Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Danchenko - Defense Team - Waiver of Conflicts of Interest
Danchenko - Defense Team - Waiver of Conflicts of Interest
Alexandria Division
Igor Y. Danchenko, by and through counsel, hereby provides notice of his waiver of any
actual or potential conflicts of interest raised by the United States’ Motion to Inquire Into Potential
Conflicts of Interest. Dkt. 35. Since the government filed its motion, Mr. Danchenko has
consulted with his own counsel as well as with separate and independent counsel, Nina J. Ginsberg.
Following those consultations, and in light of the fact that his counsel’s law firm has agreed to
wall off any attorneys or support staff who have previously worked on the representation of the
Clinton campaign, Mr. Danchenko has knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived any
1
The Court ordered defendant to file an executed waiver of any actual or potential conflicts of
interest by December 24, 2021. Dkt. 34. However, because Mr. Danchenko is currently traveling
with his family, he was unable to physically sign and return a copy of the attached Waiver by the
Court’s December 24, 2021, deadline. Undersigned counsel has reviewed the attached Waiver with
Mr. Danchenko and he has consented to its filing and has authorized counsel to electronically sign
the Waiver on his behalf. Mr. Danchenko will physically sign an additional copy of the Waiver
upon his return to the District, which will be filed with the Court.
1
Case 1:21-cr-00245-AJT Document 37 Filed 12/24/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID# 181
Respectfully submitted,
IGOR Y. DANCHENKO
By Counsel
2
Case 1:21-cr-00245-AJT Document 37 Filed 12/24/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID# 182
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this 24th day of December, 2021, I electronically filed a true copy
of the foregoing motion with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a
3
Case 1:21-cr-00245-AJT Document 37-1 Filed 12/24/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID# 183
Alexandria Division
I, Igor Y. Danchenko, have reviewed the government’s motion to inquire into potential
conflicts of interest (Dkt. 35) that may arise as a result of my continued representation by Danny
C. Onorato and Stuart A. Sears, and the law firm of Schertler Onorato Mead & Sears, LLP. I have
discussed the government’s motion and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with my
attorneys and how they could impact their representation of me. In addition, and on the advice of
Mr. Onorato and Mr. Sears, I have consulted with independent legal counsel. Specifically, I
reviewed and discussed the government’s motion with Nina J. Ginsberg, a partner at the law firm
of DiMuroGinsberg P.C. Based on my conversations with Mr. Onorato and Mr. Sears, as well as
my separate consultation with Ms. Ginsberg, I believe I have a full understanding of any actual or
potential conflicts of interest that might arise during the course of my representation. With that
knowledge and understanding, I voluntarily waive any actual or potential conflicts of interest, and
choose to continue with my current counsel of choice, Danny C. Onorato and Stuart A. Sears.