Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effect of Egg Parasitoid, Trichogramma - 205-2010-Plant Pathology
Effect of Egg Parasitoid, Trichogramma - 205-2010-Plant Pathology
2, 2012
Treatments
T1 Trichocard having 300 parasitized eggs
T2 Trichocard having 300 parasitized eggs in combination with 45 Chrysoperla 2nd instar larvae
T3 Trichocard having 300 parasitized eggs in combination with Neem extract
T4 Trichocard having 300 parasitized eggs in combination with 45 Chrysoperla 2nd instar larvae and neem
extract
T0 Control (no trichocards)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Data collected on 1st week after the treatment indicated that the lowest number of H. armigera larvae
-1
plant recorded in treatments T3 and T4 i.e. recorded 0.50 and 0.60. The treatments T1 and T2 on par with T0
control which recorded 0.90 larvae plant-1. The treatments T3 and T4 were significantly different from the T0
Table I.
Table I Field layout of the experiment
T1 T2 T3 T4 T0
300 Trichogramma
300 Trichogramma
eggs + 45
300 Trichogramma eggs + 45 300 Trichogramma
Rep 1 Chrysoperla 2nd Control
eggs Chrysoperla 2nd eggs + neem extract
instars larvae and
instars larvae
neem extract
300 Trichogramma
300 Trichogramma
eggs + 45
300 Trichogramma 300 Trichogramma eggs + 45
Rep 2 Chrysoperla 2nd Control
eggs + neem extract eggs Chrysoperla 2nd
instars larvae and
instars larvae
neem extract
300 Trichogramma
300 Trichogramma
eggs + 45
eggs + 45 300 Trichogramma 300 Trichogramma
Rep 3 Control Chrysoperla 2nd
Chrysoperla 2nd eggs eggs + neem extract
instars larvae and
instars larvae
neem extract
Data in Table II recorded on 2nd week revealed the lowest number (0.63) of H. armigera larvae plant-1
was recorded in T4 followed by T3 i.e. 0.83 larvae plant-1. The number of H. armigera larvae plant-1 recorded on
T0 (0.93 larvae plant-1) was at par with T1 and T2. Significant difference was recorded between the T3, T4 and T0.
The number of H. armigera larvae plant-1 recorded on 3rd week was highest in T1 i.e. recorded 1.03
larvae plant-1 followed by 0.97 and 0.87 at T2 and T3 whereas the lowest number of 0.73 larvae plant-1 was
recorded in T4. The number of H. armigera larvae plant-1 recorded in T0 was 1.40. All the treatments were
significantly different with the T0.
Table II Effect of Bio agents and neem extract on the infestation of tomato fruit worm, Helicoverpa armigera,
plant-1 recorded on different dates during 2009
Treatments 15th April 22nd April 29th April 5th
May 12th May 19th May 26th May 3rd June 10th June Mean
T1 0.90a 1.03a 1.20b 1.33b 1.50b 1.37b 1.13b 0.97b 0.67b 1.12b
T2 0.80a 0.93a 0.97c 1.23b 1.40b 1.20b 0.90bc 0.70c 0.67b 0.97c
T3 0.60b 0.83ab 0.87cd 0.93c 1.10c 0.97c 0.90bc 0.77c 0.67b 0.85d
T4 0.50b 0.63b 0.73d 0.67d 0.90d 0.77d 0.80c 0.67c 0.50b 0.68e
T0 0.90a 0.93a 1.40a 1.63a 1.83a 1.67a 1.67a 1.57a 1.00a 1.40a
Means followed by the same letters within each column are not significantly different at 5 % level of probability (LSD –Test).
Results in Table II on 4th week indicated that the lowest number of H. armigera larvae was recorded in
T4 i.e. 0.67 larvae plant-1 which was followed by 0.93 larvae plant-1 at T3. The number of larvae recorded on T1
and T2 were 1.33 and 1.23 larvae plant-1 as compared to the T0 where the number of larvae recorded 1.63 larvae
plant-1. Statistical analysis of the data showed significant difference between the treatments and T0. Data
recorded on 5th week after the application showed the highest (1.50) number of H. armigera larvae plant-1 in T1
followed by 1.40 and 1.10 larvae plant-1 in T2 and T3 as compared to T4 where the number of H. armigera larvae
was recorded lowest (0.90 larvae plant-1). In T0 the number of H. armigera larvae was 1.83 larvae plant-1. Data
collected on 6th week revealed that the lowest number of H. armigera larvae plant-1 was recorded in T4 i.e. 0.77
larvae plant-1 followed by 0.97 larvae plant-1 at T3. The number of larvae recorded in T1 and T2 and T0 were 1.37,
1.20 and 1.67, respectively. The number of H. armigera larvae on 7th week was highest (1.13 larvae plant-1) in
T1 as compared to T0 where the number of larvae recorded was 1.67 larvae plant-1. The number of larvae plant-1
0.90 recorded in T2 on par with T3 and T4. On 9th week the highest number of larvae plant-1 was recorded in
control i.e. 1.57 larvae plant-1. The number of larvae 0.70 plant-1 recorded in T2 on par with T3 and T4. On 10th
week the number of larvae 0.67 larvae plant-1 recorded in T1 was also on par with T2, T3 and T4. In T0 the
M. Usman et al. effect of egg parasitoid, trichogramma chilonis against tomato fruitworm… 256
number of larvae recorded was 1.00 larvae plant-1. In both weeks all the treatments were significantly different
from the control.
Results concluded from overall mean of the data indicated that the lowest number of H. armigera
larvae was recorded in T1 i.e. recorded 1.12 larvae plant-1 followed by 0.97 and 0.85 larvae plant-1 in T2 and T3 as
compared to T4 where the number of larvae was recorded lowest (0.68 larvae plant-1). In control the number of
larvae recorded was 1.40 larvae plant-1. The treatments T1, T2, T3 and T4 were significantly different from the
control.
Yield and Percent Weight Loss
The mean yield of tomato fruit recorded in T1, T2, T3 and T4 were 8428, 9039, 10010 and 11570 kg
respectively, as compared to control plot where the yield of tomato fruit was 7250 kg. Table II shows that
highest yield (11570 kg ha-1) was recorded in T4 which was non-significant from the yield recorded in T3 (10010
kg/ha) while significantly higher than T1, T2 and T0. Percent weight loss of tomato fruit recorded in T1, T2, T3
and T4 were 15.18, 13.65, 12.59 and 11.04%, respectively as compared to T0 plot where the percent weight loss
of tomato fruit was 20.45%. Statistical analysis of the data showed that the lowest percent damage (11.04%)
recorded in T4 was non-significant from T3 (12.59%) and significant with all other treatments.
Table III Effect of Bio agents and neem extract on tomato yield and percent weight loss by H. armigera during 2009
Treatments Yield (Kg) % weight loss
T1 107000 Trichogramma parasitized eggs/ hectare 8428 BC 15.18 B
T2 107000 Trichogramma parasitized eggs with 66000/ha Chrysoperla 9039 BC 13.65 BC
T3 107000 Trichogramma parasitized eggs with neem extract 10010 AB 12.59 CD
T4 107000 Trichogramma parasitized eggs with 66000/ha Chrysoperla, neem extract 11570 A 11.04 D
T0 Control 7250 C 20.45 A
Means followed by the same letters are not significantly different at 5 % level of probability (LSD –Test).
The above results show that Trichogramma parasitism, Trichogramma in combination with
Chrysoperla and neem (T4) does have an impact on population of tomato fruit worm. In the present experiment
Trichogramma in combination with Chrysoperla and neem extract (T4) decreases the population of tomato fruit
worm. These results are in conformity with those of Reddy and Manjunatha (2000) who used Trichogramma
chilonis alone and in combination with plant extracts and synthetic pesticides and reported positive results in
controlling lepidopterous pests of field crops. Shah (2008) after conducting field experiments also reported that
Chrysoperla carnea and Trichogramma chilonis are the best bio-control agents for controlling tomato fruit
worm in tomato crop. For significant reduction in pest population however, application of 50 2nd instar C.
carnea larvae and 400 Trichogramma wasps were significant in reducing the pest population. Despite
application of bio-control agent the pest survived, though in significantly less number, to cause some damage.
Workers around the world could not achieve 100% control with Trichogramma, Chrysoperla and neem extract.
This includes Shah (2008) who tested Trichograma, Chryosperla and neem extract respectively, against H.
armigera.
In the present studies the mean number of tomato fruit worm recorded show that the application of
Trichogramma in combination with Chrysoperla and neem (T4) significantly help in reducing the infestation of
tomato fruit worm. Although the treatment with the Trichogramma in combination with Chrysoperla and neem
(T4) significantly reduced the number of tomato fruit worm, it also put a positive impact on yield. Shah (2008)
achieved significant increase in yield.
In the present experiment, the reason for this low-significant reduction may be that due to less number
of pest larvae, they faced little competition and distributed well in the field plant-1 and caused damage. Figures
of percent weight loss show that all the treatments are better than control and application of Trichogramma in
combination with Chrysoperla and neem can be recommended. Release of Trichogramma in combination with
Chrysoperla and neem put a positive impact on reducing fruit worm infestation, yield and percent weight losses.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Trichogramma and C. carnea in combination with neem seed extract work well against tomato fruit
worm and can be incorporated into and IPM strategy directed towards managing tomato fruit worm and can also
be used in the biological control programme. Despite the application of these bio-control agents losses due to
fruit worm were still high. More work should be done to enhance the efficacy of these bio-control agents.
Cannibalism exists in C. carnea, it is impossible to rear two or more C. carnea in a test tube which is extremely
laborious, costly and time consuming. Work should be done to minimize or modify this cannibalism behavior of
C. carnea.
Sarhad J. Agric. Vol.28, No.2, 2012 257
REFERENCES
Ayvaz, A., E. Karasu, S. Karaborklu and S. Yilmaz. 2008. Dispersal ability and parsitizion performance of egg
parasitoid Trichogramma evanescene Westwood (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in field and storage
conditions. Turk. J. Biol. 32: 27-33.
Dhingra, S., S. Walia, J. Kumar, S. Singh, G. Singh and B.S. Parmar. 2008. Field efficacy of azadirachtin-A,
tetrahydroazadirachtin-A, NeemAzal and endosulfan against key pests of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) J.
Pest Mgt. Sci. 64(11): 1187-1194.
Easterbrook, M. A., J.D. Fitzgerald and M.G. Solomon. 2006. Suppression of aphids on strawberry by augmentative
releases of larvae of the lacewing Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens). Biol. Sci. Tech. 16(9): 893-900.
Hussin, B. and S. Bilal. 2007. Efficacy of different insecticides on tomato fruit borer Helicoverpa armigera. J.
Entomol. 4(1): 64-67.
Inayatullah, M. 2007. Control of tomatoes fruit worm Helicoverpa armigera (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera) using
Trichogramma and Chrysoperla. 2nd Tech. Rep. HEC Funded Project. Deptt. Entomol, Agric. Univ.
Peshawar, Pakistan. pp. 1-82.
Kevany, B.M., M.G. Taylor and H.J. Klee. 2008. Fruit-specific suppression of the ethylene receptor LeETR4 results
in early-ripening tomato fruit. J. Pl. Biotech. 6(3): 295-300.
Nabil, E. Wakeil and S. Vidal. 1999. Using Chrysoperla carnea in combination with Trichogramma species for
controlling Helicoverpa armigera. J. Appld. Entomol. 124(5-6): 213-221.
Reddy, G. V. P and M. Manjunatha. 2000. Laboratory and field studies on the integrated pest management of
Helicoverpa armigera in cotton, based on performance trap catch threshold level. J. Appld. Entomol. 125(4-
5): 212-216.
Shah, A. R. 2004. Impact of neem oil and neem seed extract on tomato fruit worm (H. armigera) and its natural
enemies. M.Sc (Hons) Thesis, Agric. Univ. Peshawar, Pakistan. pp. 1-77.
Shah, R. 2008. Impact of the use of predators and parasitoids on population of tomato fruit worm (Helicoverpa
armigera) Lepidoptera: Noctuidae at Dargai. M.Sc (Hons) Thesis. Agric. Univ. Peshawar, Pakistan. pp. 1-
37.