Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GT and CAPP
GT and CAPP
GT and CAPP
Group technology is a manufacturing philosophy in which similar parts are identified and
grouped together to take the advantage of their similarities in manufacturing and design.
Similar parts are arranged in to part families.
Group Technology is the concept, which has been around since World War 2, and
received wide attention due to close association with cellular manufacturing, FMS, CIM,
etc. GT is not simple the formation of machinery into manufacturing cells, but it involves
1
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613) – 2013E.C
bringing together and organizing common concepts, principles, problems, tasks, and
technologies, to improve productivity.
Part classification and coding is concerned with identifying the similarities and using
these similarities to evolve a classification code. Similarities are of two types: design
attributes (such as geometric shape and size), and manufacturing attributes (the sequence
of processing steps required to make the part).
In companies which employ several design engineers and manufacturing a diverse range
of products, such classifications and coding has a number of other uses. One of the major
2
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613) – 2013E.C
benefits is avoiding the duplication of similar components. This can result in considerable
savings in terms of design cost, processing cost and tooling cost. One prime necessity to
realize this is to have a good design retrieval system.
The parts classification and coding is required in a design retrieval system, and in
computer aided process planning the process routing is developed by recognizing the
specific attributes of the part and relating these attributes to the corresponding
manufacturing operations.
Group technology is a manufacturing philosophy in which similar parts are identified and
grouped together to take the advantage of their similarities in manufacturing and design.
Before After
Discontinuous, Random Flow of Parts
Structured Flow of Parts
Through the Shop
Reinvent New Parts Retrieve Parts Already in Production
Multitude of Process Plans for Some Parts Consistent, Single, Best Process Plans
Continuous Purchase of Components due
Regulated Purchase of Components
to Lack of Total Visibility
Inflexible, Rigid, Unable to Respond to
Changing Environment Flexible
i. Production design
ii. Tooling and setups
3
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613) – 2013E.C
The main advantages of GT for product design come in cost and time savings, because
design engineers can quickly and easily search the database for parts that either presently
exist or can be used with slight modifications, rather than issuing new part numbers.
A similar cost savings can be realized in the elimination of two or more identical parts
with different part numbers. Another advantage is the standardization of designs. Design
features such as corner radii, tolerances, chamfers, counter bores and surface finishes can
be standardized with GT.
In the area of tooling, group jigs and fixtures are designed to accommodate every
member of a part family. Also work holding devices are designed to use special adapters
in such a way that this general fixture can accept each part family member. Since setup
times are very short between parts in a family, a group layout can also result in dramatic
reductions in setup times.
GT facilitates a group layout of the shop. Since machines are arranged as cells, in a group
layout, the materials handling cost can be reduced by reducing travel and facilitating
increased automation.
GT simplifies production and planning control. The complexity of the problem has been
reduced from a large portion of the shop to smaller groups of machines. The production
scheduling is simplified to a small number of parts through the machines in that cell.
4
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613) – 2013E.C
The concept of group technology - parts classification and coding - lead to an automated
process planning system. Grouping parts allows an examination of the various
planning/route sheets for all members of a particular family. Once this has been
accomplished, the same basic plans can be applied to other members, thereby optimizing
the shop for the group.
In the GT work environment, the supervisor has in – depth knowledge of the work
performed and better control.
• The plant currently uses traditional batch production and a process type layout and
this result in much material handling effort, high in-process inventory, and long
manufacturing lead times.
• The parts can be grouped into part families. This is a necessary condition, each
machine cell is designed to produce a given part family, or limited collection of part
families, so it must be possible to group parts made in the plant into families.
However, it would be unusual to find a mid-volume production plant in which parts
could not be grouped into part families
There are two major tasks that a company must undertake when it implements group
technology. These two tasks represent significant obstacles to the application of GT.
5
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613) – 2013E.C
1. Identifying the part families: If the plant makes 10,000 different parts, reviewing all
of the part drawings and grouping the parts into families is a substantial task that
consumes a significant amount of time.
2. Rearranging production machines into machine cells: it is time consuming and
costly to plan and accomplish this rearrangement, and the machines are not
producing during the changeover
One of the major benefits derived from GT applications is part family formation for
efficient work flow. Efficient work flow can result from grouping machines logically so
that material handling and setup can be minimized. Parts can frequently be grouped so
that the same tooling and fixtures can be used. When this occurs, a major reduction in
setup results. Machines can also be grouped so that the amount of handling between
machining operations also can be minimized. A part family is a collection of parts which
are similar either because of geometric shape and size or because similar processing steps
are required in their manufacture. The parts within a family are different, but their
similarities are close enough to merit their identification as members of the part family.
The major obstacle in changing over to group technology from a traditional production
shop is the problem of grouping parts into families.
The parts within a family are different, but their similarities are close enough to merit
their identification as members of the part family. The major obstacle in changing over to
6
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613) – 2013E.C
group technology from a traditional production shop is the problem of grouping parts into
families. There are three general methods for solving this problem.
1. Visual inspection - using best judgment to group parts into appropriate families,
based on the parts or photos of the parts
2. Production flow analysis - using information contained on route sheets to classify
parts
3. Parts classification and coding system - identifying similarities and differences
among parts and relating them by means of a coding scheme
The visual inspection method is the least sophisticated and least expensive method. It
involves the classification of parts into families by looking at either the physical parts or
photographs and arranging them into similar groupings. It is obvious that when we have
many components, visual inspection will be difficult to use. This method is generally
considered to be the least accurate of the three.
Production Flow analysis (PFA) is a method for identifying part families and
associated machine groupings that uses the information contained on production route
sheets rather on part drawings. Work parts with identical or similar routings are classified
into part families. These families can then be used to form logical machine cells in a
group technology layout.
The procedure of Production flow analysis (PFA) consists of the following steps:
1. Data collection: The minimum data needed in the analysis are the part number and
operation sequence, which is obtained from process plans.
2. Part sorting and routing: A sortation procedure is used to group parts with identical
process plans.
7
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613)
(MAT – 2013E.C
In PFA, a large matrix (incidence matrix) is constructed. Each row represents an OP code,
and each column in the matrix represents a component
component.
Step 2: Assign binary weight and calculate a decimal weight for each row.
Step 5: Continue preceding steps until there is no change in the position of each
element in the row and the column.
Example #1
Consider a problem of 5 machines and 6 parts. Try to group them by using Rank Order
Clustering Algorithm.
8
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613)
(MAT – 2013E.C
In group technology, parts are identified and grouped into families by classification and
coding (C/C) systems. This process is a critical and complex first step and is done
according to the part’s design attributes and manufacturing attributes.
Systems in the first category are useful for design retrieval and to promote design
standardization.. Systems in the second category are used for computer
computer-aided process
planning, tool design, and other production related functions. The third category
represents an attempt to combine the functions and advantages of the other two systems
into a single classification
sification scheme. The types of design and manufacturing attributes
typically included in classification schemes are listed below:
9
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613) – 2013E.C
A part coding scheme consists of symbols that identify the part’s design and/or
manufacturing attributes. The symbols in the code can be all numeric, all alphabetic, or a
combination of both types.
Three categories of part similarities can be distinguished 1. Design attributes which are
concerned with part characteristics such as, geometry, size and material, and 2.
Manufacturing attributes consider the processing steps required to make a part. 3. System
based on both attributes.
10
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613) – 2013E.C
There are three basic code structures used in group technology applications:
With the hierarchical structure, the interpretation of each succeeding symbol depends on
the value of the preceding symbols. In the chain type structure, the interpretation of each
symbol in the sequence is fixed and does not depend on the value of preceding digits.
Most of the commercial parts coding systems are used in industry are a combination of
the two pure structures.
Coding systems
Through more than 100 coding systems are available, some of the coding systems that
have been successfully implemented in process planning are given below:
When implementing a parts classification and coding system, most companies can
purchase a commercially available package or develop a system for their own specific
use. Commercial systems have the advantage of less lead time in implementation.
11
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613) – 2013E.C
of group technology in which dissimilar machines have been aggregated into cells,
each of which is dedicated to the production of a part family.
The machines in a multi station system with variable routing may be manually operated,
semi-automatic, or fully automated. When manually operated or semi automatic the
machine groups are often called machine cells, and the use of these cells in a factory is
called cellular manufacturing.
12
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613) – 2013E.C
Design of the machine cell is critical in cellular manufacturing. The cell design
determines to a great degree the performance of the cell. In this subsection, we discuss
types of machine cells, cell layouts, and the key machine concept.
Types of cell design (Types of Machine Cells and Layouts): GT manufacturing cells
can be classified according to the number of machines and the degree to which the
material flow is mechanized between machines.
Factors to be considered:
Geometrical features, dimensional sizes, tolerances, materials, and surface finishes are
analyzed and evaluated to determine an appropriate sequence of processing operations.
Process planning involves determining the most appropriate manufacturing and assembly
processes and the sequence in which they should be accomplished to produce a given part
or product according to specifications set forth in the product design documentation. The
scope and variety of processes that can be planned are generally limited by the available
13
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613) – 2013E.C
processing equipment and technological capabilities of the company or plant. Parts that
can-not be made internally must be purchased from outside vendors. It should be
mentioned that the choice of processes is also limited by the details of the product design.
Based on the planner's knowledge, skill, and experience, the processing steps are
developed in the most logical sequence to make each part. Following is a list of the many
decisions and details usually included within the scope of process planning.
14
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613) – 2013E.C
• Manual approach
• Computer aided process planning techniques
• Retrieval type CAPP system (Variant type CAPP system)
• Generative type CAPP system
There is much interest by manufacturing firms in automating the task of process planning
using computer-aided process planning (CAPP) systems. The shop-trained people who
are familiar with the details of machining and other processes are gradually retiring, and
these people will be unavailable in the future to do process planning. An alternative way
of accomplishing this function is needed, and CAPP systems are providing this
alternative. CAPP is usually considered to be part of computer-aided manufacturing
(CAM). However, this lends to imply that CAM is a stand-alone system. In fact, a
synergy results when CAM is combined with computer-aided design to create a
CAD/CAM system. In such a system, CAPP becomes the direct connection between
design and manufacturing. The process planning function bridges the gap between
engineering design and manufacturing, and is thus a critical element in integrating
activities within manufacturing organizations. Current CAPP systems range from simple
editors for manual planning to fully-automated systems for planning a range of products.
The benefits derived from computer-automated process planning include the following:
15
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613) – 2013E.C
There are also several problems associated with automation of the planning process:
1. The designer's intention may not always be obvious to the process planner, who
must act on the designer's intentions. Differences in terminology and perspectives
separate these two functions.
2. In order to fully automate process planning, the features of a part must be extracted
from the product model without human intervention; however, engineering
drawings sometimes do not convey all the information about a part. Information
may be inaccessible or in a form incompatible with CAPP.
3. One problem source for CAPP systems is the interface between CAD and CAPP,
where features are translated into a form recognizable by CAPP. Different CAD
systems have different methods of representing dimensions. Translation from CAD
to CAPP often requires a human interface.
4. The designer is often unaware of potential manufacturing constraints and may
produce a design that is either infeasible or costly to produce.
5. The generation and execution of a production plan may take a long time and may
involve several organizations in different geographical locations. Plan-monitoring
and improvement may be complex and difficult to automate.
16
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613)
(MAT – 2013E.C
Computer aided process planning system offers the potential for reducing the routine
clerical work of manufacturing engineers. It provides the opportunity to generate routings
which are rational, consistent and perhaps even optimal.
The ultimate goal of a system is to integrate design and production data into a system that
generates useable process plans. Computer-aided
aided process planning systems are designed
d
around two approaches. Some CAPP systems combine the two approaches in what is
known as semi-generative
generative CAPP.
A variant CAPP system, also called a retrieval CAPP system, has been widely used in
machining applications. Of the various CAPP methods, variant process planning is the
easiest to implement. Variant systems allow rapid generation of process plans through
comparison of features with other known features in a database. The basic idea behind
the retrieval CAPP is that
hat similar parts will have similar process plans. In this system, a
process plan for a new part is created by recalling,, identifying and retrieving an existing
plan for a similar part, and making the necessary modifications for the new part.
In fact, the
he variant CAPP is a computer - assisted extension of the manual approach. The
computer assists by providing an efficient system for data management, retrieval,
retrieval editing
and high speed printing of the process plans. The retrieval CAPP system has the capacity
to alter an existing process plan. That’s why it is also known as variant CAPP system.
17
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613) – 2013E.C
A retrieval CAPP system is based on the principles of group technology (GT) and parts
classification and coding. In this system, for each part family a standard process plan (i.e.,
route sheet) is prepared and stored in computer files. Through classification and coding, a
code number is generated. These codes are often used to identify the part family and the
associated standard plan. The standard plan is retrieval and edited for the new part.
Adopt existing coding or classification schemes to label parts for the purpose of
classification. In some extreme cases, a new coding scheme maybe developed.
Group the part families using the coding scheme defined in Step 1 based on some
common part features. A standard plan is attached to each part family (see step 3). Often,
a number of part types are associated with a family, thereby reducing the total number of
standard process plan.
Step 3: Develop a standard process plan for each part family based on the common
features of the part types. This process plan can be used for every part type within the
family with suitable modifications.
When a new part enters the system, it is assigned to a part family based on the coding and
classification scheme. Then the corresponding standard process plan is retrieved and
modified to accommodate the unique features of the new part.
• Once a standard plan has been written, a variety of parts can be planned.
• Comparatively simple programming and installation ( compare with generative
CAPP systems) is required to implement a planning system.
• Efficient processing and evaluation of complicated activities and decisions, thus
reducing the time and labour requirements.
18
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613)
(MAT – 2013E.C
Unlike the retrieval CAPP no standard manufacturing plans are predefined or stored.
Instead, the computer automatically generates a unique operation/ route sheet whenever
the part is ordered. Thus the generative CAPP system automatically generates the process
plan based on decision logics and pre-coded
pre coded algorithms. The computer stores the rules of
manufacturing and the equipment capabilities (not any group of process plans).
19
CAD/CAM/CIM (MAT-613) – 2013E.C
When using a system, a specific process plan for a specific part can be generated without
any involvement of a process planner. The human role in running the system includes (i)
inputting the GT code of the given part design, and (ii) monitoring the function.
20