Professional Documents
Culture Documents
21-04-15 Local Infrastructure and Public Works Devolved in Favor of Local Government Units
21-04-15 Local Infrastructure and Public Works Devolved in Favor of Local Government Units
Section 5. Rules of Interpretation. - In the interpretation of the provisions of this Code, the
following rules shall apply:
(a) Any provision on a power of a local government unit shall be liberally interpreted
in its favor, and in case of doubt, any question thereon shall be resolved in favor of
devolution of powers and of the lower local government unit. Any fair and reasonable
doubt as to the existence of the power shall be interpreted in favor of the local
government unit concerned;
(b) In case of doubt, any tax ordinance or revenue measure shall be construed
strictly against the local government unit enacting it, and liberally in favor of the
taxpayer. Any tax exemption, incentive or relief granted by any local government unit
pursuant to the provisions of this Code shall be construed strictly against the person
claiming it.
(c) The general welfare provisions in this Code shall be liberally interpreted to give
more powers to local government units in accelerating economic development and
upgrading the quality of life for the people in the community;
(d) Rights and obligations existing on the date of effectivity of this Code and arising
out of contracts or any other source of presentation involving a local government unit
shall be governed by the original terms and conditions of said contracts or the law in
force at the time such rights were vested; and
(e) In the resolution of controversies arising under this Code where no legal provision
or jurisprudence applies, resort may be had to the customs and traditions in the place
where the controversies take place.
xxx
(b) Such basic services and facilities include, but are not limited
to, the following:
(d) The designs, plans, specifications, testing of materials, and the procurement of
equipment and materials at P170 from both foreign and local sources necessary for
the provision of the foregoing services and facilities shall be undertaken by the local
government unit concerned, based on national policies, standards and guidelines.
(e) National agencies or offices concerned shall devolve to local government units
the responsibility for the provision of basic services and facilities enumerated in this
Section within six (6) months after the effectivity of this Code.
As used in this Code, the term "devolution" refers to the act by which the national
government confers power and authority upon the various local government units to
perform specific functions and responsibilities.
(f) The national government or the next higher level of local government unit may
provide or augment the basic services and facilities assigned to a lower level of local
government unit when such services or facilities are not made available or, if made
available, are inadequate to meet the requirements of its inhabitants.
(g) The basic services and facilities hereinabove enumerated shall be funded from
the share of local government units in the proceeds of national taxes and other local
revenues and funding support from the national government, its instrumentalities and
government-owned or controlled corporations which are tasked by law to establish
and maintain such services or facilities. Any fund or resource available for the use of
local government units shall be first allocated for the provision of basic services or
facilities enumerated in subsection (b) hereof before applying the same for other
purposes, unless otherwise provided in this Code.
(h) Regional offices of national agencies or offices whose functions are devolved to
local government units as provided herein shall be phased out within one (1) year
from the approval of this Code. Said national agencies and offices may establish
such field units as may be necessary for monitoring purposes and providing technical
assistance to local government units. The properties, equipment, and other assets of
these regional offices shall be distributed to the local government units in the region
in accordance with the rules and regulations issued by the oversight committee
created under this Code.
(i) The devolution contemplated in this Code shall include the transfer to local
government units of the records, equipment, and other assets and personnel of
national agencies and offices corresponding to the devolved powers, functions, and
responsibilities.
(j) To ensure the active participation of the private sector in local governance, local
government units may, by ordinance, sell, lease, encumber, or otherwise dispose of
public economic enterprises owned by them in their proprietary capacity.
Costs may also be charged for the delivery of basic services or facilities enumerated
in this Section.
xxx
(b) No such way or place or any part thereof shall be permanently closed without
making provisions for the maintenance of public safety therein. A property thus
permanently withdrawn from public use may be used or conveyed for any purpose
for which other real property belonging to the local government unit concerned may
be lawfully used or conveyed: Provided, however, That no freedom park shall be
closed permanently without provision for its transfer or relocation to a new site.
(c) Any national or local road, alley, park, or square may be temporarily closed during
an actual emergency, or fiesta celebrations, public rallies, agricultural or industrial
fairs, or an undertaking of public works and highways, telecommunications, and
waterworks projects, the duration of which shall be specified by the local chief
executive concerned in a written order: Provided, however, That no national or local
road, alley, park, or square shall be temporarily closed for athletic, cultural, or civic
activities not officially sponsored, recognized, or approved by the local government
unit concerned.
(d) Any city, municipality, or barangay may, by a duly enacted ordinance, temporarily
close and regulate the use of any local street, road, thoroughfare, or any other public
place where shopping malls, Sunday, flea or night markets, or shopping areas may
be established and where goods, merchandise, foodstuffs, commodities, or articles
of commerce may be sold and dispensed to the general public.
xxxx
The Court ruled in the case of Pimentel v Aguirre, G.R. No. 132988,
July 19+, 2000, that decentralization is simply the devolution of
national administration, not power, viz:
nder our present system of government, executive power is vested in the President. The 10
members of the Cabinet and other executive officials are merely alter egos. As such, they
are subject to the power of control of the President, at whose will and behest they can be
removed from office; or their actions and decisions changed, suspended or reversed. In 11
contrast, the heads of political subdivisions are elected by the people. Their sovereign
powers emanate from the electorate, to whom they are directly accountable. By
constitutional fiat, they are subject to the President’s supervision only, not control, so long as
their acts are exercised within the sphere of their legitimate powers. By the same token, the
President may not withhold or alter any authority or power given them by the Constitution
and the law.
Hand in hand with the constitutional restraint on the President's power over local
governments is the state policy of ensuring local autonomy. 12
them more effective partners in the pursuit of national development and social progress.' At 18
the same time, it relieves the central government of the burden of managing local affairs and
enables it to concentrate on national concerns. The President exercises 'general
supervision' over them, but only to 'ensure that local affairs are administered according to
19
law.' He has no control over their acts in the sense that he can substitute their judgments
20
Decentralization of power, on the other hand, involves an abdication of political power in the
favor of local government units declared to be autonomous. In that case, the autonomous
government is free to chart its own destiny and shape its future with minimum intervention
from central authorities. According to a constitutional author, decentralization of power
amounts to 'self-immolation,' since in that event, the autonomous government becomes
accountable not to the central authorities but to its constituency."
Under the Philippine concept of local autonomy, the national government has not completely
relinquished all its powers over local governments, including autonomous regions. Only
administrative powers over local affairs are delegated to political subdivisions. The purpose
of the delegation is to make governance more directly responsive and effective at the local
levels. In turn, economic, political and social development at the smaller political units are
expected to propel social and economic growth and development. But to enable the country
to develop as a whole, the programs and policies effected locally must be integrated and
coordinated towards a common national goal. Thus, policy-setting for the entire country still
lies in the President and Congress. As we stated in Magtajas v. Pryce Properties Corp.,
Inc., municipal governments are still agents of the national government.
In the case of Pimentel v Ochoa, G.R. No. 195770, July 17, 2012, the
Court had the occasion to explain that devolution of powers to the
local government units is not a complete relinquishment of central
central government powers, thus:
“In order to fully secure to the LGUs the genuine and meaningful autonomy that would
develop them into self-reliant communities and effective partners in the attainment of
national goals, Section 17 of the Local Government Code vested upon the LGUs the duties
16
and functions pertaining to the delivery of basic services and facilities, as follows:
(a) Local government units shall endeavor to be self-reliant and shall continue
exercising the powers and discharging the duties and functions currently vested upon
them. They shall also discharge the functions and responsibilities of national
agencies and offices devolved to them pursuant to this Code. Local government units
shall likewise exercise such other powers and discharge such other functions and
responsibilities as are necessary, appropriate, or incidental to efficient and effective
provision of the basic services and facilities enumerated herein.
(b) Such basic services and facilities include, but are not limited to, x x x.
While the aforementioned provision charges the LGUs to take on the functions and
responsibilities that have already been devolved upon them from the national
agencies on the aspect of providing for basic services and facilities in their respective
jurisdictions, paragraph (c) of the same provision provides a categorical exception of
cases involving nationally-funded projects, facilities, programs and services, thus:
(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (b) hereof, public works and
infrastructure projects and other facilities, programs and services funded by the
National Government under the annual General Appropriations Act, other special
laws, pertinent executive orders, and those wholly or partially funded from foreign
sources, are not covered under this Section, except in those cases where the local
government unit concerned is duly designated as the implementing agency for such
projects, facilities, programs and services. (Underscoring supplied)
The essence of this express reservation of power by the national government is that, unless
an LGU is particularly designated as the implementing agency, it has no power over a
program for which funding has been provided by the national government under the annual
general appropriations act, even if the program involves the delivery of basic services within
the jurisdiction of the LGU.
The Court held in Ganzon v. Court of Appeals that while it is through a system of
17
decentralization that the State shall promote a more responsive and accountable local
government structure, the concept of local autonomy does not imply the conversion of local
government units into "mini-states." We explained that, with local autonomy, the Constitution
18
did nothing more than "to break up the monopoly of the national government over the affairs
of the local government" and, thus, did not intend to sever "the relation of partnership and
interdependence between the central administration and local government units." In 19
Pimentel v. Aguirre, the Court defined the extent of the local government's autonomy in
20
terms of its partnership with the national government in the pursuit of common national
goals, referring to such key concepts as integration and coordination. Thus:
Under the Philippine concept of local autonomy, the national government has not completely
relinquished all its powers over local governments, including autonomous regions. Only
administrative powers over local affairs are delegated to political subdivisions. The purpose
of the delegation is to make governance more directly responsive and effective at the local
levels. In turn, economic, political and social development at the smaller political units are
expected to propel social and economic growth and development. But to enable the country
to develop as a whole, the programs and policies effected locally must be integrated and
coordinated towards a common national goal. Thus, policy-setting for the entire country still
lies in the President and Congress.
Decentralization of power, on the other hand, involves an abdication of political power in the
[sic] favor of local governments [sic] units declared to be autonomous. In that case, the
autonomous government is free to chart its own destiny and shape its future with minimum
intervention from central authorities. According to a constitutional author, decentralization of
power amounts to ‘self-immolation,’ since in that event, the autonomous government
becomes accountable not to the central authorities but to its constituency.22
In Mandanas v Ochoa, G.R. No. 199802, July 3, 2018, the Court explained this concept
further in this wise:
As a system of transferring authority and power from the National Government to the LGUs,
decentralization in the Philippines may be categorized into four, namely: (1) political
decentralization or devolution; (2) administrative decentralization or deconcentration; (3)
fiscal decentralization; and (4) policy or decision-making decentralization.
confers power and authority upon the various LGUs to perform specific functions and
responsibilities. It encompasses reforms to open sub-national representation and policies to
35
Section 19 of the LGC characterize political decentralization in the LGC as different LGUs
empowered to address the different needs of their constituents. In contrast, devolution in
favor of the regional units is more expansive because they are given the authority to regulate
a wider array of subjects, including personal, family and property relations.
Local Health Boards and the Local Development Councils, and has transferred some of
39 40
the authority from the agencies of the National Government, like the Department of
Education and the Department of Health, to such bodies to better cope up with the needs of
particular localities.
Fiscal decentralization means that the LGUs have the power to create their own sources of
revenue in addition to their just share in the national taxes released by the National
Government. It includes the power to allocate their resources in accordance with their own
priorities. It thus extends to the preparation of their budgets, so that the local officials have to
work within the constraints of their budgets. The budgets are not formulated at the national
level and imposed on local governments, without regard as to whether or not they are
relevant to local needs and resources. Hence, the necessity of a balancing of viewpoints and
the harmonization of proposals from both local and national officials, who in any case are
partners in the attainment of national goals, is recognized and addressed. 41
The constitutional authority extended to each and every LGU to create its own sources of
income and revenue has been formalized from Section 128 to Section 133 of the LGC. To
implement the LGUs' entitlement to the just share in the national taxes, Congress has
enacted Section 284 to Section 288 of the LGC. Congress has further enacted Section 289
to Section 294 of the LGC to define the share of the LGUs in the national wealth. Indeed, the
requirement for the automatic release to the LGUs of their just share in the national taxes is
but the consequence of the constitutional mandate for fiscal decentralization. 45
For sure, fiscal decentralization does not signify the absolute freedom of the LGUs to create
their own sources of revenue and to spend their revenues unrestrictedly or upon their
individual whims and caprices. Congress has subjected the LGUs' power to tax to the
guidelines set in Section 130 of the LGC and to the limitations stated in Section 133 of the
LGC. The concept of local fiscal autonomy does not exclude any manner of intervention by
the National Government in the form of supervision if only to ensure that the local programs,
fiscal and otherwise, are consistent with the national goals. 46
In fine, certain limitations are and can be imposed by Congress in all the forms of
decentralization, for local autonomy, whether as to power or as to administration, is not
absolute. The LGUs remain to be the tenants of the will of Congress subject to the
guarantees that the Constitution itself imposes.
It must be noted that former Senate Minority Leader Aquilino
Pimentel had called for the devolution of public works to local
governments in a press briefing in July 12, 2006.
http://legacy.senate.gov.ph/press_release/2006/0712_pimentel4.asp
https://legacy.senate.gov.ph/press_release/2009/1106_pimentel2.as
p