Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Attributes of Medical Professionalism
Attributes of Medical Professionalism
ASSIGMENT 2
ATTRIBUTES OF
MEDICAL
PROFESSIONALISM
DONE BY :MONA FUAD TAHA
SUPERVISED BY :PROF.NASR
ALDEEN
vpc
Attributes of medical professionalism
Objectives:
The reader will able to:
Defining professionalism
Introduction
Definition of professionalism:
Attributes of professions such as characteristics, behaviors, commitment, goals and values are a
description of professionalism. (1)
Professionalism define as: the practitioners set a codes of conduct according to their standard
practice. Subsequently, elements for guarding medical practice from other competing
professions, and for controlling commercialization of the profession.(2)
Importance of professionalism:
Characteristics of professionalism:
Arnold and stern put framework for the professionalism including (1)
Clinical competence
Effective communicative skills
Ethics
The framework is modified with the permission of kieo journal of medicine in to:
Accountability:
Altruism:
Excellence:
obligations to maintain a competence in medical knowledge, avoiding overuse and under use
of health care resources.(3)
concept of humanity building relationship between doctors and patients and respecting of
persons and their rights, express empathy and convey compassion.(3)
Another studies grouped the professionalism attributes in to three groups these are:(2)
Clinician ship:
Respecting patient privacy, kindly caring with patient, appear compassion and empathy to the
patient, advise the patient and colleague as needed, accessibility and showing altruism toward
patient, communicating in a clear and effective.
Workmanship:
Citizenship:
That adhering to professional rules and regulations, functioning according to law, avoiding drugs
misuse, behaving honestly and being sound in judgment and in decision making and being
punctual.
Doctors must be confident, reliable, dependable, composed, and accountable and dedicated
across all settings. Personal appearance, physical features or social standing may play little or no
role in a doctor being considered ‘professional’.(2)
Scenario:
First scenario
Patients came to the dental clinic with his son and he oblige or enforced the dentist to extract his
son tooth although the tooth can be preserved and treated the dentist show a high degree of
professionalism he is quite competence and confidence and he try to change the parent decision
and refuse to extract the tooth that can be treat it.
Positive Attributes: The dentist take on the clinicionship attributes of professionalism (advocate,
expert behavior)
Second scenario:
Patient attending to the hospital suffering from pain and the doctor is at the launch time and the
patient annoyed because the doctor is running late, the doctor didn’t apologized to the patient and
admit that he is coming late, the patient consider the doctor delay due to disrespect and the
doctor screaming on patients and refuse to examine the patient.the doctor misbehaved with
patient due to lack of clinicionship professionalism
Negative attributes: missed commitment and behaver
In different ways scenarios can be used such as longer cases scenarios for
example:
A doctor who is a leader of resident on busy clinic, you are the chief resident and received
numbers of emails complaining at that site. The charge nurse appreciate the doctor efforts, he
work hard ,references policies, guidelines and procedure, but the doctor missing details about
how orders and consults are to be done. He accept the intervention firstly and now he became
aggressive when you ask questions about his assignments. You notice that rush of patient is
reduced.(6)
References:
1. Mueller PS. Special Issue on the Rambam – Mayo Collaboration Teaching and Assessing
Professionalism in Medical Learners and Practicing Physicians *. 6(2):1–13.
5. Kleshinski J, Shriner C, Khuder SA. The Use of Professionalism Scenarios in the Medical
School Interview Process : Faculty and Interviewee Perceptions. 2008;
6. Teaching C, Guide AT. T3. professionalism scenarios and case discussion. 2015;