building Cooling Load Ton Ref 435 407 6,3% 380 12,7% 352 19,0%
AC Unit (Chiller, Unitary, Split) KW/TR 0,676 0,676 Same 0,676 Same 0,676 Same
Chill Water Pump -CHWPP (primary) KW/TR 0,097 0,097 Same 0,097 Same 0,097 Same
Chill Water Pump -CHWPS (secondary) KW/TR - - - - - - -
Condenser Water Pump -CWP KW/TR 0,061 0,061 Same 0,061 Same 0,061 Same
Cooling Tower -CT KW/TR 0,039 0,039 Same 0,039 Same 0,039 Same
Total AC Plant KW/TR 0,873 0,873 Same 0,873 Same 0,873 Same
Total AC Plant Energy Consumption KWH/year 987.338 924.806 6,3% 862.275 12,7% 799.744 19,0%

Air Distribution (AHU, Indoor Unit) KWH/year 101.739 101.739 Same 101.739 Same 101.739 Same

Artificial Lighting W/m2 15 15 Same 15 Same 15 Same

KWH/year 390.000 390.000 Same 390.000 Same 390.000 Same

Vertical Transportation (lift, escalator) KWH/year 198.000 198.000 Same 198.000 Same 198.000 Same

Car Park Ventilation KWH/year - - - -

Other KWH/year 343.916 343.916 Same 343.916 Same 343.916 Same

Summary Unit Base Bldg Designed Designed Designed

Chiller Plant KWH/year 987.338 924.806 6,3% 862.275 12,7% 799.744 19,0%
Air Distribution KWH/year 101.739 101.739 Same 101.739 Same 101.739 Same
Lighting KWH/year 390.000 390.000 Same 390.000 Same 390.000 Same
Lift & Escalator Lift & Escalator KWH/year 198.000 198.000 Same 198.000 Same 198.000 Same
Carpark MV KWH/year - - - -
Others KWH/year 343.916 343.916 Same 343.916 Same 343.916 Same
Total Building Energy Consumption KWH/year 2.020.993 1.958.461 3,1% 1.895.930 6,2% 1.833.398 9,3%
Total EEI KWH/m2.year 202 196 3,1% 190 6,2% 183 9,3%
% of Improvement % 3,1% 7,3%
6,2% 18,1%
9,3%
Architect - Shifting of Design Paradigm
• Recently :
– Design iconic, unique, monumental building
– Focus on esthetics, function, room organization

• Shifting to :
– Responsibility on climate change
– First step - building envelope  energy
– Cooling load and natural lighting
What Next ??
 Should they perform the same?
NEW ‘Green’ Buildings EXISTING Grey Building
 New Building vs Existing Building
New Building : Existing Building :
• Start from “zero” • “Grey” building - is fixed
• Design • Operation & Maintenance
• Promise • Improvement
• Most on “paper” • Actual Performance
• Fill-in the gap • Energy, Water & Indoor Air
Quality
• Transform the practices
• Continuity from NB
 The gap

Regulation Implementation

Design As Built

Promise Achieved

Non-standard Based Standar based

 Building Industry Player
• Still digesting about green concept
• Green label as a marketing tools
• Less concern of green performance.
 Green Building Concept
• It is not only a technology or engineering issue
• Nor a trend,
• It is a change of :
– mindset
– behavior,
– a way of life
– culture
• It is a future
 GLOBAL FUTURE TREND
TODAY, sustainability is . . . TOMORROW, it is . . . . . . .

• Nice to have • MUST HAVE

• An area of interest • A mandate for action

• A project in individual • A strategy for an entire

building portfolio
• A business case to • A standard & code
justify