FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1

(BFC 43402)
FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT

JAWATANKUASA PROJEK SARJANA MUDA

FAKULTI KEJURUTERAAN AWAM DAN ALAM BINA
 FYP COMMITTEE MEMBER
Cluster representatives
Infrastructure and Geomatic Engineering Cluster Building and Construction Engineering Cluster
Mr Khairul Nizam Mohd Yunus Ts. Hasniza Abu Bakar
khairuln@uthm.edu.my hasniza@uthm.edu.my
019 - 984 2902 019 - 727 6878
Coordinator
Ts. Dr. Noorasyikin binti Mohammad Noh Mrs Hannifah Tami
Dr Zalipah Jamellodin norasyikin@uthm.edu.my hannifah@uthm.edu.my
zalipah@uthm.edu.my 016 - 831 2076 019 - 727 2969
019 - 722 3463
Structural and Materials Engineering Cluster Water and Environmental Engineering Cluster
Ts. Dr. Sharifah Salwa Mohd Zuki Dr Mohd Hairul Khamidun
sharifahs@uthm.edu.my hairulk@uthm.edu.my
019 - 553 0754 019 - 352 9292

Dr. Norhafizah Salleh Mr Wan Afnizan Wan Mohammad

nhafizah@uthm.edu.my afnizan@uthm.edu.my
017 - 772 2715 019 - 297 7826
 FYP 1 TIMELINE - SEM 1 – 2021/2022

21 OCT. 2021
LITERASI PENYELIDIKAN SEMINAR by
Tunku Tun Aminah Library
(Compulsory for FYP 1) 16 – 19 JAN. 2022
SEMINAR
23 OCT. 2021 FYP 1 & FYP 2
Deadline for completion of FYP
Title & Synopsis via SMAP Online Final Examination Week
(FYP 1)

WEEK
11 NOV. 2021
METHODOLOGY COURSE – PART 2 Study Week Semester Break
10 – 12 OCT. 2021 (Compulsory for FYP 1) 30 DEC. 2021
MANUAL REGISTRATION Deadline for Submission
28 OCT. 2021 Project Proposal (FYP 1)
METHODOLOGY COURSE – PART 1
(Compulsory for FYP 1)
13 – 15 OCT. 2021
SELECTION OF
SUPERVISOR (FYP 1)
 FYP 1 SUPERVISOR SELECTION

START : OCTOBER 13, 2021 @ 10.00 am

CLOSE : OCTOBER 15, 2021 @ 5.00 pm
Via SMAP Online
 FYP 1 CLASS - Compulsory

 RESEARCH LITERACY CLASS (by Tunku Tun Aminah Library)

 October 21, 2021 (Thursday) – Week 2
 2.00 pm – 5.00 pm

 METHODOLOGY CLAS – PART 1

 October 28, 2021 (Thursday) – Week 3
 2.00 pm – 5.00 pm

 METHODOLOGY CLAS – PART 2

 November 11, 2021 (Thursday) – Week 5
 2.00 pm – 5.00 pm
 FYP - DEFINITION
FYP is a form of training and exposure to engineering research undertaken by
students independently and systematically under the guidance of a supervisor
selected among academicians. Pre-requisite : 96 credits

COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLO)

 Plan research work using proper research techniques, and existing knowledge
and skills (C5, LOD 2, PLO2)
 Organize planned research work systematically and communicate the findings
effectively through report writing and oral presentation (P5, LOD 8,PLO10)
 Adapt to changes required to research, based on availability of resources,
technological improvements, and recommendations from the research supervisor
and/or examination panel (A4, LOD 13, PLO12)
 FYP LEVEL & SCOPE

 Students should be able to conduct independent enquiry as well as perform

critical evaluation and build competence in carrying out the project.

 FYP may either be a new study or an extension of past research. However, similar
projects that have been carried out at the faculty level or at other institutions of
higher learning are prohibited.

 The project should be relevant to the field of civil engineering and must be to the
level of a Bachelor’s degree.
 FYP LEVEL & SCOPE

 To meet the requirements of the FYP level and scope of FYP, several criteria need
to be followed;

 The research must involve work that can be completed within 12 weeks
for each semester (FYP 1 and FYP 2).
 Research objectives must not exceed three (3).
 Ensure that all laboratory equipment required to conduct the study is
adequate and in good condition.
 The final report must not exceed one hundred (100) pages, excluding
appendices.
 STUDENT RESPONSIBILITIES
 Register for the FYP 1 and FYP 2 courses before the closing date set by the University.
 Adhere to the FYP work schedule/timeline set by the Faculty.
 Select a supervisor and propose an FYP title along with a synopsis via the online system
before the closing date set by the Faculty.
 Ensure that the FYP research is original (either a new research or an extension of a
previously conducted research).
 Regularly meet with the supervisor to discuss matters pertaining to FYP. Complete the e-
log book (via SMAP online) fill it after meeting with the supervisor.
 Systematically plan and manage the project as well as the time allocated for the project.
 Prepare and submit all evaluation items (project proposal, e-log activity) according to the
UTHM Guidelines and work schedule/timeline set up by the Faculty.
 Avoid plagiarizing the work of other researchers.
 Compulsory to present at FYP 1 Seminar.
FYP WEBSITE - WEEBLY

https://fkaab-fyp.weebly.com/
FYP WEBSITE - FACEBOOK
FYP 1 SUBMISSION – AUTHOR System
 FYP EVALUATION – SUPERVISOR & EXAMINER
EVALUATION MARKS
FYP 1 FYP 2

Project Draft Final Technical

Presentation Total Presentation Total
Examination Proposal Report Paper
Panel
15 30 45 10 25 10 45

Project Draft Final Technical

Soft skills Total Soft skills Total
Supervisor Proposal Report Paper

20 35 55 15 30 10 55
Total 35 65 100 25 55 20 100
 FYP SEMINAR

 Seminar Schedule will be published on the FYP Weebly Website.

 Only those who have submitted the Project Proposal in Week 12
will be allowed to present at FYP Seminar in Week 15.
 Students must give an oral presentation in English, aided by
PowerPoint slides, etc.
 Time given is 15 minutes (10 minutes for presentation and 5
minutes for Q&A).
 Complete the e-Log activity and be verified by the Supervisor.
 Prepare all relevant documents to support your presentation.
 FYP GUIDES, FORMAT & FORM
 FYP Guides
 UTHM Thesis Writing Guide

 FYP Format
 FYP 1 Project Proposal Cover
 FYP Form
 Project Title and Synopsis - online
 Application to Appoint Second Supervisor
 Assessment Form (Supervisor & Examiner)

All forms can be downloaded from FYP Weebly Website

FYP ACTIVITY RECORD – e-Log

SUPERVISOR VIEW
 FYP 1 – PASSING REQUIREMENTS

 Minimum score to pass is 40%.

 Comply with all of the following evaluation requirements to the Examiner:
 Complete the e-log activity and be verified by Supervisor
 Submit the Project Proposal that has been verified by Supervisor (with
Stamp & Signature) to the Examiner.
 Attend and present at the FYP Seminar
 Attend at least 80% of the meeting hours set by the Supervisor in each
semester.
 Copying the Supervisor's Stamp and Signature is strictly prohibited. If this
happens, the student will be given Grade E (Failed).
 PELAJAR GAGAL - PSM 1 & PSM 2
Pekeliling berkaitan Pemurnian Pelaksaan
Projek Sarjana Muda - Mesyuarat
Jawatankuasa Senat Universiti Bil
3/2017/2018 dan berkuatkuasa pada
Semester 1 Sesi 2017/2018;
PSM 1
1. Pelajar yang GAGAL PSM 1 kali PERTAMA
dikehendaki mengulang semula PSM 1 dengan
mengekalkan Tajuk dan Penyelia sedia ada.
2. Pelajar yang GAGAL PSM 1 kali KEDUA
dikehendaki mengulang semula PSM 1 sama
ada mengekalkan Tajuk dan Penyelia sedia
ada atau tukar yang baharu.
PSM 2
1. Pelajar yang GAGAL PSM 2 kali PERTAMA dikehendaki mengulang
semula PSM 2 dengan mengekalkan Tajuk dan Penyelia sedia ada.
2. Sekiranya pelajar hampir GAGAL PSM 2 kali KEDUA dan penyelia
mendapati pelajar telah melaksanakan sebahagian daripada penulisannya
tetapi masih tidak mencapai kriteria penilain PSM maka:
a) Pelajar dikehendaki membuat pembetulan mengikut piawaian yang
diarahkan oleh penyelia dan perlu disempurnakan sebelum tarikh akhir
markah dimasukkan oleh penyelia di dalam sistem pemarkahan.
b) Pelajar di dalam kategori ini sekiranya lulus pembetulan PSM, pelajar
diberi Gred Lulus D sahaja.
3. Pelajar yang GAGAL PSM 2 kali KEDUA dikehendaki mengulang semula
PSM 2 dengan Tajuk yang sama dan boleh mengekalkan Penyelia sedia
ada atau tukar yang baharu.
4. Pelajar yang GAGAL PSM 2 kali KETIGA berturut-turut adalah
dimuktamadkan untuk mendapat KEDUDUKAN GAGAL (KG) PROGRAM.
FYP 2 SEMINAR WITH IAP
(Industrial Advisor Panel)
July 4, 2021
 FYP 2 SEMINAR WITH IAP – FEEDBACK
Profesor Adjung dan Panel
Maklumbalas dan Cadangan Penambahbaikan
Penasihat Industri
Profesor Adjung  Pembentangan pelajar semakin bertambah baik berbanding semester terdahulu.
 Tahap keyakinan pelajar semakin meningkat.
Datuk Ir. Hj. Abdullah bin  Pelajar perlu mengaitkan kajian penyelidikan dengan situasi sebenar terutamanya
Isnin kekangan disebabkan pandemik Covid 19.
Bekas Ketua Pengarah  Perlu menitik beratkan kesedaran masyarakat dalam kajian penyelidikan.
Jabatan Pengairan dan Saliran  Terdapat kesimpulan tidak selari dengan dapatan kajian.
Malaysia  Secara keseluruhan pembentangan pelajar sangat memuaskan.
(KKAP)  Sebahagian kajian penyelidikan berpotensi dikembangkan dan kajian yang lebih
mendalam
Penasihat Industri  Pembentangan pelajar semakin bertambah baik berbanding semester terdahulu.
 Kajian penyelidikan sesuai dengan skop kejuruteraan awam.
Ir. Wan Hasitinaziah bin  Pelajar memahami kajian yang dijalankan dengan baik.
Mohd Hassan  Sebahagian kesimpulan tidak selari dengan objektif.
Jabatan Pengairan dan Saliran  Sebahagian tajuk tidak spesifik dan terlalu meluas.
Malaysia  Tajuk kajian perlu selari dengan, kajian literasi, metodologi, dapatan kajian dan
(KKAP) kesimpulan.
 Formula yang yang digunakan mesti berdasarkan kepada piawaian ataupun kajian
terdahulu.
 FYP 2 SEMINAR WITH IAP - FEEDBACK
Profesor Adjung dan Panel
Maklumbalas dan Cadangan Penambahbaikan
Penasihat Industri
Penasihat Industri  Pembentangan pelajar dan kemahiran komunikasi semakin bertambah baik berbanding
semester terdahulu.
Ir. Kueh Kim Meow  Pelajar membuat perancangan kajian dengan teliti dan pengumpulan dan yang banyak
Pengarah Eksekutif melalui kajian literatur.
HATIKA Engineering Sdn Bhd  Kajian mengenai pengunaan semula bahan buangan sangat sesuai di masa kini dan
(KKSB) perlu kajian yang mendalam.
 Kajian perlu dilaksanakan dengan mengadakan kolaborasi dengan industri.
 Kajian mengenai tanah liat menggantikan agregat sesuai untuk dilaksankan.
 Penggunaan perisian Finite Element Modeling (FEM) boleh dikembangkan lagi
menggunakan Building Information Modeling (BIM).

Penasihat Industri  Pembentangan pelajar dan kemahiran komunikasi semakin bertambah baik berbanding
semester terdahulu.
Ir. Ooi Chee Liang  Pelajar perlu memahami kajian yang hendak dilaksanakan terlebih dahulu sebelum
Pengarah mengenalpasti rangka kerja termasuk tajuk dan juga metodologi kajian.
Jurutera MTC Sdn Bhd
(KKSB)
 FYP 2 SEMINAR WITH IAP - FEEDBACK
Profesor Adjung dan Panel
Penasihat Industri
Penasihat Industri
Ir. Ts. Dr. Hj. Zarabizan bin
Hj. Zakaria
Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia
(KKIG)
Maklumbalas dan Cadangan Penambahbaikan
 Pembentangan pelajar dan kemahiran komunikasi semakin bertambah baik
berbanding semester terdahulu.
 Kajian perlu lebih spesifik dan fokus terhadap masalah yang hendak dikaji.
 Pelajar kekurangan pengetahuan asas mengenai ‘nilai resistiviti’ dan ‘ciri-ciri tanah.
 Pelajar perlu lebih cekap dalam membuat analisis dan menyelesaikan masalah.

Penasihat Industri
 Pembentangan pelajar dan kemahiran komunikasi semakin bertambah baik berbanding
Pn. Nazaratul Munirah bin semester terdahulu.
Hisham  Tajuk kajian terlalu meluas menyebabkan objektif kajian, kajian literasi, metodologi,
Garuda Samudera dapatan kajian dan kesimpulan tidak selari dengan tajuk.
Consultancy and Services
(KKBP)
 THANK
YOU
FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT
UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA