Physics Letters B: V.P. Gonçalves, F.S. Navarra, D. Spiering

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Physics Letters B 768 (2017) 299–304

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Physics Letters B
www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb

Investigating the impact of the gluon saturation effects on the


momentum transfer distributions for the exclusive vector meson
photoproduction in hadronic collisions
V.P. Gonçalves a,∗ , F.S. Navarra b , D. Spiering b
a
Instituto de Física e Matemática, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Caixa Postal 354, CEP 96010-900, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
b
Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, CEP 05315-970 São Paulo, SP, Brazil

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: The exclusive vector meson production cross section is one of the most promising observables to
Received 4 January 2017 probe the high energy regime of the QCD dynamics. In particular, the squared momentum transfer (t)
Received in revised form 22 February 2017 distributions are an important source of information about the spatial distribution of the gluons in the
Accepted 6 March 2017
hadron and about fluctuations of the color fields. In this paper we complement previous studies on
Available online 10 March 2017
exclusive vector meson photoproduction in hadronic collisions presenting a comprehensive analysis of the
Editor: A. Ringwald
t-spectrum measured in exclusive ρ , φ and J / photoproduction in pp and P b P b collisions at the LHC.
We compute the differential cross sections taking into account gluon saturation effects and compare the
predictions with those obtained in the linear regime of the QCD dynamics. Our results show that gluon
saturation suppresses the magnitude of the cross sections and shifts the position of the dips towards
smaller values of t.
© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP3 .

1. Introduction the experimental LHC Run 1 data and the preliminary Run 2 data
can be successfully described within the color dipole formalism
Experimental results released in the last years have demon- if non-linear effects in the QCD dynamics are taken into account.
strated that photon – induced interactions in hadronic collisions The main advantage of this approach is that the main ingredi-
can be used to probe several aspects of the Standard Model (SM) ents can be constrained by the very precise HERA data and hence
as well as to test predictions of Beyond SM Physics. (For a recent the predictions for photon – induced interactions at the LHC are
review see Ref. [1].) In particular, the study of the exclusive vec- parameter free. In those previous works we presented our pre-
tor meson photoproduction in hadronic collisions is an important dictions for the t – integrated observables – rapidity distributions
source of information about the hadronic structure and also about and total cross sections – which have been measured by the AL-
QCD dynamics at high energies [2,3]. As exclusive processes are ICE, CMS and LHCb Collaborations at the LHC in the Run 1. In
driven by the gluon content of the target, with the cross sections principle, the t-distributions may be measured in Run 2 [1]. This
being proportional to the square of the scattering amplitude, they encourages us to extend our previous studies and present the color
are strongly sensitive to the underlying QCD dynamics. Addition- dipole predictions for the t-spectrum measured in exclusive vec-
ally, the squared momentum transfer (t) distributions give access
tor meson photoproduction in hadronic collisions. In particular, in
to the spatial distribution of the gluons in the hadron and about
this paper we will use the color dipole formalism to describe the
fluctuations of the color fields (see e.g. Ref. [4]).
photon-hadron interaction, with the scattering amplitude being ex-
In the last years exclusive vector meson photoproduction in
pressed in terms of the impact parameter Color Glass Condensate
hadronic collisions has been discussed by several authors consider-
(bCGC) model, which successfully describes the t-distributions for
ing different assumptions and distinct approaches (see e.g. Refs. [5,
the exclusive vector meson production at HERA. We will compute
7,8,10,9,6,11]). In particular, in Refs. [6,12] we demonstrated that
the t-spectrum for the exclusive ρ , φ and J / photoproduction
in pp and P b P b collisions at the LHC energies probed in the
* Corresponding author. Run 2. Moreover, in the case of P b P b collisions, we will consider
E-mail address: barros@ufpel.edu.br (V.P. Gonçalves). the coherent and incoherent contributions to exclusive production,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.03.009
0370-2693/© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by
SCOAP3 .
300 V.P. Gonçalves et al. / Physics Letters B 768 (2017) 299–304


which are associated to processes where the nucleus target scat- Aγ h→ V h (x, ) = i dz d2 r d2 bh e −i [bh −(1−z)r ]. ( V ∗ )
ters elastically or breaks up, respectively. For a similar analysis
considering alternative approaches see Ref. [13]. In order to in- × 2N h (x, r , bh ) , (3)
vestigate the impact of the gluon saturation effects, associated to
V∗
non-linear contributions for the QCD dynamics at high energies, where ( ) denotes the wave function overlap √ between the
we will compare our predictions with those obtained disregarding photon and vector meson wave functions, = − t is the momen-
these effects, i.e. using a linear model for the QCD dynamics. As tum transfer and bh is the impact parameter of the dipole relative
the dipole formalism of exclusive processes has been discussed in to the hadron target. Moreover, the variables r and z are the dipole
detail in our previous works [6,12,14,15], in the next Section we transverse radius and the momentum fraction of the photon car-
will only review the main elements needed to study exclusive vec- ried by a quark (an antiquark carries then 1 − z), respectively.
tor meson photoproduction in hadronic collisions. In Section 3 we N h (x, r , bh ) is the forward dipole-target scattering amplitude (for
will present our predictions for the rapidity and t-distributions and a dipole at impact parameter bh ) which encodes all the informa-
in Section 4 we will summarize our main conclusions. tion about the hadronic scattering, and thus about the non-linear
and quantum effects in the hadron wave function.√It depends on
the γ h center-of-mass reaction energy, W = [2ω s]1/2 , through
2. Formalism
the variable x = M 2V / W 2 . As in Refs. [6,12], in what follows we
will consider the Boosted Gaussian model [18,19] for the overlap
An ultra relativistic charged hadron (proton or nucleus) gives
function and the impact parameter Color Glass Condensate (bCGC)
rise to strong electromagnetic fields. In a hadronic collision, the
model [19] for the dipole-proton scattering amplitude N p . In this
photon stemming from the electromagnetic field of one of the two
model the dipole-proton scattering amplitude is given by [19]
colliding hadrons can interact with one photon of the other hadron
⎧ 
(photon-photon process) or can interact directly with the other ⎨  2 γ s + κ λ Y
ln(2/r Q s (b p ))
r Q s (b p )
hadron (photon-hadron process) [16]. In the particular case of ex- N p (x, r , b p ) = N0 2
r Q s (b p ) ≤ 2 (4)
clusive vector meson photoproduction in hadronic collisions, the ⎩ − A ln2 ( B r Q s (b p ))
1−e r Q s (b p ) > 2 ,
differential cross section can be expressed as follows
with κ = χ  (γ 
s )/χ (γs ), where χ is the LO BFKL characteristic
dσ [h1 + h2 → h1 ⊗ V ⊗ h2 ] function. The coefficients A and B are determined uniquely from
dY dt the condition that N p (x, r , b p ), and its derivative with respect to
 
dN dσ r Q s (b p ), are continuous at r Q s (b p ) = 2. The impact parameter de-
= ω |h1 (γ h2 → V ⊗ h2 ) pendence of the proton saturation scale Q s (b p ) is given by:
dω dt ωL
 
1
dN dσ  x λ2 bp2
2γs
+ ω |h2 (γ h1 → V ⊗ h1 ) , (1) Q s (b p ) ≡ Q s (x, b p ) =
0
exp − , (5)
dω dt ωR x 2B CGC
where the rapidity (Y ) of the vector meson in the final state is de- with the parameter B CGC being obtained by a fit of the t-depen-
termined by the photon energy ω in the collider frame and by the dence of exclusive J /ψ photoproduction. The factors N0 and γs
mass M V of the vector meson [Y ∝ ln (ω/ M V )]. Moreover, dσ /dt were taken to be free. In what follows we consider the set of
is the differential cross section for the γ h i → V ⊗ h i process, with parameters obtained in Ref. [20] by fitting the recent HERA data
the symbol ⊗ representing the presence of a rapidity gap in the fi- on the reduced ep cross sections: γs = 0.6599, κ = 9.9, B C GC =
nal state and ω L (∝ e −Y ) and ω R (∝ e Y ) denoting photon energies 5.5 GeV−2 , N0 = 0.3358, x0 = 0.00105 and λ = 0.2063. As demon-
from the h1 and h2 hadrons, respectively. Furthermore, dN dω
denotes strated in Ref. [20], these models allow us to successfully describe
the equivalent photon spectrum of the relativistic incident hadron, the high precision combined HERA data on inclusive and exclusive
with the flux of a nucleus being enhanced by a factor Z 2 in com- processes.
parison to the proton one. Eq. (1) takes into account the fact that In the case of a nuclear target, the exclusive vector meson pho-
both incident hadrons can be sources of the photons which will in- toproduction can occur in coherent or incoherent interactions. If
teract with the other hadron, with the first term on the right-hand the nucleus scatters elastically, the process is called coherent pro-
side of the Eq. (1) being dominant at positive rapidities while the duction. On the other hand, if the nucleus scatters inelastically,
second term dominating at negative rapidities due to the fact that i.e. breaks up, the process is denoted incoherent production. As
the photon flux has support at small values of ω , decreasing ex- discussed e.g. in Refs. [23,21,22], these different processes probe
ponentially at large ω . As in Refs. [6,12] we will assume that the distinct properties of the gluon density of the nucleus. While co-
photon flux associated to the proton and to the nucleus can be de- herent processes probe the average spatial distribution of gluons,
scribed by the Dress–Zeppenfeld [17] and the relativistic point – the incoherent ones are determined by fluctuations and correla-
like charge [16] models, respectively. tions in the gluon density. As demonstrated e.g. in Refs. [14,15],
In the color dipole formalism, the γ h → V h process can be fac- the incoherent processes dominate at large-t, with the coherent
torized in terms of the fluctuation of the virtual photon into a qq̄ one being dominant when t → 0. The coherent cross section is
color dipole, the dipole-hadron scattering by a color singlet ex- given by Eq. (2) in terms of the dipole-nucleus scattering ampli-
change and the recombination into the vector meson V . The final tude N A . As in our previous works [6,12,14,15], we will assume
state is characterized by the presence of a rapidity gap. The differ- that N A can be expressed as follows
ential cross section for the exclusive vector meson photoproduction  
can be expressed as follows 1
N A (x, r , b A ) = 1 − exp − σdp (x, r 2 ) A T A (b A ) , (6)
2
dσ 1
= |Aγ h→ V h (x, )|2 , (2) where T A (b A ) is the nuclear profile function, which is obtained
dt 16π
from a 3-parameter Fermi distribution form of the nuclear density
with the amplitude for producing an exclusive vector meson normalized to 1, and σdp is the dipole-proton cross section that is
diffractively being given in the color dipole formalism by expressed by
V.P. Gonçalves et al. / Physics Letters B 768 (2017) 299–304 301


σdp = 2 d2 b p N p (x, r , b p ) , (7)

with N p given by the bCGC model. For the calculation of the dif-
ferential cross section dσ /dt for incoherent interactions we apply
for the vector meson photoproduction the treatment presented in
Ref. [21], which is valid for t
= 0. Consequently, we have that

dσinc 1
= dzdz d2 rd2 r  ( V ∗ )( z, r )
dt 16π
× ( V ∗ )( z , r  ) |A|2 , (8)
with the average of the squared scattering amplitude being ap-
proximated by [21]

|A(r , r  , t )|2

= 16π B p d2 b A e − B p A N p (x, r )N p (x, r  ) A T A (b A )
2
2 2

  
× exp − 2π ( A − 1) B p T A (b A ) N p (x, r ) + N p (x, r  ) , (9)

where N p (x, r ) is the dipole-proton scattering amplitude. The pa-


rameter B p is associated to the impact parameter profile function
of the proton.
In order to investigate the impact of gluon saturation effects on
the exclusive vector meson photoproduction we will also estimate
the differential cross sections assuming that N p (x, r , b p ) is given
by the linear part of the bCGC model, which is

 2 γs + ln(2/r Q s (b p ))
r Q s (b p ) κλY
N p (x, r , b p ) = N0 , (10)
2
with the same parameters used before in Eq. (4). Moreover, in the
case of γ P b interactions we will assume that the dipole-nucleus
amplitude can be expressed by
1
N A (x, r , b A ) = σdp (x, r ) AT A (b A ) , (11)
2
with σdp expressed by Eq. (7) and N p given by Eq. (10). Using
Eq. (10) we disregard possible non-linear effects in the nucleon.
On the other hand, using Eq. (11) we disregard the multiple scat-
terings of the dipole with the nucleus, which generate non-linear
effects in the full calculation. Fig. 1. Rapidity distribution for the exclusive
√ ρ , φ and J / photoproduction in pp
collisions at s = 13 TeV.
3. Results
dynamics. In Fig. 2, we present our predictions for P b P b collisions.
In what follows we will present our predictions for exclusive In this case the difference between the linear and non-linear pre-
vector meson photoproduction in pp and P b P b collisions at the dictions is larger in comparison to the pp one. The difference is
LHC energies
√ of Run 2. In particular, we will consider pp col- a factor of the order of 10 at Y = 0 for ρ production, while for
lisions at s = 13 TeV and P b P b at 5.02 TeV. Our main focus J / production it is ≈ 2. This result is also expected, since the
will be on the transverse momentum distributions, which are ex- saturation scale Q s , which defines the onset of the gluon satura-
pected to be studied considering the higher statistics of Run 2 tion effects, increases with the atomic mass number ( Q s2 ≈ A 1/3 ).
[1]. However, firstly let us analyse the impact of the gluon satu- Our results indicate that in exclusive light vector meson photopro-
ration effects on the rapidity distributions at a fixed value of the duction in A A collisions we are probing deep in the saturation
momentum transfer t. We will estimate Eq. (1) for t = tmin , with regime. Moreover, we observe that gluon saturation effects are
tmin = −m2N M 4V / W 4 . In Fig. 1 we present our predictions for the non-negligible in the J / production. As verified in pp collisions,
rapidity distributions to be measured in pp collisions. We observe the study of φ production can be useful to understand in more
that the difference between the linear and non-linear predictions detail the QCD dynamics.
is larger for lighter vector mesons, with the gluon saturation ef- Let us now to analyze the impact of the gluon saturation ef-
fects decreasing the magnitude of the cross sections. In particular, fects on the transverse √ momentum distributions. Initially, let us
for exclusive ρ photoproduction, the predictions differ by a factor consider pp collisions at s = 13 TeV assuming two different fixed
≈ 2 at Y = 0. On the hand, for the J / production, the predictions values for the vector meson rapidity (Y = 0 and 3). The linear and
are similar. These results are expected, since the gluon saturation non-linear predictions for exclusive ρ , φ and J / photoproduc-
effects are predicted to suppress the contribution of the large size tion are presented in Fig. 3. Our results for Y = 0 indicate that
dipoles, which are dominant in the ρ case, but contribute less for the presence of gluon saturation effects shifts the dip positions to
the J / production. Moreover, these results indicate that the anal- smaller values of the transverse momentum, with the shift being
ysis of φ production is an important probe of the non-linear QCD larger for lighter mesons, where the contribution of these effects
302 V.P. Gonçalves et al. / Physics Letters B 768 (2017) 299–304

Fig. 2. Rapidity distribution for the exclusive


√ ρ , φ and J / photoproduction in
P b P b collisions at s = 5.02 TeV.
Fig. 3. Transverse momentum distributions for the exclusive ρ , φ and J / photo-

production in pp collisions at s = 13 TeV assuming two different values for the
is larger. In particular, for the J / production, the shift is small vector meson rapidity.
|t | ≈ 0.1 GeV2 , while for ρ we have |t | ≈ 0.7 GeV2 . Moreover,
for the production of light vector mesons, the number of dips in up becomes larger. Additionally, the presence of gluon saturation
the range |t | ≤ 3 GeV2 is larger when gluon saturation effects are effects strongly decreases the magnitude of the coherent cross sec-
present. Another important aspect that can be observed in Fig. 3 is tions, in particular for lighter vector mesons, and implies a shift in
that the position of the dip is not modified when we increase the the position of the dip to smaller values of t. In the case of the
rapidity. However, it is not so pronounced as for central rapidities. incoherent contribution, we have that the linear and non-linear
predictions are similar.
√ In Fig. 4 we present our predictions for P b P b collisions at
s = 5.02 TeV. We consider Y = 0 and present separately the co- Our results indicate that incoherent processes dominate at
herent and incoherent contributions. Similar results are obtained large-|t | and the coherent ones at small values of the momen-
for Y = 3. In the case of the incoherent predictions we only tum transfer. Therefore, one can expect that the analysis of the
present predictions for |t | ≥ 0.005 GeV2 , since the model proposed t dependence can be useful to separate coherent and incoherent
in Ref. [21] and used in our calculations fails to describe the van- interactions. However, as discussed in detail in Refs. [23,22], the
ishing of the incoherent cross section as |t | → 0. As expected, we experimental separation of these processes is still a challenge. In
find that the coherent cross section clearly exhibits the typical recent years, the detection of the fragments of the nuclear breakup
diffractive pattern. Moreover, the coherent processes are charac- produced in the incoherent processes, e.g. the detection of emitted
terized by a sharp forward diffraction peak and the incoherent one neutrons by zero-degree calorimeters, has been discussed in the
by a weak t-dependence. We have verified that the incoherent pro- literature as a alternative to separate coherent and incoherent pro-
cesses dominate at large-|t | and the coherent ones at small values cesses [23,22]. However, it is still not clear if this technique can be
of the momentum transfer. This is expected, since increasing the implemented and is feasible at the LHC. Considering that this sep-
momentum kick given to the nucleus the probability that it breaks aration is not yet possible, in Fig. 5 we present our predictions for
V.P. Gonçalves et al. / Physics Letters B 768 (2017) 299–304 303

Fig. 4. Transverse momentum distributions for the exclusive ρ , φ and J / pho- Fig. 5. Transverse momentum distributions for the exclusive ρ , φ and J / pho-
√ √
toproduction in P b P b collisions at s = 5.02 TeV. The coherent and incoherent toproduction in P b P b collisions at s = 5.02 TeV. The predictions for the sum of
contributions are presented separately. the coherent and incoherent contributions are presented for different values of the
vector meson rapidity.
the sum of the coherent and incoherent contributions. We observe
that the incoherent contribution partially fills the dip in the trans- as well as the Run 1 LHC data on vector meson photoproduction.
verse momentum distribution. However, it is still present, with its We presented predictions for the t-spectrum of the exclusive ρ , φ
position being affected by gluon saturation effects. and J / photoproduction in pp and P b P b collisions, which could
be compared with future experimental LHC data. In order to es-
4. Conclusions timate the impact of the gluon saturation effects, we also have
presented a comparison with the predictions obtained disregard-
The study of exclusive vector meson photoproduction in had- ing these effects. Our results demonstrate that gluon saturation
ronic collisions is strongly motivated by the expectation that this effects reduce the magnitude of the cross sections, with the reduc-
process may allow us to probe the QCD dynamics at high energies, tion being larger for lighter vector mesons. Moreover, the gluon
driven by the gluon content of the target (proton or nucleus) which saturation effects change the positions of the dips with respect to
is strongly sensitive to non-linear effects (parton saturation). Our the linear regime, shifting the dips to smaller values of the trans-
goal in this paper was to extend and complement previous stud- verse momentum. Finally, our results indicate that dips predicted
ies about exclusive vector meson photoproduction in pp and P b P b by the coherent contribution in P b P b collisions should be visible,
collisions, presenting the color dipole predictions for the transverse independently of the fact that this contribution could not been
momentum distributions taking into account gluon saturation ef- easily experimentally separated. These results are robust predic-
fects in the QCD dynamics. In particular, we have used an approach tions of the saturation physics, which can be used to investigate
that reproduces well the available HERA data on vector meson non-linear QCD dynamics in the kinematical range of the Run 2 of
photo and electroproduction, including data on the t-distributions, the LHC.
304 V.P. Gonçalves et al. / Physics Letters B 768 (2017) 299–304

Acknowledgements V. Guzey, M. Zhalov, J. High Energy Phys. 1310 (2013) 207, J. High Energy Phys.
1402 (2014) 046.
[10] S.P. Jones, A.D. Martin, M.G. Ryskin, T. Teubner, J. High Energy Phys. 1311
This work was partially financed by the Brazilian funding agen- (2013) 085, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (11) (2016) 633.
cies CNPq, CAPES, FAPESP and FAPERGS. [11] G. Sampaio dos Santos, M.V.T. Machado, J. Phys. G 42 (2015) 105001;
M.B.G. Ducati, F. Kopp, M.V.T. Machado, S. Martins, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016)
References 094023.
[12] V.P. Goncalves, B.D. Moreira, F.S. Navarra, arXiv:1612.06254 [hep-ph].
[13] V. Guzey, M. Strikman, M. Zhalov, arXiv:1611.05471 [hep-ph].
[1] K. Akiba, et al., LHC Forward Physics Working Group Collaboration, J. Phys. G [14] V.P. Gonçalves, D.S. Pires, Phys. Rev. C 91 (2015) 055207.
43 (2016) 110201. [15] V.P. Goncalves, F.S. Navarra, D. Spiering, J. Phys. G 43 (9) (2016) 095002.
[2] V.P. Goncalves, C.A. Bertulani, Phys. Rev. C 65 (2002) 054905. [16] G. Baur, K. Hencken, D. Trautmann, S. Sadovsky, Y. Kharlov, Phys. Rep. 364
[3] V.P. Goncalves, M.V.T. Machado, Eur. Phys. J. C 40 (2005) 519. (2002) 359;
[4] H. Mantysaari, B. Schenke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (5) (2016) 052301, Phys. Rev. D V.P. Goncalves, M.V.T. Machado, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 19 (2004) 2525;
94 (2016) 034042. C.A. Bertulani, S.R. Klein, J. Nystrand, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 55 (2005) 271;
[5] V.P. Goncalves, M.V.T. Machado, Phys. Rev. C 73 (2006) 044902, Phys. Rev. D 77 K. Hencken, et al., Phys. Rep. 458 (2008) 1.
(2008) 014037, Phys. Rev. C 84 (2011) 011902. [17] M. Drees, D. Zeppenfeld, Phys. Rev. D 39 (1989) 2536.
[6] V.P. Goncalves, B.D. Moreira, F.S. Navarra, Phys. Rev. C 90 (2014) 015203, Phys. [18] H. Kowalski, D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 114005.
Lett. B 742 (2015) 172. [19] H. Kowalski, L. Motyka, G. Watt, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 074016.
[7] W. Schafer, A. Szczurek, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 094014; [20] A.H. Rezaeian, I. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 074016.
A. Rybarska, W. Schafer, A. Szczurek, Phys. Lett. B 668 (2008) 126; [21] T. Lappi, H. Mantysaari, Phys. Rev. C 83 (2011) 065202.
A. Cisek, W. Schafer, A. Szczurek, Phys. Rev. C 86 (2012) 014905. [22] T. Toll, T. Ullrich, Phys. Rev. C 87 (2013) 024913.
[8] A. Cisek, W. Schäfer, A. Szczurek, J. High Energy Phys. 1504 (2015) 159. [23] A. Caldwell, H. Kowalski, Phys. Rev. C 81 (2010) 025203.
[9] L. Frankfurt, V. Guzey, M. Strikman, M. Zhalov, J. High Energy Phys. 0308 (2003)
043;

You might also like