Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Apollo Temple at Bassae - What Have We Learned About The Temple's Architecture Through 250 Years of Archaeology?
The Apollo Temple at Bassae - What Have We Learned About The Temple's Architecture Through 250 Years of Archaeology?
net/publication/314519716
The Apollo Temple at Bassae - What have we learned about the temple’s
architecture through 250 years of archaeology?
CITATIONS READS
0 1,316
1 author:
Jens Schwarz-Nielsen
University of Copenhagen
2 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Jens Schwarz-Nielsen on 10 March 2017.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents ................................................................................................................... 2
Introduction and practical remarks ........................................................................................ 3
The written inheritance (Pausanias) ...................................................................................... 3
1765 - 1814 (Rediscovery and ”the Society of Travellers”) .................................................. 4
1815 – 1864 (Publication) ................................................................................................... 11
1865 – 1914 (The first scientific approach)......................................................................... 12
1915 – 1964 (Dinsmoor)...................................................................................................... 12
1965 – 2015 (Cooper/Kelly and the modern approach) ...................................................... 13
Summary.............................................................................................................................. 15
References ........................................................................................................................... 16
List of Illustrations............................................................................................................... 17
List of Plates ........................................................................................................................ 17
Plates .................................................................................................................................... 18
2
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
Phigalia is surrounded by mountains, on the left by the mountain called Cotilius, while on the right is another, Mount Elaius,
which acts as a shield to the city. The distance from the city to Mount Cotilius is about forty stades. On the mountain is a
place called Bassae, and the temple of Apollo the Helper, which, including the roof, is of stone.
Of the temples in the Peloponnesus, this might be placed first after the one at Tegea for the beauty of its stone and for its
symmetry. Apollo received his name from the help he gave in time of plague, just as the Athenians gave him the name of
Averter of Evil for turning the plague away from them.
It was at the time of the war between the Peloponnesians and the Athenians that he also saved the Phigalians, and at no
other time; the evidence is that of the two surnames of Apollo, which have practically the same meaning, and also the fact
that Ictinus, the architect of the temple at Phigalia, was a contemporary of Pericles, and built for the Athenians what is
called the Parthenon. My narrative has already said that the tile image of Apollo is in the market-place of Megalopolis.2
The inheritance from Pausanias provides us with both topography, context and architecture to
work with. We are given an exact location on Mount Cotilius close to the polis of Phigalia, as well as
we are given the name of the location; Bassae. We are told that the temple is dedicated to ’Apollo
the Helper,’ a statement substantiated by the fact that Pausanias himself has seen the original cult
statue in Megalopolis.3 We are also informed that Apollo’s name as ’the Helper’ originates from the
time of the Peloponnesian War, and Apollo’s help with keeping the plague away from the Phigalians.
As far as the architecture is concerned, we are informed that the temple is built entirely of stone,
and then we get a snippet of information, which still keeps archaeologists occupied; that the temple
was built by Ictinus, the architect who also built the Parthenon at Athens.
1
Cockerell 2008 p.60.
2
Paus. 8.41.7-9.
3
Cooper p.70 and Paus. 8.30.2-4. Megalopolis was founded in 370/369 b., and the Apollo statue was
brought as a gift from neighbouring Phigalia.
3
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
It was of the Doric order, and had six columns in front. The number, which ranged round the cell, was thirty eight. Two at the
angles are fallen; the rest are entire, in good preservation, and support their architraves. Within them lies a confused heap.
The stone inclines to gray with reddish veins. To its beauty is added great precision of execution in the workmanship. These
remains had their effect, striking equally the mind and the eyes of the beholder .5
Chandler does not mention, that Bocher went back to Bassae in 1770 to measure up the temple,
and that that was the last that was seen of him. When Pouqueville was in the area in 1798, the locals
told about a ’voyageur’, who came to visit the temple, but was killed by bandits. Pouqueville
connected, as far as anyone knows correctly, this person with Bocher.6
Now that the temple’s existence had been made public knowledge, the following years saw a
string of visitors, including the French Consul L.F-S. Fauvel in 1787. None of the visitors conducted
any investigations of the temple, but it was probably Fauvel, who told about it to one or more of the
participants in the next expedition proper.7
Some of the visitors, however, drew or pained the temple, but it was only for the few to have
access to these visual impressions. The watercolour (from around 1800, but only made publically
available in 1821) in Plate 1 clearly shows the confused heap mentioned by Bocher lying inside the
peristyle.
What was not known at that time, was that Bocher actually had made a drawing of the temple’s
plan (Fig.1). The drawing is incorrect as far as cella is concerned, but Bocher had realised that there is
an internal colonnade – which he draws with two rows of 8 Doric columns in each – and a spur wall,
which forms an adyton inside the building. The drawing was not made public, until it was bought
(from a private collector) by the Victoria & Albert Museum at London in 19148 and here Bocher (of no
fault of his own) starts a rather unlucky tradition, as we shall see that henceforth there is often a
substantial delay before observations and results reach the public space.
Bocher’s discover expanded the architectonic knowledge we had inherited through Pausanias, but
there was nothing which per se pointed to the temple being particularly special, apart perhaps from
the somewhat elongated plan. The Parthenon (8x17), Hephaisteion (6x13), the Poseidon temple at
Sounion (6x13), the Ares temple from Acharnia (6x13) and the incomplete Nemesis temple at
Rhamnous (6x12) are considered as belonging to the same school, period and, possibly, architect.9 If
Ictinus should be the architect behind the Apollo Temple at Bassae, one would thus expect a
somewhat ’broader’ plan.
4
Roux p.16.
5
Chandler p.296.
6
Pouqueville p.116.
7
Cooper p.13.
8
Victoria & Albert Museum.
9
Lawrence p.133.
4
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
Fig. 1: Bocher’s drawing of the Apollo Temple at Bassae. C. 1765. In the margin he has written: par moi
decouvert au mois de novembre de l’anne 1765. J.Bocher.
Only 40 years after its rediscovery, did the temple become the centre of an investigation proper.
This time the visitors were a mixed group of architects, antiquarians and fortune seekers, who have
been called a range of things, of which the most complimentary is probably ‘adventurers’. They,
however, referred to themselves as ‘the Society of travellers’.
The group was not homogeneous10, but included J.C. Haller von Hallerstein, C.R. Cockerell, John
Foster, M. von Stackelberg and the Dane P.O. Brøndsted.11
The individual participant’s reasons for travelling around during the Napoleonic Wars were as
different as pure academic interest, architectonic inspiration, painting and simple greed, but the
spirit which bonded the group was a mix of it all.
The group was formed at Rome in 1808 and their first big success was at Aegina, where they in
the spring of 1811 found a range of pediment sculptures by the Athena Aphaia temple. The
sculptures were ‘bought’ from the locals for the sum of £4012 and as fast as possible sailed to the
island of Zante. They were later sold to Prince Ludwig of Bavaria (for £600013) and formed the
nucleus for the collection at the Glyptotek at Munich.
On the hunt for further treasure, the group continued Bassae in august of 1811. Their visit was cut
short when the local ‘arcont’ stopped it at the beginning of September. The Ottoman governor, Veli
Pasha, was away and without his approval they could not continue. The project was thus postponed
till the following year.14
But the trip was not without success. In Cockerell’s own words: Haller had engagements, which I had got
him, to make four drawings for English travellers. I made some of my own account, and there were measurements to be taken and
a few stones moved for the purpose, all of which took time.15 Apart from Cockerell and Haller, Stackelberg also
completed a series of drawings and it was the works of these gentlemen, which in the following years
provided the public with the first visual glimpses of the Apollo Temple at Bassae, even if – once again
– it was with some delay.
The drawings were, however, not the only important outcome. Of even greater importance was
the discovery of a frieze under the ‘confused heap’ inside the temple’s -still standing – columns. The
story cut to the essence, Cockerell saw a fox disappear into a hole in the middle of the pile of ruins.
10
Cooper p.15 for an overview of the group’s composition at various times between 1810 and 1814.
11
Ibid. p.16-31 for a detailed review of the member’s lives.
12
Ibid. p.1416.
13
Cockerell p.49.
14
Hofkess-Brukker, C. & Mallwitz, A. p.10
15
Cockerell 2008 p.30.
5
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
He stuck his head in and saw and saw a marble relief.16 He covered his find in order not to alert the
locals that there was anything of value, but the following year the group decided to return to Bassae
in order to attempt an excavation. This time they got official permission to excavate and even
permission to remove (and sell) any valuable finds on the condition, that Veli Pasha was paid half the
returns.17
Permission in hand, they proceeded to clear the temple platform of the heap of debris, so they
could get to the frieze that Cockerell had seen, as well as they were hoping to find pediment
sculpture. Even if they did have some interest in the architectonic details, the ’excavation’ was an
anything but scientific affair, which consisted of local workers simply moving the heap of ruins from
inside the peristyle to outside the peristyle. Stackelberg himself has caught the spirit of the
excavation in the drawing shown as Fig. 2, in which it is clear that tender care is not the highest
priority.
Stackelberg himself refers to the drawing as: Auf dem Hauptplatze (s. die Titelvignette) bildete ein über Pfäle
ausgespanntes Arcadisches Zelttuch das Versamlungs- und Speishaus, in dem Dorische Capitale und andere Fragmente des
Tempels als Tisch und Sitze dienten.18
The valuable frieze was, however, treated with more respect. In the words of Stackelbergs: Mit
gröfster Vorsicht wurden alle, auch die kleinsten Fragmente, aufgelesen und so ging von ihnen nichts verloren, was die
Verwitterung nicht schon gänzlich aufgelöst hatte.19 But over and above the frieze, the clearing of the temple
also revealed a range of other – surprising - finds, which did not escape the attention of the
travellers.
16
Stackelberg p.13.
17
Ibid.
18
Stackelberg p.16.
19
Ibid. p.17.
6
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
It had from the outset been clear that the temple’s peristyle was Doric, but a number of Ionic
capitals also emerged, with matching column parts. Even more surprising was, however, the find of a
Corinthian capital. It soon became clear that there was more to the Apollo Temple at Bassae than the
– in its own right spectacular – frieze.
Inside the cella building it became clear, that the Ionic columns were a kind of half-columns,
integrated at the end of spur walls short seated perpendicular to the cella building’s outer walls. It
could furthermore be established, that the cella building’s long eastern wall (as the temple is
orientated north to south) had the opening for a door, which lead into the furthest end of cella.
Stackelberg could now draw the temple’s plan (Fig. 3) in a form which basically has survived till
the present day.
The plan discloses the unique design, which still fascinates. That the temple is orientated north-
south is explained by the fact that narrow outcrop of bedrock on which the temple is located, is
oblong in that direction and would not allow for a large east-west orientated building. Pronaos is
thus located on the north-side of the temple.
The stylobate measures 14,52x38,32 m. (Hephaisteion for comparison measures 13,7x 31,77
m.)20. The Doric peristyle (made from local sandstone) is as such not spectacular21, and if it is indeed
a building of the Athenian school, then it is not surprising, that pronaos’ distyle in antis are aligned
with the second pair of columns counted from north, as well as the middle pair of columns on the
short side. It is also in line with the norms of the times, that the distance between the last pair of
columns before each corner is lightly reduced to cater for the outermost triglyphs.
It is however surprising that also opisthodomos’ distyle in antis are aligned with the second pair of
columns counted from the south. That kind of perfect symmetry is not the contemporary norm, even
if some examples can be found from the beginning of the 5th century b., for instance ’Temple A’ at
Akragas and ’Temple E’ at Selinous.22 Worth noticing is also the deep pronaos and opisthodomos,
which reduces cella proper (with adyton) till less than half of the stylobate’s length (Ictinus’
Parthenon has very narrow pronaos and opisthodomos without antes).
The metopes on the outside are undecorated, but there are decorated metopes, in marble, over
the entry to both pronaos and opisthodomos23. Fragments of these were also found during the 1812
20
Spawforth p. 156, 137.
21
Neer p.311 claims, that the Doric columns in the peristyle are shorter than what was the norm at the
times. I have, however, not – through comparison with other, contemporary, Doric temples- been able to
find any proof of this claim.
22
Spawforth p. 126, 131. Both these temples also have a 6x15 plan and an adyton.
23
Lawrence p.134. This is typical Peloponnesian style and points away from an Athenian architect.
7
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
excavation.24 Where the contemporary Athenian temples were subject to experimental exterior
decoration25, the design at Bassae follows a more conservative scheme on the exterior decoration,
but the conservative approach comes to an abrupt halt as soon as we move through pronaos and
into cella itself.
The experience when one, in the temple’s prime, moved into cella must have been both different
and overwhelming. Rather than the ‘normal’ experience of a cella segmented into (typically 3)
section with columns placed in the long direction of the room, the room at Bassae must have
provided an experience similar to that of Ramses II’s temple at Abu Simbel (see Plate 4).
Growing from the room’s long side walls come 5 short spur walls, each ending in Ionic half-
columns. To make the Ionic capitals attractive from all 3 possible viewing-angles, unique three-sided
angle-capitals have been deployed, where the capital’s volutes have been dragged out in a 45 angle
at both corners, a technique which at the same time is being attempted on the temple by Ilissos at
Athens, but which, compared to Bassae, comes across as clumsy at Athens (see Fig. 4).
The rearmost third of the room is separated from the rest by a diagonal row of columns with spur
walls protruding from the rooms side walls at a 45 angle and a single slim column with a Corinthian
capital in the middle. It is from this small adyton, that an opening lead out through the building’s east
wall.
Over this internal colonnade sits the four-sided frieze that Cockerell had first found pieces of in
1811, a unique internal placement sculpture, which completes this wholly unique design where a
simple exterior hides a complex and refined experience in the inner space. It is tempting to say that
where, for instance, the Parthenon is built to please man, the Apollo temple at Bassae is built to
please the god. A perhaps more earthbound observation is, that where the frieze on the outside of
the Parthenon can never be viewed more than one segment at the time, the frieze at Bassae is more
approachable and can be seen as a single piece from one position.
24
Cooper p.201
25
Spawforth p.142 og Lawrence p.114. On the Parthenon there is an exterior frieze around the cella
building itself, and on both the Parthenon and Hephaistaion there is an Ionic frieze above the Doric
columns by pronaos and ophistodomos.
8
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
Fig. 4: A: Cockerell’s drawing of the three-sided Ionic capital. B: The contemporary four-sided capital
from Ilissos.
The excavation also disclosed roof tiles made of marble (as described by Pausanias) and ceiling
decorations made from marble, testimony to a richly decorated, and expensive, coffer ceiling.26
Several of the expeditions members were gifted artists, and their drawings from (and immediately
following) the excavation reached the public eye through the publications they released in the
decades following. Plate 2 shows Stackelberg’s drawing of the cleared temple platform. We can here
clearly see the remains of cella’s spur walls, the angled Ionic capitals and the Corinthian capital which
stands (upside down) on the remains of the central column. Plate 3 shows Stackelberg’s
reconstruction, where it is worth noticing that he envisages a roof that is open over cella. Plate 5
shows Cockerell’s attempt at a reconstruction of the ceiling.
Den most copied drawing is, however, probably Cockerell’s reconstruction of the temple’s cella as
seen from the entrance (Fig. 5). Here we see all the temple’s peculiarities in play at the same time,
the we were meant to do. Towards the back of the room we see the column with the Corinthian
capital, and in the adyton stands a cult statue which, at sunset, is illuminated through the small
opening in the east-wall. The skylight and the domed roof is however – as the exhibited tropaion – an
expression of Cockerell’s artistic license rather than based on archaeology.
26
Cooper 1996 p.339. Cooper believes that Pausanias actually refers to the ceiling rather than the roof.
9
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
According to Cockerell it was smashed by the frustrated Ottoman soldiers on the beach,28 and was
thus lost to posterity.
The abducted frieze was subsequently sold to British Museum for the considerable sum of
£19,000,29 more than three times the amount the group had been paid for the pediment figures from
Aegina. From a modern perspective one can have split opinions about this abduction cultural
treasure, men Kenner concludes that; Damit war eines der vollkommensten Kunstwerke, das Altertum der Neuzeit
überliefert hat, vor weiterem Verfall geschützt 30 and that, at least, is one view on the matter.
As was the case previously with Bocher, it would take some time before the findings of the 1812
expedition reached the public space, even if the first public mention (of the frieze) took place in 1814
through a somewhat opportunistic announcement by Martin von Wagner, who had not actually
participated in the expedition.31 And so ended those 50 years, where much had been discovered, but
very little had reached the public at large.
27
Stackelberg p.23, Cooper p.13, 21 and Cockerell 2008 p.77.
28
Cockerell 2008 p.77.
29
Kenner p.31.
30
Kenner p. 31.
31
Hofkes-Brukker & Mallwitz p.12.
10
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
32
British Museum 1820 Preface.
33
Donaldson p.5c.
34
Blouet p.5-30.
35
Cockerell 1860 p.49.
11
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
36
Dinsmoor 1927 p.94.
37
Cooper p.66-7.
38
Kavvadivas p.174.
39
Dinsmoor 1927 p.112.
40
Ibid. P.112-3 og 120.
41
Ibid. 113.
42
Ibid. P.115
12
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
expedition had been lost (after the Greek War of Independence), but that the Greek excavation at
the beginning of the century had revealed many others as well as sorted the ‘confused heap’.
Dinsmoor here presented a range of further conclusions. Den most important was the sequence he
proposed for the frieze, men also in the area of architecture did he fire on all cylinders. He was
convinced, that the reason no pediment sculpture had been found at Bassae was, that it had been
removed during roman times. He reconstructed the pediment’s rear walls and believed he could
trace the sculptures all the way to Rome.43 He also believed that so many fragments of Corinthian
capital had been found, that there was not one, but rather three; one (as generally accepted) in the
middle and one of each of the flanking half-columns.44
Dinsmoor had planned to write at larger, consolidated, work about Bassae, he even referred to it
in his own article from 1933,45 but the work was never done, and his notes were instead, on his death
in 1973, passed to the 20. Century’s most significant researcher; Frederick A. Cooper.
43
Dinsmoor 1933 p.224.
44
Ibid. p.212.
45
Ibid. p.227 ’Dinsmoor, William B. Bassae: the temple of Apollo near Phigalia. (In preparation).’
46
Kelly p.238-49.
47
Kelly p.263
13
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
48
Ibid. p.74-5.
49
Cooper p.8-11.
50
Ibid p.7.
51
Neer p.310.
52
Spawforth p.158
14
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
Summary
Cult activity took place at Bassae since the end of the 8. Century b. and the activity increased from
around the middle of the 7. Century b. Around 625 b. a temple was constructed from wood and mud
brick with a terracotta roof.53 The temple was rebuilt around 575 b. – possibly after a fire - where an
opisthodomos was added and a new roof was fitted. The original temple was replaced by a stone
peripteros somewhere between 500 b. and 430 b. There is disagreement as to whether there were
one or two building phases, but the classic temple we know today is from the last part of the 5.
Century b.
The stone temple inherited a range of design elements from the archaic temple. This lead to a
design which was more elongated than was the norm of its time and range of unusual design choices
such as spur walls, an adyton and an east-facing side-door.
The architect of the classic temple took the opportunity to integrate these older design elements
with a range of new elements. He designed a unique three-sided Ionic capital (executed in marble,
contrary to the column’s sand stone), and he placed the first known Corinthian capital on a central
column, separating cella and adyton.
Where the architect decided on conservative exterior decoration, he revolutionised by placing a
four-sided frieze on the inside of cella, where it could be viewed from a single position.
Whom this architect was is unknown, even if researchers have attempted to prove that it is
Ictinus. Dinsmoor outright accepted, without reservations, that Ictinus was the architect.54 Carpenter
uses several pages to substantiate that Ictinus could have been in Bassae.55 Cooper does the same,
and backs the argument up with a historic presentation.56 Lawrence, on the other side takes a more
sceptical viewpoint, and notes a range of architectonic elements which point away from Ictinus.57
Despite these attempt to substantiate Pausania’s statement, we still miss the ’smoking gun’.
There is not, as is the case with the Parthenon, left written accounts or other contemporary sources
identifying the architect, and Carpenter notes that; It has been suggested that Pausanias must have been
misinformed and that the ascription of the temple to Iktinos was due to local vainglory, desirous of attaching a famous name to the
remote and little visited temple.58
Facts are that some architectonic details substantiate that Ictinus could be the architect, while
others make it less likely59. 250 years of archaeology has thus given us a detailed knowledge of the
Apollo Temple at Bassae’s architecture, but we do not know everything, so the temple is allowed to
maintain some of its mystique.
53
Cooper p.73.
54
Dinsmoor 1927 p.112.
55
Carpenter p.135-46.
56
Cooper p.
57
Lawrence p.133-34.
58
Carpenter p.143-45.
59
Carpenter p.149-58 for a complete comparison of arguments for and against.
15
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
References
Blouet, Abel. 1834. Expédition Scientifique de Morée ordonee par le Gouvernement de Français.
Deuxiéme Volume. Paris: Firmin Didot Fréres.
British Museum 1820. A description of the collection of ancient marbles in the British Museum;
with engravings. Part IV. London: The Trustees of the British Museum.
Chandler, Richard 1776. Travels in Greece o r an account of a tour made at the expense of the
Society of Dilettanti. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cockerell, Charles R. 1860. The Temples of Jupiter Panhellenius at Ægina and of Apollo Epicurius at
Bassæ near Phigaleia in Arcadia. London: John Weale.
---- --. 2008(1903). Travels in Greece. Athens: Anagnosis.
Cooper, Frederick A. 1996. The Temple of Apollo Bassitas - Volume I. Princeton: The American
School of Classical Studies at Athens.
Dinsmoor, William Bell 1927. The Architecture of Ancient Greece. London: B.T.Batsford.
---- --. 1933. The Temple of Apollo at Bassae, Metropolitan Museum Studies IV, 204-227.
Donaldson, T.L. 1830. The Temple of Apollo Epicurius at Bassae. London: Priestley and Weale.
Kavvadivas, P. 1905. Der Apollotempel von Phigaleia. Comtes rendus de congrés international
d’archéologié 171-9.
Kelly, Nancy. 1995. The Archaic Temple of Apollo at Bassai: Correspondences to the Classical
Temple, Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens 64.2, 227-
277.
Kenner, Hedwig 1946. Der Fries des Temples von Bassae-Phigalia. Wien: Frank Deuticke.
Neer, Richard T. 2012. Art & Archaeology of the Greek World - A new history, c. 2500 - c. 150
BCE.London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.
Pausanias, Pausanias Description of Greece with an English Translation by W.H.S. Jones, Litt.D.,
and H.A. Ormerod. London: William Heinemann Ltd. 1918.
Roux, Georges 1976. Karl Haller von Hallenstein Le Temple de Bassae. Strasbourg: La Biblioteque
et Universitaire de Strasbourg.
Spawforth, Tony 2006. The Complete Greek Temples. London: Thames and Hudson Ltd.
Victoria & Albert Museum. According to conversation with, and email from, Catherine Flood,
Curator of Prints, 21/5/2015, the drawing (with others) was bought from one ‘T. Thorp’ in 1914.
16
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
List of Illustrations
Front page: Stackelberg T.II.
List of Plates
Plate 1: Dodwell, Edward 1821. Views in Greece, from Drawings by Edward Dodwell Esq. F.S.A
&c., London: Rodwell and Martin.
17
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
Plates
Plate 1: Watercolour of the Apollo Temple at Bassae before the 1812 excavation.
18
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
19
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
20
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
Plate 4: Interior of the Great Temple at Abu Simbel (ca. 1264 b.).
21
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
22
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
23
The Apollo Temple at Bassae.
24