Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How Democratic Is The US Constitution?
How Democratic Is The US Constitution?
How Democratic Is The US Constitution?
States Constitution, by design, empowers the Senate, the president, and the judicial
branch over most people in America. Therefore, because of the framer's original purpose
of limiting democracy and its undemocratic origins and elements, it is hard to say that the
The United States of America Constitution was written, ratified, and has been in
operation since the 18th century (1787, 1788, and 1789, respectively). For context, this
loose alliance between states formed a weak central government. In "Framing the
Constitution," Charles Beard proposes evidence that the framers of the Constitution were
more interested in protecting the interests of the wealthy class and private property than
in furthering democratic principles (Woll, 1). Thus, it is fair to affirm that the framers
approached the creation of the Constitution with two principal political purposes in mind.
First, to create a strong enough government to protect property from radical state
legislatures and promote commerce. Secondly, and more relevant to the topic, to prevent
the threat presented by the "excessive democracy" of the state and national governments
under the Articles of Confederation (Lowi, 48). Within the purposes of the Constitution,
the creation of the Constitution could not even be considered a democratic process. A
democracy can only be considered as so if the people govern themselves and have the
power within the legislation. Not only was the Constitution not created as the result of a
democratic process since only a few selected individuals wrote it, but it also did not give
power to all the people. Ironically, the famous first three words of the Consitution, "We
the People…" only referred to white men, leaving out both women and people of color.
Moreover, even some people who were constitutionally allowed to vote were restricted to
vote upon additional requirements from the different states. So, how can there be a
many elements. For example, one of the most significant undemocratic elements of the
framer's Constitution was that it enabled slavery to happen and even denied Congress the
power to prohibit slaves' importation. This specific constitutional right, along with many
adding amendments later in time. Some of the amendments added with the purpose of
changing the Constitution's undemocratic aspects were amendments thirteen (13), added
with the purpose of abolishing slavery; fifteen (15), added with the purpose of giving
people of color the right to vote; and nineteen (19), added with the purpose of giving
empowers the Senate, the president, and the judicial branch over its citizens. As a result
of The Connecticut Compromise (also known as The Great Compromise of 1787), the
Senate
overrepresents citizens from smaller states by allocating the same number of Senators as
citizens from larger states. The president's election can be considered undemocratic
because of the intervention of the Electoral College since it can sometimes overrule the
majority of the popular vote, thus disturbing the democratic nature and purpose of the
elections. A perfect example of this situation can be the 2016 presidential elections in
which Hillary Clinton won the majority vote. However, because of the Electoral
College's intervention, President Donald Trump assumed office. Finally, the judicial
branch. Although Hamilton defines the judiciary as "the weakest of the three departments
Constitution, judges can be appointed for life, giving them the power to shape the law of
an entire generation. In addition, federal judges also have the power to strike down laws
amend the Constitution. This possibility could be argued as democratic if it was not for
the fact that citizens do not actually partake in the process of amending the Constitution.
Article V states that only when two-thirds of both Houses approve may Congress propose
an amendment, thus giving the Senate the power to veto. This power has been used on
several occasions before, for example, to block amendment nineteen, which gives women
the right to vote. Because of the equality of state vote regardless of population (which I
previously mentioned), the Senate can stop an amendment from happening even if the
and taking into consideration everything that has been mentioned in this essay, including
democracy," the creation of the Constitution without an entirely democratic process, and
all the undemocratic elements within the Constitution itself, it is fair to say that the
framer's Constitution was not democratic enough. Some people would argue that with
time most of the undemocratic aspects of the Constitution have been amended. For
example, the addition of the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments of the Constitution,
ensured the rights and liberties of the American people. Democracy is built on the
fundament of human rights, and the Bill of Rights allowed these rights to be protected.
But, even with all the amendments that have been added since it was created, the
Constitution is still far from being the completely democratic document that most
Lowi, Theodore J., et al. American Government: Power and Purpose. W.W. Norton &
Company, 2021.
Woll, Peter, and Charles Beard. “Framing the Constitution.” American Government:
References
Federalist 78