The document provides rubrics for assessing presentations and written assignments. The presentation rubric includes criteria for content, presentation skills, visual aids, attitude, and question/answer session. The content assessment rubric evaluates dimensions of organization, ideas, and supporting evidence/examples. Both rubrics provide scales to score elements as very poor, poor, fair, good, or very good.
The document provides rubrics for assessing presentations and written assignments. The presentation rubric includes criteria for content, presentation skills, visual aids, attitude, and question/answer session. The content assessment rubric evaluates dimensions of organization, ideas, and supporting evidence/examples. Both rubrics provide scales to score elements as very poor, poor, fair, good, or very good.
The document provides rubrics for assessing presentations and written assignments. The presentation rubric includes criteria for content, presentation skills, visual aids, attitude, and question/answer session. The content assessment rubric evaluates dimensions of organization, ideas, and supporting evidence/examples. Both rubrics provide scales to score elements as very poor, poor, fair, good, or very good.
Total Scale (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Content (40%) Includes most Includes essential Covers topic No essential Lack of essential essential information with thoroughly, includes includes adequate information and information and information, details __x8 = some supporting details that support coverage of knowledge in details details are somewhat the issues presented details the topic sketchy Engage audience, Presentation (20%) Clear and fluid delivery, uses Well prepared, Not clear, not Lack of clarity and understandable, different approach speaks clearly, includes English __x4 = understandable understandable uses limited other than simply delivers with ease, proficiency, eloquence and clarity delivery techniques reading screen, invites questions invites questions Visually attractive, Text is sometimes text is easy to read, Visually appealing, Slides/Video (20%) Text is very difficult Text is difficult to hard to read, colors enhance clean simple layout, to read, layout is read, layout is less sometimes graphics readability, graphics text is easy to read, refers to the attractiveness __x4 = cluttered and appealing and or special effects and special effects graphics enhance of visual presentation used confusing confusing distract from do not distract from understanding understanding understanding ideas ideas Attitude (10%) Inconsistent with Excellent eye Good eye contact, Presenter has a eye contact and contact, no Poor eye contact, no distracting clear presence in includes dress, posture , volume. Obvious distracting volume too low or gestures, usually the room that __x2 = eye contact, time used distracting gestures, and mannerism during loud, over time has appropriate commands mannerism(s); Over appropriate volume; presentation volume; on-time attention; on-time time on-time Answers are Answers are Shows knowledge Answers ramble, Answers are inconsistent in uniformly good, and at a professional off-target; may have uniformly good, Q & A (10%) quality, either in show knowledge level for the topic. __x2 = poor eye contact both in substance substance or beyond Answers questions when answering and delivery delivery presentation with authority Grand Total % Lampiran B
RUBRIK FOR CONTENT ASSESSMENT (I.E WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT/REPORT)
DIMENSIONS TRAITS 1 2 3
Introduction Not clearly Presents the Clearly
stated topic but presents about the does not the topic in topic engage the informative reader manner
Conclusion Lacks an Summarize Summarize
identifiable and repeat and offer conclusion what has excellent been said overview of the topic
Logical Flow No logical Sensible flow Logical and
flow, but consistent ORGANISATION confusing, inconsistent flow choppy
Layout Poor Improper and Sections,
labeling of inconsistent sub-topics, sections, labeling tables and sub-topics, figures are tables and clearly figures labeled
Sentencing Poor Acceptable Excellent
sentence sentencing connection connection, but not clear with clear long enough sentences sentences
Problem No Too broad or Clear and
statement identificatio too narrow focused n of and loosely statement statement presented
Evidence of Missing or Relevant Well
support irrelevant support of supported supporting ideas with ideas relevant IDEAS details (CONTENT) Provision of No example Adequate Relevant examples given examples examples with no which connection to connect to the ideas the ideas
Presentation Repetitive Satisfactory Excellent
of argument or lack of argument and original clear point argument
No Available but Comprehen
reference inadequate, sive REFERENCE no proper compilation referencing of reference