Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

n the first side of the argument, people argue that competition is

advantageous. In their point of view, structuring an environment under


a context of competition will be challenging and will establish the need
to strive and work harder to attain a particular goal that many aims.
Therefore, competition enhances motivation and gives a sense of
fulfilment. For instance, children in nursery schools join different
contests and compete with other children. They try to do their best and
maximises their resources to win the competition because of the reward
that they may get from their parents or teachers.

On the other hand, some people believe that the drawbacks outweigh
the positive effects of competition and teaching the child to cooperate
are better. They explain that cooperation allows children a chance to
understand and adjust to the needs of other children, hence, training
them to become more sensitive individuals in the future. For example, in
our home, I have never felt that my mum encouraged competition
between me and my younger sister. She always says that each has her
own unique talents and skills that should be enhanced and be shared to
one another. Hence, every time that we need to do some task, we
would rather help one another than to compete.

In summary, establishing a competitive and cooperative environment


has its own merits. However, in my opinion, teaching children to
cooperate is more beneficial in honing a mature and useful individual.

[ by - Karen Kate ]
Model Answer 5:
In today's modern world, most of the people around the globe lead a
competitive lifestyle as they need to secure a decent job with a high
payment. Therefore, there are a handful of people who assert that there
should be competition among the children so that they will reach their
goals in the future. However, some people are of the opinion that
children should be taught to co-operate as they have higher tendency to
become a useful citizen once they know about cooperation. Hence, it is
important for us to examine both sides of the views before reaching a
reasonable conclusion.

Admittedly, if there is a sense of competition among the children, they


are stimulated to work harder when acquiring knowledge in school. It is,
possibly, due to the reason that they want to score better in examination
than their classmates. With the existence of competition among children,
they are highly likely to perform well in school as they will always
compare their academic progressions with others. To illustrate, during a
quiz or a test, the children will probably try harder to solve the questions
as they love the feeling of being praised by their teachers and friends.
Thus, with the existence of competition among children, they will have
more momentum in studying and achieving success.

On the other hand, it is believed that children who know how to co-
operate with others will attain success and contribute more to the
society. In school, if the teachers teach them about the moral value of
cooperation, it will further encourage them to have good teamwork
between children learn how to respect others' opinions. It, indirectly,
helps them to develop the crucial interpersonal skills which play an
indispensable role in their studies and prospective jobs. Hence, any
misunderstanding can be avoided among the child which is the key to
achieving their aspirations both in their studies and their works.

In conclusion, I believe that both the competition and cooperation


should exist among the children as each of them helps the young
children to become a more knowledgeable and useful individual who can
contribute endlessly to the society. As a consequence, our nation will
surely continue to prosper and flourish in the decades to come.
[ by - Lee Wing Qeen ]
Model Answer 6:
Some individuals believe that it is necessarily important to motivate
children to be more competitive to perform better. Yet, it seems to
others that children, who are supplied (exposed) by the spirit of group-
working, will be able to be more useful people in their life later than
those who presume that competition is a priority. This essay will discuss
both of these opinions through the following paragraphs.

First, citizens may think that the more competition someone faces, the
faster the growth of his or her cognitive values would be. This idea can
be a better consideration to boost and to explore people’s hemisphere to
be more innovative in their lifetime as they are encouraged to be the
first and have a passion for defeating other's idea. Being the best
student in class, for instance, is one of the real examples. Students, who
always get the first place, will try to maintain their position by expanding
their competitiveness through study harder than others.

However, living in the real community, besides competitiveness, people


are also required to be cooperative as their faith as social creatures that
have to engage or be involved with other people to achieve a goal.
Individuals, who can be a good cooperative people, are those who have
been trained to do a team-work, moreover since their childhood rather
than those who always competitive. My uncle, Rian, is a real figure. He
is always involved in a community work and acts collaboratively with
others because he used to do that since he was a little child and as the
result, their goals are mostly achieved easier.  

Someone who always excels in education and jobs is not necessarily a


person with competitive mentality. Helpfulness and sharing with other
expand the knowledge we gather. It is a good human quality to help
other rather than competing. Children who are learned to share, often
become better persons that those who always compete.  
All in all, being competitive is considerably important to enhance
knowledge, yet the communal life needs cooperative people as well.
Thus, individuals are cordially suggested to balance both
competitiveness and cooperativeness.
[ by - Linda ]

You might also like