Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change: Article Information
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change: Article Information
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by 232872 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for
Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines
are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company
manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as
providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee
on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive
preservation.
The use of
The use of costing information in costing
Egypt: a research note information
Sander van Triest
Amsterdam Business School, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 329
The Netherlands, and
Mohamed Fathy Elshahat
Accounting Department, Benha University, Benha, Egypt
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to investigate the use of costing information in Egypt.
Downloaded by UMEA UNIVERSITY At 23:18 02 April 2015 (PT)
1. Introduction
Research on management practices in general, and accounting practices in particular,
in non-Western countries is limited in volume[1]. This is a problem, since a lack of
knowledge of the current state of these practices limits the possibilities to improve
management practices in non-Western countries. Furthermore, without adequate
empirical data, it is not clear whether the findings on this subject in Western (especially
US) organizations are universally applicable. Parnell and Hatem (1999) refer to the
experiences of expatriate managers, which are well documented and show substantial
problems in applying Western concepts in a non-Western business environment.
In this paper, we present the results of a survey study on the use of management
accounting information in Egypt. Egypt is an important country in the Arab world,
both in terms of political influence and economic impact (Abd-Elsalam and Weetman,
2003). Furthermore, the Egyptian business environment has experienced substantial
reforms in the past few decades (HassabElnaby et al, 2003). Owhoso et al. (2002)
document that after South Africa, Egypt was the most popular African country for US Journal of Accounting &
Organizational Change
Vol. 3 No. 3, 2007
The authors thank participants at the 29th EAA Congress in Dublin 2006 and the referees and pp. 329-343
q Emerald Group Publishing Limited
the guest editors of this special issue for helpful comments, and Jan Bilderbeek for his guidance. 1832-5912
This research was partly financed by a grant from the Egyptian Government. DOI 10.1108/18325910710820328
JAOC listed firms to start activities in during the period 1975-1997. However, as Parnell and
3,3 Hatem (1999, p. 403) state, “[although] Egypt has a rich cultural and commercial
tradition, most scholars agree that its present business and management practices lag
behind its Western counterparts. None the less, Western influence in Egypt has grown
recently.”
Our sample consists of 40 industrial firms, and the survey results are complemented
330 by interviews and field visits. We report on the costing systems used, and on the
application of costing information in strategic planning and decision making. The
results indicate that acquaintance with modern management (accounting) techniques
is limited. The most salient detail is the almost complete absence of advanced
costing techniques such as activity-based costing. The most important use of costing
information is in pricing decisions, implying a cost-plus approach to pricing.
Next to this, we report on the problems of doing survey research in the non-Western
setting of Egypt. We ran into substantial difficulties in gathering the data. The original
Downloaded by UMEA UNIVERSITY At 23:18 02 April 2015 (PT)
method of using a postal survey resulted in an almost zero response rate. Only personally
collecting the questionnaires at the sample firms worked in obtaining responses.
Furthermore, much of the terminology used in the questionnaire – taken from the
literature – seemed unknown, or not clear to the respondents. Based on our experiences,
we suggest that survey research in non-Western countries requires the involvement of at
least one native researcher. Also, it is prudent not to assume that the Western management
terminology is known or understood in non-Western countries.
As a result of the practical problems encountered, the study ultimately plays out as
a pilot study. We discuss methodological issues and pitfalls that researchers should
be aware of, and suggest some avenues for further research. The paper is structured as
follows. In Section 2, we review the relevant research in non-Western countries, and
Egypt in particular, with respect to (management) accounting practices and also from a
methodological point of view. The research design is presented in Section 3. In Section
4, we present the empirical results. We close with a discussion of our findings.
2. Literature review
2.1 Empirical research on management accounting in non-Western settings
Within the field of accounting, attention for the financial accounting practices in
non-Western countries has increased in recent years, partly because international
accounting standards are being introduced in these countries (Uche, 2002;
Abd-Elsalam and Weetman, 2003; Ashraf and Ghani, 2005). Research focusing on
management accounting practices in non-Western countries is limited. For example,
Lee (2002) reviews the literature on activity-based costing adoption and theory
development in an international context, but he only cites studies carried out in Europe,
the USA, Japan, and Australia. Granlund and Lukka (1998, p. 154) argue that
management accounting practices over the world are more similar than different, but
they refer to studies of “British, German, American, Japanese, etc. management
accounting practices” indicating a focus on Western settings. Results from countries
that are less well developed in terms of GDP or GDP growth are hardly available,
although there is a limited tradition of case research in less developed countries
(Hopper et al., 2003). Nevertheless, to get an idea of the state of management accounting
practices in non-Western countries, we briefly discuss a number of studies, focusing on
the costing system and the use of activity-based costing.
Firth (1996) investigates the use of managerial accounting procedures in China. The use of
His questionnaire was administered in 1993, at which time the Chinese economy was costing
opening up substantially to both market forces and foreign investments, Western but
still at the beginning of its ongoing transformation into a market economy in close information
contact with firms and practices (O’Connor et al., 2004). The sample firms consisted of
partners in international joint ventures (foreign and Chinese firms) as well as a control
group of Chinese firms that did not cooperate with foreign firms. The non-cooperating 331
Chinese firms show lower levels of adoption of accounting techniques than the Chinese
joint venture partners. Use of multiple cost pools and multiple allocation bases for
costing purposes is 10 percent or lower for non-cooperating firms, while joint venture
partners have usage rates of up to 20 percent. The application of activity-based costing
is 2 percent for partners, and 1 percent for the other group (although it should be noted
that activity-based costing was relatively new in 1993 – on the other hand, 15 percent
of the foreign firms in the sample report using it). The costing information is used by
Downloaded by UMEA UNIVERSITY At 23:18 02 April 2015 (PT)
. . . [the] shortage of management research may result from the fact that studies in Egypt that
involve primary data collection through field surveys, interviews, and opinion polls often,
depending on their nature, require special and tedious governmental permission. Cultural
differences are often manifested in the differences in indicators used in scales designed to
measure the same constructs. Those who seek secondary data must consider the frequent
lack of availability of accurate and current data.
Despite these problems of doing empirical research in Egypt, reported response
rates for mail surveys in Egypt are not always low. Parnell and Hatem (1999) obtain
a response rate of 26 percent on a sample of 411 “top executive members” of the
American Chamber of Commerce in Egypt. However, only 20 percent of the
respondents are Egyptian nationals, and the questionnaire was sent out in English
rather than translated into Arabic. Humphreys (1996) used a sample of 75 principals of
technical schools, obtaining 57 replies for a response rate of 76 percent. Notably, the
questionnaires were delivered personally to the sample. Mady (2000) surveyed
49 state-owned manufacturing enterprises in Egypt using a mailed questionnaire. He
obtained 37 questionnaires for a response rate of 76 percent. Rice (2006) investigates
the impact of values and context on creativity by performing a survey of employees in
nine organizations in Cairo. She succeeds in obtaining a response rate of 84 percent out
of a total sample of 240 questionnaires by using a drop-off, pick-up method where the
chief executive of each organization was asked to distribute the questionnaire in such a
way that a representation of all departments would be obtained. There was no check
whether this representation actually was achieved. Finally, Douglas et al. (2007) report
a response rate of 76 percent in a survey of ethical positions and budgetary slack; their
sample consists of Egyptian managers at the US and Egyptian firms “located in
Egypt” (Douglas et al., 2007, p. 104), but no further information on size, industry or
sample selection procedure is given.
regulations in the language of the country. They identify three groups of disclosure
requirements:
(1) a group that is similar to existing Egyptian disclosure rules and available in
Arabic;
(2) a group that is new, and available in Arabic; and
(3) a group that is new and not available in Arabic.
The level of compliance was significantly higher for the first group than for the
second group, which in turn had a significantly higher level of compliance than
the third group. This is quite convincing evidence that both language and familiarity
impact the implementation of accounting standards. Although, this conclusion cannot
be extended directly to accounting concepts in general, such activity-based costing, it
does convey a warning not to assume that such concepts will automatically be
understood in non-Western settings.
Mady (2000) provides some results on the understanding of Western management
techniques by Egyptian respondents. He investigates the sales forecasting practices of
Egyptian firms. One of his findings is that an advanced technique called demand
composition, which is rarely used in the USA, scores relatively high in his sample,
leading him to conclude that “[although] a brief explanation for each technique was
included in the questionnaire, the author has some doubt that the decomposition
method was fully understood by all respondents.” Furthermore, the finding that two
thirds of the sample uses some sort of probabilistic confidence interval in forecasting is
qualified by the statement that “the author doubts that these probabilistic estimations
were done through the conventional quantitative methods” (Mady, 2000, p. 362).
Finally, the study by Rice (2006) mentioned above also shows problems in
transferring Western concepts to an Egyptian setting. She tries to measure
organizational context through constructs such as “structure, control, and hierarchy”
and “atmosphere” by using multiple question per construct. However, the questions
per construct do not load as expected (i.e. Cronbach’s a is below the threshold value).
Therefore, she has to revert to choosing individual items instead of constructing values
from multiple items, indicating that the survey population did not interpret the
questionnaire as she expected.
JAOC 3. Methodology
3,3 We use a mail survey to obtain our data. The questionnaire was discussed with
academics and consultants in Egypt before it was sent out, and we did not encounter
major problems. We mailed the questionnaires (in Arabic) to 100 firms randomly
selected from the public and private sector. However, we obtained responses from only
two firms after four weeks. This forced us to take a different approach. We selected
334 40 firms in four sectors: ten each in the pharmaceutical, foodstuff, chemical, and
packing and wrapping industry. These sectors were chosen because of their presence
in the Egyptian economy, their development and growth, and their diversity in
technology. All firms are privately held firms, meaning that there is no state
ownership. This choice was based on the expected bureaucratic problems in dealing
with state-owned firms, as indicated by Parnell and Hatem (1999). These 40 firms were
all visited personally to drop off the questionnaire and take it in after being filled out.
Thus, access was the essential criterion for inclusion in the sample. Obviously, this
Downloaded by UMEA UNIVERSITY At 23:18 02 April 2015 (PT)
4. Survey results
4.1 General characteristics of the sample
As indicated in the methodology section, the sample is limited to firms from four
sectors. Table I presents information on the size distribution of the sample. Although,
the food sector companies are somewhat smaller, there is no statistical difference
between the sectors with respect to the distribution of firm size according to a x 2-test.
Information on overhead costs is shown in Table II. The average overhead as a
percentage of total costs is 35 percent. This is comparable (though somewhat high) with
findings from the literature of 30.5 percent for a sample of the US firms (Krumwiede, 1998),
21-25 percent for a sample of UK and New Zealand (Lamminmaki and Drury, 2001), and
33.5 percent for a sample of Polish firms (Szychta, 2002). Although, the food sector seems
somewhat lower in its average overhead percentage, the averages do not differ
significantly between the sectors: a one-way ANOVA test leads to a p-value of 0.218.
We analyze the relationship between firm size and overhead by computing
bivariate correlations. We take the natural log of sales to correct for the skewed
distribution. The results in Table II are somewhat mixed. Although, the normal
(Pearson) correlation shows a significant positive relationship between firm size and
overhead, this is not apparent at the sector level. The non-parametric Spearman
Downloaded by UMEA UNIVERSITY At 23:18 02 April 2015 (PT)
correlation has no overall relationship between firm size and overhead, and a weakly
significant negative one for the food sector. This is the sector with the smallest firms.
Of the 40 firms, only two indicate that they are working on implementing it. All other
firms did not reply to any of the questions regarding ABC, this while the questionnaire
part on ABC contained 12 questions. The implications of this go further than the
observation that only 5 percent of the sample is trying to apply ABC: the other firms do
not seem to have heard of it at all. This inference is perhaps somewhat strong, but
answers to other questions reinforce the feeling that knowledge on modern
management accounting techniques is rather limited. On the question whether
products differed in their usage of firm resources, only six firms answered. The other
34 did not provide any answer. Since, the notion of resource usage and differences in
consumption of resources is central to the logic behind ABC, this suggests a lack of
familiarity with the basic concepts involved in ABC. A related question asked whether
overhead costs are assigned to cost centers, again a standard procedure in any
advanced costing system. Seven firms answered yes, two no, and 31 did not give an
answer. The unfamiliarity with accounting concepts such as ABC could also extend to
the concept of cost pools, as suggested above. This also qualifies the reported use of
multiple allocation bases and cost pools by 90 percent of the firms.
The size of the respondents’ firms could be a factor in the use of advanced costing
techniques. In Western countries, ABC usage is often found to be related to firm size
(Chenhall and Langfield-Smith, 1998); larger companies also attach more importance to
cost information (Hoque, 2000). Within the sample, firm size has no correlation with
costing system characteristics such as specificity, accuracy or number of cost pools
(Table III). This could imply that all firms fall within the category of small,
Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1. Specificity 1.00
2. Accuracy 0.15 1.00
Table III. 3. Satisfaction 0.34 * * 0.25 1.00
Bivariate non-parametric 4. Development plans 20.28 * 20.09 2 0.25 1.00
Spearman correlations of 5. No of cost pools 20.05 20.32 * * 2 0.14 0.08 1.00
several assessments of 6. Overhead percent 0.27 * 0.18 0.27 * 20.17 20.14 1.00
the costing system, the 7. Firm size 20.14 20.14 2 0.45 * * 20.38 * * .02 .11 1.00
number of cost pools and
overhead percentage Notes: *Indicates significance at 10 percent; * *at 5 percent
unsophisticated firms. On the other hand, the average sales number of Egyptian £114 The use of
million translates into e15 million, which suggests that we are not dealing with corner costing
shops or start-ups. Also, the pharmaceutical and chemical industries require certain
levels of sophistication. Thus, it seems that the unfamiliarity with ABC, and the almost information
total absence of ABC usage in practice, cannot be explained solely from a size effect.
function or the purpose of costing information based on an ANOVA test. The only
exception is the importance of pricing decisions, which scored significantly lower in
the food sector relative to the packing and the chemical sector. Related to this, the
industry-level means for functions and purpose of costing information presented in the
tables show largely comparable patterns with respect to the ordering. For the functions
using costing information, all orderings are identical except for the packing industry
where marketing is more important than top management. The pattern of the purposes
is somewhat more varied, but the lowest scoring items are decisions on product mix,
adding or deleting products, and activity analysis in all industries.
Furthermore, the results are not necessarily consistent with the information about
the costing system that respondents provided. For example, firms that use costing
information for customer profitability calculations can be expected to use the customer
as cost object. However, no significant difference is found between the score on using
costing information for customer profitability calculations and the use of the customer
as a cost object.
equivalent is not available. We had to describe the concept, rather than being
able to refer to a more or less well-known term from the Egyptian accounting
tradition – although some interviewees knew the English term “cost pool” as such.
This is problematic in applying the concepts (and even more in doing empirical
research on their usage).
1999), but the internal consistency as measured with Cronbach’s a was way below
acceptable standards. Obviously, this does not mean that Egyptian firms have no idea
about strategy, but we can conclude that the Western terminology used to describe
strategy is not interpreted by our respondents as we expected. Another example is in
the measurement of environmental uncertainty. We tried to measure this construct
with a number of questions on the importance of, e.g. suppliers’ actions, government
regulations and technology developments (Gul and Chia, 1994; Hoque, 2004), but again
we did not obtain an acceptable Cronbach’s a[2]. As such, we ran into the same
problems as Rice (2006), who also could not arrive at good constructs (Section 2.3). The
use of data reduction methods such as factor analysis also did not lead to results that
were readily interpretable. Furthermore, the number of responses is too low to justify
the use of factor analysis: Fabrigar et al. (1999, p. 274) strongly advise a minimum
sample of 100 observations.
Based on our experience, we have serious doubts that straightforward application of
Western concepts in doing empirical research on management accounting is useful in
the Egyptian setting. As other authors have experienced or remarked, Egyptian
respondents do not always react to questions in ways that are comparable with
Western firms (Rice, 2006), or else they seem to interpret the questions differently
(Mady, 2000). Coupled with the unfamiliarity with questionnaires and a tendency
towards secrecy, this makes doing survey research in Egypt a daunting task. It seems
essential to include a form of personal contact, which means at the very least visiting
organizations in person to drop off questionnaires in order to obtain any responses.
Furthermore, because of the unfamiliarity with Western accounting and managerial
concepts, it may be more useful to conduct a series of interviews to assess their use and
usefulness. Should a questionnaire be used, it would seem advisable to include
definitions and explanations of the main terms. An example of such an approach is
provided by Guilding et al. (2000). They anticipate possible misconceptions with
respect to accounting concepts such as life cycle costing, strategic management
accounting, and target costing by including a glossary in the questionnaire – this
while their questionnaire was mailed to New Zealand, UK and US companies.
Even then, it is wise to take into account the following remark of Van der Stede et al.
(2005, p. 678) which they make after assessing the quality of recent management
accounting survey research:
Conducting high-quality survey research requires a set of conditions that are not all within The use of
the researcher’s control. It requires a population that has good access; that uses a common
language; that is willing to discuss a wide-range of subjects with strangers; and that trusts costing
pledges of confidentiality. . . information
All four criteria they list are not met in the case of Egypt.
of Egyptian firms. Given the current state of cost accounting, simply trying to
implement advanced accounting techniques does not seem useful. Finally, the
difficulties in obtaining responses means that it is impossible to conduct empirical
research with the “average” (non-international) Egyptian firm without input from
native researchers, especially with respect to the language barrier.
Notes
1. The nominator “non-Western countries” is defined differently by different researchers;
also used are terms like “less developed countries” or “emerging countries”. For this
research, the essential quality of non-Western countries is that they are relatively new to
both the economic structures of Western countries, specifically the absence of wide-ranging
government regulations in favor of market forces, and to the management theory and
practices of Western countries.
2. For example, our measure of environmental uncertainty coincides with Hoque (2004), using
eight statements on the importance of suppliers, customers, etc. Hoque (2004, p. 493) finds a
Cronbach’s a (of 0.70, while this measure is negative in our sample.
References
Abd-Elsalam, O.H. and Weetman, P. (2003), “Introducing international accounting
standards to an emerging capital market: relative familiarity and language effect in
Egypt”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Vol. 12 No. 1,
pp. 63-84.
Anderson, S.W. and Lanen, W.N. (1999), “Economic transition, strategy and the evolution of
management accounting practices: the case of India”, Accounting, Organizations and
Society, Vol. 24 Nos 5/6, pp. 379-412.
Ashraf, J. and Ghani, W.I. (2005), “Accounting development in Pakistan”, The International
Journal of Accounting, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 175-201.
Brown, D.A., Booth, P. and Giacobbe, F. (2004), “Technological and organizational influences on
the adoption of activity-based costing in Australia”, Accounting and Finance, Vol. 44,
pp. 329-56.
Chenhall, R.H. and Langfield-Smith, K. (1998), “Adoption and benefits of management
accounting practices: an Australian study”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 9
No. 1, pp. 1-19.
JAOC Dahawy, K., Merino, B.D. and Conover, T.L. (2002), “The conflict between IAS disclosure
requirements and the secretive culture in Egypt”, Advances in International Accounting,
3,3 Vol. 15, pp. 203-28.
Douglas, P.C., HassabElnaby, H., Norman, C.S. and Wier, B. (2007), “An investigation of ethical
position and budgeting systems: Egyptian managers in US and Egyptian firms”, Journal
of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 90-109.
342 Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C. and Strahan, E.J. (1999), “Evaluating the use of
exploratory factor analysis in psychological research”, Psychological Methods, Vol. 4 No. 3,
pp. 272-99.
Firth, M. (1996), “The diffusion of managerial accounting procedures in the People’s Republic of
China and the influence of foreign partnered joint ventures”, Accounting, Organizations
and Society, Vol. 21 Nos 7/8, pp. 629-54.
Frey, K. and Gordon, L.A. (1999), “ABC, strategy and business unit performance”, International
Journal of Applied Quality Management, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 1-23.
Downloaded by UMEA UNIVERSITY At 23:18 02 April 2015 (PT)
Granlund, M. and Lukka, K. (1998), “It’s a small world of management accounting practices”,
Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10, pp. 153-79.
Guilding, C., Cravens, K.S. and Tayles, M. (2000), “An international comparison of strategic
management accounting practices”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11 No. 1,
pp. 113-35.
Gul, F.A. and Chia, Y.M. (1994), “The effects of management accounting systems, perceived
environmental uncertainty and decentralization on managerial performance: a test of
three-way interaction”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 19 Nos 4/5, pp. 413-26.
Haldma, T. and Lääts, K. (2002), “Contingencies influencing the management accounting
practices of Estonian manufacturing companies”, Management Accounting Research,
Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 379-400.
HassabElnaby, H.R. and Mosebach, M. (2005), “Culture’s consequences in controlling agency
costs: Egyptian evidence”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation,
Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 19-32.
HassabElnaby, H.R., Epps, R.W. and Said, A.A. (2003), “The impact of environmental factors on
accounting development: an Egyptian longitudinal study”, Critical Perspectives on
Accounting, Vol. 14, pp. 273-92.
Hassan, M.K. (2005), “Management accounting and organisational change: an institutional
perspective”, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 125-40.
Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture’s Consequences, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Hopper, T., Tsamenyi, M., Uddin, S. and Wickramasinghe, D. (2003), “The state they’re in”,
Financial Management (CIMA), pp. 14-19, June.
Hoque, Z. (2000), “Just-in-time production, automation, cost allocation practices and importance
of cost information: an empirical investigation in New Zealand-based manufacturing
organizations”, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 133-59.
Hoque, Z. (2004), “A contingency model of the association between strategy, environmental
uncertainty and performance measurement: impact on organizational performance”,
International Business Review, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 485-502.
Humphreys, M.S. (1996), “Culture difference and its effect on the management of technical
education”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 34-41.
Joshi, P.L. (2001), “The international diffusion of new management accounting practices: the case
of India”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Vol. 10 No. 1,
pp. 85-109.
Krumwiede, K.R. (1998), “The implementation stages of activity-based costing and the impact of The use of
contextual and organizational factors”, Journal of Management Accounting Research,
Vol. 10, pp. 239-77. costing
Lamminmaki, D. and Drury, C. (2001), “A comparison of New Zealand and British information
product-costing practices”, The International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 36 No. 3,
pp. 329-427.
Lee, J.Y. (2002), “An examination of international differences in adoption and theory development 343
of activity-based costing”, Advances in International Accounting, Vol. 15, pp. 65-77.
Luther, R.G. and Longden, S. (2001), “Management accounting in companies adapting to
structural change and volatility in transition economies: a South African study”,
Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 299-320.
Mady, M.T. (2000), “Sales forecasting practices of Egyptian public enterprises: survey evidence”,
International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 359-68.
O’Connor, N.G., Chow, C.W. and Wu, A. (2004), “The adoption of ‘Western’ management
Downloaded by UMEA UNIVERSITY At 23:18 02 April 2015 (PT)
Corresponding author
Sander van Triest can be contacted at: s.p.vantriest@uva.nl
systems. Managerial Auditing Journal 23:2, 187-219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]