BIS3003 - Assessment Brief T3, 2021

Assessment Brief: BIS3003 IS Capstone Industry Project A
Trimester 3, 2021
Assessment Overview
Assessment Task Type Weighting Due Length ULO
Assessment 1: Project Definition Individual 10% Week 3 1500 words ULO1
and Scope ULO2
The report defines the problem,
describing the background and context,
and detailing the scope of the project
to be undertaken.
Assessment 2: Requirements Individual 20% Week 6 1500 words ULO2
Analysis ULO3
Students submit a report covering their
requirements analysis for the project.
Assessment 3: Project Reflection Individual 30% First: 2*1000 ULO5
Reflection on the student’s journey in Week 7 words
the unit focused on (a) the skills and and
knowledge they were able to draw on Second:
from earlier parts of the course; (b) the Week 12
areas where they needed development
and how they addressed those; (c) how
they would approach a project like this
next time; (d) considerations for
BIS3006 IS Capstone Industry Project B
Assessment 4: Report and Oral Group 40% Week 11 3000 words ULO1
Defence ULO2
Students prepare and the Project Presentation ULO3
Design, Feasibility Analysis, and Initial 15 minutes ULO4
Invigilate
Implementation Plan and present and maximum;
d
defend their solution design through 15 slides
an oral defence. maximum
(1500 word
equiv.)
Assessment 1: Project Definition and Scope
Due date: Week 3

Group/individual: Individual
Word count/Time provided: 10%
Weighting: 1500 words
Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO1, ULO2
Assessment 1 Detail
Assessment 1: Project Definition and Scope
The report defines the problem, describing the background and context, and detailing the scope of the project
to be undertaken.
Assessment 1 Marking Criteria and Rubric

The assessment will be marked out of 10 and will be weighted 10% of the total unit mark. The
marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.
Marking Criteria Not Satisfactory Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent
(0-49% of the criterion (50-64% of the (65-74% of the (75-84% of the (85-100% of the
mark) criterion mark) criterion mark) criterion mark) criterion mark)
Criterion -1 (1 mark) Business case is not Business case is Business case is Business case is Business case is
Does the business case established for the established for the established for the established for the established for the
is established for the project proposal, and project proposal, and project proposal, and project proposal, and project proposal, and
project proposal, and the project scope is the project scope the project scope the project scope the project scope
the project scope not described generally described described clearly described clearly and specifically
described . described .
Criterion-2 (1 mark) Project charter is not Project charter is Project charter is Project charter is Project charter is
Does project charter identifies your goal generally identifies identifies your goal clearly identifies your clearly and specifically
identifies your goal and sets out the work your goal and sets and sets out the work goal and sets out the identifies your goal
and sets out the work commitments out the work commitments work commitments and sets out the work
commitments expected of you commitments expected of you expected of you commitments expected
expected of you expected of you of you
Criterion-4 (8 marks) Business case is not Business case is Business case is Business case is clearly Business case is clearly
Does the Vision addressed and addressed and vaguely addressed and addressed and and specifically
document captures the business captures the business captures the business captures the business addressed and
demonstrate the ability value of the proposed value of the proposed value of the proposed value of the proposed captures the business
of spelling out the core system. system. system. system. value of the proposed
idea and the business All stakeholders is not Some stakeholders All stakeholders All stakeholders clearly system.
case justifying the identified. identified. identified. identified. All stakeholders clearly
development effort. Business needs is not Business needs Business needs Business needs clearly and specifically
expressed. generally expressed. expressed. expressed. identified.
Functional and Non- Some Functional and Functional and Non- Functional and Non- Business needs clearly
functional Non-functional functional functional and specifically
requirements are requirements are requirements are requirements are expressed.
related to business related to business related to business related to business Functional and Non-
needs and identified. needs and identified. needs and identified. needs and clearly and functional
specifically identified. requirements are
related to business
needs and clearly and
specifically identified.
Assessment 2: Requirements Analysis
Due date: Week 6

Word count/Time provided: 1500 words
Weighting: 20%
Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO2, ULO3
Assessment 2 Detail
Assessment 2: Requirements Analysis
Students submit a report covering their requirements analysis for the project.
Assessments 2 Marking Criteria and Rubric

(0-49% of the (50-64% of the criterion (65-74% of the criterion (75-84% of the criterion (85-100% of the criterion
criterion mark) mark) mark) mark) mark)
Criterion (5 marks) No critical and Some critical and minor Several critical and Almost critical and All critical and minor Use
Does the minor Use Cases Use Cases identified and minor Use Cases minor Use Cases Cases identified and
Interaction Model identified correctly named. The identified and correctly identified and correctly correctly named. The
helps to identify identified Use Cases named. The identified named. The identified identified Use Cases
user completely consistent Use Cases completely Use Cases completely completely consistent with
requirements? Doe with needs and features consistent with needs consistent with needs needs and features of your
s modelling of of your proposed and features of your and features of your proposed system.
highlights the system. proposed system. proposed system. The use case diagram built
communication The use case diagram The use case diagram The use case diagram including all identified use
problems that may built including all built including all built including all cases.
arise. Does identified use cases. identified use cases. identified use cases. The use case descriptions
Modelling the The use case The use case The use case provided for all identified
component descriptions provided descriptions provided descriptions provided use.
interaction helps in for all identified use. for all identified use. for all identified use. All Use case diagrams built
understanding if a All Use case diagrams All Use case diagrams All Use case diagrams that show clear and
proposed system built that show clear and built that show clear and built that show clear significant interactions
structure is likely to significant interactions significant interactions and significant between a system and its
deliver the required between a system and between a system and interactions between a environment. Sequence
system its environment. its environment. system and its diagrams built that show
performance and Sequence diagrams built Sequence diagrams built environment. Sequence clear and significant
dependability. that show clear and that show clear and diagrams built that show interactions between
significant interactions significant interactions clear and significant actors and the system and
between actors and the between actors and the interactions between between system
system and between system and between actors and the system components.
system components. system components. and between system
components.
Criterion (5 marks) No critical and Some critical and minor Several critical and Almost critical and All critical and minor
Does the structural minor classes classes identified based minor classes identified minor classes identified classes identified based on
model of the identified on the identified based on the identified based on the identified the identified
software display the requirements and requirements and requirements and requirements and correctly
organization of a correctly named. All correctly named. All correctly named. All named. All Domain Class
system in terms of Domain Class diagrams Domain Class diagrams Domain Class diagrams diagrams built and show
the components built and show the built and show the built and show the the object classes in the
that make up that object classes in the object classes in the object classes in the system and the
system and their system and the system and the system and the associations between
relationships?. Does associations between associations between associations between these classes.
it show the dynamic these classes. these classes. these classes. Relationships between
models, which Relationships between Relationships between Relationships between domain objects correct.
show the domain objects correct. domain objects correct. domain objects correct. Completely correct
organization of the Completely correct Completely correct Completely correct concept of inheritance and
system when it is concept of inheritance concept of inheritance concept of inheritance aggregation/composition
executing?. and and and shown (if appropriate).
aggregation/compositio aggregation/compositio aggregation/compositio All domain class diagrams
n shown (if n shown (if n shown (if built without concerning
appropriate). appropriate). appropriate). about the implementation
All domain class All domain class All domain class detail. No application
diagrams built without diagrams built without diagrams built without concepts such as
concerning about the concerning about the concerning about the databases or user
implementation detail. implementation detail. implementation detail. interfaces present in
No application concepts No application concepts No application concepts domain model.
such as databases or such as databases or such as databases or
user interfaces present user interfaces present user interfaces present
in domain model. in domain model. in domain model.
Criterion (5 marks) No activity Some activity diagrams Several activity diagrams Almost activity All activity diagrams built
Does the diagrams built built and clearly and built and clearly and diagrams built and and clearly and
behavioural models significantly show the significantly show the clearly and significantly significantly show the
Show the dynamic sequence of actions sequence of actions show the sequence of sequence of actions
behavior of a involved in processing involved in processing actions involved in involved in processing
system as it is input data and input data and processing input data input data and generating
executing. generating an generating an and generating an an associated output. All
Show what happens associated output. All associated output. All associated output. All state machine diagrams
or what is supposed state machine diagrams state machine diagrams state machine diagrams built and clearly and
to happen when a built and clearly and built and clearly and built and clearly and significantly Shows how a
system responds to significantly Shows how significantly Shows how significantly Shows how system responds to
a stimulus from its a system responds to a system responds to a system responds to external and internal
environment. external and internal external and internal external and internal events. All state machine
events. All state events. All state events. All state diagrams built based on
machine diagrams built machine diagrams built machine diagrams built the assumption and that
based on the based on the based on the events may cause a
assumption and that assumption and that assumption and that transition from one state
events may cause a events may cause a events may cause a to another.
transition from one transition from one transition from one
state to another. state to another. state to another.
Criterion (5 marks) No critical and Some critical and Several critical and Almost critical and All critical and significant
Does the analysis of significant Non- significant Non- significant Non- significant Non- Non-Functional
non-functional Functional Functional requirements Functional requirements Functional requirements requirements addressed
requirements requirements addressed and justified. addressed and justified. addressed and justified. and justified.
demonstrate an Prioritisation of them Prioritisation of them Prioritisation of them Prioritisation of them
ability to identify, clearly and correctly clearly and correctly clearly and correctly clearly and correctly
quantify, prioritise, justified against specific justified against specific justified against specific justified against specific
and communicate needs of project. needs of project. needs of project. needs of project.
required system Costs and benefits of Costs and benefits of Costs and benefits of Costs and benefits of
qualities? addressing all of them addressing all of them addressing all of them addressing all of them
clearly identified and clearly identified and clearly identified and clearly identified and
discussed in relation to discussed in relation to discussed in relation to discussed in relation to
specific needs of specific needs of specific needs of specific needs of project.
project. All critical and project. All critical and project. All critical and All critical and significant
significant external significant external significant external external interfaces
interfaces identified. All interfaces identified. All interfaces identified. All identified. All critical and
critical and significant critical and significant critical and significant significant system
system constraints system constraints system constraints constraints identified.
identified. identified. identified.
Assessment 3: Project Reflection
First: Week 7
Due date: and
Second: Week 12
Word count/Time provided: 2*1000 words
Weighting: 30%
Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO5
Assessment 3 Detail
Assessment 3: Project Reflection
Reflection on the student’s journey in the unit focused on (a) the skills and knowledge they were able to draw
on from earlier parts of the course; (b) the areas where they needed development and how they addressed
those; (c) how they would approach a project like this next time; (d) considerations for BIS3006 IS Capstone
Industry Project B

Part-A
Criterion (5 marks) The plan is not clear The plan is fairly clear The plan is clear in The plan is clear in and The plan is clear and
Does the initial project in regard to the in regard to the regard to the project. fairly specific regard to specific in regard to the
architecture design project. project. The plan fairly The plan clearly the project. The plan project. The plan
plan set an achievable clearly and specific identifies the main clearly and fairly clearly and specific
schedule to achieve identifies the main structural components specific identifies the identifies the main
the desired project structural components in a system and the main structural structural components
results? in a system and the relationships between components in a in a system and the
relationships between them. The plan is clear system and the relationships between
them. The plan is fairly in linking between the relationships between them. The plan is clear
clear in linking design and them. The plan is clear and specific in linking
between the design requirements model. and fairly specific in between the design
and requirements The plan shows clearly linking between the and requirements
model. The plan shows when each design and model. The plan shows
clearly when each architectural element requirements model. clearly when each
architectural element and element of The plan shows clearly architectural element
and element of functionality will be when each and element of
functionality will be delivered as iteration architectural element functionality will be
delivered as iteration targets. All identified and element of delivered as iteration
targets. All identified risk mitigation functionality will be targets. All identified
risk mitigation strategies are delivered as iteration risk mitigation
strategies are accounted for targets. All identified strategies are
accounted for Contingency planning risk mitigation accounted for
Contingency planning is thorough. strategies are Contingency planning is
is thorough. accounted for thorough.
Contingency planning
is thorough.
Part-B
Criterion (5 marks) Layered model is not Layered model is Layered model is clear Layered model is fairly Layered model is
Does the layer model organised the sub- organised the sub- organised the sub- clear and specifically clear and specifically
organize the major systems. systems. Layered systems. Layered organised the sub- organised the sub-
components that make model organised the model organised the systems. Layered systems. Layered
up the system and system into a set of system into a set of model organised the model organised the
their interactions? layers, each of which layers, each of which system into a set of system into a set of
provide a set of provide a set of layers, each of which layers, each of which
services. services. provide a set of provide a set of
services. services.
Criterion (5 marks) There is no design Some design class Several design class Almost design class All design class
Does the structural class diagrams . diagram with each diagram with each diagram with each diagram with each
models Show logical subsystem shown as a subsystem shown as a subsystem shown as a subsystem shown as a
groupings of objects package with enclosed package with enclosed package with enclosed package with enclosed
into coherent objects. objects. objects. objects.
subsystems?
Criterion (5 marks) Sequence models are Some Sequence Several Sequence Almost Sequence All Sequence models
Does the dynamic not designed models clearly and models clearly and models clearly and clearly and
models build in early specifically designed specifically designed specifically designed specifically designed
stage of the design and showed the and showed the and showed the and showed the
process? object interactions. object interactions. object interactions. object interactions.
All State machine All State machine All State machine All State machine
models clearly and models clearly and models clearly and models clearly and
specifically designed specifically designed specifically designed specifically designed
and Showed how and Showed how and Showed how and Showed how
individual objects individual objects individual objects individual objects
change their state in change their state in change their state in change their state in
response to events. response to events. response to events. response to events.
Criterion (5 marks) Component interfaces Some Component Several Component Almost Component All Component
Does the interfaces are not defined interfaces defined interfaces defined interfaces defined interfaces defined
specify so that objects precisely so that other precisely so that other precisely so that other precisely so that other
and subsystems can be objects can use them. objects can use them. objects can use them. objects can use them.
designed in parallel.? All system and user All system and user All system and user All system and user
interfaces defined. . interfaces defined. interfaces defined. interfaces defined.
Criterion (5s marks) data base tables and Some data base tables Several data base Almost data base All data base tables
Does the relational the data dictionary are and the data dictionary tables and the data tables and the data and the data dictionary
data model and data not identified are identified dictionary are dictionary are are identified
dictionary build for all identified identified
subsystems?
Assessment 4: Report and Oral Defence
Due date: Week 11

Group/individual: Group
Word count/Time provided: 3000 words
Weighting: 40%
Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO1, ULO2, ULO3, ULO4
Assessment 4 Detail
Assessment 4: Report and Oral Defence
Students prepare and the Project Design, Feasibility Analysis, and Initial Implementation Plan and present and
defend their solution design through an oral defence.


(0-49% of the (50-64% of the (65-74% of the criterion (75-84% of the (85-100% of the
criterion mark) criterion mark) mark) criterion mark) criterion mark)
Criterion (2.5 marks) The Vision has not The Vision has been The Vision has been The Vision has been The Vision has been
Does the revised Vision been updated even partially updated to updated to updated to thoroughly updated to
give a clear idea of the though the expected reflect a few changes reflect some changes in reflect most changes in reflect any and
business case and final outcomes of the in project scope. project scope. project scope. all changes in project
functional and non- project clearly need scope.
functional to be revised.
requirements of the
project
Criterion (2.5 marks) Report hasn't Reporting Reporting demonstrates Reporting Reporting demonstrates
Does the report provide a demonstrates the competent or basic demonstrates high- highly advanced skills in
demonstrate the skills demonstration basic skills in skills in Feasibility level skills in Feasibility Feasibility Analysis, and
in Feasibility Analysis? about the skills in Feasibility Analysis, Analysis, and present and Analysis, and present present and justified
Does the revised Feasibility Analysis. . and present and justified their solution. and justified their their solution . The
requirement model The requirement justified their The requirement model solution . The requirement model
clearly define the model has not been solution. The provided with an requirement model provided with an
functional, non- updated even requirement model explanation. . The provided with an explanation. The
functional, and data though the provided with an requirement model has explanation. . The requirement model has
requirements for the functional, non- explanation. . The been thoroughly updated requirement model has been thoroughly
project? functional, and data requirement model to reflect some changes been thoroughly updated to reflect any
requirements for the has been thoroughly in functional, non- updated to changes in and all changes in
project clearly need updated to reflect functional, and data functional, non- functional, non-
to be revised. any and few changes requirements for the functional, and data functional, and data
in functional, non- requirements for the requirements for the
functional, and data project?
requirements for the
demonstrate the skills demonstration basic skills in Initial skills in Initial level skills in Initial Initial Implementation
in Initial about the skills in Implementation Plan Implementation Plan and Implementation Plan Plan and present and
Implementation Plan? Initial and present and present and justified and present and justified their solution .
Does the revised Implementation justified their their solution. The initial justified their solution. The initial plan provided
Master Test Plan Plan. The master solution . The initial plan provided with an The initial plan with an explanation. The
clearly indicate the test plan does not plan provided with an explanation. The master provided with an master test plan sets
overall testing strategy, set out a reasonable explanation. The test plan sets out a explanation. The out a very high quality,
the priority, level of plan for testing. master test plan sets prioritised, reasonable master test plan sets well thought out, clearly
effort, basic out a plan for testing and achievable plan for out a good quality, prioritised, well
techniques, and during the remaining testing during the prioritised, justified, justified, reasonable and
coverage to be development. remaining development. reasonable and achievable plan for
achieved in each type achievable plan for testing during the
of testing, as well as testing during the remaining development.
acceptance and remaining
remediation development. The
procedures? master test plan sets
out a prioritised,
reasonable and
achievable plan for
testing during the
remaining
development.
demonstrate the skills demonstration basic skills in Project skills in Project Design, level skills in Project Project Design, present
in Project Design? Does about the skills in Design, present and present and justified Design, present and and justified their
the revised executable Project Design justified their solution their solution justified their solution. solution . The fully
Architectural of your The executable implements the
project clearly architecture proposed architecture,
identified? implements the with no missing
proposed architecture, elements.
with no
significant elements
missing
Criterion (2 marks) The goals and Some goals that the Several goals that the Almost goals that the All goals that the
Does the proposed philosophies haven't architecture needs to architecture needs to architecture needs to architecture needs to
architecture formulate explained meet in its structure meet in its structure and meet in its structure meet in its structure and
set of goals and and behaviour , and behaviour , and and behaviour , and behaviour , and
describes the philosophies well philosophies well philosophies well philosophies well
philosophy? explained. The Issues explained. The Issues explained. The Issues explained. The Issues
that drive the that drive the philosophy that drive the that drive the
philosophy identified identified philosophy identified philosophy identified.
Criterion (2marks) The critical Some critical Several critical Almost critical All critical architecturally
Does the proposed architecturally architecturally architecturally significant architecturally significant requirements
architecture identified significant significant requirements correctly significant correctly identified and
and link to the requirements not requirements identified and link to the requirements correctly link to the requirements
requirements ? correctly identified correctly identified requirements that must identified and link to that must be
and link to the be implemented to the requirements that implemented to realize
requirements that realize the architecture. must be implemented the architecture.
must be implemented to realize the
to realize the architecture.
architecture.
Criterion (2 marks) The list of the A comprehensive list A comprehensive list of A comprehensive list of A comprehensive list of
Does the proposed assumptions and of the assumptions the assumptions and the assumptions and the assumptions and
architecture listed the dependencies not and dependencies , dependencies , and list of dependencies , and list dependencies , and list
assumptions and provided. and list of decisions decisions and constraints of decisions and of decisions and
dependencies that and constraints identified. Decisions constraints identified. constraints identified.
drive architectural identified. Decisions completely consistent Decisions completely Decisions completely
decisions? Does the completely consistent with goals and consistent with goals consistent with goals
proposed architecture with goals and philosophies, sensible, and philosophies, and philosophies,
Listed the decisions philosophies, sensible, and well justified with sensible, and well sensible, and well
that have been made? and well justified with reference to specific justified with reference justified with reference
reference to specific needs of project. to specific needs of to specific needs of
needs of project. project. project.
Criterion (2 marks) The architectural Some architectural Several architectural Almost the All the architectural
Does the proposed mechanisms are not mechanisms are listed mechanisms are listed architectural mechanisms are listed
architecture described listed . and described the and described the mechanisms are listed and described the
the mechanisms? current state of each current state of each and described the current state of each
one. Mechanisms one. Mechanisms related current state of each one. Mechanisms
related to to architecturally one. Mechanisms related to
architecturally significant requirements. related to architecturally
significant architecturally significant
requirements. significant requirements.
requirements.
Criterion (12 marks) All features to be Some features to be Several features to be Almost features to be All features to be tested,
Does the test plan give tested, features not tested, features not to tested, features not to be tested, features not to features not to be
a clear idea of the to be tested, be tested, resource tested, resource be tested, resource tested, resource
acceptance testing? resource requirements, testing requirements, testing requirements, testing requirements, testing
requirements, schedule, test writing, schedule, test writing, schedule, test writing, schedule, test writing,
testing schedule, test coverage, test test coverage, test test coverage, test test coverage, test
test writing, test deliverables, pre- deliverables, pre- deliverables, pre- deliverables, pre-
coverage, test requisite for test requisite for test requisite for test requisite for test
deliverables, pre- execution, bug execution, bug reporting execution, bug execution, bug reporting
requisite for test reporting and tracking and tracking mechanism, reporting and tracking and tracking
execution, bug mechanism, test test metrics identified in mechanism, test mechanism, test metrics
reporting and metrics identified in the test plan. metrics identified in identified in the test
tracking mechanism, the test plan. the test plan. plan.
test metrics
identified in the test
plan.
Criterion (2.5 marks) There is no Logical Audience cannot Audience has difficulty Presents information in Presents information in
Logical sequence and sequence understand following presentation logical sequence that logical, interesting
ease of presentation. some of the because student jumps the audience can follow sequence that the
Use of available time presentation around but is close to and delivered close to audience can easily
and overall because there is no being on time. time given. follow and delivered on
organisation of the sequence of time.
seminar. information and
either falls short or
goes over the time
limit.
Criterion (5 marks) Audience Demonstrates just a Demonstrates comfort Demonstrates ease Demonstrates full
Audience engagement engagement and basic does grasp of with explanations, but with explanations and knowledge (more than
and interest interest haven't information about the fails to elaborate at times willing to elaborate at required) with
maintained. Expertise maintained project throughout in the report. times in the report. explanations and
and ability is shown to the report; Student elaboration of the
justify results and reads all of report Student occasionally uses Student maintains eye project in the report;
conclusions to peers. with no eye contact or eye contact, but still contact most of the
the video sounds like reads most of report time but frequently Maintains eye contact
a prepared speech. from notes or the screen. returns to notes. with
audience or the camera,
Student mumbles or Student's voice is low. Student's voice is clear. seldom returning to
incorrectly Student Student pronounces notes.
pronounces terms, incorrectly pronounces most words correctly.
and speaks too quietly terms. Most audience Student uses a clear
audience members or Audience members or members or viewers voice that all audience
can hear the members or viewers can
viewers to hear. viewers have difficulty presentation. hear the presentation.
hearing all the
presentation.
Criterion (2.5marks) The questions were Cannot answer all Able to answer only Answers to all Answers all questions
Audience Interaction handled questions rudimentary questions questions, but fails to with detailed
and Impact Skills about subject. from the audience. elaborate at times. explanations and
How well the questions elaboration.
were handled in the
'live' seminar.

BIS3003 - Assessment Brief T3, 2021

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

BIS3003 - Assessment Brief T3, 2021

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

BIS3003 - Assessment Brief T3, 2021

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Assessment Brief: BIS3003 IS Capstone Industry Project A

Due date: Week 3

Assessment 1 Marking Criteria and Rubric

Due date: Week 6

Assessments 2 Marking Criteria and Rubric

Assessments 3 Marking Criteria and Rubric

Assessment 4: Report and Oral Defence

Due date: Week 11

Assessments 4 Marking Criteria and Rubric

Marking Criteria Not Satisfactory Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent

You might also like