Consumer perceived risk in online shopping i i i i i

i environment via Facebook as medium i i i i

ABSTRACT

The observe pastimes to understand the consumer buying conduct at the same
i i i i i i i i i i i

i time as buying online. The have a observe unveils the multidimensional perceived
i i i i i i i i i i i

i risk in on line purchasing so one may be beneficial for the marketers in mitigating
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i the perceived danger. The examine used universally popular deter-minants of

i i i i i i i i i

i clients’ perceived danger namely economic hazard, product hazard, transport

i i i i i i i i

i chance, time danger and privacy This multi-pronged perceived danger has full-size
i i i i i i i i i i

i impact on the web buying behavior of the client and adversely influences their buy
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i behavior. The overall extensive form of one hundred eighty respondent has been
i i i i i i i i i i i

i determined on for the number one have a look at. The accessible sampling technique
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i of non-opportunity sampling has been used for choice of respondents. The observe
i i i i i i i i i i i

i discovered that the demographics have a outstanding feature to play on customers’

i i i i i i i i i i i

i belief closer to on line shopping. Income and gender are the vital elements identified
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i that would have extensive impact on clients’ notion toward on-line buying. T-check,
i i i i i i i i i i i

i ANOVA and regression evaluation has been used for records assessment reason.
i i i i i i i i i i

1. INTRODUCTION
i

India has almost 500 million Internet customers (as in step with 2016) and
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i which makes it as second-biggest user global, most effective in the back of China.
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i However, the penetration of e-trade is a good deal less in comparison with United
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i States or United Kingdom but is growing at an remarkable fee. One of the crucial
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
i motives for this is the nature of on-line stores that foster numerous worries within the
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i minds of the clients. After the launch of the World Wide Web, the concept of online
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i purchasing has superior regularly. This has been manifested through the numerous
i i i i i i i i i i

i e-trade structures that have been budding for the motive that late 2000’s. Shopping
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i internet sites together with Flipkart, Amazon, Snapdeal, Myntra etc. Have fueled the
i i i i i i i i i i i

i upward push inside the shopping tendency of Indian customers. Consumers are
i i i i i i i i i i

i stimulated with the resource of convenience and are likely to keep on line for
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i particular varieties of services and products. According to an editorial in the

i i i i i i i i i i i

i Economic Times, the variety of on line clients in India in 2015 was anticipated at 50
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i million. This discern is expected to boom to about 320 million by means of the 365
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i days 2020. Average on-line purchases in India extended via using seventy eight% in
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i 2016 be-reason of progressive advertising and marketing method thru the marketers.
i i i i i i i i i i

i The common on-line purchases accelerated by the use of 78% in 2016 from sixty
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i six% in 2015, due to numerous reasons in various class of the goods.

i i i i i i i i i i i i

The implementation of strong 4G networks thru cell carriers (this is already

underway) will force increasing digital purchases made via smartphone. In
addition, the declining expenses of 4G gadgets and carrier plans will make it a
great deal less tough for clients to analyze, browse and buy on smartphones. In
spite of the sturdy growth, the ecommerce trade stays in a genuinely growing
degree with crucial e- commerce ventures being began out with the aid of more
youthful first-time In India 75% of net, customers are elderly among 15-34, which
is a good sign for marketers to develop their products for the customers.
Constrained geographical reach with the useful resource of brick & mortar model,
growing internet penetration, increasing cellphone usage & declining data fees
provide excessive marketplace ability for e-retailing
 COD turned into one of the crucial system in achieving internet buying in
non-metropolitan cities. Majority of e-shops in India offer free home delivery, even
though a nominal price is charged for terribly small rate orders. Other similar tasks
place unit benefits like hassle loose go back policies interior 7–30 days, referral
discount, desire listing, attempt to shop for, tracking the consignment as quickly
because the product is ordered The threat that clients understand in shopping
online is diverse. The chance can be measured on different factors like consistent
with-personality, age, gender, income and so forth. It is, consequently, vital for the
online entrepreneurs to no longer most effective apprehend the sub measurement
dangers that customers apprehend in online shopping for, however additionally the
variation in the threat amongst people, that lets in you to layout proper hazard
mitigating This paper interests to apprehend the affect of client conduct while
purchasing on-line. The paper try to un-veil the numerous dimensions of perceived
danger in online buying so one may be beneficial for the marketers in mitigating
the perceived The universally famous determinants of customers’ in step with-
acquired threat particularly monetary danger, product chance, shipping hazard,
time chance and privacy danger has been used for fulfilling the targets of the
examine. This perceived risk has significant impact on the online purchasing
behavior of the client and influences their purchase conduct. In addition,
demographics have a chief feature to play on clients’ notion closer to on line
buying. Income and gender are the 2 essential elements diagnosed that could have
huge effect on clients’ notion within the course of on-line buying. The following
i i

i are the desires of the have a look at:

i i i i i i i i

• To have a observe the effect of customer has perceived risks on online buy
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i purpose. i
 • To degree the connection amongst gender and the numerous dimensions of
i i i i i i i i i i

i consumer perceived threat. i i i

• To degree the relationship amongst earnings and the various dimensions of

i i i i i i i i i i

i client perceived threat. i i

2. LITERATURE REVIEW i i

Buying conduct is the method and performances of humans elabo-rate in i i i i i i i i i i

i shopping for and the usage of products. Consumer conduct is the examine of ways
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i people, groups, and businesses pick out, purchase, use, and do away with items,
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i offerings, thoughts or studies to satisfy their dreams and wants (Kotler K. At.Et.
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i Impulse buying describes any purchase, which a purchaser makes with none making
i i i i i i i i i i i

i plans. It is an critical phenomenon in context of present day retail and first rate-
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

marketplace shops (Verplanken & Sato, 2011), following which e-shops also are
i i i i i i i i i i

i analyzing affect of such behavior on purchase propensity Impulse purchasing for

i i i i i i i i i i

i conduct is taken into consideration unintentional, because the customers are not
i i i i i i i i i i

i precisely searching for the goods and do not want to buy the object. Unplanned
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i looking for explains all of the buying with out proper making plans from time to time
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i its impulse buying. (Jiyeon, 2000). The competitive promotions, imaginative

i i i i i i i i

i messages and right use of technology inside the retail stores (Muruganantham &
i i i i i i i i i i i

i Bhakat, 2013). The examine with the aid of Gandhi, Vajpay-ee & Gautam (2013)
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i emerge as to have a have a look at the impulse buy selections of beverages across
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i one in every of a kind types of current change in the cities of Thus, to factor out the
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i factors which have an effect on such purchases. It became located that Age, Gender
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i and the Time Taken to Purchase had been determined to have a big impact on
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i impulse purchases of clients, while amount of people accompanying a Shopper

i i i i i i i i i i

i confirmed no big impact on impulse purchases as regards to beverage purchases.

i i i i i i i i i i i

i Mesiranta (2009) have a look at consumer stories of impulse buying within the
i i i i i i i i i i i i
i digital worlds. This reason changed into achieved via addressing two essential
i i i i i i i i i i

i questions. The first question aiming to discover the elements of on line impulsive
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i looking for, and the second one question asking approximately the varieties of on
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i line impulsive research that can be identified. It in addition examined that various
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i elements namely shopping surroundings, internet-store format, product and the

i i i i i i i i

i purchaser performed a prime characteristic in explaining the impulsive The sorts of

i i i i i i i i i i i

i impulse purchasing for that became positioned come to be a couple of, additional,
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i promotional, social, trial, and complementary shopping. (Muruganantham &

i i i i i i i

i Bhakat,2013). External elements of impulse attempting to find searching fori i i i i i i i i

i recommendation from selling cues or stimuli that ar positioned and controlled thru i i i i i i i i i i i

i the vender. In step with the shop traits, commercials, employees, choice of friends
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i and own family, self-provider era, retail advertising are affected to the consumer
i i i i i i i i i i i

i impulse purchasing for conduct as companion diploma outside stimulation. Impulse

i i i i i i i i i

i shopping for appears as unplanned and un thoughtful considering that it is driven by

i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i means of outdoor stimuli, like mer-chant advertising ways, which can create clients
i i i i i i i i i i i

i ambivalent and cause the requirement to create an acquisition without delay (Jenn
i i i i i i i i i i i

i rule, et.Al. 2011).

i i

Offline settings ar better prepared to offer a number of the on the spot

satisfactions and sensory perceptions crucial to numerous purchasers’ buying
alternatives that decrease associated threat perceptions with transactions, like
personal looking help by way of employees and immediate rights to a services or
products. The provision of face-to-face interplay with commercial enterprise
employees to address patron troubles is a smaller amount cutting-edge and on the
spot inside the on line putting.
i
 This will increase the extent of perceived dangers with on line transactions
i i i i i i i i i i i

i and characteristic an effect on the patron’s buying name method. The belief of risk
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i associated with a organisation and their online additionally may even many
i i i i i i i i i i

i moreover also can be affected by preceding en-counters and now have an effect on
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i their choices to finish purchases while now not sensory perceptions available in
i i i i i i i i i i i

i ancient brick-and-mortar Consumers’ previous knowledge with on line purchases or

i i i i i i i i i

i lack there from, can be a huge affect of chance consistent with-reception thru clients
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i and their buying Negative reviews boom degrees of hazard belief with online
i i i i i i i i i i i

i purchasing for and hamper now not completely a business’s possibility of

i i i i i i i i i i

i maintaining clients but will create it greater hard for alternative on line agencies to
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i understand preliminary clients. In an effort to spot the versions amongst clients

i i i i i i i i i i i

i preferring on line searching and those who decide upon offline searching, this take a
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i look at examines however clients understand on-line The top notch on-line buying
i i i i i i i i i i i

i risk elements has been decided on numerous studies papers. Online buying offers the
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i benefits of convenience, time and money financial savings. On the other hand, use of
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i internet for getting is affected by extra risks not encountered in traditional

i i i i i i i i i i i

i marketplaces. The numerous identified risks are. i i i i i

2.1. Financial threat

i i i

• I think that my credit card statistics might be misused when I store on line.
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

• Retailer would possibly overcharge me because it has my credit score card in-
i i i i i i i i i i i i

formation. i

• I feel that my credit score card facts can be compromised to 1/3 party.
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

2.2. Product threat

i i i

• The product I get hold of is probably defective.

i i i i i i i i i
 • I experience that I might acquire something one of a kind from what I actually
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i ordered. i

• It is not smooth to choose the great and different attributes over net.
i i i i i i i i i i i i

2.3. Delivery danger

i i i

• I doubt the reliability of on line shippers.

i i i i i i i i

• I won't get hold of the product in time.

i i i i i i i i i

• I won't receive the product ordered online.

i i i i i i i

2.4. Time comfort danger

i i i i

• Finding the proper product on-line may be very time-consuming.i i i i i i i i i

• Cancellation of order is a complicated activity. i i i i i i i

• I would possibly face problems in returning a product.

i i i i i i i i i

2.5. Privacy risk

i i i

• The store may promote my information associated with picks and preferences
i i i i i i i i i i

i to different corporations.
i i i

• Other organizations could abuse email address.

i i i i i i

• Other companies would abuse telephone wide variety.

i i i i i i

Brooker (1984) reformed the perceived hazard variables into a pair of

i i i i i i i i i i

i problems at the utilization of generic food merchandise using a varimax rotation

i i i i i i i i i i i

i correlation analysis on perceived hazard scale components to have a look at what the
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i element structure appeared Then he got non-personal risk issue. Personal risks are
i i i i i i i i i i i

i outlined due to the fact the risks that are related to self-image, self-idea or social
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i analysis. Following this attitude, but, most of past evaluation on perceived risk has
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i targeted on historic marketplace and shopping for things. Searching in a virtual

i i i i i i i i i i i

i putting is a ways utterly absolutely exclusive from searching in stores. Internet

i i i i i i i i i i i
i searching gives the advantages of comfort, time and coins savings. On the
i i i i i i i i i i i

i alternative hand, use of internet for searching is complete of in addition dangers no

i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i longer encountered in popular marketplaces (Noort, Kerkhof, The different

i i i i i i i i

i dimensions pertinent in the course of this unique context are deliberate supported e-
i i i i i i i i i i i i

Commerce literature further as privacy chance, security hazard, and provide risk
i i i i i i i i i i

i Research methodology.
i

After good sized secondary studies, the five most familiar dimen-sions of
i i i i i i i i i i

i perceived hazard have been identified, particularly,

i i i i i i

• Perceived Financial Risk i i i

• Perceived Product Risk i i i

• Perceived Delivery Risk i i i

• Perceived Time Risk i i i

• Perceived Privacy Risk The following hypotheses designed to meet the goals
i i i i i i i i i i

i of the observe:
i i
3.1. Research layout
i i i

The research design is conclusive because it aims at trying out the pre-
i i i i i i i i i i i i

conceived hypothesis. The hypotheses are developed via secondary studies of

i i i i i i i i i
i numerous research papers. After the secondary studies, the studies framework
i i i i i i i i i

i became advanced. i i

3.2. Primary statistics supply

i i i i

Primary data is critical and plenty more beneficial as it's far undisguised
i i i i i i i i i i i

i records about the results of an test or observation. This Primary facts supply is
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i collected from a questionnaire which includes diverse constructs of consumers’

i i i i i i i i i

i perceived risk in on-line shopping being tested on Secondary statistics source

i i i i i i i i i i

i Various research papers and on-line material on Online purchasing behavior of

i i i i i i i i i i

i purchasers has been taken into consideration and accordingly, hypotheses are
i i i i i i i i i

i developed. i

3.4. Convenience sampling approach

i i i i

Convenience sampling method has been used for selection of the respondents i i i i i i i i i i

i for the have a look at. The sample size of the respondent for the primary studies are
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i 180. i

3.5. Research instrument

i i i

The primary records has been gathered through pre-tested well-designed

i i i i i i i i

i questionnaire. For pretesting of the questionnaire, the Cronbach’s alpha has been
i i i i i i i i i i

i calculated and the fee comes to be 0.813 which falls in proper region.
i i i i i i i i i i i i
4. Result and discussion
i i i

Table 1 gift the demographic profile of the respondents. The desk revels that
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i 55 percent of respondents have been male at the same time as 45 percent had been
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i woman. The sample changed into consultant of a larger variety of male respondents
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i to that of woman respondents. Most of the respondents, that's 28 percent, fall within
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i the age group of 30-35 years.

i i i i i i

4.1. Relationship between gender of the respondents and perceived hazard in on

i i i i i i i i i i i

line shopping
i i i

To take a look at the hypotheses, Independent Sample t-check is used. The

i i i i i i i i i i i i

i unbiased-samples t-check (or unbiased t-take a look at) compares the means i i i i i i i i i i

i between two unrelated corporations at the identical continuous, structured variable.

i i i i i i i i i

i Table 2 suggests the outcomes of t-check. As all the p values are extra than that of
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i significant cost 0.05. The following are the consequences primarily based on the
i i i i i i i i i i i

i statistic of the results. i i i

Table 2: Relationship between Gender of the respondents and perceived risk in
i i i i i i i i i i i

i online shopping i

As in step with the results there may be a no widespread role of gender in

i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i consistent with-received chance for all of the dimensions that leads to the realization
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i that each male and woman understand the same degree of risk at the same time as
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i doing online shopping.

i i i
4.2. Relationship between income of the respondents and perceived chance in on
i i i i i i i i i i i

line shopping
i i i

The ANOVA take a look at has been used to check the hypotheses to under-
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

stand whether income has any have an impact on any of the individual consumers’
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i perceived chance in on line shopping.

i i i i i

The table 3 famous the relationship between unique stage of profits and the
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i diploma of perceived chance in on-line buying. After comparing the giant fee with
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i 0.05 the subsequent outcomes comes out.

i i i i i
 Out of [5] exclusive dimensions of perceived threat, Product and privacy
i i i i i i i i i i

i threat are dimensions which reflects no large impact of earnings, even as other three
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i dimensions has enormous impact on unique degree of profits.

i i i i i i i i i

4.3. Relationship among on-line buying conduct of the respondents and

i i i i i i i i i

perceived hazard
i i i

The regression analysis has been used to apprehend the relation-ship among
i i i i i i i i i i

i online buying and perceived threat. In regression version shopping for conduct of
i i i i i i i i i i i

i the respondents treated as dependent variable even as the 5 dimensions of perceived

i i i i i i i i i i i i

i danger treated as predicators.

i i i
 In regression model the R Square coefficient cost is coming out to be .504
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i because of this that the variations in predictors can ex-simple 50.4% variant in
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i established variable. The model also offers exciting insights into our response facts.
i i i i i i i i i i i

i Product, time and pri-vacy threat come out to be full-size predictors as Sig. Value is
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i much less than 0.05. Also, most of these variables have inverse relation to purchase
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i reason as it may be visible the negative values of un standardized B.

i i i i i i i i i i i i
 As in keeping with the consequences Product, time and privacy risk found to
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i be the variables which has impact on purchase intention of the respondents.

i i i i i i i i i i i i

5. CONCLUSION
i

The evaluation of number one information indicates that out of the [5] perceived
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i clients’ threat in online buying, product danger, time threat and privacy hazard
i i i i i i i i i i i

i confirmed horrible correlation with the purchasing for On-line marketers at the
i i i i i i i i i i

i equal time as advertising and marketing their merchandise inside the cluttered on
i i i i i i i i i i i

i line buying corporation should make use of this records. Product danger is most
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i usual in garment industry in which consumers are hesitant to buy fashion product
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i actually via searching at it honestly. In fashion products, the touch and sense issue
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i topics the most to the consumer. For this reason, product threat is exceptionally
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i negatively correlated to the clients’ looking for cause. Although, on-line retailers
i i i i i i i i i i

i sell online buying revel in as very handy and time saving however our results are
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i expecting that clients don't understand on line shopping experience to be that handy.
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i The purpose inside the lower back of this perhaps that the buys do now not feel they
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i may discover the proper product in time or cancellation and go back system is
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i inconvenient. Privacy is the maximum relevant element when it comes to shopping

i i i i i i i i i i i
i for product on-line. Customers are reluctant to percentage their private information
i i i i i i i i i i

i associated with residential deal with, touch wide variety and email cope with to the
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i net shops. Customers worry that the shop would probably com-promise their private
i i i i i i i i i i i

i information to extraordinary groups and their individual-al facts may be exploited

i i i i i i i i i i

i via unknown Marketers may additionally moreover make the most this facts and
i i i i i i i i i i i

i format such techniques and advertising conversation to mitigate this consumer

i i i i i i i i i

i perceived danger. i

REFERENCES

i [1] Amel, G., Maachou D.E., Mohamed B., (2014), The impact of Environmental
i i i i i i i i i i i

i Factors on Impulse Buying Behavior Using the Mehrabian and Russell’s

i i i i i i i i i

i Framework, Leonardo Journal of Sciences, Vol-4, Issue-9. i i i i i i i

[2] Banerjee, N., Dutta, A., & Dasgupta, T. (2010). A study on customers' attitude
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i towards online shopping-An Indian perspective. Indian Journal of Marketing,

i i i i i i i i

i 40(11), 36-42. i i

[3] Banyte, J., Rutelione, A., Gadeikiene, A., & Belkeviciute, J. (2016). Expression of
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i Irrationality in Consumer Behaviour: Aspect of Price Perception. Inzinerine

i i i i i i i i

i Ekonomika- i Engineering i Economics, i 27(3), i 334–344. i In-line

i Citation:(Banyte, Rutelione, Gadeikiene, i i i

[4] Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. Dynamic Marketing for a
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i Changing World: Proceedings of 43rd Conference, American Marketingi i i i i i i

i Association, (pp. 389-398). Chicago. i i i i

[5] Bhatnagar, A., & Ghose, S. (2004). Segmenting consumers based on the benefits
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i and risks of Internet shopping. Journal of Business Research, 57(12), 1352-

i i i i i i i i i i

1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148- 2963(03)00067-5.

i i i
[6] Brooker, G. (1984). An assessment of an expanded measure of perceived risk.
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 439-441.

i i i i i

[7] Cases, A. S. (2001). Perceived risk and risk-reduction strategies in Internet

i i i i i i i i i i i

i shopping. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer

i i i i i i i i

i Research, 12(4), 375-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593960210151162.

i i i i

[8] Cunningham, S. M. (1967). The major dimensions of perceived risk. Cambridge:

i i i i i i i i i i i

i Harvard University Press.

i i i

[9] Forsythe, S. M., & Shi, B. (2003). Consumer Patronage and Risk perceptions in
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i Internet shopping. Journal of Business Research, 56(11), 867-875.

i i i i i i i

i https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00273-9. i

[10] George, J. F. (2004). The theory of planned behavior and Internet purchasing.
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i Internet i Research, i 14(3), i 198-212.

i https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240410542634. i

[11] Hualin Wang (2015), Study of Influencing Factors on Consumer Online

i i i i i i i i i i

i Impulse Buying,June 2015,Volume 4, Issue 2.

i i i i i

i [12] Jacoby, J., & Kaplan, L. B. (1972). The components of perceived risk.
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer

i i i i i i i i i i

i Research (pp. 382-393). Chicago: Association for Consumer Research.

i i i i i i i i

[13] Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Todd, P. A. (1996). Consumer reactions to electronic

i i i i i i i i i i i i

i shopping on the World Wide Web. International Journal of Electronic

i i i i i i i i i

i Commerce, 1(2), 59-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.1996.11518283.

i i i i
[14] Kalla, S. M. (2016). Impulse Buying: What Instills This Desire to Indulge?
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i Journal of Business and Retail Management Research (JBRMR), 10(2), 94–

i i i i i i i i i

104.

i [15] Khorrami, M. S., Esfidani, M. R. E., & Delavari, S. (2015). The Effect of
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i Situational Factors on Impulse Buying and Compulsive Buying: Clothing.

i i i i i i i i

i International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, 2(8), 823– i i i i i i i i

837. i

[16] Kotler, P. (2009). Marketing Management. New York: Prentice Hall.

i i i i i i i i i i

[17] Lee, F., & Kim, I. (2008). Online consumers' perceived risk analysis: a
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i graphical modeling approach. Journal of Academy of Business and

i i i i i i i i

i Economics, 8(1). i i

[18] Lim P.L., & Rashad Y., (2015), What Internal And External Factors Influence
i i i i i i i i i i i i

i Impulsive Buying Behavior In Online Shopping? Global Journal of

i i i i i i i i

i Management and Business Volume 15 Issue 5. i i i i i i

i [19] McCorkle, D. E. (1990). The role of perceived risk in mail order catalog
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i shopping. modeling approach. Journal of Academy of Business and

i i i i i i i i

i Economics, 8(1). i

i [20] Noort, G. V., Kerkhof, P., & Fennis, B. M. (2007). Online versus conventional
i i i i i i i i i i i i i

i shopping: consumers’ risk perception and regulatory focus. Cyberpsychology

i i i i i i i

i & behavior: the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on
i i i i i i i i i i i

i behavior and society, 10(5), 731- 733. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9959.

i i i i i i

i [21] Sahney, S., Shrivastava, A., & Bhimalingam, R. (2008). Consumer Attitude
i i i i i i i i i i

i towards Online Retail Shopping in the Indian Context. The Icfai University
i i i i i i i i i i

i Journal of Consumer Behavior, 3(4), 34-68.

i i i i i