Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

UMW TOYOTA MOTOR GROUP

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MANAGEMENT STAFF SR -JG14 (Supervisors & Executives)

UMWT IQH / SPLD/ RPDC KK/ RPDC KUC AISB

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL YEAR 2021 BRP ASSB SAP / BRP TBU SAP / BRP

EMPLOYEE NAME HAMDAN BIN ABDULLAH STAFF NO 10002480

DESIGNATION GROUP LEADER JOB GRADE SM

SECTION/ DEPARTMENT UTILITIES / MAINTENANCE DIVISION PLANT ADMIN DIVISION

IMMEDIATE SUPERIOR AZMIR BIN YUNUS DATE JOIN 2/24/2003

APPRAISAL SUMMARY
4.51 - 5.00 3.76 - 4.50 2.76 - 3.75 2.26 - 2.75 ≤ 2.25
Part 1 Target/ KPI 3.60 II OVERAL
PERFORMANCE Significantly
Part 2 Competency 3.30 B SCORE Outstanding Exceed Expectation Meet Expectation Below Expectation
Expectat

PART 1 S I II III IV
PART 2 P A B C D
AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDED FOR PROMOTION YES / NO IF RECOMMENDED FOR PROMOTION PLEASE PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION HERE

EMPLOYEE COMMENT & ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IMMEDIATE SUPERIOR COMMENT & ACKNOWLEDGEMENT NEXT LEVEL SUPERIOR COMMENT & ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Target setting was discussed with me YES / NO Target setting was discussed with employee YES / NO NA
If Yes , discussed & agreed date :

Signature : Signature : Signature :

Date : Date : Date :


PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PART 1 - TARGET / KPI

Employee Name HAMDAN BIN ABDULLAH Staff No 10002480

Review Period JAN 2021 - MAY 2021 Job Grade SM

2021 Part 1 Rating


Weightage
No KPI (Min-5, Max 12) Measure Achievement % Score
(%) Target Actual Rating
%
1 Cost Structural Reform Activities (ESCO) activity related to Energy 15.00% Achieve < 40 ton CO2 per Achieve < 40 ton CO2 110% 4 0.60
Saving. year. per year.
2 Cost Repair and Maintenance cost reduction from yearly budget. 15.00% Achieve > RM30K per year Achieve RM45k cost 110% 4 0.60
cost reduction. reduction
3 Process Timely updating of F-PMR material and visualize. 10.00% 70% updating and 70% updating and 100% 3 0.30
visualize. visualize.
Project 80%
Project 70%
4 Productivity Implement all Utilities department project according to plan 10.00% implementation according implementation 105% 4 0.40
schedule. to plan schedule according to plan
Late penalty or Summon for renewal of certification, license schedule
5 Regulation and 10.00% Receive = 1 case. 0 Case 100% 3 0.30
competency.
6 Safety Incident and accident case for team member and contractor. 10.00% 1 case for incident 0 Case 110% 4 0.40

7 Productivity Utilities equipment Major Break Down. 10.00% Line Stop Time (LST) < 20 0 Case 100% 3 0.30
Breakdown and production Stop <20 minutes per year. mins
8 Process Internal and External EMS Audit, ISO 14001 Audit and Tokio 10.00% 1 EAR / CAR issued for 0 EAR/CAR 100% 3 0.30
Marine Audit. internal / external audit

9 Safety Machine safety & Risk Assestment Audit. 10.00% 1 Major Non Conformance 0 Non Conformance 110% 4 0.40
Item Item

10 0 0.00

11 0 0.00

12 0 0.00

100.00% 3.60

PART 1 RATING 1 2 3 4 5 S I II III IV

Significantly Below Significantly PERFORMANCE Significantly Below


DESCRIPTION Below Target On Target Above Target Outstanding Exceed Expectation Meet Expectation Below Expectation
Target Above Target SCORE PART 1 Expectation

4.51 - 5.00 3.76 - 4.50 2.76 - 3.75 2.26 - 2.75 ≤ 2.25


QUANTITATIVE ≤ 74% 75% - 95% 96% - 105% 106% - 124% ≥ 125%

100% completion
100% completion
75% - 99% significantly ahead
QUALITATIVE: ≤ 74% completion on 100% completion ahead of the dateline
completion on the of the dateline with
Project Base the dateline with approval with approval (i.e ≥ 1
dateline approval (i.e ≥ 3
month)
months)

Full Compliance or Full Compliance or Full Compliance or


zero penalty with a zero penalty with a zero penalty with a
QUALITATIVE: Non-compliance or Partly Compliance or
standard level of medium level of highest level of Part 1 Target/ KPI 3.60 II
Compliance more than 2 penalties 1 penalty
difficulty and difficulty and difficulty and
complexity complexity complexity
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PART 2 - COMPETENCY EVALUATION FOR SR-JG 14 (Supervisors & Executives)

Employee Name HAMDAN BIN ABDULLAH Staff No

Review Period Job Grade

COMPETENCY RATING SCALE


COMPETENCY EVALUATION FOR SR-JG 14 (Supervisors & Executives) Rating Score
1 2 3 4 5
Does not meet
WEIGHTAGE required Below required Fully meets required Significantly higher Consistently exceeds
No Competency Descriptor standard of standard of standard of than required required standard % Score
% behaviour behaviour behaviour standard behaviour behaviour

1 Accomplish targeted goals within required timeline 10% 3 0.30

2 Accomplish targeted goals with expected quality of deliverables 10% 4 0.40

3 Ability to manage time and prioritise to accomplish tasks 10% 3 0.30

4 Problem solving ability 10% 4 0.40

5 Ability to contribute fresh ideas/ creativity 10% 3 0.30

6 Responds promptly with appropriate solutions on issues 10% 4 0.40

7 Communication & interpersonal skill 10% 3 0.30

8 Self initiative and commitment 10% 3 0.30

9 Cooperation & teamwork 10% 4 0.40

10 Initiative to learn new skill & knowledge 10% 2 0.20

100% 3.30

Part 2 Competency 3.30 B

IMMEDIATE SUPERIOR COMMENT

SUPERIOR NAME : DATE :

You might also like