Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Low-Tension Waterflooding Process: Spe-Aime, Mobil Research and Development Corp
A Low-Tension Waterflooding Process: Spe-Aime, Mobil Research and Development Corp
Introduction
The work summarized here represents a part of the quirements on the composition of the slug. Our
effort by Mobil Research and Development Corp. to process, on the other hand, does not depend upon
develop an economic low-tension waterflooding proc- miscibility between crude oil and water, but relies on
ess. Various aspects of displacement at low tension very low interracial tension between a water solution/
are discussed in general terms. Details of the exten- dispersion of a surfactant and the reservoir crude oil.
sive background effort supporting the necessary labo- Also, the compositional requirements that must be
ratory and field experiements, an interpretation of met in order to achieve and maintain a condition of
results, and the development of an adequate trans- very low tension are somewhat different from those
port theory are deferred to later publications. Not needed in the Maraflood process.
all aspects of this process have been field tested yet. n....: +:-- A An D.n~mcc
However, Mobil has carried out a field test in South MGwl-lp Llull U1 L1lW A 1 Wwwuu
Texas to examine factors relating primarily to sur- In what follows it is assumed that the process is
factant behavior. A polymer injection study was con- started in a sandstone reservoir that is nearly or com-
ducted at the same site some time later. As a result pletely watered out. The water phase present in the
of these field studies and supporting theory we con- reservoir at this stage is assumed to be a typical oil-
cluded that a tertiary oil bank can be formed in a field brine, high in total dissolved solids and in
reservoir using low-tension surfactants and that mo- divalent cations, particularly calcium and magnesium.
bility control immediately behind the bank is essen- A regular pattern from the existing injectors and pro-
tial to insure that a significant fraction of the “mobil- ducers is chosen, with high areal sweep as an im-
ized oil” will be driven to producing wells. portant design criterion.
A surfactant waterflooding process capable of pro- The process consists of injecting three slugs of
ducing a tertiary oii bank has aiso been ciescriloed by ‘W-ater“Wfi&I :J a?--.... ~h~~lid
dlklCIC1lL
nr-+innc
COrnvu.Lv.... Thew
. ... . .
Gogarty and Tosch.l One significant difference be- will be denoted as the protective slug, the surfactant
tween their “Maraflood” process and the process slug, and the mobility-control slug, or as Slugs 1, 2,
described here is the manner in which the surfactant and 3, respectively.
is used. Maraflood employs a surfactant slug that is The protective slug is an aqueous solution of
miscible with the reservoir crude. Miscibility implies sodium chloride. Within limits, its volume is some-
zero interracial tension between this slug and the res- what arbitrary, in the range of 0.1 of the pattern pore
ervoir crude oil. Achieving and, particularly, main- volume. For most applications the concentration of
taining this miscibility condition places rigorous re- sodium chloride in this slug would be between 1.0
I
A field test to examine some aspects of surfactant behavior, and a later polymer
injection study, led to the conclusion that a tertiary oil bank can be formed in a reservoir
using low-tension surjactants. Another conclusion is that it is essential to control the
mobility immediately behind the bank to insure that a significant jraction of the
mobilized oil will be driven to the producing wells.
10
nomically feasible to maintain such a water viscosity %
.
over an appreciable fraction of the reservoir volume,
10”6
the concentration of biopolymer must be decreased
with distance from the rear of the oil bank, until it
1o”’
finally vanishes. Such a graded viscosity zone pro-
vides a mildly unstable hydrodynamic condition.
From laborato~ experiments we estimate that the 10”8
pore volume of this mobility-control slug should 1
This sequence of three slugs can be driven by the Fig. l—Dependence of residual oil on capillaty number.
10 , I I , 1 , (
7
tension in dynes /cm
1. , , ( J
.Ou
.001
0. \
. m5
So”o.
o @
0.00 \
o.1,~
0.10
0.m AQUEOUS CONCENTRATION OF PETROLEUM SULFONATE, gl 10I ml
can be produced between crude oils and salt solutions centration. AS we have said, this is accomplished by
containing petroleum sulfonates. A typical system of adjusting the salinity of Slug 3 to a value somewhat
this type for an intermediate-paraffinic crude oil is below the minimum salinity required for low tension
illustrated in Fig. 3. Interracial tension is contoured as determine from the tension map,
as a function of sodium chloride and petroleum sul-
fonate concentrations in the water phase. For this Partitioning of Surfactants Between Oil and Water.
system, a deep minimum in tension occurs at con- The relative solubilities of petroleum sulfonates in
centrations of about 1.0 grn/ 100 ml for sodium crude oil and water are very strongly dependent on
chloride and 0.04 gm/ 100 ml for petroleum sul- the salinity of the aqueous phase. As was noted in
fonate! An area of low tension extends from 0.7 to Fig. 3, aqueous concentrations in the low-tension re-
2.0 grn/100 ml for sodium chloride and from 0.025 gion are rather low. In general, these values range
to 0.10 gm/ 100 ml for petroleum sulfonate. Tension from about 0.02 to 0.30 gm,/100 ml (+ 0.02 to 0.30
maps of this kind appear when the correct partition- weight percent). In order that Slug 2 represent a small
ing of the petroleum sulfonate between water and oil fraction of the pattern pore volume and stiIl contain
has been achieved. However, the position of the sufficient surfactant to propagate a low-tension region
minimum is dependent on crude-oil composition. For across the pattern, initial surfactant concentrations
instance, with this particular petroleum sulfonate, must be much above this range. To initiate a 10w-
the minimum would shift to lower sodium chloride tension region early in the development of the pro-
and higher surfactant concentrations for a typical cess, the petroleum sulfonate must preferentially par-
naphthenic crude. tition into the oil phase by an amount sufficient to
In general, petroleum sulfonates with salinity ad- lower the aqueous concentration into the low-tension
justed to produce a iow-temion region in this com- region. It is therefore useful to determine the parti-
position space can be blended from commercial pe- tioning coefficient as a function of sodium chloride
troleum sulfonates whose average equivalent weights and equilibrium petroleum sulfonate concentrations
vary from 350 to 500. In most cases the average in the aqueous phase.
equivalent weight of a correctly balanced blend will The required injection concentration of Slug 2 is
lie between 400 and 450. related to the partitioning coefficient, the residual oil
in the reservoir, and the desired initial equilibrium
Factors Affecting Surfactant and concentration in the aqueous phase. The size of Slug
Sodium Chloride Transport 2 is then determined if the total surfactant require-
Adsorption. It is well known that surface-active ment is known. As the partitioning coefficient depends
agents concentrate at solid-liquid as well as liquid- strongly on salinity, the salinity of Slug 2 can seine
liquid interfaces. Petroleum sulfonates, which are to fix both the size and the surfactant concentration
anionic surfactants, probably compete for the posi- of this slug. We have generally found that a sodium
tively charged sites on reservoir pore surfaces. Ad-’ chloride concentration in the upper part of the low-
sorption isotherms of petroleum sulfonates on reser- tension region is sufficient to provide the necessary
voir solids are typically Langmuir-like. Adsorption initial redistribution of surfactant between oil and
rises rapidly as equilibrium concentration in the water. On the other hand, surfactant is utilized most
aqueous phase increases, reaching a plateau value efficiently during the whole process if this concentra-
that depends on the number of sites available, the tion is as low as possible.
sodium chloride concentration, the equivalent weight
of the surfactant, the concentration of - competing Dispersion and Mixing. As previously mentioned, in
anions, and temperature. The plateau value tends to many reservoirs an important criterion for propagat-
increase with an increase in the first three variables ing a low-tension region between injector and pro-
and decrease with an increase in the last two. The ducer wells is the effective separation of the petroleum
mll
.. . mht=r
....””. nf
“. ~~~~~ ~~~ 1~~~~ ~~il~~.~ of ~~i~~~ ~n~ ~h~ su]f~nate from the reservoir brine. Slug 1 must be
temperature are fixed in the reservoir. Losses to ad- large enough to accomplish this. During the miscible [
sorption can be reduced by choosing a petroleum displacement of the reservoir brine by Slug 1, the
sulfonate blend with as low an average equivalent mixing zone that develops depends most critically on
weight as possible, consistent with the need for a low- a “mixing length,”* which is a rock property and
tension region, or a blend with a low-tension region which largely determines the value of the dispersion
at low salt concentrations. Unfortunately, these cri- or mixing coefficient at typical flood rates. Given
teria are in conflict because, for a given crude oil, sufficiently representative samples of the reservoir
petroleum sulfonates of relatively low equivalent rock, an average value of this coefficient can be deter-
weight require relatively high salinity to produce low mined in the laboratory. The dimensioniess form of
tension and those of relatively high equivalent the dispersion coefficient is essentially this mixing
weight require relatively low salinity to produce
low tension. We have found that the most prac-
*The Ion fsitudinal coefficient, DL, of the dispersion tensor for some
tical way to minimize adsorption is by (1) using sac- chemical component can be expressed approximately as
rificial inorganic chemicals that economically com- DL=TDIU+AV +...,
where terms are as defined in the Nomenclature. For most water-
pete for the adsorption sites and (2) introducing a flood the second term of DL dominates.
,..,,
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY