Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.1. Message Strategies
1.1. Message Strategies
1.1. Message Strategies
MESSAGE STRATEGIES
1.1.1. Introduction
The effectiveness of integrated marketing communication largely depends upon message. Ideally, the message should get
attention, hold interest, arouse desire, and obtain action. Message consists of facts, opinion, appeal, idea, symbols,
pictures or convincing arguments about the product.
Main purpose of ad-copy is to communicate with the target audience. Advertiser wants to send some information, facts,
and appeals, in a convincing way so that the attention of audience can be attracted and their interest can be aroused and
they can be persuaded to buy the advertiser’s product.
The decision regarding message-content, message-format, and message-source depends upon factors like – competition,
consumer-characteristics, buyer-behaviour, product features, legal factors, amount of ad-budget, etc.
Message Strategy
1.1.2.1. Cognitive Strategies
A Cognitive
cognitive message strategy is the presentation of rational arguments or pieces of information to consumers. These ideas
strategies Affective strategies
require cognitive processing. When a cognitive message strategy is used, the advertisement’s key message is about the
product’s attributes orstrategies
Conative the benefits. Customers can obtain these benefits by using the product. The goal of the cognitive
message strategy approach is to design an ad that will have an impact on a person’s beliefs and/or knowledge structure.
This can be accomplished by suggesting any one of a wide variety of potential product benefits. Foods may be described
as healthful, pleasant tasting, or low calorie. Cognitive message strategies make these benefits clear to potential
customers. There are five major forms of cognitive strategies:
1) Generic Messages: Generic messages are direct promotions of product attributes or benefits without any claim of
superiority. This type of strategy works best for a firm that is clearly the brand leader and is the dominant company in
the industry. The goal of the generic message is to make the brand synonymous with the product category.
2) Pre-emptive Messages: Pre-emptive messages claim superiority based on a product’s specific attribute or benefit.
The idea is to prevent the competition from making the same or a similar statement.
3) Unique Selling Proposition: A unique selling proposition (USP) is an explicit, testable claim of uniqueness or superiority
that can be supported or substantiated in some manner. Brand parity makes a unique selling proposition more difficult to
establish. Reebok claims it is the only shoe that uses DMX technology, which provides for a better fit. Reebok can use this
unique selling proposition because the company holds patents on DMX technology.
4) Hyperbole: The hyperbole approach makes an untestable claim based upon some attribute or benefit. When NBC
claims that its Thursday night line up is “America’s favourite night of television,” the claim is a hyperbole. These
claims do not have to be substantiated, which makes this cognitive strategy quite popular.
5) Comparative Advertisement: When an advertiser directly or indirectly compares a good or service to the
competition, it is the comparative method. The advertisement may or may not mention the competitor by name. This
approach, however, is not as effective as comparative advertising that states the actual competitor’s name.
Action-inducing conative advertisements create situations in which cognitive knowledge of the product or affective
liking of the product may come later (after the actual purchase) or during product usage. For example, a point-of
purchase display is designed (sometimes through advertising tie-ins) to cause people to make impulse buys. The goal is to
make the sale, with cognitive knowledge and affective feelings forming as the product is used. In terms of an attitude
sequence, conative message strategies typically utilize the conative →cognitive →affective approach.
Promotional support conative advertisements are used to support other promotional efforts. Besides coupons and
phone-in promotions, a company may advertise a sweepstakes that a consumer enters by filling out the form on the
advertisement or by going to a particular retail store.
Selecting the right source and spokesperson to use in an advertisement is a critical decision. Approximately 20% of all
advertisements use some type of celebrity spokesperson. Payments to celebrities account for around 10% of all
advertising dollars spent. A celebrity endorser is used because his or her stamp of approval on a product can enhance the
product’s brand equity. Celebrities also help create emotional bonds with the products. The idea is to transfer the bond
that exists between the celebrity and the audience to the product being endorsed. This bond transfer often is more
profound for younger consumers. Older consumers are not as likely to be influenced by celebrity endorsements. Still,
many advertisers believe they are effective.
The sender or source of a communication could be a person or organisation that has information to share with another
person or group of people. The individual could be a salesperson of the company or hired spokesperson such as a
celebrity who appears in a company’s advertisements.
Herbert Kelman developed three basic categories of source attributes. Each influences the recipient’s attitude or
behaviour through a different process.
1) Source Credibility: Source credibility implies the spokesperson’s positive characteristics which affects the receiver’s
acceptance of the message. The credibility of a source comes from expertise, trustworthiness or a combination of the
two. Does Virat Kohli give the credibility, the brand he endorses demands? Well, depends upon the perception of the
consumers about him. And a marketer has to be careful in understanding that perception.
“Expertise” is the extent to which the source is perceived to have the ability of making correct assertions by virtue of
having the relevant skills. “Trustworthiness” is the degree to which the audience considers the communicator and the
assertions to be valid.
The use of expertise and trustworthiness helps in creating a positive attitude towards the message and hence leaves a
positive influence on the receiver. Using celebrities (like him), experts in the given domain or corporate leaders (in
case of Dell), as the spokesperson generally help in giving credibility to the message being delivered.
In terms of persuasion a communicator seen as knowledgeable and expert in one’s own field is more persuasive than
one with less expertise similarly a communicator is seen as unbiased or has no underlying motive for advocating a
communication is supposed to be more reliable.
Applying Expertise
Perceived expertise of the celebrity endorser was found to be a significant factor in explaining purchase intentions then
their attractiveness or trustworthiness. Thus for celebrity spokesperson to be truly effective they should be knowledgeable,
experienced and qualified to talk about the product.
Applying Trustworthiness
While expertise is important, the target audience must also find the source believable. Source trustworthiness in
general sense is listeners trust in the speaker. It is difficult to establish trustworthiness in case of celebrity endorsers
as consumers know that the endorser is being paid for advocating the message in such situations source
trustworthiness can be increased by use of publicity and events. There have been instances where instead of using
celebrity in advertisements they were roped in various events and product launch parties where they talked in general
sense about the product on television and chat shows to make message more credible.
Using Corporate Leaders as Spokespeople
In some cases corporate leaders are used as spokesperson in order to enhance source credibility. Examples include
endorsement by Narayanmurthy of Infosys and CEO of Pespsico India. Not all CEOs have necessary qualities to be
effective company spokesperson. The fact that they are CEOs does not mean that they will automatically be highly
persuasive spokesperson.
When CEO credibility is high and product or company image is positive, the use of CEO may have an enhancing effect.
When CEO image is positive and company/product image is negative CEO might be able to move product/company
image in a positive direction but attention should be given to the effect of advertising. There is every possibility that
continued use might further increase CEO credibility and have no effect on company image.
2) Source Attractiveness: Next important aspect is attractiveness of the source. It leads to persuasion through the
process of identification. The source of the message should be attractive enough to concentrate the viewer’s attention
towards the advertisement but not to an extent that it overshadows the brand itself.
More favourable evaluations of the product and the advertisement are made when attractive models are used.
Identification occurs when consumers adopt attitudes and behaviour advocated by the source because they get
satisfaction in the idea of being similar to the source. Identification is not like internalisation where information from an
attractive source is integrated into the belief system of the consumers; the consumers may conform only till the source
remains relevant or attractive to them.
Source attractiveness is more related to physical attributes such as similarity, familiarity, and likability.
Applying Similarity
Similarity is used in influencing the receiver by choosing the source to be someone towards who the receiver can feel
a sense of similarity. In order, for the audience to like the source and better understand the message, the
communicator and the source should possess similar needs, goals, interests and lifestyles. Similarity as a source
attribution is also used to create situations where the message receiver is feeling empathy and make the consumers to
think they could see themselves being in that situation.
Applying Familiarity
According to Belch and Belch (2001), familiarity can be considered as the level of knowledge a celebrity possesses
of a brand. When a company considers choosing a celebrity for their advertising campaign, they need to analyse the
previous knowledge a celebrity has or how he/she will utilise their knowledge in the exposure phase. The authors
believe that this will be an attribute that the respondents will observe as too difficult to evaluate and therefore the
authors will exclude it from the research process. Furthermore, the respondent might find it to be diffusive.
Applying Likability
Likability is the most important reason for using celebrities for advertising. The idea is to hire someone (movie star, TV
star, sports star, musician and other popular public figures) who is admired amongst a large number of audience. A study
by Friedman et al. (1978) found that celebrities who are liked will be trusted product endorser. Thus individuals accept
influence from an attractive/likable celebrity because of desire to identify with this person.
3) Source Power: The power dimension of Kelman influences communication through a process called compliance.
The source power exists when the source can reward or punish the receiver. In advertising context it is very difficult
to use source power directly but an indirect way could be to use authoritative personality, example could be Amitabh
Bachchan for polio eradication advertisement campaign. In this campaign Amitabh is portrayed as a Big Brother and
he tries to persuade audience for participation in Polio Eradication programme.
There are few important factors affecting on source power. The source must possess perceived control meaning that
the source needs to be able to administer positive or negative sanctions to the message receiver. In addition perceived
concern needs to be reflected so the receiver feels that the source cares whether or not the receiver conforms.
Finally, the receiver’s estimation on whether the source is able to observe conformity affects source power. Through
the process of compliance the receiver accepts the persuasion of the source and acquires to his or her position in
hopes of obtaining favourable reaction or avoiding punishment. Through this process, the source is perceived as
having power.