Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ijciet 09 08 0211
Ijciet 09 08 0211
net/publication/327529874
CITATIONS READS
2 695
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Sanjay Kumar on 24 September 2018.
Baboo Rai
Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering,
National Institute of Technology Patna, India
ABSTRACT
The CO2 emission amid the generation of concrete can be significantly reduced by
the partial substitution of Portland cement with Supplementary cementing materials
(SCMs) and consequently helps in producing a more reasonable and ecological
amicable concrete. Durability issues of normal cement concrete can be related with
the gravity of the atmosphere and the usage of unseemly high water/binder (w/b)
ratios. High-Performance Concrete (HPC) that has a w/b ratio in the range of 0.25 to
0.35 is usually more durable than ordinary concrete. By the incorporation of SCMs in
HPC durability of concrete is significantly enhanced, as the ingress of deleterious
chemicals is quite difficult and only superficial.The rate of hydration of Portland
cement supplanted with SCMs is enhanced due to the physical phenomena or chemical
reactions like nucleation effect and pozzolanic activity. The binary or ternary
composition of SiO2-Al2O3-CaO of SCMs at even large cement substitution ratios can
lead to astonishingly encouraging durability performance of concretes. Wider
application of additives in concrete is reported in the past as per their effect on the
properties of hardened and fresh concrete.This review paper includes literature
reviews related to HPC and effects of several mineral admixtures on properties of
such concrete.
Key words: High-Performance Concrete, Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Ultra Fine Slag,
Durability.
Cite this Article: Sanjay Kumar and Baboo Rai, A Review on Wider Application of
Supplementary Cementitious Materials on the Development of High-Performance
Concrete. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(8), 2018, pp.
187-204.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=9&IType=8
1. INTRODUCTION
Conventional vibrated concrete (CVC) has various issues, for example, corrosion of steel
reinforcement and delicacy of concrete construction. Therefore, most structures made with
conventional concrete require yearly maintenance[1]. As of now, there is a basic requirement
for cutting edge elite building materials for foundation and repair [2].
In recent years, the use of High-performance Concrete (HPC) in structures increased
considerably. HPC is a relatively new product, and its properties are different from those of
ordinary concrete. In spite of researchers‘ growing interest in this promising material, only a
few national and international building codes address concretes with compressive strength
values greater than 60 MPa.
The two major constituents of Concrete are – cement paste and aggregates. It is a
composite material including possible supplementary cementitious materials consisting of
aggregates enclosed in cement paste matrix. the adhesion between the paste and aggregate
surface mainly influences the strength of concrete [3]. By enhancing the strength of the
cement paste it is conceivable to build concretes up to 120MPa compressive strength, which
can be made possible by choosing type and dosage of admixtures and through the choice of
water-content proportion [4].
The base extent of the quality of High Strength Concrete (HSC) depending chiefly on the
availability of unrefined materials from the industry varies with time and land region. In the
1950‘s, concrete delivered with a 30 MPa compressive strength were believed to be HSC are
presently seen as low quality. In the 1960‘s concretes with 40-50 MPa compressive strength
were viewed as HSC while in the 70‘s and the early 80's concrete with 60 MPa strength have
been developed and utilized as a part of viable structures. Despite the speedy progress in
concrete technology in ninety‘s, concrete with compressive strength higher than 40-60 MPa is
still regarded as HSC. In the ACI 318[5], ―HSC are those that accomplish cylinder
compressive strength of no less than 41 MPa at 28 days‖. In the FIP/CIB (1990) [6] HSC is
defined as ―concrete having a 28-day cylinder compressive strength of 60 MPa‖.
Notwithstanding, with the ongoing headway in solid innovation and the accessibility of
different kinds of mineral and compound admixtures, and an extraordinary water retarder,
concrete of up to 100 MPa compressive quality would now be able to be created economically
with a worthy level of inconstancy utilizing ordinary aggregates [6].The strength of the
concrete they use was modest by current standards; the Lignosulfonate based water reducers
were mostly used at that time. The tendency of this water reducer was to entrap or entrain air,
as well as to retard set. To overcome this industry Slag (S) and Fly Ash (FA) had been
introduced after ensuring the quality and consistency [7]. The range of high strength concrete
produced was 45-60 MPa. It was impossible to increase the compressive strength of concrete
beyond 60 MPa with the available water reducers. The available water reducers mainly
lignosulfonate based were not capable in reducing the water / binder only further. The high
compressive strength of concrete was achieved by decreasing water binder ration beyond 0.35
which created a rheological constraint, in other words, loss in slump. The concrete mix
because unworkable The high-quality FA reduced the water demand and compensated the
slump loss and allowing the water-binder ratio to reduce further [8].
The advent of superplasticizers (High range water reducer) further helped in reducing
water binder ratio [9]. HRWR were much more powerful then lignosulfonates in reducing
water binder ratio up to 0.3 and still getting a slump than 250mm [10]. After researchers
started to lower water binder ratio below 0.3 by increasing the dosage of HRWR[9]. The
applications of HSC all around the globe have increased due to these developments. High
strength concrete, an innovative concrete started gaining wider use after concrete producer
allowed the blending of additives in the proportioning [11].
―The concrete that was known as HSC in the late 1970s is now referred to as HPC
because it has been found to be much more than just stronger: it displays enhanced
performances in such areas as durability and abrasion resistance. Although widely used, the
expression ‗‗HPC‘‘ is very often criticized as being too vague, even as having no meaning
atall. Since there is no single best definition for the material known as HPC, it is preferable to
define it as a low water/binder concrete which receives an adequate water curing. It must be
emphasized that the development of HPC technology has shown us once more what Ferret
[12] expressed in his original formula for calculating the compressive strength of a concrete
mixture: concrete compressive strength is closely related to the compactness of the hardened
matrix [13].‖
The difference between fundamental microstructure level of the cement paste with 0.65
and 0.25 water/cement ratios is schematically represented in Fig. 1. On close examination, the
cement grains per unit volume were more for 0.25 w/c ratios than for a 0.65 w/c ratio cement
paste. The 0.65 w/c ratio cement paste exhibited less water per unit volume. A totally unique
sort of hydrated cement paste is formed due to this major difference in water to cement ratio.
Figure 1 Schematic Image of the Microstructure Cement Pastes having w/c Ratios of 0.65 and 0.25.
(P.C. Aitcin 2003)[14]
The high compressive quality of HSC offers numerous advantages over conventional
concrete and can be profitably utilized in compression members like piles and columns. This
further leads to lessening in section size and increments inaccessible floor space. HSC can
likewise be viably utilized as a part of structureswhere large in-plane compressive stresses
exist, for example,shells and arches, domes folded plates. The inalienable methods of creating
HSC produce a thick microstructure leading to lesspenetration of aggressive agents into the
concrete core from the environment and consequently improve the durability of the structure.
Various reports and model codes [6], [15], [16] have outlined overall advancement and
utilization of HSC to exhibit its flexibility and far-reaching application possibilities.
Creation of HSC could possibly require extraordinary materials, however, it
unquestionably requires materials of the most astounding quality and their ideal proportions
[17]. The generation of HSC places more stringent necessities on material choice that reliably
meets prerequisites for workability and strength development [15]. In any case, numerous
preliminary batches are frequently required to create the information that empowers the
analysts and experts to recognize ideal blend extents for HSC. Functional cases of mix
proportions of HSC utilized as a part of structures officially assembled can likewise be the
helpful data in accomplishing HSC. Nagataki and Sakai (1994)[18] outlined various
techniques for achieving HSC, and are displayed in Fig. 2.
The basic in the generation of the high-quality structural concrete is the application of
chemical admixtures [25]. A few researches [26], [27] have shown that utilization of
Chemical admixtures in Self-compacting concrete (SCC) expands the quality and enhance the
solidness and flowability. Self-compacting concrete (SCC) is an exceptionally liquid-solid
because of its superior fresh properties. Under the influence of gravity it flows into a uniform
level with the ability to compact itself without the requirement of vibration. Along these lines,
this sort of concrete is of extraordinary intrigue, particularly as per the sparing, specialized
and ecological purposes of view [20], [28].
The significant enhancement of the durability and concrete strength is the result of the
limited w/c (w/b) proportion within the sight of new generation chemical admixtures [25].
The enhanced workability, and further, reduced bleeding and segregation in freshly mixed
concrete is due to application of chemical admixtures [24]. Moreover, a more impermeable
concrete is achieved with diminishment in the proportion of water to cement, with a better
overall resistance to belligerent environments.
problem to the concrete as it leached out easily by water. This also increases the porosity in
the concrete, it has positive feature also that it maintain a high pH, which protects the
reinforcing steel. After addition of FA that lime is utilized since the FA is slow in reaction due
to its particle size, the early gain of strength is not possible. So free or liberated lime, if mixed
with reactive pozzolan in appropriate proportion can be transformed into CSH as shown
through the sequence. Portland cement + pozzolan + water C- S – H. Theoretically it
requires 30-40% pozzolan to consume all liberated free lime to complete the reaction but in
reality, the pozzolanic reaction is never completed.
As Mehta [39] showed, the addition of FA will, accelerate the reactions and forms smaller
CaOH crystals in the cement matrix. In most cases, for the precipitation of the hydration
products of the cementitious paste the number of nucleation sites increases by the addition of
FA in the cementitious paste. This is attributed to the chemical action of the pozzolanic
reactions which causes the refinement of CH grains as the curing time progresses. Berry
[40]also noticed that the unreacted FA particle may fill the voids and increase paste density.
As the FA content in the paste increases this effect is more pertinent.
FA possesses comparatively high potential activity as it consists of much-unfixed SiO2
and Al2O3. According to Cao et al (2000) [41] ―The main useful effect of FA in concrete
consists of three aspects, often called morphologic effect, pozzolanic effect, and micro-
aggregate effect. The morphologic effect states that there are many microbeads in FA working
as lubricating balls when incorporated in fresh concrete; hence it benefits the fluidity. The
micro-aggregate effect of FA states the microbeads in FA can disperse well in concrete and
combine firmly with gel produced in cement hydration, and thus promote concrete density.
The pozzolanic effect is the main effect of FA, which states that the unfixed SiO2 and Al2O3
in FA can be activated by Ca (OH)2 product of cement hydration and produce a more
hydrated gel‖.
In concrete with high volume FA the strength of concrete improves as the capillary in
concrete are completely filled due to the gel produced from the pozzolanic action. The
commitment of pozzolanic impact to strength can likewise be viewed as one part of cement
contribution while taking the cement hydration as a prerequisite.It ought to likewise be
brought up here that the above three effects of FA in certainty co-influence with each other,
however,centre around the different performance of concrete, individually. Since it is
troublesome and not important to recognize the beforehand specified three impacts, regularly
they are all in all called ―fly ash effect‖ or ―pozzolanic effect.‖
The mass of SF added in concretes is usually between 5 and 15% of the total mass of the
cementitious material, with 10% being a typical value. The actual dosage of super plasticizer
depends on the content of active solids in the liquid super plasticizer, the amount of water, the
rheological properties required, and the content and characteristics of the cementitious
materials. The value of the water-cementitious materials ratio (w/cm) is usually in the range of
0.25 to 0.35 [29]. Practically speaking, the mixture proportions differ, contingent upon the
properties of the individual ingredients and on the coveted properties of the concrete in
benefit.
The partial replacement of cement with Supplementary Cementitious Material (SCM)
such as SF decreases the permeability by the formation of C-S-H gel in the concrete mix
which further put resistance against corrosion [53], [54]. SF is considered to produce low
permeability concrete because of its high pozzolanicity and extreme fineness [55].Moreover,
the incorporation of supplementary materials such as SF appeared to fill the spaces between
cement grains. this further leads to reduction in water permeability, penetration of chloride
ions, and, consequently, reduces the corrosion rate of reinforcements [56].
Calcium hydroxides produced by the hydration of ordinary Portland cement is consumed
by the oxides (SiO2) present in SF during the pozzolanic reaction which further results in
lowerporosity, permeability and bleeding. The pozzolanic reactionsalso leads to lower heat
liberation and strength development; lime-consuming activity; smaller pore size distribution.
SF due to its pozzolanic action improves the bond between the paste and aggregate. So its use
in high-performance concrete is widely accepted. The denseness in the concrete mix after
incorporation of SF at low water binder ratio is improved and subsequently the compressive,
flexural and split tensile strength is increased [47], [57]–[59]. Therefore it has been used as a
replacement material in the production of high-performance concrete. The same has been
observed during an extensive experimentalstudy over the water-binder ratios ranging from
0.26 to0.42 and SF to binder ratios from 0.0 to 0.3 [47].
The pozzolanic property of SF helps in the formation of C-S-H gel and as a result, there is
a significant improvement in impermeability. However, the other property such as workability
gets reduced [60]. A 15 to 20mm slump loss as compared toconventional concrete after
addition of 7.5% SF has been reported. The same has been reported by Ghafoori et.al[61].To
overcome this adverse effect of silica fume on freshmixture workability, researchers and
designers usually alter the mixture proportionof plain concrete (without SF) upon
theincorporation of SF[62].
In deciding whether or not to use SF, economic considerations have to be taken into
account, in addition to the technical benefits of using SFs, such as improved workability and
higher early strength. The optimum SF content for maximum compressive strength is
about10% by mass of cement. Sometimes an optimum content as high as 15% is
suggested[63]. The question arises, however, whether this optimum is constant for different
curing conditions and w/cm (water-binder ratios [w/b]), and finally, for different mechanical
characteristics of HPC.
the ash so delivered had poor pozzolanic properties and was nearly crystalline. The impact of
pyroprocessing parameters on the pozzolanic reactivity of RHA are portrayed in the first of a
few papers published by Mehta in 1973. In view of his exploration, Pitt (1976)[67] planned
for controlled burning of rice husks in a fluidized-bed heater. By doing so, a highly reactive
RHA was obtained.
The effect of incineration conditions on the pozzolanic properties of the ash and a review
of physical and chemical characteristics of RHA is documented in a state-of-the-art report on
rice husk ash (RHA) published by Mehta‘O in 1992 [68]. The report also contains rundown of
the exploration discoveries from various nations on the usage of RHA as a supplementary
cementing material.
For quite a few years, a very receptive pozzolanic material (RHA) being utilized in
concrete production has been inquired about, particularly in developing nations. The
properties RHA change with the distinctions in burning conditions, geographic area, and
fineness [69]–[71].High silica content, up to 95%, in the form of amorphous silica are present
in highly reactive RHA [72]. Generally, the reactivity is also favoured by the porous structure
of the particles which forms a very large surface area. The high reactivity is also attributed to
the increase the fineness of the RHA [69]–[71], [73], [74]. The internal surface area of the
particles activates the pozzolanic effect in RHA‘s, despite that, Mehta [75]has considered that
the grinding of RHA to a high degree of fineness should be avoided. The particle size of RHA
in the 10–75 µm range exhibits satisfactory pozzolanic behaviour have been reported [76].
RHA if processed and utilized appropriately, offers comparable advantages like SF with
respect to the enhanced strength and durability of concrete [64], [66], [77]. RHA not only
enhances the concrete properties but also provides pecuniary and ecological benefits.
Understanding the complex advantages of RHA, it has been utilized effectively to deliver
HPC [77].
Very recently, Md. Safiuddin et al [78] produced various Self Compacting High-
Performance Concrete (SCHPC) using customary RHA as an SCM. The effects of RHA were
for the most part researched regarding the key hardened properties of concrete. He concluded
that the hardened properties of the concretes were logically enhanced with the expanded
substance of RHA in view of its microfilling and pozzolanic impacts, which enhance the
microstructure and pore structure of concrete in bulk paste matrix and transition zone.
The decision to use the slag clearly depends on its availability at an economic price. It
appears that slag performs well in HPC. Up to now, slag has always been used in conjunction
with SF to make HPC up to 75MPa and has never been used for HPC>75 up to 150MPa.Since
slag and FA are not as reactive as Portland cement; hence one day or 3days compressive
strength gain is not reported till date. In conjunction with SF, the slag can be used. The heat of
hydration produced by the slag due to its composition is less than Portland cement, whereas
cementing efficiency is almost the same. The advantages of GGBFS are
1. Reduction in heat of hydration
2. Enhancement of pore structures.
3. Reduction in porousness.
It makes concrete more cohesive. The bleeding which appears after addition of
dispensable solid in the mix can be arrested by the use of GGBFS. Selection of dosage is
confirmed after the evaluation of fresh concrete and hardened concrete properties. Available
literature indicates its use up to 30%. For HPC with GGFBS at w/b of 0.30, compressive
strength reaches the highest value at the optimum replacement of 15% [82].Concrete
containing 40% slag with 450 kg/m3 cement exhibits greater strength (83.8 Mpa) than that of
control normal PCC Concrete [83].It has been observed that Weight sorptivity slightly
increases by replacing 50% of OPC with GGBS yet effective porosity is smaller than for OPC
concrete. The same effect has also been observed in case of SF concrete. The gain in strength
of concrete with GGBS at early ages is less but continues to gain strength over a long period
as the grain size of GGBS is less than ordinary Portland cement[84].
shifting measure of cement dosage were analyzed. The compressive quality diminished
beyond the ideal substitution level of 40%. At long last, they achieved maximum compressive
quality of concrete with 42% of cement supplanted by FA (according to the cement dosage).
For 45% FA replacement of cement content, Cao et al[41]achieved the most astounding
cement compressive quality of 55.4 MPa following 28 days. Hannesson et al analysed the
properties of self-compacting concrete and contemplated the impact of FA and Sup to 100%
cement replacement. As per their investigation the ideal measure of slag, and additionally of
FA powder (both C and F Classes), was around 40%. The reference self-compacting concrete
achieved 80 MPa during the exploratory program. The most extreme compressive quality of
85 MPa following 28 days was demonstrated by concrete with slag and the one containing FA
came to 87 MPa.
Most of the researchers [104]–[107] produced HSCs with ternary binders exclusively
using SF as it helped in achieving a higher packing density apart from filling well the
intergranular space to. For instance, for the cement: SF: MK ratio of 75:8:17,Borosnyói[108]
achieved compressive strength after 28 days, of 91 MPa as the best result. Further, based on
ternary cement with the Portland cement: FA: RHA and Portland cement: FA: SF ratio of
7:2:1. Le et al[107] proposed, several concrete mixtures and achieved 120 MPa compressive
strength as the best result after 28 days. Moreover, a very substantial synergy was achieved
[109]when the Portland cement-FA-spent fluid catalytic cracking catalyst (FCC) binder with a
7:2:1 ratio was used . Approximately 20% improvement in compressive strength, with 97
MPa as the best value after 28 days, was reported due to the application of FCC as compared
with the 7:3:0 and 10:0:0 binders.
The effects of SCMs on the rheological and mechanical properties of SCC and high-
performance cement grout have been evaluated by several researchers[110]–[112]. The
rheological behaviour of SCC containing SF, S, and FA was evaluated. for the mixtures
containing binary cement (SF), ternary cement (SF and FA), and quaternary cement (SF, FA,
and S)lower plastic viscosity values was reported than corresponding plain SCC mixtures
[112]. Instead of numerous benefits of SCMs in SCC, they may likewise debilitate SCC
properties in comparison to the conventional SCC. For example, SF may impede the required
workability in fresh concrete but early strength significantly increments and permeability
recognizably lessens. In contrast, enhanced workability is observed by inclusion of Slag but
early strength generally decreases. Combinations of SCMs have found huge significance in
construction industry recently due to these contrary impacts [110].
The impacts of SCMs on the rheological characteristics of cement grouts were tried and
the conclusion was the partial replacement of cement with FA and S expanded the plastic
viscosity in comparison to that of the reference grout made without any SCMs, in spite of the
fact that, SF decreased the plastic viscosity perceptibly [111]. In another study, the
compressive strength of cement grouts, with the addition of high amounts of class F fly ash
and GGBFS, was investigated by Fonseca et al. [113]. The authors have concluded that high
volume FA and FA-GGBFS substitution of Portland cement (PC) is a reasonable option to
make grout masonry construction more economical and sustainable. The grouts made with up
to 55% FA and up to 85% FA-GGBFS achieved desirable grout compressive strength that
could essentially be compared to conventional masonry grout. Also, the authors have reported
that ternary blended (FA and S) grout mixes accomplished higher extreme compressive
qualities than those of binary blends (FA) and PC grout mixes.
The hindrance of pores and voids by the activity of the finer grains (physical or filler
effect) and changes in pore structure created by the decrease in the grain size caused by the
pozzolanic effect (PE) are the most imperative impacts in the cementitious paste
microstructure. A small number of available literatures put a figure on these two effects.
According to Isaia‘s [114], [115] studies, ―when a less reactive pozzolan is employed in
ternary mixtures together with another one more reactive such as SF or rice husk ash, there is
a synergy between these pozzolans, thus the obtained result is higher than those verified in the
respective binary mixtures; this result is called the synergic effect. This FA effect may be
explained by its physical effect because it is related to the cement grain deflocculation
provided by FA which is higher than that provided by SF or rice husk ash particles. This
higher deflocculation increases the specific cement surface contacting water, being enhanced
by the electro kinetic potential (zeta potential) between the particles. These mechanisms
propitiate more quantity of nucleation sites to begin the hydration reactions, and the final
result would be a higher amount of hydrated products and, consequently, higher calcium
hydroxide consumption, pozzolanic activity and, finally, unitary strength gain (per mass unit
of Portland cement in the mixture) or the enhancement of other variables linked with
durability. The physical action enhances the chemical one, and the concrete global
performance is increased‖.
For delivering HPC, it is very much perceived that the utilization of SCM for example,
SF, GGBS, RHA and FA, are fundamental. These materials enhance the durability and
strength attributes of concrete when used as mineral admixtures in HPC.
Nonetheless, in most cases, both the early age and long-term strengths was found to
decrease by using high volumes of SCMs [116]. In some cases, the decrease in early strength
was compensated by adding SF [97], [117]–[119] while endeavouring to keep up/improve the
durability attributes related with high volume replacements levels of Portland cement with
SCMs. Concretes with these cementitious materials are utilized broadly all through the world.
Power, gas, oil and nuclear industries are a portion of the real clients. The applications of such
concretes are expanding with the progression of time because of their unrivalled basic
execution, ecological agreeableness and low effect on vitality usage[120].The utilization of
HPC in concrete structures has expanded as of late [121].
Different previous studies [95], [122], utilized different types of SCMs, aggregates, curing
and testing conditions for preparing HPC concrete. The comparison of the performance of
such concrete produced by different researchers with respect to strength and durability is
difficult to generalize for any given application and is beyond the scope of this review. In any
case, a nearby examination of distributed information demonstrate that the HPC can be made
with any blend of cement and mineral, such as SF, GGBS, RHA and FA,MK, ultra fine
Sand/or fillers, such as limestone powder.
4. CONCLUDING STATEMENT
Going through the published literature it can be very well established that HPC can be
prepared through a careful proportioning of its ingredients. The physical and chemical
properties of individual ingredients and their compatibility with each other are the key
elements in achieving a gain in compressive strength of the concrete mix or the gain in an
initial slump.
Binary, ternary and quaternary systems are progressively used to exploit the synergy of
different mineral components to enhance properties of concrete in the fresh and solidified
states, and to manufactureHPC more cost-effective and environment friendly.
To enhance the adoption of these materials in codes, there is a need for developing a
database of mechanical properties of HPC to be established by experimental work and
thorough statistical analysis.
Although much work has been done on minimizing cement, there still exist plenty of
scopes that need to be investigated further. A means to meet this growing demand is by using
a high amount of SCMs in HPC. The performance of these materials is largely dependent on
their physical and chemical characteristics. It is generally accepted that the SCMs with high
silica and alumina, abundant amorphous content in phase composition and similar or finer
particles size than cement grains lead to better pozzolanic reactivity. Although these SCMs
are widely used in normal concrete, it is necessary to give a suggestion on the optimum
proportions of these materials in HPC.
REFERENCES
[1] P. R. Gupta and K. N. Shiu, ―Effective Repair and Maintenance Strategies for Parking
Structures,‖ Concr. Repair Bull., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 30–34, 2014.
[2] U. S. D. of H. S. (DHS) S. and Technology, ―UHPC Ultra-High Performance Concrete,‖
Technical Report, Washington, DC, 23.‖
[3] L. Berntsson, T. Kutti, and S. Chandra, ―Principles and Factors Influencing High-Strength
Concrete Production,‖ Concr. Int., vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 59–62, 1990.
[4] P. K. Mehta and P.-C. Aitcin, ―Effect of Coarse Aggregate Characteristics on Mechanical
Properties of High-Strength Concrete,‖ ACI Mater. J., vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 103–107, 1990.
[5] ACI Committee 318, ―Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-95)
and commentary (ACI 318R-95),‖ Am. Concr. Inst., vol. 552, no. d, p. 503, 1995.
[6] C. CEB-FIP, ―Model Code 1990,‖ Com. Euro-International Du Beton, Paris, pp. 87–109,
1991.
[7] J. Albinger and J. Moreno, ―Higher strength concrete: Chicago Style,‖ Concr. Constr., vol.
26, no. 36, pp. 241–245, 1991.
[8] E. Berry, R. Hemmings, M. Zhang, B. Cornelius, and D. Golden, ―Hydration in high
volume fly ash concrete binders,‖ ACI Mater. J., vol. 91, no. 4, 1994.
[9] K. Ozawa, K. Maekawa, and H. Okamura, ―Development of High Performance Concrete,‖
J. Fac. Eng. Univ. Tokyo, vol. XLI, no. 3, pp. 381–439, 1992.
[10] K. H. Khayat and P. C. Aitcin, ―Silica Fume in Concrete - An Overview.,‖ Istanbul Conf.
Proceeding, no. 508, pp. 1–14, 1992.
[11] J. Moreno, ―High strength concrete in Chicago high rise buildings, in concrete structures
for the future,‖ in Proceedings of IABSE symposium, Versaillers, Paris, IABSE-4IPC-
IVBH, Zarich, 1987, pp. 407–412.
[12] R. Feret, ―On the compactness of hydraulic mortars. Memoirs and documents relating to
the art of constructions at the service of the engineer,‖ Ann. des Ponts Chaussées, vol. 2nd
semest, pp. 5–161, 1892.
[13] P. C. Aitcin, ―The durability characteristics of high performance concrete: a review,‖
Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 25, no. 4–5, pp. 409–420, 2003.
[14] P. C. Aitcin, ―The durability characteristics of high performance concrete: a review,‖
Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 25, no. 4–5, pp. 409–420, 2003.
[15] ACI Committee 363, ―State-of-the-Art Report on High-Strength Concrete (ACI 363R-
92),‖ ACI J. Proc., vol. 92, no. Reapproved, 1992.
[16] R. Favre and H. Charif, ―Basic model and simplified calculations of deformations
according to the CEB-FIP model code 1990,‖ ACI Struct. J., vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 169–177,
1994.
[17] P. M. C. and R. L. Carrasquillo, ―Evaluation of the Use of Current Concrete Practice in
the Production of High Strength Concrete,‖ ACI Mater. J., 1988.
[18] E. Nagataki, S and Sakai, ―Applications in Japan and South East Asia,‖ in In High-
Performance Concretes and Applications, E. A. S. P. Shah and S. H. Ahmad, Ed. London,
1994, pp. 375–397.
[19] V. Malhotra, ―Superplasticizers and other chemical admixtures in concrete,‖ in Proc of 7th
CANMET/ACI international conference on superplasticizers and other chemical
admixtures in concrete. editor. ACI SP-217, Berlin, 2003.
[20] W. N. Wczelik and B. Trybalska, ―Effect of admixtures on the rate of hydration and
microstructure of cement paste,‖ Cem. Wapno Bet., vol. 6, pp. 284–289, 2007.
[21] P. Łukowski, ―Admixtures for mortars and concretes (in Polish).,‖ in Polish Cement
Association, Cracov, 2003.
[22] L. Kucharska, ―Traditional and modern water reducing concrete admixtures,‖ Cem.
Wapno Bet., vol. 2, pp. 46–61, 2000.
[23] N. Spiratos, M. Page, N. P. Mailvaganam, V. M. Malhotra, and C. Jolicoceur,
―Superplasticizers for Concrete- Fundamentals, Technology and Practice,‖ in
Supplementary Cementing materials for Sustainable Development, Ottawa, Canada, 2003.
[24] W. Nocun‘-Wczelik, ―A contribution to the study of kinetics and the mechanism of the
influence of concrete admixtures,‖ in Concrete days - Tradition inowoczesnos‘c‘, 335,
Wisła, 2004.
[25] W. Nocun-Wczelik, T. Wasag, M. Styczynska, and G. Miklaszewski, ―Effect of some
concrete admixtures on the Portland cement hydration,‖ Cem. Wapno Bet., vol. 14, no. 5,
p. 223–+, 2009.
[26] S. Kumar and B. Rai, ―A review of durability properties of SCC with high volume fly
Ash,‖ Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol., vol. 9, no. 4, 2018.
[27] B. Rai, S. Kumar, and K. Satish, ―Effect of Quarry Waste on Self-Compacting Concrete
Containing Binary Cementitious Blends of Fly Ash and Cement,‖ Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng.,
vol. 2016, 2016.
[28] L. Du and K. J. Folliard, ―Mechanisms of air entrainment in concrete,‖ Cem. Concr. Res.,
vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1463–1471, 2005.
[29] A. Neville and P.-C. Aïtcin, ―High performance concrete—An overview,‖ Mater. Struct.,
vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 111–117, 1998.
[30] P. C. Aïtcin, High-Performance Concrete. 1998.
[31] P.-C. Aitcin, A. Neville, and P. Acker, ―Integrated View of Shrinkage Deformation,‖
Concr. Int., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 35–41, 1997.
[32] I. Shiomi, Y. Masuda, M. Abe, M. Yasuda, and K. Kodama, ―Influence of Various Factors
on Drying Shrinkage of High-Strength Concrete,‖ in Proceedings, High-Strength Concrete
1993, Lillehammer, Norway, 1993, pp. 921–928.
[33] P. C. Aitcin, S. L. Sarkar, and P. Laplante, ―Long-term characteristics of a very high
strength concrete,‖ Concr. Int. Des. Constr., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 40–44, 1990.
[34] A. M. Paillere, M. Buil, and J. J. Serrano, ―Durability of Very High-Strength Concrete:
Effect of Hydration Shrinkage on Early-Age Cracking,‖ in First International RILEM
Conference, Materials Science to Construction Materials Engineering, Versailles,
Chapman and Hall, 1987, pp. 990–997.
[35] C. D. Atiş, ―Accelerated carbonation and testing of concrete made with fly ash,‖
Construction and Building Materials, vol. 17, no. 3. pp. 147–152, 2003.
[36] K. Ganesh Babu and G. Siva Nageswara Rao, ―Efficiency of fly ash in concrete with age,‖
Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 465–474, 1996.
[37] K. G. Babu and G. S. N. Rao, ―Efficiency of fly ash in concrete,‖ Cem. Concr. Compos.,
vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 223–229, 1993.
[38] M. J.G.L, O. L.T., and D. R.K., ―Mix proportioning of concrete with PFA: A critical
review,‖ ACI, SP 79, pp. 267–288, 1983.
[39] P. K. Mehta and N. Pitt, ―Energy and industrial materials from crop residues,‖ Resour.
Recover. Conserv., 1976.
[40] Berry EE et al, ―Hydration in high-volume fly ash concrete binders,‖ ACI Mater J, vol. 91,
no. 4, pp. 382–389, 1994.
[41] C. Cao, W. Sun, and H. Qin, ―The analysis on strength and fly ash effect of roller-
compacted concrete with high volume fly ash,‖ Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 71–
75, 2000.
[42] K. H. Khayat and P. C. Aitcin, ―Silica fume in concrete - an overview,‖ ACI SP-132, vol.
2, pp. 835–872, 1993.
[43] M. Mazloom, ―Effect of silica fume on mechanical properties of high-strength concrete,‖
Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 347–357, 2004.
[44] C. S. Poon, S. Kou, and L. Lam, ―Compressive strength, chloride diffusivity and pore
structure of high performance metakaolin and silica fume concrete,‖ Constr Build Mater,
vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 858–865, 2006.
[45] H. S. Wong and H. A. Razak, ―Efficiency of calcined kaolin and silica fume as cement
replacement material for strength performance,‖ Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 35, no. 4, pp.
696–702, 2005.
[46] R. D. Hooton, ―Influence of silica fume replacement of cement on physical properties and
resistance to sulfate attack, freezing and thawing, and alkali-silica reactivity,‖ ACI Mater.
J., vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 143–151, 1993.
[47] S. Bhanja and B. Sengupta, ―Influence of silica fume on the tensile strength of concrete,‖
Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 743–747, 2005.
[48] O. Gautefall, ―Effects of CSF on the diffusion of chloride throughhardened cement paste,‖
in Proceedings of the Second International Conferenceon the Use of Fly Ash, Silica Fume,
Slag and Natural Pozzolansin Concrete, vol. 2, American Concrete Institute, SP-91, 1986,
pp. 991–997.
[49] F. F. Radjy, ―A review of experience with condensed silica fume concretesand products,‖
in Proceedings of the Second International Conferenceon the Use of Fly Ash, Silica Fume,
Slag and Natural Pozzolansin Concrete, vol. 2, American Concrete Institute, SP-91, 1986,
p. 1135.
[50] K. Kohno, ―Relative durability properties and strengths of materialscontaining finely
ground silica and silica fume,‖ in Proceedings of theThird International Conference on the
Use of Fly Ash, Silica Fume,Slag and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, vol. 2, American
ConcreteInstitute, SP-114, 1989, pp. 815–826.
[51] T. Yamato, ―Chemical resistance of concrete containing condensedsilica fume,‖ in
Proceedings of the Third International Conference onthe Use of Fly Ash, Silica Fume,
Slag and Natural Pozzolans inConcrete, vol. 2, American Concrete Institute, SP-114,
1989, pp. 897– 914.
[52] S. L. Marusin, ―The influence of length of moist curing time on theweight change
behaviour and chloride permeability of concrete containingsilica fume,‖ in Proceedings of
the Third International Conferenceon the Use of Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag and
NaturalPozzolans in Concrete, American Concrete Institute, SP-114, 1989, pp. 924–929.
[53] V. M. Malhotra and P. K. Mehta, Pozzolanic and Cementitious Materials, vol. 1. 1996.
[54] F. Report:, ―Condensed silica fume in concrete. FIP State of Art Report, FIPCommission
ofConcrete. UK: Thomas Telford House,‖ 1988.
[55] J. Hou and D. D. L. Chung, ―Effect of admixtures in concrete on the corrosion resistance
of steel reinforced concrete,‖ Corros. Sci., vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1489–1507, 2000.
[56] R. Mejía de Gutiérrez, ―Effect of supplementary cementing materials on the concrete
corrosion control,‖ Rev. Metal., vol. 39, no. 94, pp. 250–255, 2003.
[57] M. G. Alexander and B. J. Magee, ―Durability performance of concrete containing
condensed silica fume,‖ Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 917–922, 1999.
[58] W. A. Al-Khaja, ―Strength and time-dependent deformations of silica fume concrete for
use in Bahrain,‖ Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 169–172, 1994.
[59] Y. L. Khatri RP, Sirivivatnanon V, ―Effect of curing on water permeability of concretes
prepared with normal Portland cement and with slag and silica fume,‖ Mag Concr Res,
vol. 49, pp. 167–72, 1997.
[60] K. H. Khayat, M. Vachon, and M. C. Lanctôt, ―Use of blended silica fume cement in
commercial concrete mixtures,‖ ACI Mater. J., vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 183–192, 1997.
[61] N. Ghafoori and H. Diawara, ―Strength and wear resistance of sand-replaced silica fume
concrete,‖ ACI Mater. J., vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 206–214, 2007.
[62] Z. Bayasi and J. Zhou, ―Properties of silica fume concrete and mortar,‖ ACI Mater. J., vol.
90, no. 4, pp. 349–356, 1993.
[63] R. Duval and E. H. Kadri, ―Influence of silica fume on the workability and the
compressive strength of high-performance concretes,‖ Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 28, no. 4,
pp. 533–547, 1998.
[64] W. Zhu and P. J. . Bartos, ―Permeation properties of self-compacting concrete,‖ Cem.
Concr. Res., vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 921–926, 2003.
[65] P. K. Mehta and P. J. M. Monteiro, Concrete: microstructure, properties, and materials.
2006.
[66] A. Salas, S. Delvasto, R. M. de Gutierrez, and D. Lange, ―Comparison of two processes
for treating rice husk ash for use in high performance concrete,‖ Cem. Concr. Res., 2009.
[67] N. Pitt, ―Process for preparation of siliceous ashes:US Patent,‖ 3959007, 1976.
[68] Mehta PK, ―Rice husk ash – a unique supplementary cementing material,‖ in Proceedings
of the CANMET/ACI international symposium on advances in concrete technology, 1992,
pp. 407–30.
[69] G. Rodríguez De Sensale, ―Strength development of concrete with rice-husk ash,‖ Cem.
Concr. Compos., 2006.
[70] A. N. Givi, S. A. Rashid, F. N. A. Aziz, and M. A. M. Salleh, ―Assessment of the effects
of rice husk ash particle size on strength, water permeability and workability of binary
blended concrete,‖ Constr. Build. Mater., 2010.
[71] S. Rukzon, P. Chindaprasirt, and R. Mahachai, ―Effect of grinding on chemical and
physical properties of rice husk ash,‖ Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2009.
[72] V. Della, I. Kuhn, and D. Hotza, ―Rice husk ash as an elemente source for active
silicaproduction,‖ Mater. Lett., 2002.
[73] D. D. Bui, J. Hu, and P. Stroeven, ―Particle size effect on the strength of rice husk ash
blended gap-graded Portland cement concrete,‖ Cem. Concr. Compos., 2005.
[74] G. A. Habeeb and H. Bin Mahmud, ―Study on properties of rice husk ash and its use as
cement replacement material,‖ Mater. Res., 2010.
[75] P. K. Mehta, ―Properties of Blended Cements Made from Rice Husk Ash,‖ J. Am. Concr.
Inst., 1977.
[76] C. L. Hwang and S. Chandra, ―The use of rice husk ash in concrete,‖ in Waste Materials
Used in Concrete Manufacturing, 1996.
[77] M. V. M. Zhang M.H., ―High performance concrete incorporating rice husk ash as a
supplementary cementing materials,‖ ACI Mater. J., vol. 93(6), no. 93, pp. 629–636,
1996.
[78] M. Safiuddin, J. S. West, and K. A. Soudki, ―Flowing ability of the binder pastes
formulated from self-compacting concretes incorporating rice husk ash,‖ Kuwait J. Sci.
Eng., 2011.
[79] D. M. R. and G. M. ldorn, ―Hydration, Structure, and Properties of Blast Furnace Slag
Cements, Mortars, and Concrete,‖ J. Proc., 1982.
[80] C. Arya and Y. Xu, ―Effect of cement type on chloride binding and corrosion of steel in
concrete,‖ Cem. Concr. Res., 1995.
[81] D. M. Roy and G. M. Idorn, ―Hydration , Structure , and Properties of Blast Furnace
Cements , Mortars , and Concrete,‖ ACI J., no. Nov-, pp. 444–457, 1982.
[82] A. Cheng, R. Huang, J. K. Wu, and C. H. Chen, ―Influence of GGBS on durability and
corrosion behavior of reinforced concrete,‖ Mater. Chem. Phys., 2005.
[83] C. Bilim and C. D. Ati, ―Alkali activation of mortars containing different replacement
levels of ground granulated blast furnace slag,‖ Constr. Build. Mater., 2012.
[84] S. K. Rao, P. Sravana, and T. C. Rao, ―Abrasion resistance and mechanical properties of
Roller Compacted Concrete with GGBS,‖ Constr. Build. Mater., 2016.
[85] M. A. J. Upadhyay, Siddharth P, ―Effect on compressive strength of high performance
concrete incorporating alcofine and fly ash,‖ J. Int. Acad. Res. Multidiscip., vol. 2, no. 2,
pp. 125–130, 2014.
[107] H. T. Le, M. Müller, K. Siewert, and H.-M. Ludwig, ―The mix design for self-compacting
high performance concrete containing various mineral admixtures,‖ Mater. Des., 2015.
[108] A. Borosnyói, ―Long term durability performance and mechanical properties of high
performance concretes with combined use of supplementary cementing materials,‖ Constr.
Build. Mater., 2016.
[109] L. Soriano, J. Payá, J. Monzó, M. V. Borrachero, and M. M. Tashima, ―High strength
mortars using ordinary Portland cement-fly ash-fluid catalytic cracking catalyst residue
ternary system (OPC/FA/FCC),‖ Constr. Build. Mater., 2016.
[110] A. A. A. Hassan, M. Lachemi, and K. M. A. Hossain, ―Effect of metakaolin and silica
fume on the durability of self-consolidating concrete,‖ Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 34, no.
6, pp. 801–807, 2012.
[111] K. H. Khayat, A. Yahia, and M. Sayed, ―Effect of supplementary cementitious materials
on rheological properties, bleeding, and strength of structural grout,‖ ACI Mater. J., 2008.
[112] A. J, ―Formwork pressure of self-consolidating concrete influence of thixotropy,‖ 2004.
[113] F. S. Fonseca, R. C. Godfrey, and K. Siggard, ―Compressive strength of masonry grout
containing high amounts of class F fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag,‖
Constr. Build. Mater., 2015.
[114] G. C. Isaia, A. L. G. Gastaldini, and R. Moraes, ―Physical and pozzolanic action of
mineral additions on the mechanical strength of high-performance concrete,‖ Cem. Concr.
Compos., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 69–76, 2003.
[115] G. C. Isaia, ―Synergic Action of Fly Ash In Ternary Mixtures of High-Performance
Concrete,‖ in SP-186: High-Performance Concrete: Performance and Quality of Concrete
Structures, 1999.
[116] P. Mehta, ―Pozzolanic and cementitious by-products in concrete – anotherlook,‖ in
Proceedings of the third international conference on fly ash, silicafume, slag and natural
pozzolans in concrete. Trondheim, Norway, AC1 SP 114-1, vol. 1, 1989, pp. 1–44.
[117] T. K. Erdem and Ö. Kirca, ―Use of binary and ternary blends in high strength concrete,‖
Constr. Build. Mater., 2008.
[118] M. H. Shehata and M. D. A. Thomas, ―Use of ternary blends containing silica fume and
fly ash to suppress expansion due to alkali-silica reaction in concrete,‖ Cem. Concr. Res.,
2002.
[119] S. Popovics, ―Portland cement-fly ash-silica fume systems in concrete,‖ Adv. Cem. Based
Mater., 1993.
[120] P. K. Mehta, ―Concrete Technology for Sustainable Development,‖ ACI Concr. Int., 1999.
[121] A. Neville and P. Aitcin, ―High performance concrete- An overview,‖ 1998.
[122] B. H. Oh, S. W. Cha, B. S. Jang, and S. Y. Jang, ―Development of high-performance
concrete having high resistance to chloride penetration,‖ Nucl. Eng. Des., 2002.