The Silent Shout in Protest

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

The Silent Shout in Protest

On a night over shadowed by the great world record run from Joshua Cheptegei, it is forgivable not
to remember the raised gloved fist of Noah Lyles at the start of the 200m during last weekend’s
Diamond League competition in Monaco. The action was akin to the actions of US athletes Tommie
Smith and John Carlos on that fateful morning during the 1968 Olympic Games. Then it was a Black
power salute, and in Monaco on Friday, almost 52 years later, it was in solidarity for Black Lives
Matter, almost the same cause.

With the increased viewership and passionate followership worldwide, Sport is an obvious choice for
voices to reach a large target. The sheer numbers that tune into different sports make it attractive to
advertisers and also to people with a cause to promote or publicize. And it is so much so for the
greatest sporting showcase in the World, The Olympics. As the biggest multi sports event watched
by over 2 billion people it is a great avenue for people and companies to advertise their goods or
make their causes heard. It is even more powerful a voice when athletes themselves are the carriers
of these protests.

In 1968, as a response to the two American athletes’ public protest, the International Olympic
Committee president, Avery Brundage saw this gesture as a domestic political statement unfit for
the Olympic Games. In pressured the American Team to expel the two athletes from the Games.
Today, the IOC has Rule 50 in its charter to guard against open show of protest by athletes.

Rule 50 states: "No kind of demonstration or political, religious or racial propaganda is permitted in
any Olympic sites, venues or other areas."

However some have argued that this is gagging athletes as they have a freedom of expression clearly
defined in their recently documented Declaration of Athletes Rights. Though there is a thin balance
in preserving the neutrality and brand of the Olympics and obstructing the rights of individual
expression.

Recently, the International Paralympics Committee (IPC) have called athletes together for
consultations on protests at the Paralympic Games as societal and global events recently have really
brought injustice and racial prejudice to the fore especially in Sports.

Pressure has grown on the IOC to relax Rule 50, which bars athletes from protesting at Olympic
venues and sites during the Games, in light of worldwide demonstrations following the death of
George Floyd in the United States.The move from the IPC follows the International Olympic
Committee tasking its Athletes Commission to conduct a similar exercise amid growing pressure on
the organization to relax or abolish its Rule 50, which prohibits athletes from protesting at the
Olympic Games.

"We all know that athlete protests at the Games is something of a Pandora's Box. The last thing we
want to do is create a free-for-all at the Games where Para-athletes are free to protest on any
subject they like, including ones the wider world will find repulsive, as this will overshadow the
sporting performances. Our aim is to strike a fine balance whereby Para-athletes can raise their
views in a constructive way rather than use the Games as a platform to spread hate." said Chelsey
Gotell, the IPC Athletes' Council chairperson.
Protests on the stage of sporting events have become popular. The cases of hammer thrower Gwen
Berry and fencer Race Imboden were highlighted as part of discussions on Rule 50, with the two
athletes protesting at last year's Pan American Games in Lima.

Since August 2016, some American athletes have protested against police brutality and racism


by kneeling on one knee during the U.S. national anthem. The protests began in the National
Football League (NFL) after San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick sat and
later knelt during the anthem, before his team's preseason games of 2016. Throughout the following
seasons, members of various NFL and other sports teams have engaged in similar silent protests

IOC President Thomas Bach, who has been an advocate of athletes’ rights, has refused to rule out
allowing podium protests - although it is thought unlikely these will be allowed during the postponed
Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games - and warned of the need to differentiate between what he called
"divisive demonstrations" and suitable forms of protest.

Many sporting organizations support advocacy against injustice using their field of play. While the
English Premier league disallows the use of gestures and personal signs to highlight political beliefs
(The former French international striker played his last game for Premiership side West Bromich
Albiom FC after using a political gesture during a goal celebration), it has encouraged anti-racism
protest by supporting kneeling before Premiership games recently.

A minute’s silence at the Opening Ceremony of the Tokyo 2020 Olympics is one of the options being
considered within International Olympic Committee (IOC) circles as a compromise in relaxing Rule
50. However the debate is on and no matter what is reached, Sports has become a platform for the
oppressed to protest different forms of injustice.

So the voices of the protesters somehow would be heard…even in silence.

You might also like