Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Business Law 1-5
Business Law 1-5
2
Civil and Commercial Code of Thailand
3
Some Words and their Meaning
Thing and Property
Thing (ทรัพย์)
• Section 137 of the Civil and Commercial Code
“Things are corporeal objects.”
• In legal terms, a thing is a corporeal object i.e. has a form,
shape, appearance and it is tangible.
• i.e. table, computer, car etc.
Property (ทรัพย์สนิ )
• Section 138 of the Civil and Commercial Code
“Property includes things as well as incorporeal objects,
susceptible of having a value and of being appropriated.”
• In legal term, a property includes things and incorporeal
objects that have a value and can be carried, possessed or
owned. 4
5
Things: Section 139-142
Thing can be classified into:
• I. Immovable things (อสังหาริ มทรัพย์) and movable things (สังหาริ มทรัพย์)
• II. Indivisible things and divisible things
10
Things: Section 139-142
• (4) A juristic act or legal act to acquire right in an immovable
thing has to comply with a legal form i.e. a contract on leasing
land for three (3) years must be in writing and signed by the
parties of the contract. In general, no legal form for movable
things.
12
Things: Section 139-142
Things
• Section 142 “Indivisible things are those which cannot be
separated without alteration in its substance as well as
those which are considered indivisible by law.”
• Indivisible things
• (1) Things that cannot be divided due to its condition or
nature. Any division of the thing will cause a change in
condition or nature of the thing i.e. house, fan, chair and
computer etc.
• (2) Things which are unlawful to divide i.e. a company
share.
Section 1118 “Shares are indivisible.
If a share is held by two or more persons in common,
they must appoint one of them to exercise their rights as
shareholders. 13
Persons holding a share in common are jointly liable to
the company for payment of the amount of the share.”
Divisible Things vs. Indivisible Things
14
Things vs. Property
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-dQdSXnhAY
15
Things:
A Component Part of a Thing (ส่ วนควบ)
Section 1 “A component part of a thing is that which, according to
its nature or local custom, is essential to its existence and cannot be
separated without destroying, damaging or altering its form or
nature.
The owner of a thing has ownership in all its component parts.”
1
Accessory: Section 147
Section 147 “Accessories are movable things, which are,
according to the usual local conception or clear intention of
the owner of the principal thing, attached to such thing
permanently for its management, use or preservation, and,
by connection, adjustment or otherwise, brought by the
owner into the relation with the principal thing, in which it
must serve the principal thing.
Even though an accessory is temporarily served from
the principal thing, it does not cease to be an accessory.
Saving special disposition to the contrary, the accessory
follows the principal thing.”
1
Accessory: Section 147
An accessory (อปกรณ์ ) is a movable thing that serve a principal
things (ทรพย์ ประธ น). It can be either immovable or movable. For
example, a mouse (accessory) plugged into a computer (principal
thing).
An accessory is attached permanently or temporarily to a
principal thing for its management, use or preservation.
Unless agreed otherwise, a sale of principal thing is a sale of
accessory as well.
1
Accessory: Section 147
20
Fruit: Section 148
Section 148 “By fruit of a thing is a natural fruit and legal
fruit.
22
Fruit: Section 148
23
Person: Section 15 and 65
(I) Natural person (บุคคลธรรมดา) - A human person with the full
completion of birth as a living child and end with death.
• Section 15 “Personality begins with the full completion of
birth as a living child and ends with death.”
(II) Juristic person (นิติบคุ คล) - A nonhuman person that comes into
existence by the law. A juristic person is formed by natural
person collectively and is registered as according to law. Upon
registration, a juristic person (i.e. a foundation, an association, a
company limited, a public company limited etc.) is considered as
a separate person or an entity from its members, owners,
founders or shareholders.
• Section 65 “A juristic person can come into existence only 24
by this Code or of other law.”
Rights
Rights are benefits verified and protected by the law.
Law provides two types of rights to a natural person and a juristic
person:
• (I) Personal rights (บคคลสทธ) are right to do something or refrain
from doing something. They can be called as “Contractual
rights or “Debt rights which are enforceable against
particular persons.
• For example, the right of a creditor to request for payment
of money debt from a debtor, the right of a creditor to claim
against a debtor in court for default in payment of loan etc.
• Personal right arises from a juristic (legal) act i.e. a contract
or a tort.
• Personal rights are only enforceable against a debtor or
successors of debtor.
**Debtor here includes anyone who has an obligation to 25
perform or to refrain from performing. It does not only refer to a
debtor of a money debt.
Rights
Law provides two types of rights to a natural person and a juristic
person (Cont.):
• (II) Real rights (ทรพยสทธ) are rights in property which arise from
specific provision of the law. Real right in property are binding
on everyone, not just parties of contract.
• Real rights in property cannot be provided through a juristic
act from a person.
Section 1298 “Real rights may be created only by the virtue
of this Code or other laws.”
2
Rights
• For example: a person who has ownership tile of a property
has the rights in property to prevent anyone from owning or
using property.
Section 1336 . Within the limits of law, the owner of
property has the right to use and dispose of it and
acquires its fruits; he has the right to follow and recover
it from any person not entitled to detain it and has the
right to prevent unlawful interference with it.
(b) Written evidence signed by the party liable; for example, a promise contract to sell
house and land, sale of movable property (sale price is 20,000 baht or more) etc. (i.e.
Section 456 Paragraph 2 and 3, Section 538);
Section 456 (paragraph 2). An agreement to sell or to buy any of
immovable property, or a promise of sale of such property is not enforceable by
action unless there is some written evidence signed by the party liable or unless
earnest is given, or there is part performance. The same rule applies to ships or
vessels of six tons and over, to steam launches or motor boats of five tons and over,
to floating houses and to beasts of burden.
The provisions of the foregoing paragraph shall apply to a contract of sale
of movable property where the agreed price is twenty hundred baht or upwards.
32
(d) Other special forms of documents.
Q&A
Thank you 33
Business Law
Class 2: Juristic Acts and Obligations
35
Juristic Act as Source of Obligations
Sources of Obligations
• I. Juristic act (นตกรรม)
• Contract
• Will
• II. Legal cause/ causative event (นต หต)
• Tort/ wrongful act
• Action that unfairly causes someone else to suffer, loss or harm resulting in
legal liability for the person who commits the tortious act, called a tortfeasor.
The victim of the harm can recover their loss as damages in a lawsuit.
• Section 420. A person who, willfully or negligently, unlawfully injures the
life, body, health, liberty, property or any right of another person, is said
to commit a wrongful act and is bound to make compensation therefore.
• Management of affairs without mandate
• A case where one person, the “manager assumes the management of the
affairs of another person, the “principal , without authority or delegation.
• Section 395. A person who takes charge of an affair for another without
having received mandate from him or being otherwise entitled to do so in
respect of him, shall manage the affair in such manner as the interest of
the principal requires, having regard to his actual or presumptive wishes.
• Undue enrichment
• A benefit by chance or mistake for which the one enriched has not paid or
worked.
• Section 406. Any person who, through an act of performance made by
another person or in any other manner, obtains something to the
prejudice of such other person without legal ground, must return it to the
latter. 3
• Legal duties e.g. duty to pay tax
Legal Cause:
Management of Affairs Without Mandate
• Section 395. A person who takes charge of an affair for
another without having received mandate from him or being
otherwise entitled to do so in respect of him, shall manage the
affair in such manner as the interest of the principal requires,
having regard to his actual or presumptive wishes.
• Management of affairs without mandate is a case where one
person, the “manager”, assumes the management of the affairs of
another person, the “principal”, without authority or delegation.
The manager must manage the affairs in accordance with the
wishes and needs of the principal as well as exercise care in
undertaking sufficient actions with respect to the particular
situation.
• Management of affairs without mandate arises when the principal
is unable to manage his/her own affairs. If the manager is not
aware of the intentions of the principal, the manager must
undertake the management of affairs pursuant to standards which
are suitable to the situation and circumstances 3
Source of
obligations
Legal
Juristic cause/
act causative
event
• Contract
• Will 1. Tort
Obligations 2. Management of affair
without mandate 3
3. Undue enrichment
4. Legal duties e.g. duty
to pay tax.
Definition of Juristic Act
Section 149. Juristic act are voluntary lawful acts, the
immediate purpose of which is to establish between persons
relations, to create, modify, transfer, preserve or extinguish
rights.
Elements of Juristic Act
• Act
• Lawfulness
• Voluntariness
• Intention of creating legal consequences
• Intention of establishing the person relations
• Intention of moving person’s right
• Movement of rights: to create the right that has not existed,
to modify the right that has existed to the different right, to
transfer the right to another person, to preserve the right
that has existed to be more stable, to extinguish the right
that exist to be invalid. 3
Types of Juristic Act
I. Divided by the numbers of parties
• Unilateral Act: will
• Bilateral Act: many agreements/ contracts i.e. purchase agreement (seller
vs. buyer), lease agreement (landlord vs. tenant)
• Multilateral Act: partnership agreement, company formation agreement
• Section 1012. A contract for the organization of a partnership or
company is a contract whereby two or more persons agree to
unite for a common undertaking, with a view of sharing profit
the profits which may be derived therefrom.
• Section 1097. Any three or more persons may, by subscribing
their names to a memorandum and otherwise complying with
the provisions of this Code, promote and form a limited company.
II. Divided by the validity of juristic act
• Validity: Juristic act is valid and enforceable.
• Invalidity
• Void ( มฆะ): A juristic act is not effective from the beginning.
• Voidable ( มฆยะ): A juristic act which is voidable can be ineffective and
unenforced if the person who has the right nullifies the act. 40
• Unenforceable: A juristic act is effective for parties, but law affords no
enforcement.
Essential Elements of a Valid Juristic Act
Person (Legal capacities of contractual parties)
• Section 153. An act which does not comply with the
requirements concerning capacity of person is voidable.
Purpose (Illegality/ Impossibility of purpose)
• Section 150. An act is void if its object is expressly
prohibited by law or is impossible or is contrary to public
order or good morals.
Form (Formalities requirements)
• Section 152. An act which is not in the form prescribed by
law is void.
Intention (Expression of intention)
• Section 151. An act is not void on account of its differing
from a provision of any law if such law does not relate to 41
public order or good moral.
I. Person
Types of Person
• Natural Person
• Juristic Person
I. Natural Person
Normally, a person can own and exercise his rights. There are
exceptions: some types of person who are owning right;
however, they cannot fully exercise their right.
Section 153. An act which does not comply with the
requirements concerning capacity of person is voidable.
• Minor (ผ้ ย ว์)
• Unsound mind person (คนวกลจรต)
• Adjudged incompetent person (คน ร้คว มส ม รถ)
• Adjudged quasi-incompetent person (คน สมอน ร้คว มส ม รถ) 42
Natural Person
Minor (Section 19-27)
Section 1448. A marriage can take place only when the man
and woman have completed their seventeenth year of age. But
43
the Court may, in case of having appropriate reason, allow
them to marry before attaining such age.
Minor
Minor (Section 19-27) Cont.
**Section 21. For the doing of a juristic act, a minor must
obtain the consent of his legal representative. (ผ้ ทน ดยช บธรรม)
All acts done by him without such consent are voidable unless
otherwise provided.
Section 23. A minor can do all acts which are strictly personal.
e.g. Section 1547. A child born of the parents who are not married to
each other is legitimate by the subsequent marriage of the parents, or
by the registration made on application by the father, or by a
judgment of the Court.
Section 24. A minor can do all acts which are suitable to his
condition in life, and actually required for his reasonable
needs. e.g. buy food, apparel 44
4
Adjudged Incompetent Person
Adjudged incompetent person (Section 28, 29, 31)
Section 28. A person of unsound mind may be adjudged
incompetent by the Court on the application of any spouse,
ascendants, descendants, guardian or curator, a person taking
care of the person or the Public Prosecutor.
The person adjudged incompetent under paragraph one
must be placed under guardianship. The appointment of guardian
(ผ้ ทน ดยช บธรรม), power and duties of guardian, and termination of
guardianship shall be in accordance with provisions of Book V of
this Code.
Section 28. A person of unsound mind may be adjudged incompetent by the Court on
the application of any spouse, ascendants, descendants, guardian or curator, a
person taking care of the person or the Public Prosecutor.
52
Juristic Person
II. Juristic Person (Section 65-77)
• Example
• Administrative Department
• Temple
• Partnership: limited, unlimited
• Company: private, public
• Chulalongkorn University
53
Juristic Person
II. Juristic Person (Section 65-77)
Section 66. A juristic person has rights and duties conformity
with the provisions of this Code or of other law within the
scope of its power and duties, or its object as provided by or
defined in the law, regulation or constitutive act.
Section 67. Subject to Section 66, a juristic person enjoys the
same rights and is subject to the same duties as a natural
person, by reason of their nature, may only be enjoyed or
incurred only by a natural person.
Section 70. A juristic person must have one or several
representatives as prescribed by the law, regulations or its
constitutive act, decisions as to the affairs of juristic persons
are made by a majority of the representatives.
• Acts of juristic person must be done by its representative e.g.
directors.
• A juristic person enjoys the same rights and is subject to the same
duties as a natural person except some rights which may only be 54
enjoyed or incurred only by a natural person by its nature.
• A juristic person can be sued under both civil and criminal law.
II. Purpose
Purpose of Juristic Acts
• e.g. sale agreement
• Seller’s purpose: payment
• Buyer’s purpose: transferring of title/ownership of goods
• Section 150. An act is void if its object is expressly
prohibited by law or is impossible, or is contrary to public
order or good morals.
• The purpose must be lawful, possible and not contrary to
public order or good morals; otherwise, the act will be void.
• ***The Principle of Freedom of Contract***
• Section 151. An act is not void on account of its
differing from a provision of any law if such law does
not relate to public order or good moral.
55
II. Purpose
Example: some sections in Civil and Commercial Code of Thailand
regulates the loan agreement
5
Q&A
Thank you 57
Business Law
Class 3: Juristic Acts and Obligations (Part 2)
Section 653. A loan of money for a sum exceeding twenty thousand baht
in capital is not enforceable by action unless there be some written
evidence of the loan signed by the borrower.
2
3
Intention
(1) Difference between internal and declared intentions (Cont.)
• 1.2 Fictitious declaration of intention ( จตน ลวง) Section 155
Paragraph 1
Section 155. A declaration of intention made with the
connivance of the other party which is fictitious is void; but
its invalidity cannot be set up against third persons injured
by the fictitious declaration of intention and acting in good
faith.
e.g. A conspires with B to sell his car to B in order to avoid C to
legally take it. The sell agreement between A and B will be void
under Section 155. However, if B sold the car to D, who bought it
in good faith, the car will belong to D.
4
Section 155. A declaration of intention
made with the connivance of the other
party which is fictitious is void. 5
Section 155. A declaration of intention
made with the connivance of the other
party which is fictitious is void; but its
invalidity cannot be set up against third
persons injured by the fictitious
declaration of intention and acting in good
faith.
Intention
(1) Difference between internal and declared intentions
(Cont.)
• 1.3 Concealed act (นตกรรมอ พร ง) Section 155 Paragraph 2
Section 155 (the second paragraph). If a declaration of
fictitious intention under paragraph one is made to conceal
another juristic act, the provisions of law relating to the
concealed act shall apply.
e.g. A wants to give B (A’s daughter) a diamond ring but does not
want C (A’s another daughter) to be sad. Then, A discloses that
she sells it to B.
Intention
(1) Difference between internal and declared intentions (Cont.)
• 1.4 Mistake as to an essential element of the juristic act (ส คญผด นสง
ซง ปนส ระส คญ ห่งนตกรรม) Section 156
Section 156. A declaration of intention is void if made under a
mistake as to an essential element of the juristic act.
0
A mistake as to a person to be a
partner of the juristic act.
1
A mistake as to a property being an object
of the juristic act.
2
Intention
(2) Distorted declaration of intention
• 2.1 Mistake as to quality of person or property (ส คญผด นคณสมบต
ของบคคลหรอทรพย์สน) Section 157-158
• 2.2 Fraud (กลฉ้อฉล) Section 159-163
• 2.3 Duress (ข่มข่) Section 165-166
3
Intention
(2) Distorted declaration of intention
• 2.1 Mistake as to quality of person or property (ส คญผด นคณสมบต
ของบคคลหรอทรพย์สน) Section 157-158
Section 157. A declaration of intention is voidable if made
under a mistake as to a quality of the person.
5
A mistake as to a quality of the object.
Intention
(2) Distorted declaration of intention
• 2.2 Fraud (กลฉ้อฉล) Section 159-163
Section 159. A declaration of intention produced by fraud is
voidable.
1
Intention
Section 161
2
Intention
(2) Distorted declaration of intention
• 2.2 Fraud (Section 159-163)
Section 162. (กลฉ้อฉล ดยก รนง) In bilateral juristic acts, the
intentional silence of one of the parties in respect to a fact or
quality of which the other party is ignorant, is deemed to be a
fraud if it is proved that, without it, the act would not have
been made.
e.g. In life insurance agreement, the assurer does not tell the insurer
that he has a cancer.
Thank you 88
Section 163
0
A Contract or an Agreement
What is it?
• A juristic act arising from two or more parties declaring their common
intentions to give raise to rights and obligations which are legally binding.
Formation of a Contract
• Offer from one party
• Acceptance from the other party and
• The offer and the acceptance are completely correct and in line with each
other.
1
A Contract or an Agreement
2
The Effect of Declaration
Section 168. A declaration of intention made to a person in his presence takes effect
from the time when it becomes known to the receiver of the intention. This also
apply to the declaration of intention made by one person to the other through
telephone, other communication devices, or other means through which similar
communication can be made.
Section 169. A declaration of intention made to a person not in his presence takes
effect from the time when it reached the receiver of the intention. If does not
become effective if a revocation reaches him previously or simultaneously.
Even though the person who made a declaration of intention dies, becomes
incompetent or quasi-incompetent by an order of the Court after it has been sent,
the validity of declaration is not impaired thereby.
3
The Effect of Declaration
Declaration made a person at a distance. When the intention reaches the receivable.
4
Elements of Contract
5
Parties
The “Mirror Image” Rule: There is a “contract at the time when an offer and an
acceptance become identical.
• An offer must be accepted exactly without modifications.
• Question: In case that there is modification, what will happen?
• A modified acceptance becomes a new offer.
A (Seller) B (Buyer)
I have a diamond ring to offer you at Okay. I want to buy it at that price.
one million baht.
• In due time
Clear and offer acceptance • No additions, restrictions,
definite other modifications
Contract
Section 361. The contract comes into existence at the time when the notice of acceptance reaches the offeror.
Purposes of Contract
100
Types of Contract
Unilateral Contract/ Bilateral Contract/Multilateral Contract
Contract for the benefit of the party of the contract V.S. Contract for the benefit of a
third party
A deposit can be money or other things of value which one contractual party delivered to
the other contractual party when entering into a contract. The deposit is the proof of the
conclusion of the contract and it is the security that the contract will be performed.
The deposit must be delivered, therefore immovable property cannot be used as deposit since
it cannot be delivered.
(2). To be forfeited, if the party giving it fails to perform, or if the performance becomes
impossible in consequence of the circumstance for which he is responsible or if the
rescission of the contract is due to his fault.
(3). To be returned, if the party receiving it fails to perform, or, if the performance becomes
impossible in consequence of a circumstance for which he is responsible.
102
Penalty บยปรับ (Section 379-383)
What is it ?
• A penalty is damages or compensation for damage which the contractual parties
agreed in advance.
• The debtor agreed that if the debtor does not perform his obligation in the
contract or does not perform it correctly, the penalty is forfeited, or the debtor is
requested to make payment of the penalty.
1. A deposit must be delivered to the other contractual party when entering into the
contract. However, a penalty amount can be delivered or not be delivered to the other
contractual party.
2. A deposit is something given to act as a security that the contract shall be
performed. A penalty amount is payable if the debtor does not perform his obligation
in the contract and damages has incurred. A deposit secures the performance of the
contract while a penalty compensates for the damages that arise.
104
Rescission of Contract ก ร ลกสัญญ
Right to terminate the contract
• By the agreement of parties to contract
• By provisions of law
• Right to terminate for delayed performance
• Right to terminate for impossibility of performance
Section 386. If by contract or by the provisions of law one party has the right
of rescission, such rescission is made by a declaration of intention to the
other party.
Section 387. If one party does not perform the obligation, the other party may fix a
reasonable period and notify him to perform within that period. If he does not
perform within that period, the other party may rescind the contract.
. 10
Right to Terminate for Delayed Performance
Section 388. If the object of a contract according to its nature or to an intention
declared by the parties can be accomplished only by performance at a fixed time or
within a fixed period, and such time or period has passed without one of the
parties having performed, the other party may rescind the contract without the
notification mentioned in the foregoing section.
The party has right to rescind without duty to notified the party who has delayed in
performance.
For example, A agree to organize grand opening ceremony for B’s company April 25,
2018 which is the first day of B’s company. However, A cannot do it on that date. B can
then terminate the contract without any prior notice.
10
Right to Terminate for Impossibility of Performance
Section 389. If performance becomes wholly or partly impossible by a cause
attributable to the debtor, the creditor may rescind the contract.
For example, A agrees to sell her car to B and B agrees to pay the purchase price when
A delivers the car. However, a fire destroyed the car completely due to A’s negligence. B
can then terminate the contract.
10
Effect of Rescission
Section 391. If one party has exercised his right of rescission, each party is bound
to restore the other to his former condition; but the rights of third persons cannot
be impaired.
For services rendered and for allowing the use of a thing the restitution shall be
made by paying the value, or, if in the contract a counter-payment in money is
stipulated for, this shall be paid.
**The exercise of the right of rescission does not affect a claim for damages.
Effect of rescission: restore to the former condition or paying the value or counter-
payment in money + interest.
Section 7. Whenever interest is to be paid, and the rate is not fixed by a juristic
act or by an express provision in the law, it shall be seven and a half per cent
(7.5%) per year.
10
Q&A
Thank you
110
Business Law
Tort Law
111
Torts in Civil & Commercial Code
112
Torts in Civil & Commercial Code
Damage Arising from Persons
1. No liability without fault (Liability for his owned wrongful acts)
• Section 420
2. No fault liability
• Damage arising from the other person’s acts Liability for other person’s
wrongful acts)
• Damage arising from properties (Liability for wrongful acts caused by his
owned properties)
113
General Concept of Tort Law
114
General Concept of Tort Law
Criteria for Tort Liability in Section 420
1. There is an act with conscious of a person to another person.
• Natural person and juristic person
2. The act is willful or negligent.
• Willfulness: knowing that his act will injure another person.
• Negligence e.g. driving a car faster than the speed limit regulated by law.
3. The act is unlawful.
4. There is injury arising from the act.
• Property loss
• Mental loss
• Life
• Body/ Health
5. There is a causation arising from the act.
• Link between the act and injury
115
No Fault Liability under Thai Law: Liability for the Other Person’s Acts
(Damages Arising from Person)
General Rules
• Section 425 Employer v. Employee
Section 425. An employer is jointly liable with his employee for the consequences of a
wrongful act committed by such an employee in the course of his employment.
Section 425. An employer is jointly liable with his employee for the
consequences of a wrongful act committed by such an employee in the course
of his employment.
• A legal doctrine stating that an employer must be responsible of actions that his
employees performed within the course of their employment.
• Why must an employer be jointly liable with an employee in the course of his
employment?
117
Employer v. Employee
Section 425. An employer is jointly liable with his employee for the
consequences of a wrongful act committed by such an employee in the
course of his employment.
• An employer is jointly liable with his employee for the consequences of a
wrongful act committed by such employee in the course of his
employment.
• Only in the scope of the contract of service/labor contract.
• The contract of hiring of work is not included in this section.
Section 426. The employer who has made compensation to a third person
for a wrongful act committed by his employee is entitled to reimbursement
from such employee.
• The employer who has made compensation to a third person for a
wrongful act committed by his employee is entitled to reimbursement
from such employee.
118
Employer vs. Employee
Section 425
• The employee commits the wrongful act.
• The employee is in the course of his employment.
• Whether the action of tort is relating to the work and exists while the
employee is working for his employer.
119
Employer vs. Employee
Results
• The employee is liable for his wrongful act. (Section 420 and 423)
• The employer is jointly liable for his employee’s wrongful act. Section
425)
• The employer can take recourse from his employee for the compensation
that he has made. (Section 426)
Section 425. An employer is jointly liable with his employee for the
consequences of a wrongful act committed by such an employee in the
course of his employment.
Section 426. The employer who has made compensation to a third person
for a wrongful act committed by his employee is entitled to reimbursement
from such employee.
120
Q&A
Thank you
121
Midterm Exam: 40 marks
122