Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table 1:comparison of Spectrum Sensing Methods
Table 1:comparison of Spectrum Sensing Methods
To implement effective spectrum utilization, cognitive radio (CR) has been developed
.A CR system employs dynamic spectrum resource allocation, which allows
secondary users (SUs) to share spectrum resources allocated to the primary users
(PUs) without interfering with the use of resources by PUs. To perceive the existence
of PUs, CR uses the spectrum sensing technique to perceive the existence of PUs. By
sensing the frequency band usage of PUs without changing the allocation of spectrum
resources, CR can greatly improve spectrum utilization.
For nonstationary signals, on the other hand, the autocorrelation does depend on
central time t. For the special case of nonstationary signals is called cyclostationary
signals, the autocorrelation is either a periodic function or an almost periodic function.
In either case, it can be represented by a Fourier series.
For many cyclostationary signal like bpsk modulated signal its conjugated
autocorrelation is also non zero .This feature is used for spectrum sensing.
Assumptions :
1. The signal is bpsk modulated signal
2. System is single input single output (SISO)
Simulation Parameters:
1. Modulation technique :bpsk
2. No of symbols :10
3. Carrier frequency :10 MHz
4. Channel condition: flat fading
5. Noise :Gaussian
6. Signal to noise ratio:-30 to 30 db
7. Cyclic frequency :0
Observation:
Objective :
To sense in the given spectrum whether primary user (PU) is present or not and note
the effect of cyclic frequency on probability of detection .Also note the effect
interference of other signal on probability of detection.
Assumptions :
1. The signal is bpsk modulated signal
2. System is single input single output (SISO)
Simulation Parameters:
1.Modulation technique :bpsk
2.No of symbols :10
3.Carrier frequency :10 MHz
4.Channel condition: flat fading
5.Noise :Gaussian
6.Signal to noise ratio:-30 to 30 db
7.Signal to interference ration: 3db
8.Interfence signal modulation :AM
9.Cyclic frequency :2fc
Observation:
Assumptions :
1. The signal is bpsk modulated signal
2. System is multiple input multiple output (MIMO)(2x2)
Simulation Parameters:
1. Modulation technique :bpsk
2. No of symbols :10
3. Carrier frequency :10 MHz
4. Channel condition: flat fading
5. Noise :Gaussian
6. Signal to noise ratio:-30 to 30 db
7. Cyclic frequency :0
8. Combining technique: Selection combining detection
Observation:
Fig 10. Probability of detection vs snr for 100 iterations using selection combining
technique
Objective :
To sense in the given spectrum whether primary user (PU) is present or not and note
the effect of cyclic frequency and increase in on probability of detection .Also note
the effect interference of other signal on probability of detection.
Assumptions :
1. The signal is bpsk modulated signal
2. System is multiple input multiple output (MIMO)(2x2)
Simulation Parameters:
1.Modulation technique :bpsk
2.No of symbols :10
3.Carrier frequency :10 MHz
4.Channel condition: flat fading
5.Noise :Gaussian
6.Signal to noise ratio:-30 to 30 db
7.Cyclic frequency :2fc
8. Combining technique: Selection combining detection
Observation:
Fig 11. Probability of detection vs snr for 100 iterations at α=2fc using selection
combining technique
Fig 12.Probability of detection vs snr for 100 iterations at α=2fc+α °
(with interreference) using selection combining technique .
Conclusion:
Any modulated signal is cyclostationarity in nature, they have periodic statistical
variation. Modulated signal are highly correlated and noise is random in nature
.Hence this property can be exploited to sensing spectrum for cognitive radio .At
medium and higher snr we get better detection of primary user as compared to lower
snr .Hence at higher snr the detection is immune to noise and better detection is
possible as compared to lower snr. As iteration increases chances of miss detection
increases . Average probability of detection is 0.911. As cyclic frequency increases
the detection probability increases even at the lowest snr values .If cyclic frequency is
taken into consideration then then inference with any other signal is not much affected
at higher snr. There is no considerable effect of increasing antenna on probability of
detection but computation cost increases .