Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 17

TRANSDISCIPLINARY ENGINEERING FOR

RESILIENCE: RESPONDING TO SYSTEM


DISRUPTIONS
Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering
Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering (ATDE) is a peer-reviewed book series covering the
developments in the key application areas in product quality, production efficiency and overall
customer satisfaction.
ATDE will focus on theoretical, experimental and case history-based research, and its
application in engineering practice. The series will include proceedings and edited volumes of
interest to researchers in academia, as well as professional engineers working in industry.

Editor-in-Chief
Josip Stjepandić, PROSTEP AG, Darmstadt, Germany
Co-Editor-in-Chief
Richard Curran, TU Delft, The Netherlands
Advisory Board
Cees Bil, RMIT University, Australia
Milton Borsato, Federal University of Technology – Parana, Brazil
Shuo-Yan Chou, Taiwan Tech, Taiwan, China
Fredrik Elgh, Jönköping University
Parisa Ghodous, University of Lyon, France
Kazuo Hiekata, University of Tokyo, Japan
John Mo, RMIT University, Australia
Essam Shehab, Cranfield University, UK
Mike Sobolewski, TTU, Texas, USA
Amy Trappey, NTUT, Taiwan, China
Wim J.C. Verhagen, TU Delft, The Netherlands
Wensheng Xu, Beijing Jiaotong University, China

Volume 16
Recently published in this series
Vol. 15. M. Shafik and K. Case (Eds.), Advances in Manufacturing Technology XXXIV –
Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Manufacturing Research,
incorporating the 35th National Conference on Manufacturing Research, 7–10
September 2021, University of Derby, Derby, UK
Vol. 14. X. Lei (Ed.), ISMR 2020 – Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on
Innovation & Sustainability of Modern Railway
Vol. 13. K. Säfsten and F. Elgh (Eds.), SPS2020 – Proceedings of the Swedish Production
Symposium, October 7–8, 2020

ISSN 2352-751X (print)


ISSN 2352-7528 (online)
Transdisciplinary Engineering for
Resilience: Responding to System
Disruptions
Proceedings of the 28th ISTE International Conference on
Transdisciplinary Engineering, July 5 – July 9, 2021

Edited by
Linda Newnes
The University of Bath, UK

Susan Lattanzio
The University of Bath, UK

Bryan R. Moser
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA and
University of Tokyo, Japan

Josip Stjepandić
PROSTEP AG, Germany
and
Nel Wognum
Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

Amsterdam  Berlin  Washington, DC


© 2021 The authors and IOS Press.

This book is published online with Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0).

ISBN 978-1-64368-208-2 (print)


ISBN 978-1-64368-209-9 (online)
Library of Congress Control Number: 2021946928
doi: 10.3233/ATDE16

Publisher
IOS Press BV
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
Netherlands
fax: +31 20 687 0019
e-mail: order@iospress.nl

For book sales in the USA and Canada:


IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel.: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com

LEGAL NOTICE
The publisher is not responsible for the use which might be made of the following information.

PRINTED IN THE NETHERLANDS


v

Preface
This book of proceedings contains papers that have been peer-reviewed and accepted for
the 28th ISTE International Conference on Transdisciplinary Engineering, organized by
the University of Bath, United Kingdom, July 5–9, 2021. TE2021 has been the second
conference in the series that was organized in a virtual manner due to the COVID-19
world-wide crisis. The papers published in this book of proceedings, as well as video
presentations, were accessible from July 5 till July 9 in Teams, while questions and an-
swers were being exchanged.
This is the tenth issue of the series “Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering”,
which publishes the proceedings of the TE (formerly: CE) conference series and accom-
panying events. The TE conference series is organized annually by the International So-
ciety of Transdisciplinary Engineering, in short ISTE (www.intsoctransde.org), formerly
called International Society of Productivity Enhancement (ISPE, Inc.) and constitutes an
important forum for international scientific exchange on transdisciplinary engineering.
These international conferences attract a significant number of researchers, industry ex-
perts and students, as well as government representatives, who are interested in recent
advances in transdisciplinary engineering research, advancements, and applications.
The concept of Transdisciplinary Engineering transcends Concurrent Engineering
(CE). The concept of CE, developed in the 80’s, implies that different phases of a product
life cycle are conducted concurrently and initiated as early as possible within the Product
Creation Process (PCP), including the implications of this approach within the extended
enterprise and networks. The main goal of CE is to increase the efficiency and effective-
ness of the PCP and to reduce errors in the later phases, as well as to incorporate consid-
erations for the full lifecycle, through-life operations, and environmental issues. In the
past decades, CE has become the substantive basic methodology in many industries (e.g.,
automotive, aerospace, machinery, shipbuilding, consumer goods, process industry, en-
vironmental engineering) and is also adopted in the development of new services and
service support. Collaboration between different disciplines is key to successful CE. The
main focus, though, is an engineering focus.
While for several decades CE proved its value in many industries and still continues
to do so, many current engineering problems require a more encompassing approach.
Many engineering problems have a large impact on society. The context of these prob-
lems needs to be taken into account. For example, the development of self-driving cars
requires taking into account changes in regulations for managing responsibilities, adap-
tation to road networks, political decisions, infrastructures for energy supply, etc. The
impacted society may also be the business environment of networks of companies and
supply chains. For example, the adoption and implementation of Industry 4.0 requires
taking into account the changes to be expected in the business environment, the people,
their jobs, the knowledge needed, technology, organizational rules and behaviours. These
kind of engineering problems also require collaboration, but not only between technical
disciplines. Disciplines from other scientific fields need to be incorporated in the engi-
neering process, like disciplines from social sciences (governance, psychology, etc.),
law, medicine, or other fields, relevant for the problem at hand.
vi

The concept of transdisciplinary engineering transcends inter- and multi-discipli-


nary ways of working, like in CE. In particular, transdisciplinary processes are aimed at
solving complex ill-defined problems or problems for which the solution is not obvious
from the beginning. While such problems, including their solutions, have a large impact
on society and the context in which the problems exist, it is important that people from
society and practice collaborate with people from different relevant scientific communi-
ties. Neither one discipline nor one person can bring sufficient knowledge for solving
such problems. Collaboration again is essential but has become even more demanding.
Disciplines should be open to other disciplines to be able to share and exchange the
knowledge necessary for solving the problem.
As indicated above any engineering problem can be put is a context in which the
problem is to be solved or in which the solution for the problem is expected to be used.
For researchers and engineers, it is important to take this context into account. This could
be done, for example, by collaborating with researchers who can study user acceptance
of the envisioned solution or with researchers who can apply suitable methods to acquire
user preferences in the respective context and translate them into the necessary require-
ments for the solution to be developed. Validation of a proposed engineering solution
will benefit also by incorporating people from other scientific fields.
The conference is entitled: ‘Transdisciplinary Engineering for Resilience: Respond-
ing to system disruptions’ indicating the dynamic and evolving nature of TE processes,
requiring new knowledge, methods and tools to support the process. The TE2021 Organ-
izing Committee has identified 36 thematic areas grouped into nine themes within TE
and launched a Call for Papers accordingly. More than 80 papers have been submitted
from all over the world. The submissions as well as invited talks have been collated into
nine themes.
The Proceedings contains 58 peer-reviewed papers presented at the conference by
authors from 24 countries. These papers range from the theoretical, conceptual to
strongly pragmatic addressing industrial best practice. The involvement of industry in
many of the presented papers gives additional importance to this conference.
This book on “Transdisciplinary Engineering for Resilience. Responding to System
Disruption” is directed at three constituencies: researchers, design practitioners, and ed-
ucators. Researchers will benefit from the latest research results and knowledge of prod-
uct creation processes and related methodologies. Engineering professionals and practi-
tioners will learn from the current state of the art in transdisciplinary engineering prac-
tice, new approaches, methods, tools, and their applications. The educators in the TE
community gather the latest advances and methodologies for dissemination in engineer-
ing curricula, to prepare students for transdisciplinary collaboration in complex engi-
neering processes, while the community also encourages educators to bring new ideas
into the field. With the annual contributions of many researchers and practitioners the
book series will contribute to the further development of the concept of Transdisciplinary
Engineering.
The proceedings are subdivided into several parts, reflecting the themes addressed
in the conference programme:
Part 1 is entitled Transdisciplinary Engineering Theory and contains five papers
that address the concept of TE. Paper one presents a framework for assisting a TE ap-
proach to systemic risk detection. Paper two presents a comparison of a quality and a
design approach in a TE context of setting up medical trials. Paper three presents findings
of a preliminary exploration of the significance of TE in an industrial context. Paper four
is an essay on the multi-dimensionality of TE. Paper five presents results of a workshop
vii

to develop an initial version of a disciplinary maturity grid to assess an industry’s engi-


neering capability.
Part 2 contains three papers in the field of Transdisciplinary Engineering Education
and Training, an important field in our conferences. In paper one, a framework is pre-
sented for the analysis of simulation effectiveness in training medical treatment proce-
dures. A discussion of the need for a holistic curriculum design in digital manufacturing
in presented in paper two. Design thinking is considered essential for people with differ-
ent domain knowledge. In paper three, a framework developed by master students is
proposed to facilitate design automation in different phases of design. Three SMEs have
used variations of the framework.
Part 3, PD Methods and Digital TE, contains 11 papers. In paper one, a conceptual
approach is presented to incrementally update a Digital Twin, especially suited for
SMEs. In paper two, the basis for the method described in paper one, is presented with a
use case. In paper three, a proposal for automated logo recognition and legal analysis for
IP protection is presented. Activities to develop a tool to support the design of CPSs are
described in paper four. In paper five, an NLP approach is presented for chatbots. The
approach is applied to the management of patent trends. In paper six, a framework is
proposed aimed at identifying, categorizing, prioritizing, and mitigating uncertainties in
the process of digitization of life-cycle product models. In paper seven, IT tools are de-
scribed for automating the generations of Digital Twins of machine tools. Paper eight
contains a study into improving interoperability in the new manufacturing environment.
In paper nine, also interoperability is addressed. An approach is presented for the auto-
matic prediction of failure in the manufacturing process. The authors of paper 10 inves-
tigate issues in optimising end-to-end maintenance within manufacturing with DTs, IM,
and Its. In paper 11, a five-dimensional DT framework has been proposed linking phys-
ical data and virtual data with an ERP for modelling the digital twin of electric vehicle
batteries.
Part 4 contains 15 papers in the theme Industry and Society. In paper one, a method
for implementing flex-time schedules in a service industry. An optimal production plan-
ning method for high-mix low-volume production is proposed in paper two. Paper three
contains a literature study into the use of 4.0 technologies in Product Lifecycle Manage-
ment with a focus on Sustainable Development. In paper four, an analysis is presented
of different scenarios for resource planning in a multi-project environment. Based on a
literature review the first of three artefacts is presented in paper five: a model to charac-
terize Agriculture 4.0. In paper six, a proposal for a metro-car tracking system is pro-
posed. A theoretical exploration into challenges and opportunities for the digitization of
product development and manufacturing process is presented in paper seven. In paper
eight, a study is presented into the existing gaps between reshoring drivers and critical
operations capabilities. Paper nine contains a system dynamic modeling approach and an
empirical study on innovation diffusion for subsystems in the automotive industry in the
past decades. In paper 10, a cause-effect diagram is presented for analysing risks in the
civil industry. Paper 11 contains a proposal for a framework of questions to identify risks
in different phases of a civil engineering process. In paper 12, a model is proposed for
the digitization of the railway industry, using the Balanced Score Card and Multi-Criteria
Decision making. Paper 13 contains research that contributes to the reshoring literature
by providing a multi-stage fuzzy-logic model that simultaneously handles different
groups of criteria, and to practitioners by contemplating different key competencies
within a company during the reshoring decision process. In paper 14, results of twenty-
four multiple case studies in the construction sector are presented, which suggest new
viii

quality dimensions and ways to adapt to changed service-quality demands. Paper 15 con-
tains a literature study and case studies into the level of alignment between product de-
velopment and production. Several problems have been identified.
Part 5 is entitled Product Systems and contains 13 papers. Paper one contains a
comparison between two tools for predicting human effort and ergonomic risk related to
a series of tasks. In paper two, the TRIZ approach is applied to the non-trivial design of
a Wire Electric Discharge Machining (WEDM). The work presented in paper three is an
exploration of the possibility to analyse the performance of production lines through dig-
ital models. In paper four, a proposal is presented of an associative framework between
processes and related data, which are following the recommendations of currently ap-
plied frameworks for Business Process Management and Big Data Analytics. In paper
five, a literature study is described on APSs, as well as the impact of Industry 4.0 on the
development of these systems. Paper six contains a simulation model developed for al-
lowing the selection of appropriate parameters of a power supply system and a drive
system for an electric go-kart to meet criteria assumed. In paper seven, research is pre-
sented into semantic and syntactic knowledge boundaries that play a role in introducing
new products with its accompanying production processes. Paper eight contains a litera-
ture study into Advanced Manufacturing, the results of which have been applied to an
experimental case. In paper nine, an exploration is presented of opportunities for Ka-
zakhstan to recycle CFPR waste originating in this country and neighbouring countries.
Paper 10 contains an exploration of the possibility to automate the design of a wing
structure. In paper 11, the possibility of supporting the vertical take-off and landing un-
manned aerial vehicle electric power systems by means of photovoltaic cells. An ap-
proach for optimizing floor plans using data collected from workplaces and a physics-
based planning algorithm utilizing GPU-acceleration is presented in paper 12. In paper
13, a research step is presented to develop a methodology for designing and analysing a
propeller, which can be used in a calculation backgound for a CAD model.
Part 6 contains 11 contributions on Individual and Teams. In paper one, a demon-
stration Is presented of a virtual tour in a cheese factory. The multi-faceted nature of a
virtual tour is highlighted. Paper two contains a design of a rescue helicopter that can
approach mountain tops and dangerous terrains. In paper three, a new AR/VR method-
ology is presented that allows an operator to touch any object in a virtual cabin design of
a medical helicopter. Feedback from medical professionals is included. A patent portfo-
lio analysis for VR tools is presented in paper four. Promising areas for further develop-
ment in the medical domain have been identified. Paper five contains a patent analysis
to discover trends in HCPSs in manufacturing. In paper six, an approach is presented to
enhance human perspectives by introducing a semiotic framework for representing dif-
ferent aspects of human and organizational meaning formation. The approach is illus-
trated in a translational medicine organization. Paper seven contains a demonstration of
a technology to detect behavioural states of team members during a meeting. In paper
eight, a numerical method is presented that is a good step towards systematic design of
attractive product shapes. In paper nine, a first design iteration is demonstrated in which
a framework is applied that provide disciplines guidelines for achieving health-related
objectives. Paper 10 contains a specification of a generic user interface that makes com-
putational systems models more accessible to non-technical decision makers. Finally,
paper 11 is a research paper containing research into the generation of a functional struc-
ture of a product connected with a Multi-interfaces Entity Model that supports risk as-
sessment.
ix

Committees, Organizers and Sponsors


Committees
Conference Chairs
 Linda Newnes, University of Bath (UK)
 Susan Lattanzio, University of Bath (UK)

Program Chair
 Bryan Moser, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (USA) and University of
Tokyo (J)

Program Co-Chairs
 Margherita Peruzzini, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
 Josip Stjepandić, PROSTEP AG (DE)
 Nel Wognum, Delft University of Technology (NL)
 Cees Bil, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (AU)
 Fredrik Elgh, Jönköping University (SE)
 Jerzy Pokojski, Warsaw University of Technology (PL) 
 Egon Ostrosi, University of Bourgogne (FR)

Local Organizing Committee


 Aydin Nassehi, University of Bristol (UK)
 Emily Carey, The University of Bath (UK)

Scientific Committee
 Nicolai Beisheim, Albstadt-Sigmaringen University, Germany
 Cees Bil, RMIT, Australia
 Milton Borsato, Federal University of Technology Parana – Curitiba, Brazil
 Mirza Cenanovic, Jönköping University, Sweden
 Lee Ching-Hung, Xi'an Jiaotong University, China
 Shuo-Yan Chou, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology,
Taipe, Taiwan
 Adam Cooper, UCL, UK
 Amadou Coulibaly, INSA Strasbourg, France
 Robert Day, John Deere, USA
 Fredrik Elgh, Jönköping University, Sweden
 Alain-Jérôme Fougères, ECAM, France
 Shuichi Fukuda, Keio University, Japan
 Gloria Lucia Giraldo Gómez, National University of Colombia, Colombia
 Mey Goh, Loughborough University, UK
 James Gopshill, The University of Bristol, UK
 Zobyslaw Goraj, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
x

 Kazuo Hiekata, University of Tokyo, Japan


 Teruaki Ito, Okayama Prefectural University, Japan
 Jean-Bernard Bluntzer, University of Bourgogne, France
 Kerstin Johansen, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
 Pisut Koomsap, Asian Institute of Technology School of Engineering &
Technology, Thailand
 Susan Lattanzio, University of Bath, Bath, UK
 Martin Lennartsson, Jönköping University, Sweden
 Gary Linnéusson, Jönköping University, Sweden
 Lucy Lunevich, RMIT, Australia
 Manandhar Prakash, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
 John Bang Mathiasen, Aarhus University, Denmark
 Kevin P. MacDonough, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
 Nozomu Mishima, Akita University, Japan
 Marko Mladinea, The University of Split, Croatia
 John P.T. Mo, RMIT, Australia
 Bryan Moser, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and University of Tokyo,
USA and Japan
 Egon Ostrosi, University of Bourgogne, France
 Toh Yen Pang, RMIT, Australia
 Glenn Parry, The University of Surrey, UK
 Marcello Pellicciari, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia,
Italy
 Jerzy Pokojski, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
 Margherita Peruzzini, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy
 Mariusz Pyrz, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
 Roberto Raffaeli, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia,
Italy
 Dag Raudberget, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
 Thomas Röhr, ESTA, France
 David Romero, Technological Institute of Monterrey, Mexico
 Jana Sajdakova, The University of Bath, UK
 Essam Shehab, Nazarbayev University, School of Engineering and Digital
Sciences, Kazachstan
 Alborz Shokrani, The University of Bath, UK
 Afreen Siddiqi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
 Milan Simic, RMIT, Australia
 Wojciech Skarka, Silesian University of Technology, Poland
 Piotr Skawinski, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
 Josip Stjepandic, PROSTEP AG, Germany
 Roland Stolt, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
 Anderson Szejka, Pontificial Catholic University, Brazil
 Joze Tavcar, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
 Amy J.C. Trappey, National Tsing Hua University, Taipei, Taiwan
xi

 Wim Verhagen, RMIT University-School of Engineering, Melbourne,


Australia
 Shinnosuke Wanaka, The University of Tokyo, Japan
 Nel Wognum, Technical University of Delft, The Netherlands

Organizers

University of Bath, UK

Past Transdisciplinary Engineering/ Concurrent Engineering


Conferences
2020: Warsaw. Poland
2019: Tokyo, Japan
2018: Modena, Italy
2017: Singapore, Singapore
2016: Curitiba, Brazil
2015: Delft, The NetherlandsTE
2014: Beijing, China
2013: Melbourne, Australia
2012: Trier, Niemcy
2011: Boston, USA
2010: Cracow, Poland
2009: Taipei, Taiwan
2008: Belfast, UK
2007: Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil
2006: Antibes-Juan les Pins, France
2005: Dallas, USA
2004: Beijing, China
2003: Madeira, Portugal
2002: Cranfield, UK
2001: Anaheim, USA
2000: Lyon, France
1999: Bath, UK
1998: Tokyo, Japan
1997: Rochester, USA
1996: Toronto, Canada
1995: McLean, USA
1994: Pittsburgh, USA
xii

Sponsors

University of Bath

International Society of Transdisciplinary Engineering (ISTE)

IOS Press

PROSTEP AG
xiii

Contents
Preface v
Committees, Organizers and Sponsors ix

Part 1. Transdisciplinary Engineering Theory

Towards a Transdisciplinary Approach to Systemic Risk Detection 3


Mark Wever, Nel Wognum, Munir Shah, Niall O’Leary and George Onofrei
Infrastructuring Transdisciplinary Problem Solving in Translational Research 13
Santosh Basapur, Keiichi Sato, Raj C. Shah and Sherry Robison
Foraging for Transdisciplinary Challenges: Emergent Industrial Themes 23
Emily Carey, Linda Newnes, Susan Lattanzio, Alex Hultin
and Nataliya Mogles
Transdisciplinary Engineering for Market Development 33
Shuichi Fukuda
The Transdisciplinary Engineering Index: Towards a Disciplinary Maturity Grid 41
Susan Lattanzio, Emily Carey, Alex Hultin, Reza Imani Asrai, Aydin Nassehi,
Glenn Parry and Linda Newnes

Part 2. Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Training

A Transdisciplinary Approach for the Design Optimization of Medical


Simulations 53
Agnese Brunzini, Margherita Peruzzini, Michele Germani,
Daniele Messi and Pamela Barbadoro
Fostering Design Thinking in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education 63
Jo-Yu Kuo, Xue Ting Song, Chun-Hsien Chen and Chandrakant D. Patel
Design and Production Automation for Mass Customisation – An Initial
Framework Proposal Evaluated in Engineering Education and SME Contexts 71
Leon Peter Poot, Mehdi Tarkian and Johan Ölvander

Part 3. PD Methods and Digital TE

Incremental Update of a Digital Twin of a Production System by Using Scan and


Object Recognition 83
Markus Sommer, Josip Stjepandić and Sebastian Stobrawa
Automated Generation of a Digital Twin of a Process Plant by Using 3D Scan and
Artificial Intelligence 93
Matthias Grau, Wjatscheslaw Korol, Johannes Lützenberger
and Josip Stjepandić
xiv

Logo Image Retrievals Using Deep Embedding Learning 103


A.J.C. Trappey, C.V. Trappey and Samuel Shih
Concept of a Multi-Criteria and Multi-Disciplinary Design Activity Supporting
Tool in the Design and Development Process of CPS 113
Jerzy Pokojski, Lech Knap and Stanisław Skotnicki
Technology Mining for Intelligent Chatbot Development 123
Min-Hua Chao, Amy J.C. Trappey, Chun-Ting Wu and Yi-An Su
Towards an Uncertainty Management Framework for Model-Based Definition
and Enterprise 133
Kamran Goher, Essam Shehab, Ahmed Al-Ashaab and Shoaib Sarfraz
Using AutomationML to Generate Digital Twins of Tooling Machines for
the Purpose of Developing Energy Efficient Production Systems 141
Nicolai Beisheim, Markus Linde, Tobias Ott and Sebastian Amann
A Preliminary Discussion of Digital Transformation and Semantic
Interoperability to Support the Information Exchange in the Business Process 151
Lucas Yoshio Nakano, Pedro Henrique Bertoldi, Anderson Luis Szejka
and Osiris Canciglieri Junior
Intelligent Product Quality Failure Prediction System in Smart Factories Based
on Machine Learning Techniques 161
Tainá da Rocha, Anderson Luis Szejka and Osiris Canciglieri Junior
Exploring the Transition from Preventive Maintenance to Predictive
Maintenance Within ERP Systems by Utilising Digital Twins 171
Liam Damant, Amy Forsyth, Ramona Farcas, Melvin Voigtländer,
Sumit Singh, Ip-Shing Fan and Essam Shehab
Digital Twin-Driven Framework for EV Batteries in Automobile Manufacturing 181
Rodrigo Valdez Parra, Gaurav Pothureddy, Tom Sanitas,
Vishnuvardan Krishnamoorthy, Oluwatobi Oluwafemi,
Sumit Singh, Ip-Shing Fan and Essam Shehab

Part 4. Industry and Society

Flexible Hiring Personnel Models to Promote Human Satisfaction and Business


Profit for Service Industries 193
Federico Trigos and Mario Doria
Study on Job Shop Scheduling for Keeping the Requested Shipping Sequence by
Production System Modeling and Backward Simulation 203
Yui Okubo and Taiga Mitsuyuki
Product Lifecycle Management and Sustainable Development in the Context of
Industry 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review 213
Michele Marcos De Oliveira, Luisa Geraldi Andreatta, Josip Stjepandić
and Osiris Canciglieri Junior
xv

Dynamic Modeling of Resource Allocation for Project Management in


Multi-Project Environment 223
Mst Taskia Khatun, Kazuo Hiekata, Yutaka Takahashi and Issac Okada
Reference Model as Support for the Implementation of Agriculture 4.0 233
Jaqueline Iaksch, Juliane Camatti, Milton Borsato and Maurício Infantini
Tracking Underground Metro Cars with Low-Cost Acceleration Sensors 243
Chenxi Zhou and Gang Shen
Aspects on a Digitalized Industrialization Process: Are There Challenges to
Overcome? 253
Edris Safavi, Paraskeva Wlazlak and Kerstin Johansen
Critical Operations Capabilities and Reshoring Drivers in a High-Cost
Environment 263
Cinzia Sansone and Movin Sequeira
Systems Dynamics and Empirical Studies of Innovation in the Automotive
Industry 272
Bryan Moser, Amardeep Singh and Yuru Zhang
Cause-Effect Modelling of the Risk Analysis in Objects Development:
An Application to Civil Structures 282
Luis-Emilio Velásquez-Restrepo, Olga Eugenia Urrego-Giraldo
and Germán Urrego-Giraldo
Lifecycle’s Processes-Based Categories for the Risk Analysis in
the Development of Engineering Solutions: An Application to Civil
Structures Development 292
Olga Eugenia Urrego-Giraldo, Luis-Emilio Velásquez-Restrepo
and Germán Urrego-Giraldo
Towards an Integrated MCDM and BSC Method to Support the Digital
Transformation Strategy in Railway Companies 302
Gabriel Nogueira Zanon, Anderson Luis Szejka
and Eduardo de Freitas Rocha Loures
Multi-Stage Fuzzy-Logic Model for Evaluation of Reshoring Decisions 312
Movin Sequeira
Adaptation Mechanisms and Service Quality Dimensions in Dynamic
and Turbulent Environments: Empirical Results 322
Milton F. Barragán-Landy, Sérgio Sousa and Fernando Romero
Product Platforms and Production – Current State and Future Research
Directions Targeting Producibility and Production Preparation 332
Rohith Areth Koroth, Martin Lennartsson, Dag Raudberget and Fredrik Elgh

Part 5. Product Systems

Benchmark on Human Simulation Tools: A Transdisciplinary Approach 345


Fabio Grandi, Sara Cavallaro, Margherita Peruzzini, Roberto Raffaeli
and Marcello Pellicciari
xvi

Design of a Wire Cut EDM End-Effector with Strict Robotic Constraints 355
Sergio Almeida, John P.T. Mo, Cees Bil, Songlin Ding and Xiangzhi Wang
Method for Performance Analysis of Production Lines Based on Digital Models
Powered by Real-Time Data 365
Suewellyn Krüger, Samuel Henrique Werlich and Milton Borsato
Associative Data-Process Model in Manufacturing Systems: Application Case in
Automotive Industry 375
Letícia Alves dos Santos Rosolem, Alexandre da Costa Castro,
Fernando Deschamps and Edson Pinheiro de Lima
Advanced Planning and Scheduling (APS) Systems: A Systematic Literature
Review 385
Jaison Vieira, Fernando Deschamps and Pablo Deivid Valle
Battery System Design for Electric Go-Kart 395
Krzysztof Mateja
Integration Across Knowledge Boundaries During New Product Introduction 405
Paraskeva Wlazlak, Daniel Hussmo and Kristina Säfsten
An Approach Based on Advanced Manufacturing for Replacement Parts in
Equipment Maintenance Context 415
Renan Andreassa Novaki, Athon F.C.S. de M. Leite, Anderson L. Sejka
and Osiris Canciglieri Junior
Carbon Fiber Composites Application and Recycling in Kazakhstan and
Neighboring Countries 425
Arshyn Meiirbekov, Akniyet Amantayeva, Serik Tokbolat, Aidar Suleimen,
Shoaib Sarfraz and Essam Shehab
The Use of Generative Modelling to Automate the Design of Aerial Structural
Assemblies 435
Wojciech Skarka and Mikir Alegaze
Design of the Power Supply System for Vertical Take-Off and Landing
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle 445
Jakub Czech and Wojciech Skarka
GPU-Enabled Physics-Based Floor Plan Optimization Based on Work Place
Analytical Data 455
Axel Nordin
Analysis and Optimization of the Propeller Shape for a Stratospheric Drone
Research Platform 465
Kamil Zenowicz and Wojciech Skarka

Part 6. Individual and Teams

Virtual Tours to Promote the Remote Customer Experience 477


Sara Cavallaro, Fabio Grandi, Margherita Peruzzini
and Francesca De Canio
xvii

Conceptual Design Study of a High-Altitude Mountain Rescue Rotorcraft 487


Jonathan Lakkis and Cees Bil
Human Interaction in a Virtual Reality Environment 497
Juan D. Pelaez-Restrepo, Toh Yen Pang and Cees Bil
Patent Portfolio Analysis Related to Advanced VR Technologies and
Applications for Treating Driving Phobia 507
A.J.C. Trappey, C.V. Trappey, R.R.T. Kuo and A.P.C. Lin
Development Trend of Human-Cyber Physical System in Manufacturing: Mixed
Reality Patent Analytics 517
Amy J.C. Trappey, Dawi K. Baroroh, Halim B. Santoso
and Armin Darmawan
Enhancing Human Perspectives in CPS Models: Application to Collaborative
Problem-Solving in Translational Medicine 527
Keiichi Sato, Fei Hu, Santosh Basapur, Raj C. Shah and Gunnar Hartvigsen
Development of Method for Visualizing Behavioral States of Teams 537
Sixiong Peng, Takashi Amakasu, Hiroki Kawauchi, Hideyuki Horii
and Kazuo Hiekata
Quantification of User’s Preference on Product Shapes Using Automobile as
a Case Study 547
Nozomu Mishima and Taiga Toyoshima
A Conceptual Framework for Designing Smart Domestic Health Enhancement
Devices 556
Pei Fen Chee, Jo-Yu Kuo and Chun-Hsien Chen
User Interface Design for Multi-Objective Decision Making 566
Ira Winder and Kazuo Hiekata
Functional Approach for Summative Risk Management of Medical Products 574
Roberto Riascos, Tomislava Majić, Egon Ostrosi, Jean-Claude Sagot
and Josip Stjepandić

Subject Index 585


Author Index 589

You might also like