Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cons Tem: Truc Sys
Cons Tem: Truc Sys
Construction Delivery
System
2 Main Organizations
Formal Informal
Follow standards, Deviate from standards,
procedures, laws and procedures, laws and
regulation. regulation from the
authorities.
Prepared by
agencies/institution Built outside the building
recognized by the industry’s environment.
government, local [Eg. Squatters and slum
authorities, private areas].
organization, and financial
institution. Illegal construction.
Using contemporary
construction delivery
systems
A guaranteed maximum price (also known as GMP, not-to-exceed price, NTE, or NTX) contract is a cost-type
contract (also known as an open-book contract) where the contractor is compensated for actual costs incurred
plus a fixed fee subject to a ceiling price.
A lump sum contract (or stipulated sum contract) is the traditional means of procuring construction, and still the
most common form of construction contract. Under a lump sum contract, a single 'lump sum' price for all the
works is agreed before the works begin
Target Price Contracts are based on a cost reimbursable mechanism in which the contractor is reimbursed his
costs (on an actual cost basis) subject to the application at the end of the project of a formula which allows the
contractor to share any savings made and to contribute towards overspend.
Unit Price Contract. Construction contract in which the client or owner pays a fixed sum for each
completed unit of work.
Traditional System
(Design-Bid-Build) [DBB]
Architect Engineer 1
Owner/ Engineer 2
Main Contractor
Developer
QS
Sub Sub Sub
1 2 3
Owner/ Engineer 2
Developer Main Contractor
QS
Sub Sub Sub
1 2 3
• Contract between client and architect • Contract between client and contractor.
• The design team is selected by the owner and • General contractors bid for the project, with the
works on owner’s behalf to produce construction lowest qualified bidder receiving the job.
documents that define the location, appearance, • Similarly, the general contractor selects sub-
materials, and methods to be used in the creation contractors based on competitive tender or
of the building and its infrastructure [construction bidding, and awards the specific work, e.g. steel
drawings, specifications and contract packages]. erection or masonry works to the lowest qualified
bidder.
RAG 132 BUILT ENVIRONMENT & HUMAN SETTLEMENT
Construction Delivery System
Owner/ Engineer 2
Developer Main Contractor
QS
Sub Sub Sub
1 2 3
Phases of Implementation in
Traditional System [DBB]
Selection of
architect
use
Selection of
architect
Phase 1 [DBB]
►Project Initiation.
use
Selection of
architect
use Phase 2 [DBB]
Project Initiation Design Tender and Construction
►Design.
selection of
contractor
Selection of
Phase 3 [DBB]
architect
►Tender &
use
selection of
Project Initiation Design Tender and
selection of
Construction contractor.
contractor
Selection of
Phase 4 [DBB]
architect
►Construction
use
Advantages of DBB
• Widely applicable, well understood, well established
and clearly defined roles of the actors involved.
• Owner and Architect have significant control over
quality of the end product.
• Commitment on a price for the building prior to the
start of the construction.
• Competitive tender gets the best price for the
construction cost.
Disadvantages of DBB
Although the project is theoretically delivered at the lowest cost to the
OWNER:
• Process is time consuming since all design works must be completed
prior signing of the construction contract.
• Owner faces exposure to contractor’s claim over design and
constructionability issues since Owner accepts liability for design in its
contract with the contractor.
• Contractor adopts a least-cost approach to completing the project,
requiring increased oversight and quality review by the Owner.
• Absence of contractor’s input at the initiation stage may limit the
effectiveness and constructionability of the design.
• Promotes more adversarial relationships rather than
cooperation/coordination among Owner, Architect and Contractor.
Disadvantages of DBB
Conflicts among the parties to the contract [owner, design team,
general contractor, subcontractors, material suppliers] are frequent,
resulting in
• Emotional tension through the lack of overall management.
• Communication problems [miscommunication] between contract parties.
• Uncertainty over responsibility for problems that arise due to the
segmented/separated contract.
• Duplication of design works – costly and time consuming.
• Leads to specific problems reflected in unnecessarily high project cost
and long completion period due to change orders, repairs, and lawsuits.
Owner/
Developer
Owner/
Developer
• Grown in popularity.
• Integrate the two components of design [architect/engineer] and
built [contractor]
• The system provides the owner with a single contractual relationship
with an entity that combines both design and construction services.
• This entity may be a firm that possesses in-house design and
construction capabilities, or a partnership between a design firm and
a construction firm.
Owner/
Developer
Phases of Implementation in
Design & Built System [D&B]
use
use
Phases 1 [D&B]
►Project Initiation
Project Contractor Design and Construction
Initiation Selection
Phases 2 [D&B]
use
►Contractor
Project
Initiation
Contractor
Selection
Design and Construction
Selection
Phases 3 [D&B]
use
►Design and
Project
Initiation
Contractor
Selection
Design and construction
Construction
Advantages of D&B
• Better and more buildable design of specific buildings.
• Problems arise can be addresses to the main contractor as
the responsible party.
• Reduce typical design-construction conflicts.
• Efficient design and constructability.
• Cost determination at an early stage.
• Fast project completion.
• Eliminates the division of responsibility for design and
construction.
• Eliminates the communication problems.
• Facilitate improved communications among the project team
members.
Disadvantages of D&B
• Lack of owner control.
• Lack of detailed description of the work to be done –
not a disadvantage for simple buildings.
• Lack of communication between architect and end
user. Architect is answerable to the contractor.
Architect Engineer 1
Owner/
Developer Contractor 1 Engineer 2
Contractor 2 QS
Contractor 3
Architect Engineer 1
Owner/
Developer Contractor 1 Engineer 2
Contractor 2 QS
Contractor 3
Phases of Implementation in
Construction Management System
Project
Initiation Design
Selection of
architect
stage 1
stage 2
stage 3
stage 4
use
Selection of
architect
Phases 1
stage 1
► Project Initiation
stage 2
stage 3
stage 4
use
Selection of
architect
Phases 2
stage 1
► Design
stage 2
stage 3
stage 4
use
• CM assists the design team in reviewing project costs estimates and making
decisions with important cost and scheduling for phase construction also
known as fast-track scheduling.
[fast-track scheduling = work on early stages of construction such as earthworks, cut and fill, excavation and foundations
will proceed while design of the later stages of construction is still underway].
• Working together, the parties produce construction documents that meet the
owner’s requirements, schedule, and budget: and
• Prevent physical conflicts among systems, missing information, and other
product of miscommunication often found in the construction documents
produced for hard bid projects.
Selection of
architect
Phases 3
stage 1
► Selection of
stage 2
stage 3
contractor
stage 4
use
Selection of
architect
Phases 4
stage 1
► Construction
stage 2
stage 3
stage 4
use
Advantages of CM System
Disadvantages of CM System
• Owner taking the risk of committing funds at the early
stages of construction without knowing what the total
construction cost will be.
• Owner taking the risk of managing the building process.
CONSIDERATION
Following considerations guide in the selection of a proper delivery
system:
o Type of project: the level of complexity and uniqueness of the
project and maintain an appropriate level of control.
o Size of project: the amount of outside assistance and number of actors
should match the significance of project. The more complex and
costly the project, the greater the need for professional
management and advice.
o Owner capabilities: the owner should realistically assess its own in-
house capabilities in evaluating the delivery methods.
o Time considerations: fast-track construction for projects requiring
severely compressed time limit. However should weigh the need for
compressed time limit against the increased cost and risk of fast
tracking.
o Likelihood of changes: if numerous changes are foreseen during the
construction period, then D&B may present the best choice for
incorporating changes during construction, but it will incur higher cost.
CONCLUSION
No one right construction delivery
system for a given project.
END