CONSTLAW1DEPTSYLLABUSSY2021 2022lmub

San Beda University
College of Law
COURSE SYLLABUS
COURSE CODE:
COURSE TITLE: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I
COURSE CREDIT: 3 UNITS
COURSE PREREQUISITE/S: NONE
FACULTY: ATTY. LUIS MANUEL U. BUGAYONG
EMAIL ADDRESS: lbugayong@sanbeda.edu.ph
TERM/ACADEMIC YEAR: FIRST SEMESTER - SCHOOL YEAR 2021-2022
DAY/TIME/ROOM/SECTION:
COURSE DELIVERY MODE: FULL ONLINE
CONSULTATION DAY/TIME:
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
A comprehensive study of constitutional framework of the Republic of the

Philippines, its three (3) branches the government (with their powers and inter-
relationship), the Constitutional Commissions, and the principles of governmental
accountability.
COURSE GOALS: Expected College of Law Graduate Attributes (ELGAs)
Know and understand the Constitution, memorize provisions, critical and

analytical thinking, effective in written and oral communication, logical reasoning,
and sound judgment, exercise of proper professional and ethical responsibilities.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES (LOs):
1. Knowledge/Remembering: define, list, recognize

2. Comprehension/Understanding: describe, explain, identify, recognize
3. Application/Applying: choose, demonstrate, implement, perform
4. Analysis/Analyzing: analyze, categorize, compare, differentiate
5. Evaluation/Evaluating: assess, critique, evaluate, rank, rate
6. Synthesis/Creating: construct, design, formulate, organize, synthesize
Upon completion of the Constitutional Law I course, the student is expected to be able to:
Expected College of
Law Graduate LEARNING OUTCOMES (LOs)
Attributes (ELGAs)
Critical and analytical LO1. Explain, during class recitation and discussion, the basic
thinking framework of the 1987 Constitution, the composition and powers of
Effective in written and the branches of government, and the different Constitutional
oral communication principles relative to governmental administration.
Logical reasoning LO2. Analyze the practical and Constitutional implications of current
Sound judgment and proposed statutes, regulations, judicial rulings, legal arguments,
Exercise of proper and strategies to the workings and operation of the government.
professional and ethical LO3. Assess the Constitutionality of current and proposed
responsibilities governmental action in consideration of the policies sought to be
achieved.
LO4. Utilize legal research tools to gather information that aids in the
analysis of legal issues in submitting Position Paper that could serve
as a basis of governmental policies.
ASSESSMENT/GRADING SYSTEM:
The student will be graded according to the following:
Percentage
(Weight is based
Scope of Work
Requirements (Based on the Learning Outcomes) on the
(Individual)
importance of
the LO)
LO1 Class recitations, Quizzes, Case Digests, Individual
LO2 and discussion Individual
LO3 Individual
LO4 - - Research Paper, Case Study Individual
Class standing before Midterms Individual 16.67%

Midterm Exams Individual 16.67%
Class Standing after Midterms Individual 33.33%
Final Exams Individual 33.33%
TOTAL 100
LEARNING PLAN:
Design or the structure of the course that includes content/topics to be covered;

learning resources to be used; weekly schedule of the topics to be taken up; and the
learning methods to be utilized that are most likely to lead students towards the
goals and learning outcomes that were defined.
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING RESOURCES (Schedule of (activities designed
(arrangement or sequence of (print and non-print each Topic, or deployed by the
the major topics is based on a materials and online/ Assign, teacher to bring
logical order) open-access resources) Exam for about, or create the
the entire conditions for
semester) learning)
Course Introduction
 Course overview Syllabus 16 to 20 Lecture
 Course assignments August 2021 Discussion
 Course requirements
MODULE 1:
23 to 27  Recitation
I. The Constitution • Textbooks August 2021  Case study &
reporting
• Basic Principles and • Supreme Court Decisions:  Discussion/lecture
Concepts  Quiz
- Political Law- ➢ People v. Perfecto [43
Concept and Scope Phil 887]
- Constitutional Law ➢ Macariola v. Asuncion
and Constitution - [114 SCRA 77]
Concepts ➢ De Leon v. Esguerra
[G.R. No. 78059,
• Effectivity of the August 31, 1987]
Constitution
2
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
➢ Manila Prince Hotel v.
• Rules on Interpreting GSIS [G.R. No.
Doubtful Provision of 122156, February 3,
the Constitution 1997]
➢ Francisco v. House of
Representatives [G.R.
No. 160261, November 30 August  Recitation
10, 2003] to Sept 3  Case study &
2021 reporting
 Discussion/lecture
• Textbooks Quiz
II. Amendments & Revision
• Article XVII, 1987
• Source of Power to Constitution
Propose Changes to
the Constitution • Republic Act No. 6735
• Proposal • Supreme Court Decisions:

➢ Amendment v. ➢ Gonzales v.
Revision COMELEC [G.R. No.
➢ Modes of L-28196, November 9,
Proposing 1967]
Amendments or ➢ Imbong v. COMELEC
Revision [G.R. No. L-32432,
➢ Requirements for September 11, 1970]
Proposals ➢ Santiago v. COMELEC
[G.R. No. 127325,
• Ratification March 19, 1997]
➢ Doctrine of Proper ➢ Occena v. COMELEC
Submission [G.R. No. 56350, April
➢ Requirements for 2, 1981]
Ratification ➢ Tolentino v.
COMELEC [G.R. No.
L-34150, October 16,
1971]
➢ Sanidad v. COMELEC
[G.R. No. L-44640,
October 12, 1976]
➢ Province of Cotabato v.
The Gov’t. of the RP
Peace Panel on
Ancestral Domain
[G.R. No. 183591,
October 14, 2008]
➢ Lambino v. COMELEC
[G.R. No. 174153,
October 25, 2006]
3
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
Lambino v. COMELEC
[G.R. No. 174153,
November 21, 2006]
MODULE 2:
Concept of the State

• State v. Country September  Case study &
2021 reporting
• Elements of State • Textbooks  Discussion/lecture
➢ Territory  Quiz
➢ People • Article I, 1987 Constitution
➢ Government
▪ Constituent v. • Republic Act No. 3046
Ministrant
▪ Doctrine of • Republic Act No. 5446
Parens Patriae
▪ De Facto • Republic Act No. 9522
Government
➢ Sovereignty • United Nations Convention
▪ Nature and on the Law of the Sea
Characteristics (UNCLOS)
▪ Effect of
Belligerent • Sec. 1, Article IV, 1987
Occupation Constitution
▪ Concept of
Auto- • Chapter 2, Book I,
Limitation Administrative Code of
1987
• Sec. 2(1), Administrative

Code of 1987
• PCA Case Nº2013-19, “In

the Matter of the South
China Sea Arbitration”
Between the Republic of
the Philippines and the
People’s Republic of China
• Supreme Court Decisions:
➢ Collector of Internal
Revenue v. Campos
Rueda [G.R. No. L-
13250, October 29,
1971]
4
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
➢ Magallona v. Ermita
[G.R. No. 187167, 16
August 2011
➢ Edu v. Ericta [G.R. No.
32069, October 24,
1970]
➢ Bacani v. National
Coconut Corporation,
G.R. No. L-9657,
November 29, 1956]
➢ Philippine Virginia
Tobacco
Administration v. Court
of Industrial Relations,
65 SCRA 416
➢ Gov’t of the Phililppine
Islands v. Monte de
Piedad, 35 SCRA 738
➢ Cabañas v. Pilapil, 58
SCRA 94
➢ Co Kim Cham v.
Valdez Tan Keh, 75
Phil. 113
➢ Laurel v. Misa, 77 Phil.
856
➢ Ruffy v. Chief of Staff,
75 Phil. 875
➢ People v. Gozo [G.R.
No. L-36409, October
26, 1973]
➢ People v. Perfecto, 43
Phil. 887
➢ Macariola v. Asuncion,
114 SCRA 77
➢ Vilas v. City of Manila,
229 US 345
➢ Peralta v. Director of
Prisons, 75 Phil. 285
➢ Alcantara v. Director of
Prisons, 75 Phil. 749
5
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
MODULE 3:
State Immunity 20 Sept to 1  Recitation

October  Case study &
• Concept of State • Textbooks 2021 reporting
Immunity  Discussion/lecture
• Sec. 3, Article XVI, 1987  Quiz
• Tests if Suit is Against Constitution
the State
• Act No. 3083
• Suit Against Public
Officers • Commonwealth Act No.
327, as amended by
• Suit Against Presidential Decree No.
Government Agencies 1445
➢ Incorporated v.
Unincorporated • Supreme Court Decisions:
➢ Local Government
Units ➢ Philippine Agila
Satellite, Inc. v.
• Suit Against Foreign Lichauco, et al. [G.R.
State and International No. 134887, July 27,
Organizations 2006]
➢ Republic v. Sandoval
• Consent to be Sued [G.R. No. 84607,
➢ Express v. Implied March 19, 1993]
➢ Scope of Consent - ➢ United States of
Suability v. America v. Guinto
Liability [G.R. No. 76607,
February 26, 1990]
• Remedies ➢ Sanders v. Veridiano,
162 SCRA 88
➢ Vinzons-Chato v.
Fortune Tobacco
Corporation [G.R. No.
141309, December 23,
2008]
➢ Department of Health v.
Philippine
Pharmawealth [G.R.
No. 182358, February
20, 2013]
➢ Shauf v. Court of
Appeals [G.R. No.
90314 November 27,
1990]
➢ Wylie v. Rarang [G.R.
No. 74135, May 28,
1992]
6
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
➢ Republic v.
Sandiganbayan [G.R.
No. 142476, March 20,
2001]
➢ United States of
America v. Reyes [G.R.
No. 79253, March 1,
1993]
➢ Department of Health
Secretary v. Philippine
Pharmawealth [G.R.
No. 169304, March 13,
2007]
➢ Rayo v. CFI of
Bulacan, 110 SCRA
460
➢ Air Transportation
Office v. Spouses
Ramos, G.R. No.
159402, 23 February
2011
➢ Municipality of San
Fernando v. Firme 195
SCRA 692
➢ Bureau of Printing v.
Bureau of Printing
Employees Association,
1 SCRA 340
➢ Mobil Philippines v.
Customs Arrastre
Services Division, 18
SCRA 1120
➢ Merritt v. Government
of the Philippines
Islands, 34 Phil. 311;
➢ Department of
Agriculture v. NLRC,
227 SCRA 693
➢ Amigable v. Cuenca, 43
SCRA 460
➢ EPG Construction v.
Secretary Vigilar, G.R.
No. 131544, 16 March
2001;
➢ Froilan v. Pan Oriental
Shipping, G.R. No. L-
6060, 30 September
1950;
7
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
➢ Lim v. Brownell, 107
Phil. 345;
➢ United States v.
Ruiz,136 SCRA 487;
➢ Holy See v. Rosario
[G.R. No. 101949,
December 1, 1994]
➢ China National
Machinery &
Equipment Corporation
(Group) v. Sta. Maria,
665 SCRA 189
➢ Republic of Indonesia
v. Vinzon [G.R. No.
154705, June 26, 2003]
➢ Minucher v. Court of
Appeals [G.R. No.
142396, February 11,
2003]
➢ Lasco v. UNRFNRE
[G.R. Nos. 109095-
1995]
➢ Republic v. Villasor, 54
SCRA 83
➢ Municipality of Makati
v. Court of Appeals,
190 SCRA 206
➢ University of the
Philippines v. Dizon
[G.R. No. 171182,
August 23, 2012]
8
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
MODULE 4:
Declaration of Principles &

State Policies 4 to 8  Recitation
October  Case study &
• Democracy and 2021 reporting
Republicanism • Textbooks  Discussion/lecture
 Quiz
• Generally Accepted • Article II, 1987
Principles of Constitution
International Law
➢ Municipal Law v. • Supreme Court Decisions:
Treaty ➢ Villavicencio v.
➢ Doctrine of Lukban, 39 Phil. 778
Incorporation ➢ Poe-Llamanzares v.
➢ Doctrine of COMELEC [G.R. No.
Transformation 221697,221698-700, 8
March 2016]
• Service in defense of ➢ Kuroda v. Jalandoni, 42
the State O.G. 4282
➢ Agustin v. Edu, [G.R.
• Separation of Church No. L-49112, February
and State 2, 1979]
➢ Concept and ➢ Gonzales v. Hechanova,
Rationale 9 SCRA 230
➢ Different Kinds of ➢ Ichong v. Hernandez,
Wall of Separation 101 Phil. 115
➢ Accommodation ➢ People v. Lagman &
➢ Tests to Determine Zosa, 66 Phil. 13
Accommodation ➢ Aglipay v. Ruiz, 64
Phil. 201
• International Policy ➢ Garces v. Estenzo, 104
➢ Government SCRA 510
Policies ➢ Estrada v. Escritor
➢ Trade [A.M. No. P-02-1651,
➢ Nuclear Weapon June 22, 2006]
➢ In Re Letter of Tony
• Social Justice Valenciano [A.M. No.
➢ Different Concepts 10-4-19-SC, March 7,
2017]
• Policy on Human ➢ Fonacier v. Court of
Rights Appeals [G.R. No. L-
5917, January 28, 1955]
• Protection on Family, ➢ Taruc v. Dela Cruz
Life and Children [G.R. No. 144801,
➢ Same Sex Marriage March 10, 2005]
➢ Abortion ➢ Tañada v. Angara, 272
➢ Commencement of SCRA 18
Constitutional
9
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
Protection for the ➢ Calalang v. Williams,
Unborn 70 Phil. 726
➢ Double Effect ➢ Ondoy v. Ignacio, 97
Principle SCRA 611
➢ Curfew Ordinances ➢ Salonga v. Farrales, 105
SCRA 459
• Gender Equality ➢ Sec. of National
Defense v. Manalo
• Health and [G.R. No. 180906,
Environment October 7, 2008]
➢ Writ of Kalikasan ➢ Obergefell v. Hodges
[576 U.S _ (2015)]
• Policy on Education ➢ Falcis v. Civil Registrar
General [G.R. No.
• Autonomy of Private 217910, September 3,
Enterprises 2019]
➢ Imbong v. Ochoa, G.R.
• Agrarian Reform No. 204819, 8 April
2014
• Autonomy of Local ➢ Samahan ng mga
Government Progresibong Kabataan
➢ Relationship (SPARK) v. Quezon
Between the City [G.R. No. 225442,
National and Local August 8, 2017]
Governments ➢ Oposa v. Factoran, 224
➢ Kinds of SCRA 792
Decentralization ➢ Metropolitan Manila
➢ Associative Development
Principle Authority, et al. v.
Concerned Residents of
Manila Bay [G.R. No.
• Opportunity to Public
171947-48, December
Service
18, 2008]
•
➢ Guingona v. Carague,
• Policy of Full Public
196 SCRA 221
Disclosure ➢ Association of Small
➢ Concept of Full Landowners v. Sec. of
Public Disclosure
Agrarian Reform, 175
➢ Right to
SCRA 343
Information
➢ Hacienda Luisita vs.
➢ Limitation of the
Presidential Agrarian
Policy on Full
Reform Council [G.R.
Public Disclosure
No. 171101, July 5,
➢ Privileged
2011]
Information
➢ Basco v. PAGCOR,
197 SCRA 52
➢ Limbona v. Mangelin,
170 SCRA 786
10
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
➢ Province of North
Cotabato v. Gov’t. of
the Republic of the
Philippines Peace Panel
on Ancestral Domain
[G.R. No. 183591,
October 14, 2008]
➢ Pamatong v.
COMELEC [G.R. No.
161872, April 13, 2004]
➢ Legaspi v. Civil Service
Commission, 150
SCRA 530
➢ Valmonte v. Belmonte,
170 SCRA 256
➢ Chavez vs. Presidential
Commission on Good
Government [G.R. No.
130716, December 9,
1998]
➢ In Re: Production of
Court Records and
Documents and the
Attendance of Court
officials and employees
as witnesses under the
subpoenas of February
10, 2012 and the
various letters for the
Impeachment
Prosecution Panel dated
January 19 and 25,
2012, [February 14,
2012]
11
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
MODULE 6:
I. Separation of Powers
• Concept and Basis October  Case study &
• Textbooks 2021 reporting
• Relationship Between  Discussion/lecture
the Three Departments • Supreme Court Decisions:  Quiz
• Checks and Balances ➢ Angara v. Electoral

Commission, 63 Phil.
• Blending of Powers 139
➢ Belgica v. Ochoa [G.R.
• Political and No. 208566, November
Justiciable Questions 11, 2013]
➢ Casibang v. Aquino, 92
• Expanded Judicial SCRA 642
Power of the Courts of ➢ Tañada v. Cuenco, 100
Justice Phil. 1101
[G.R. No. L-44640, 12
October 1976]
➢ Daza v. Singson, 180
SCRA 496
➢ Ongsiako-Reyes v.
COMELEC [G.R. No.
207264, June 25, 2013]
MODULE 6:
II. Delegation of Powers

• Concept • Textbooks October  Case study &
2021 reporting
• Tests of Valid • Sections 23(2) and 28(2),  Discussion/lecture
Delegation Article VI, 1987  Quiz
Constitution
• Permissible
Delegation of • Supreme Court Decisions:
Legislative Power
➢ Emergency Power ➢ People v. Vera, 65 Phil.
➢ Tariff Power 56
➢ Administrative ➢ Araneta v. Dinglasan,
Agencies 84 Phil. 368
➢ Local Government ➢ Rodriguez v. Gella, 92
Units Phil. 603
➢ People ➢ Garcia v. Executive
Secretary, 211 SCRA
219
12
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
➢ ABAKADA Guro v.
Ermita [G.R. No.
168056, September 1,
2005]
➢ Eastern Shipping Lines
v. POEA [G.R. No.
76633, October 18,
1988]
➢ Ynot v. IAC, 148
SCRA 659
No. 208566, November
11, 2013]
MIDTERM Last Week

EXAMINATIONS of October
2021
MODULE 7:
Legislative Department 3 to 12  Recitation

November  Case study &
• Bicameralism • Textbooks 2021 reporting
 Discussion/lecture
• Senate • Article VI, 1987  Quiz
➢ Composition Constitution
➢ Qualifications of
Senators • Republic Act No. 6735
➢ Term and Term
Limit • Republic Act No. 6645
• House of • Supreme Court Decisions:

Representatives ➢ Pimentel. Jr. v.
➢ Composition COMELEC [G.R. No.
➢ Qualifications of 133509, February 9,
Members of the 2000]
House of ➢ Tobias v. Abalos, 239
Representatives SCRA 106
➢ Term and Term ➢ Mariano, Jr. v.
Limit COMELEC, 242 SCRA
211
• Party-List System
13
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
➢ Rules on ➢ Montejo v. COMELEC,
Participation G.R. No. 118702, 16
➢ 20% Allocation March 1995
➢ 2% Percent ➢ Aquino v. COMELEC,
Threshold G.R. No. 189793, 7
➢ 3 Seat Limit April 2010
➢ Proportional ➢ Veterans Federation
Representation Party vs. COMELEC
[G.R. No. 136781,
• Election of Members October 6, 2000]
of Congress ➢ BANAT v. COMELEC
➢ Regular [G.R. No. 179271,
➢ Special April, 21 2009]
➢ Ang Bagong Bayani-
• Salaries and OFW Labor Party v.
Perquisites COMELEC [G.R. No.
147589, June 26, 2001]
• Legislative Immunities ➢ Atong Paglaum, Inc. v.
➢ Immunity from COMELEC [G.R. No.
Arrest 203766, April 2, 2013]
➢ Privileged Speech ➢ Ang Ladlad LGBT
Party v. COMELEC
• Disclosures and [G.R. No. 190582,
Conflict of Interest April 8, 2010]
➢ Abayon v. HRET [G.R.
• Disqualifications and No. 189466, February
Inhibitions 11, 2010]
➢ Incompatible ➢ Philippine Guardians
Office Brotherhood, Inc. v.
➢ Forbidden Office COMELEC, G.R. No.
190529, April 29, 2010
• Legislative Sessions ➢ Bantay Republic Act or
➢ Regular BA-RA 7941 v.
➢ Special COMELEC [G.R. No.
177271, May 4, 2007]
➢ Romualdez-Marcos v.
• Adjournment
COMELEC, 248 SCRA
➢ Day-to-Day
300
➢ Sine Die
➢ Aquino v. COMELEC,
➢ Final Adjournment
248 SCRA 400
➢ Adjournment for
➢ Co v. HRET, G.R. Nos.
more than three
92191-92, July 30,
days
1991]
➢ Adjournment in
➢ Frivaldo v. COMELEC
other places
[G.R. No. 87193, June
23, 1989]
• Organization of
➢ Dimaporo v. Mitra
Congress
[G.R. No. 96859,
October 15, 1991]
• Quorum
14
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
➢ Jimenez v.
• Disciplinary Power Cabangbang, 17 SCRA
876
• Rule-Making Power ➢ Osmeña v. Pendatun,
• Legislative Journal 109 Phil. 863
➢ Pobre v. Defensor-
• Legislative Record Santiago [A.C. No.
7399, August 25, 2009]
• Electoral Tribunals ➢ Puyat v. De Guzman
➢ Composition [G.R. No. 51122,
➢ Manner of March 25, 1982]
Apportionment ➢ Santiago v. Guingona,
➢ Powers/Function Jr. [G.R. No. 134577,
➢ Jurisdiction November 18, 1998]
➢ Baguilat v. Alvarez
• Commission on [G.R. No. 227757, July
Appointments 25, 2017]
➢ Composition ➢ Avelino v. Cuenco, 83
➢ Manner of Phil. 17
Apportionment ➢ Arroyo v. De Venecia,
➢ Powers/Function [G.R. No. 127255, June
26, 1998]
➢ Santiago v.
• Inquiries in Aid of
Sandiganbayan [G.R.
Legislation
No. 128055, April 18,
➢ Executive
2001]
Privilege
➢ Paredes, Jr. v.
➢ Prohibition on
Sandiganbayan [G.R.
Members of the
No. 108251, January
Armed Forces
31, 1996]
➢ Arroyo v. De Venecia,
• Question Hour
G.R. No. 127255,
August 14, 1997 and
• Declaration a State of
June 26, 1998]
War
➢ United States v. Pons,
34 Phil. 729
• Bills that Must ➢ Casco Philippine
Originate from the Chemical Co. v.
House of Gimenez, 7 SCRA 347
Representatives ➢ Philippine Judges
Association v. Prado
• Appropriation [G.R. No. 105371,
➢ Annual November 11, 1993]
➢ Special ➢ Robles v. HRET [G.R.
➢ Procedure No. 86647, February 5,
➢ Budget Cycle 1990]
➢ Budget Re- ➢ Angara v. Electoral
Enactment Commission, 63 Phil.
139
15
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
➢ Budget ➢ Lazatin v. HRET [G.R.
Augmentation No. 84297, December
➢ Reversion of 8, 1988]
Budget to the ➢ Abbas v. Senate
General Funds Electoral Tribunal, 166
➢ Special Funds SCRA 651
➢ Budget ➢ Bondoc v. Pineda, 201
Impoundment SCRA 792
➢ Sectarian Purposes ➢ Chavez v. COMELEC
[G.R. No. 105323, July
• Taxation 3, 1992]
➢ Principles of ➢ Pimentel v. House of
Taxation Representatives
➢ Exemption Electoral Tribunal
[G.R. No. 141489,
• Law Making Power November, 29, 2002]
➢ Formal ➢ Ongsiako-Reyes v.
Requirements COMELEC [G.R. No.
➢ Substantive 207264, June 25, 2013]
Requirements ➢ Daza v. Singson, 180
➢ Certification of SCRA 496
Bills ➢ Coseteng v. Mitra, 187
➢ Bicameral SCRA 377
Conference ➢ Guingona v. Gonzales,
Committee 214 SCRA 789
➢ Drilon v. De Venecia,
• Veto Power of the G.R. No. 180055, 31
President July 2009, and
➢ Regular Veto Madrigal v. Villar, G.R.
➢ Item Veto No. 183055, 31 July
➢ Doctrine of 2009
Inappropriate ➢ Bengzon v. Senate Blue
Provision Ribbon Committee, 203
➢ Legislative Veto SCRA 767
➢ Standard Chartered
• Restrictions on the Bank v. Senate
Legislative Power Committee on Banks
➢ Increase in the [G.R. No. 167173,
Jurisdiction of the December 27, 2007]
Supreme Court ➢ Arnault v. Nazareno, 87
➢ Grant of Title of Phil. 29
Nobility ➢ Balag v. Senate [G.R.
No. 234608, July 3,
• Initiative and 2018]
Referendum ➢ Senate v. Ermita [G.R.
No. 169777, April 20,
2006]
16
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
➢ Gudani v. Senga [G.R.
No. 170165, August 15,
2006]
➢ In re Petition for
Issuance of Writ of
Habeas Corpus of
Camilo L. Sabio [G.R.
No. 174340, October
17, 2006]
➢ Neri v. Senate
Committee on
Accountability of
Public Officers and
Investigations [G.R.
No. 180643, March 25,
2008]
➢ Garcillano v. House of
Representatives [G.R.
No. 170338, December
23, 2008]
➢ Tolentino v. Secretary
of Finance [G.R. No.
115455, August 25,
1994 and October 30,
1995]
➢ Alvarez v. Guingona,
252 SCRA 695
➢ Lawyers Against
Monopoly and Poverty
v. Secretary of DBM
[G.R. No. 164987,
April 24, 2012]
➢ Garcia v. Mata, 65
SCRA 520
➢ Demetria v. Alba [G.R.
No. 71977, February
27, 1987]
➢ Philconsa v. Enriquez,
235 SCRA 506
11, 2013]
➢ Araullo v. Aquino III
[G.R. No. 209287, July
1, 2014]
➢ Philconsa v. Gimenez,
15 SCRA 479
17
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
➢ Tio v. Videogram
Regulatory Board, 151
SCRA 208
➢ Philippine Judges
Association v. Prado
[G.R. No. 105371,
November 11, 1993]
➢ ABAKADA Guro v.
Ermita [G.R. No.
2005]
➢ Gonzales v. Macaraig,
191 SCRA 452
➢ Bengzon v. Drilon, 208
SCRA 133
➢ Philconsa v. Enriquez,
235 SCRA 506
➢ Lung Center of the
Philippines v. Quezon
City [G.R. No. 144104,
June 29, 2004]
➢ Province of Abra v.
Hernando, 107 SCRA
104
➢ Abra Valley College v.
Aquino, 162 SCRA 106
➢ Pascual v. Secretary of
Public Works, 110 Phil.
331
➢ Aglipay v. Ruiz, 64
Phil. 201
➢ Guingona v. Carague,
196 SCRA 221
➢ Osmeña v. Orbos [G.R.
No. 99886, March 31,
1993]
➢ First Lepanto Ceramics,
Inc. v. Court of Appeals
[G.R. No. 110571,
March 10, 1994 and
October 7, 1994]
➢ Diaz v. Court of
Appeals [G.R. No.
109698, December 5,
1994]
➢ Subic Bay Metropolitan
Authority v.
COMELEC [G.R. No.
18
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
1996]
MODULE 8:
Executive Department
• Executive Power • Textbooks 15 to 26  Recitation

November  Case study &
➢ Non-Executive • Article VII, 1987 2021 reporting
Powers of the Constitution  Discussion/lecture
President  Quiz
➢ Residual Power
➢ Marcos v. Manglapus
• Immunity of the [G.R. No. 88211,
President September 15, 1989]
➢ Estrada v. Arroyo [G.R.
• Qualifications of the No. 146738, March 2,
President and Vice- 2001]
President ➢ Soliven v. Makasiar,
167 SCRA 393
• Term and Term Limit ➢ Brillantes v COMELEC
[G.R. No. 163193, June
• Canvassing of Votes of 15, 2004]
the President and Vice- ➢ Lopez v. Senate [G.R.
President 163556, June 8, 2004]
➢ Pormento v. Estrada
• Presidential and Vice- [G.R. No. 191988,
Presidential Electoral August 31, 2010]
Tribunal ➢ Doromal v.
Sandiganbayan [G.R.
• Salaries and No. 85468, September
Perquisites of the 7, 1989]
President ➢ Civil Liberties Union v.
Executive Secretary,
• Rules on Succession 194 SCRA 317
➢ Failure to Qualify ➢ Dela Cruz v.
➢ Failure of Election Commission on Audit
➢ Death, permanent [G.R. No. 138489,
disability or November 29, 2001]
resignation ➢ Funa v. Agra [G.R. No.
• Vacancy in the Office 2013]
of the Vice-President ➢ Aytona v. Castillo
[G.R. No. L-19313,
• Procedure in calling a January 19, 1962]
19
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
Special Election ➢ In re Appointments
dated March 30, 1998
• Temporary Inability of of Hon. Valenzuela and
the President Hon. Vallarta [A.M.
• Disclosure of the No. 98-5-01-SC,
Health Condition of the November 9, 1998]
President ➢ De Castro v. Judicial
and Bar Council [G.R.
• Disqualifications of the No. 191002, March 17,
President, his/her 2010]
family, Cabinet ➢ Binamira v. Garucho,
members and other 188 SCRA 154
officers ➢ Sarmiento v. Mison,
156 SCRA 549
• Power of Appointment ➢ Bautista v. Salonga,
➢ Regular 172 SCRA 16
➢ Ad Interim ➢ Quintos-Deles v.
➢ Confirmation by Commission on
the Commission of Appointments, 177
Appointments SCRA 259
➢ Midnight ➢ Calderon v. Carale, 208
Appointment SCRA 254
➢ Appointment for ➢ Tarrosa v. Singson
Partisan Political [G.R. No. 111243, May
Consideration 25, 1994]
➢ Soriano v. Lista [G.R.
• Power of Control and No. 153881, March 24,
Supervision 2003]
➢ Pimentel v. Ermita
• Faithful Execution [G.R. No. 164978,
Clause/Take Care October 13, 2005]
Clause ➢ Flores v. Drilon [G.R.
No. 104732, June 22,
1993]
• Military Powers
➢ Matibag v. Benipayo
➢ Calling Out of the
[G.R. No. 149036,
Armed Forces
April 2, 2002]
➢ Suspension of the
➢ Luego v. Civil Service
Privilege of the
Commission, 143
Writ of Habeas
SCRA 327
Corpus
➢ Pobre v. Mendieta, 224
➢ Declaration of
SCRA 738
Martial Law
➢ Drilon v. Lim [G.R. No.
➢ Declaration of
112497, August 4,
State of Rebellion
1994]
➢ Convening of the
➢ Villena v. Secretary of
General Court
Interior, 67 Phil. 451
Martial
• Pardoning Power
20
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
➢ Conditions ➢ Lacson-Magallanes
➢ Limitations Co., Inc. v. Paño, 21
➢ Pardon SCRA 895
➢ Amnesty ➢ City of Iligan v.
➢ Commutation Director of Lands, 158
➢ Reprieve SCRA 158
➢ Gascon v. Arroyo [G.R.
• Borrowing Power No. 78389, October 16,
1989]
• Treaty Making and ➢ Kilusang Bayan v.
Diplomatic Powers Dominguez [G.R. Nos.
85439 & 91927,January
• State of the Nation 13, 1992]
Address ➢ Ang-Angco v. Castillo,
9 SCRA 619
➢ National Marketing
Corp. v. Arca [G.R. No.
L-25743, September 30,
1969]
➢ Biraogo v. The
Philippine Truth
Commission [G.R. No.
192935, December 7,
2010]
➢ Guazon v. De Villa,
181 SCRA 623
➢ Ruffy v. Chief of Staff,
75 Phil. 875
➢ Olaguer v. Military
Commission No. 34,
150 SCRA 144
➢ Quiloña v. General
Court Martial, 206
SCRA 821
➢ Gudani v. Senga [G.R.
No. 170165, August
15,2006]
➢ SANLAKAS v. Reyes
[G.R. No. 159085,
February 3, 2004]
➢ David v. Macapagal-
Arroyo, G.R. No.
171396, May 3, 2006]
➢ IBP v. Zamora [G.R.
No. 141284, August 15,
2000]
➢ Fortun v. Macapagal-
Arroyo [G.R. No.
21
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
190293, March 20,
2012]
➢ Lagman v. Medialdea
[G.R. No. 231658, July
4, 2017]
➢ Lagman v. Pimentel
[G.R. No. 235935,
February 6, 2018]
➢ Torres v. Gonzales
[G.R. No. 76872, July
23, 1987]
➢ Monsanto v. Factoran,
170 SCRA 190
➢ People v. Salle, Jr., 250
SCRA 581
➢ Garcia v. Commission
on Audit [G.R. No.
1993]
➢ Sabello v. DECS, 180
SCRA 623
➢ Llamas v. Orbos [G.R.
No. 99031, October 15,
1991]
➢ Commissioner of
Customs v. Eastern Sea
Trading [G.R. No. L-
14279, October 31,
1961]
➢ Pimentel v. Executive
Secretary [G.R. No.
158088, July 6, 2005]
➢ Bayan Muna v. Romulo
[G.R. No. 159618,
February 1, 2011]
➢ Saguisag v. Ochoa, Jr.,
[G.R. No. 212426,
January 12, 2016]
22
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
MODULE 9:
Judicial Department
 Recitation
• Judicial Power, • Textbooks 29 Nov to 10  Case study &
Traditional December reporting
• Article VIII, 1987 2021  Discussion/lecture
• Expanded Judicial Constitution  Quiz
Power
• Requisites of Judicial
Inquiry ➢ Santiago vs. Bautista
➢ Actual Case or [G.R. No. L-25024,
Controversy March 30, 1970]
➢ Proper Party ➢ Limkaichong v.
➢ Raised at the COMELEC [G.R. Nos.
Earliest Possible 178831-32, 179120,
Opportunity 179132-33, 179240-41,
➢ Lis Mota April 1, 2009 and July
➢ Exemptions 30, 2009]
➢ Daza vs. Singson, 180
• Power to Define SCRA 496
Jurisdiction of Courts ➢ Philippine Association
of Colleges and
• Fiscal Autonomy of Universities vs.
the Supreme Court Secretary of Education
[G.R. No. L-5279,
• The Supreme Court October 31, 1955]
➢ Composition ➢ Mariano, Jr. vs.
➢ En Banc COMELEC [G.R. No.
➢ Division 118577, March 7, 1995]
➢ Qualification of ➢ David vs. Macapagal-
Justices Arroyo [G.R. No.
➢ Appointment to the 171396, May 3, 2006]
Office ➢ Pormento vs. Estrada
➢ Salaries [G.R. No. 191988,
➢ Term of Office August 31, 2010]
➢ Disqualifications ➢ Macasiano vs. National
➢ Removal from Housing Authority
Office [G.R. No. 107921, July
1, 1993]
• Powers of the ➢ Joya vs. PCGG, 225
Supreme Court SCRA 568
➢ Original ➢ Legaspi vs. Civil
Jurisdiction Service Commission,
➢ Appellate and 150 SCRA 530
Review ➢ Dumlao vs. COMELEC
Jurisdiction [G.R. No. L-52245,
January 22, 1980]
23
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
➢ Order Change of ➢ Bugnay Construction &
Venue Devt. Corp. vs. Laron
➢ Assignment of [G.R. No. 79983,
Judges August 10, 1989]
➢ Appointment of ➢ Kilosbayan, Inc. vs.
Officials and Guingona [G.R. No.
Employees in the 113375, May 5, 1994]
Judiciary ➢ Philconsa vs. Enriquez,
➢ Rule Making 235 SCRA 506
Power ➢ Tatad vs. Garcia, Jr.
➢ Administrative [G.R. No. 114222,
Supervision over April 6, 1995]
Judges and Justices ➢ Oposa vs. Factoran, 224
➢ Disciplinary Power SCRA 792
over Judges and ➢ Kilosbayan vs. Morato,
Justices 246 SCRA 540
➢ Lozada vs. COMELEC
• Judicial and Bar [G.R. No. L-59068,
Council January 27, 1983]
➢ Composition ➢ Mantruste Systems, Inc.
➢ Regular Members vs. Court of Appeals
➢ Ex Officio [G.R. Nos. 86540-41,
Members November 8, 1989]
➢ Appointment to ➢ Malaga vs. Penachos,
Office Jr. [G.R. No. 86695,
➢ Term September 3, 1992]
➢ Powers and Duties ➢ Bengzon vs. Drilon,
208 SCRA 133
• Decisions and ➢ Limketkai Sons
Resolution Milling, Inc. vs. Court
➢ Formal of Appeals, 261 SCRA
Requirement 464
➢ Substantive ➢ De Castro vs. Judicial
Requirement and Bar Council [G.R.
➢ Period of No. 191002, March 17,
Promulgation 2010]
➢ Macalintal vs.
• Annual Report to the Presidential Electoral
President and the Tribunal [G.R. No.
Congress 191618, November 23,
2010]
➢ Drilon vs. Lim [G.R.
No. 112497, August 4,
1994]
➢ Larranaga vs. Court of
Appeals [G.R. No.
130644, March 13,
1998]
24
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
➢ Bustos vs. Lucero [G.R.
No. L-2068, October
20, 1948]
➢ First Lepanto Ceramics,
Inc. vs. Court of
Appeals [G.R. No.
110571, March 10,
1994 and October 7,
1994]
➢ Aruelo vs. Court of
Appeals [G.R. No.
107852, October 20,
1993]
➢ Javellana vs. DILG
[G.R. No. 102549,
August 10, 1992]
➢ Maceda vs. Vasquez,
221 SCRA 469
➢ Raquiza vs. Castañeda,
Jr. [A.M. No. 1312-
CFI, January 31, 1978]
➢ Kilosbayan vs. Ermita
[G.R. No. 177721, July
3, 2001]
➢ Dulay vs. JBC [G.R
No. 202143, July 3,
2012]
➢ Chavez vs. JBC [G.R.
No. 202242, July 17,
2012 and April 16,
2013]
➢ Jardeleza v. Sereno
[G.R. No. 213181,
August 19, 2014]
➢ Aguinaldo vs. Aquino
[G.R. No. 224302,
November 29, 2016]
➢ Nitafan vs.
Commissioner of
Internal Revenue [G.R.
No. 78780, July 23,
1987]
➢ De la Llana vs. Alba,
112 SCRA 294
➢ People vs. Gacott, Jr.,
246 SCRA 52
➢ In re Manzano [A.M.
No. 88-7-1861-RTC,
October 5, 1988]
25
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
➢ Prudential Bank vs.
Castro, 158 SCRA 646
➢ Consing vs. Court of
Appeals [G.R. No.
78272, August 29,
1989]
➢ Nicos Industrial Corp.
vs. Court of Appeals
[G.R. No. 88709,
February 11, 1992]
➢ Mendoza vs. CFI, 66
SCRA 96
➢ Borromeo vs. Court of
Appeals, 186 SCRA 1
➢ Komatsu Industries
(Phils.), Inc. vs. Court
of Appeals, G.R. No.
127682, April 24, 1998]
➢ Oil and Natural Gas
Commission vs. Court
of Appeals [G.R. No.
114323, July 23, 1998
and 28 September
1999]
➢ Francisco vs. Permskul
[G.R. No. 81006, May
12, 1989]
➢ Valdez vs. CA [G.R.
No. 163208, August 13,
2008]
➢ Odchigue-Bondoc vs.
Tan [G.R. No. 186652,
October 6, 2010]
MODULE 10:
Constitutional Commissions
• Common Provisions • Textbooks 13 to 17  Recitation

➢ Independence and December  Case study &
Fiscal Autonomy • Article IX, 1987 2021 reporting
➢ Salaries and Constitution  Discussion/lecture
Perquisites  Quiz
➢ Disqualifications • Supreme Court Revised
and Inhibitions of Administrative Circular
Members of the No. 1-95
Constitutional
Commission • Supreme Court Decisions:
➢ Rule Making ➢ Aruelo v. Court of
Power Appeals [G.R. No.
26
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
➢ Quasi-Judicial 107852, October 20,
Power 1993]
➢ Cua v. COMELEC
• Civil Service [G.r. No. 80519-21,
Commission December 17, 1987]
➢ Composition ➢ Estrella v. COMELEC
➢ Appointment to [G.R. No. 160465, May
Office 27, 2004]
➢ Qualification ➢ Acena v. Civil Service
➢ Powers and Duties Commission [G.R. No.
➢ Term and Term 90780, February 6,
Limit 1991]
➢ Vital-Gozon v. Court of
• Civil Service Appeals [G.R. No.
101428, August 5,
• Appointments and 1992]
Termination of Office ➢ Filipinas Engineering
➢ Career Service and Machine Shop v.
➢ Policy Ferrer [G.R. No. L-
Determining 31455, February 28,
➢ Primarily 1985]
Confidential ➢ Mateo v. Court of
➢ Highly Technical Appeals [G.R. No.
113219, August 14,
• Prohibition on Partisan 1995]
Political Campaign ➢ Trade Union of the
Phils. v. National
• Security of Tenure Housing Corp. G.R.
No. L-49677, May 4,
• Prohibition on 1989]
Appointment to the ➢ De los Santos v.
Government of Losing Mallare [G.R. No. L-
Candidate 3881, August 31, 1950]
➢ Salazar v. Mathay [G.R.
No. L-44061,
• Prohibition on
September 20, 1976
Additional, Double
➢ Corpus v. Cuaderno
and Indirect
[G.R. No. L-23721,
Compensation
March 31, 1965]
➢ Luego v. Civil Service
• Commission on
Commission, 143
Election
SCRA 327
➢ Composition
➢ Prov of Camarines Sur
➢ Appointment to
v. Court of Appeals
Office
[G.R. No. 104639, July
➢ Qualification
14, 1995]
➢ Powers and Duties
➢ SSS Employees
➢ Term and Term
Association v. Court of
Limit
27
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
• Commission on Audit Appeals, 175 SCRA
➢ Composition 686
➢ Appointment to ➢ Civil Liberties Union v.
Office Executive Secretary,
➢ Qualification 194 SCRA 317
➢ Powers and Duties ➢ Flores v. Drilon [G.R.
➢ Term and Term No. 104732, June 22,
Limit 1993]
➢ Quimson v. Ozaeta
[G.R. No. L-8321,
March 26, 1956]
➢ Cayetano v. Monsod
[G.R. No. 10013,
September 3, 1991
➢ Brillantes v. Yorac, 192
SCRA 358
➢ Lindo v. COMELEC
[G.R. No. 95016,
February 11, 1991]
➢ Gallardo v. Tabamo
[G.R. No. 104848,
January 29, 1993]
➢ Relampagos v. Cumba
[G.R. No. 118861,
April 27, 1995]
➢ Edding v. COMELEC
[G.R. No. 112060, July
17, 1995]
➢ Galido v. COMELEC
[G.R. No. 95346,
January 18, 1991]
➢ People v. Inting [G.R.
No. 88919, July 25,
1990]
➢ People v. Basilla [G.R.
Nos. 83938-40,
November 6, 1989]
➢ People v. Delgado
[G.R. No. 93419-32,
September 18, 1990]
➢ COMELEC v. Silva
[G.R. No. 129417,
February 10, 1998]
➢ Arroyo v. Department
of Justice [G.R. No.
2012]
➢ Sarmiento v.
COMELEC [G.R. No.
28
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
105628, August 6,
1992]
➢ Reyes v. RTC of
Oriental Mindoro [G.R.
No. 108886, May 5,
1995]
➢ National Press Club v.
COMELEC [G.R. No.
102653, March 5, 1992]
➢ Telecommunications &
Broadcast Attorneys of
the Phils. v.
COMELEC [G.R. No.
132922, April 21, 1998]
➢ Adiong v. COMELEC
[G.R. No. 103956,
March 31, 1992]
[G.R. No. 90878,
January 29, 1990]
➢ Funa v. Villar [G.R.
No. 192791, April 24,
2012]
➢ Guevarra v. Gimenez
[G.R. No. L-17115,
November 30, 1962]
➢ Orocio v. Commission
on Audit [G.R. No.
75959, August 31,
1992]
➢ Osmeña v. Commission
on Audit, 238 SCRA
463
➢ Sambeli v. Province of
Isabela, 210 SCRA 80
➢ Bustamante v.
Commissioner on
Audit, 216 SCRA 134
➢ Saligumba v.
Commission on Audit
[G.R. No. L-61676,
October 18, 1982]
➢ Philippine Airlines v.
Commission on Audit
[G.R. No. 91890, June
9, 1995]
➢ Bagatsing v. Committee
on Privatization, 246
SCRA 334
29
WEEK/ LEARNING
DATE METHODS
semester) learning)
MODULE 11:
Accountability of Public
Officers 4 to 7
• Textbooks January  Recitation
• Impeachable Officers 2022  Case study &
• Article XI, 1987 reporting
• Different Modes of Constitution  Discussion/lecture
Filing of Impeachment  Quiz
Complaint • Republic Act No. 8249
• Initiation of • Republic Act No. 1379

Impeachment
Proceedings • Republic Act No. 6770
➢ One Year Ban Rule
➢ Articles of • Supreme Court Decisions:
Impeachment
➢ Francisco v. House of
• Impeachment Case Representatives [G.R.
• Extent of Impeachment 10, 2003]
Proceedings ➢ Gutierrez v. House of
Representatives
• Office of the Committee on Justice,
Ombudsman [G.R. No. 193459,
➢ Composition February 15, 2011]
➢ Qualification ➢ Republic v. Sereno
➢ Term of Office [G.R. No. 237428, May
➢ Powers and Duties 11, 2018]
➢ Disqualifications ➢ Khan v. Office of the
and Inhibitions Ombudsman [G.R. No.
125296, July 20, 2006]
➢ Orap v. Sandiganbayan,
139 SCRA 352
➢ Villavert v. Desierto
[G.R. No. 133715,
February 23, 2000]
➢ Office of the
Ombudsman v.
Madriaga [G.R. No.
2006]
FINAL EXAMINATIONS January
2022
30
TEXTBOOK/REFERENCE BOOK:
1. Philippine Political Law, Isagani A. Cruz and Carlo L. Cruz

2. Outline/Reviewer in Political Law, Justice Antonio Eduardo B. Nachura
3. 1987 Constitution of the Rep. of the Phils. Commentary by Fr. J. Bernas
4. The Phil. Constitutional Law Vol. 1 by H. De Leon
5. Other books and references
POLICIES:
Policies and values that the teacher might want to communicate through the
syllabus concerning attendance, participation, academic integrity (e.g. plagiarism,
cheating, fabrication), missing assignments, missed exams, recording classroom
activities, online behavior during synchronous sessions, etc.
1. Attendance will be checked every meeting.

2. Students are required to wear proper attire during online meetings.
3. Students who are called to recite but absent shall get a grade of 60.
4. Students who missed a quiz will get a grade of 60.
5. Students are prohibited from recording the online class as this is a violation of the
Copyright of the Professor.
Prepared by:
Signature
Atty. LUIS MANUEL U BUGAYONG
Faculty, College of Law
Approved by:
Signature
Atty. Marciano G. Delson
Dean, College of Law
Date Prepared by the Faculty: 14 August 2021
31

CONSTLAW1DEPTSYLLABUSSY2021 2022lmub

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

CONSTLAW1DEPTSYLLABUSSY2021 2022lmub

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CONSTLAW1DEPTSYLLABUSSY2021 2022lmub

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

San Beda University

A comprehensive study of constitutional framework of the Republic of the

COURSE GOALS: Expected College of Law Graduate Attributes (ELGAs)

Know and understand the Constitution, memorize provisions, critical and

LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES (LOs):

1. Knowledge/Remembering: define, list, recognize

The student will be graded according to the following:

Class standing before Midterms Individual 16.67%

Design or the structure of the course that includes content/topics to be covered;

• Proposal • Supreme Court Decisions:

Concept of the State

• Sec. 2(1), Administrative

• PCA Case Nº2013-19, “In

• Supreme Court Decisions:

State Immunity 20 Sept to 1  Recitation

Declaration of Principles &

• Checks and Balances ➢ Angara v. Electoral

II. Delegation of Powers

MIDTERM Last Week

Legislative Department 3 to 12  Recitation

• House of • Supreme Court Decisions:

• Executive Power • Textbooks 15 to 26  Recitation

• Common Provisions • Textbooks 13 to 17  Recitation

• Initiation of • Republic Act No. 1379

1. Philippine Political Law, Isagani A. Cruz and Carlo L. Cruz

1. Attendance will be checked every meeting.

Date Prepared by the Faculty: 14 August 2021

You might also like