Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effec I Ency
Effec I Ency
Risk of banking
Credit Risks IT risks Legal Risks
crisis
Policy making
Cash Risks Strategy Risk Political risk
risks
Foreign
currency risk
Depos Inefficient
its Loans
Non-interest
income
Fig. 2. Three-stage DEA model of the network, regardless of the credit risk management index.
output. Costs arising from interest and number of
As can be seen in figure 2, The main inputs (operating
branches, intermediate inputs of production are interest
expenses, fixed assets and deposits) and the final
income in the third stage (final output of second stage).
outputs (interest income and non-interest income) exist.
On the other hand, the output of inefficient loans is
Firstly, operating expenses and fixed assets are used to
included as the main input in the final stage. Finally the
create a time and materials (computers, construction,
main product of a bank, are the loans that the credit
electricity, etc). Personnel costs and other operating
quality of them are extracted from type and quality of
costs, intermediate outputs are in the first stage and
credit. It should be noted that in each stage of the
intermediate inputs are in the second stage of
network model an output-oriented CCR model is
production. The input of the second stage are combined
analyzed. Three-step model for measuring management
with deposits to make the interest costs related to the
performance, With regard to the risk management, First
number of branches (Output of the second stage and the
and second steps are exactly the same as the previous
main inputs in third stage). Banks need for workforce,
model, but in the third, the risk management score in
materials and supplies as initial inputs to achieve the
each of the banks which achieved by the extend of bank
profits from lending and banking services. Interest on
managements notice to risk management questionnaire
deposits, is a tool to attract deposits by banks, so It is
based on risk management criteria, is included as one of
viewed as an input in the second stage. Bank branches
the main inputs of the third stage. And the efficiency of
are located in areas that attract business customers for
banks is measured with respect to the new input (Fig.
paying bank services and deposit services and loans.
3).
Furthermore, in combination with primary and
Note that in the models mentioned above, the average
intermediate inputs produced in the second stage, banks
output stages can be considered as an overall output and
charge fees for financial services to their customers.
the final ranking is done on this basis.
These fees are non-interest income produced as a final
Keramati and Shaeri 325
Inefficient
Deposits Loans
Fig. 3. Three-stage DEA model network model with input of credit risk management.
RESULTS AND FINDINGS
scored. In this way, each of the activities is posed in the
The first question is: How the score of managerial form of a question and a rating is assigned to it using
efficiency and banks' risk management activities would Likert Scale. Finally, the average of each bank branch
be? In order to calculate the risk management activities management comments is computed and will be
and performance management in banks, A considered as the final score for each question. Finally
questionnaire, completed by the management bank Total achieved scores from questions is approved as the
branches or banks' credit management, was used .In this bank's risk management activities. The score of bank's
questionnaire the extent of importance that management credit risk management activities is shown in Table 1.
considers for credit risk activities is evaluated and
Table 2. Shows the rating and ranking of bank units regardless of credit risk management index.
Bank Step 1 score Step 2 score Step 3 score Final Score Final Rating
Ansar 0.303376 0.601279 0.929095 0.611249886 11
Iran Zamin 1 1 0.444007 0.814669 1
Parsin 0.270655 0.422845 1 0.564499737 14
Pasargad 0.296557 1 1 0.765518982 3
Post Bank 0.599203 1 0.17733 0.592177622 12
Tejarat 1 0.407297 0.652924 0.686740154 8
Tosee Saderat 0.314447 1 0.27501 0.529818989 17
Hekmat Iranian 0.169501 1 1 0.723166981 6
Day 0.106586 1 1 0.702195426 7
Saman 1 0.55361 0.711049 0.754886275 4
Sepah 0.884678 0.484192 0.266702 0.545190706 16
Sarmayeh 0.269689 1 0.397759 0.555815939 15
Sina 0.433536 0.828107 1 0.753881072 5
Shahr 0.241186 0.61639 1 0.619192071 10
Saderat 1 0.664076 0.241053 0.635043005 9
Mehre Iran 0.487858 1 0 0.495952581 19
Gardeshgari 0.36276 1 1 0.787586596 2
Mellat 0.699932 0.596257 0.26378 0.51998946 18
Melli 0.863386 0.606602 0.268068 0.579351723 13
As can be seen in table 2, With the final score obtained Indicator of credit risk management in the third stage
for each of the banks surveyed, the banks Iran Zamin, DEA model network, entered the model as an input
Gardeshgari and Pasargad have the most performance (Fig. 3). So The results obtained in steps 1 and 2 are
and Tosee Saderat, Mellat and Mehr Iran have the unchanged and the third part of the analysis with regard
lowest performance. This rating is done while the to the management of credit risk is assessed again.
extend of credit risk management notced by the banks Table 3 shows the scores obtained in each stage and
is not considered. finally score and rating of each bank with respect to
credit risk management index.
The third question of the research:
How would be the rating of banks with respect to credit
risk management index using data envelopment
analysis network?
Keramati and Shaeri 327
Table 3. Score and rating of bank units with respect to credit risk management index.
Bank Step 1 score Step 2 score Step 3 score Final Score Final Rating
Ansar 0.303376 0.601279 1 0.634885006 12
Iran Zamin 1 1 0.771515 0.923838255 1
Parsin 0.270655 0.422845 1 0.564499737 17
Pasargad 0.296557 1 1 0.765518982 6
Post Bank 0.599203 1 0.181565 0.593589253 15
Tejarat 1 0.407297 1 0.802432219 4
Tosee Saderat 0.314447 1 0.286863 0.533769937 18
Hekmat Iranian 0.169501 1 1 0.723166981 10
Day 0.106586 1 1 0.702195426 11
Saman 1 0.55361 0.711049 0.754886275 7
Sepah 0.884678 0.484192 0.517699 0.628856657 13
Sarmayeh 0.269689 1 0.485347 0.58501199 16
Sina 0.433536 0.828107 1 0.753881072 8
Shahr 0.241186 0.61639 1 0.619192071 14
Saderat 1 0.664076 0.774288 0.812788097 3
Mehre Iran 0.487858 1 0 0.495952581 19
Gardeshgari 0.36276 1 1 0.787586596 5
Mellat 0.699932 0.596257 0.87766 0.724616145 9
Melli 0.863386 0.606602 1 0.82332921 2
According to Table 3, it is observed that the final the method of financing, wages, bank accounts and
ranking of each of the banks surveyed the banks namely assets of individuals who are applying for a loan.
Iran Zamin, Mellat, Saderat have the highest Also, if the loan applicant, is a legal client, managers
performance and Tosee Saderat, Parsian and Mehre Iran before lending the loan try to review the company's
have the lowest performance. This scoring is ion profit and loss statement, statement of income, assets
condition that the extend of credit risk management and liabilities of the company.
noticed considered by banks’ managers is also taken On the other hand the importance of credit risk
into account. management by banks of Iran Zamin, Mellat and you
can keep some of the funds to repay the loan in default
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
if the borrower's account deduced. Generally managers
The aim of this study is to evaluate banks' risk that risk management is of high importance for them In
management, managerial efficiency using data addition, special attention to the above issues, the give
envelopment analysis network In other words, this importance to “Control of financial ratios (as ratio of
study is an attempt to rank the banks based on risk instantaneous, average repayment period and inventory
management by managers. According to the obtained turnover) After spending the loan to companies to avoid
results in this study, the highest score of risk spending load in risky activities” "Careful study of how
management activities belongs to banks. And most to collect the checks used by the customer before the
banks try to minimize the credit risk of lending to loan payments". And "lack of lending to high values
customers of its entities. On the other hand banks in the even if the borrower is willing to pay a higher interest
ranking of network data envelopment analysis model rate". In General the researcher suggests that banks
network with respect to credit risk management implies have to make a decision about granting credit to
that banks of Iran Zamin, Mellat, Saderat have the customers, indicators like 1) The code for the client to
highest performance. The interpretation of the results receive the credit loans, 2) Inquiry the central bank and
can be paraphrased as the managers of these banks, the banking system to assess the obligations and
check the accounts and savings of customers data liabilities of all banks, 3) Credit questionnaires filled
before loans are paid. However these managers to out by employees of the credit cycle, 4) Surveying
ensure the repayment of loans granted, seek an financial statements and tax, 5) evaluation of the bail,
acceptable pledge from individual or legal entities who 6) average of the account balance of customer in the
have taken the loans. Given that those requesting the branch and 7) Understanding the customer which
loan are of natural or legal entities. Bank managers obtained in a long run.
prior to the lending loans, try to find information about
Keramati and Shaeri 328
REFERENCES Mehrgan, Mohammedreza, (2003), "Quantitative models
for performance assessment organizations,
Jalali Naini, Amir; Sasan, Gohar Pedtram; Asadipour,
Tehran: Tehran University Press”.
Nima, (1385), "Studying the role and
Mirzaee, Hasan; Nazarian, Farzad; Baghery , Reza,
importance of risk-based supervision in the
(2011), "Credit Risk factors affecting bank
banking system and comparing it with
legal entities (Case Study Melli Bank of Iran,
adaptive supervision", the collection of the
Tehran, Iran)", Journal of Economic Research,
Seventeenth International Conference articles
Vol. XIX, No. 58, pp 67-98.
on Islamic Banking.
John B. C., Edward I. A., Paul N.; “Management credit
George and Council, (1987), resource allocation, Tehran:
risk: The next grate financial challenge”, John
the papyrus.
Wiley & Sons, N.Y, 1998.
Shamsodini, Arash, (2003), "Credit Risk Management
Sinky Jr. Joseph F; “Commercial bank financial
Principles", Summer Journal of Banking.
management”; 4th Edition; Macmilla, 1999.
Alamtabriz, Akbar and Mohammed Rahimi, Alireza
Kiss F. “Credit rating process from a knowledge
(2009) "Approach to Production and
management prospective”; Budapest
Operations Management In evaluating and
University of Technology and Economics,
improving business processes". Tehran:
2003.
commercial publishing company.
Cheng EWL., Chaing YH., Tang BS.; “Alternative
Oryani, Behroz, (2005), “Rating of credit risk of legal
approach to credit Rating by DEA: evaluating
customers based on data envelopment
borrowers with respect to PFI project”;
analysis”, Thesis, BuAlisina University,
Journal of Building and Environment, Vol. 42,
Faculty of Literature and Humanities,
2007.
Department of Economics.
Min JH. , Lee YC.; “A practical approach to credit
Mehrara, Mohammed and Mehranfar, Mina, (2013),
Rating”; Journal of Expert Systems With
"Macroeconomic factors and bank
Applications; doi:10.1016/j.eswa, 08.070,
performance in risk management", Journal of
2007.
Economic Modeling, Vol. VII, No. 1, row 21,
pp 21-37.