Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Glass Ionomer Cement
Glass Ionomer Cement
Glass Ionomer Cement
Good Morning
2
INTRODUCTION
DEFINITION OF CEMENT:
McLean 1994
HISTORY
-1971:Wilson and Kent first reported it[ASPA1]
-1972:Crisp and Wilson added tartaric acid
[ASPAII]
-Methyl alcohol was added-ASPAIII
-1973:First marketable material, ASPA IV
-1975:Crisp and Abel gave luting agent , ASPA IVa
-1977:Seed and Wilson gave metal reinforced
cements
-1978: Mc Lean and Glasser gave Cermet ionomer
cements
-1982:Prosser et al gave water activated cements ,
ASPA V
9
OTHER NAMES-
Dentin substitute
Artificial dentin
10
COMPOSITION-
11
-AL2O3&SiO2:
Glass former
1:2/more by mass[ratio is crucial]
-CaF2:
Flux
Reduce temp-at which glass will fuse
Increase translucency of cement
-FLUORIDE:
Flux
Improves therapeutic value of the cement
12
-AlPO4:
Improves translucency
Add body to cement paste
-CRYOLITE[Na3AlF6]
Flux
Increase translucency of set cements
13
INDICATIONS OF GIC
CONTRA-INDICATIONS
CLASSIFICATION OF
GIC
17
*a]restorative esthetic
*b]restorative reinforced
B.ACCORDING TO SKINNER
-TYPE 1:Luting
-TYPE 2:Restorative
-TYPE 2:Restorative
-TYPE 3:Liner/Base
D.NEWER CLASSIFICATION
-TRADITIONAL GIC:
*a]Type 1:Luting
*b]Type 2:Restorative
*c]Type 3:Liners & bases
*a]Miracle mix
*b]Cermet cement
25
26
SETTING REACTION
28
-POLYACRYLIC ACID
-WATER
29
1.DECOMPOSITION OF GLASS/ION
LEACHING PHASE
Powder + Liquid mixed
CaF2 dissociates
To form
A stable matrix
32
33
APPERANCE OF THE
MIX:
-Glossy
-Adhere to tooth structure
34
APPERANCE OF THE
MIX
RIGID
OPAQUE
37
STRUCTURE OF
SET CEMENT
41
42
CEMENT
MANIPULATION
43
44
45
LOSS OF GLOSS
TEST
47
48
WORKING AND
SETTING TIME
50
-WORKING TIME[W.T]
*W.T:3-5 min
-SETTING TIME[S.T]
1]Temperature of mixing
2]P/L ratio
53
1]TEMPERATURE OF MIXING:
-WORD OF WARNING!!
2]POWDER-LIQUID RATIO
-Varnish
PROPERTIES OF
GIC
57
1.BIOCOMPATIBILITY
-GIC is biocompatible because-
-Polyacrylic acid is a weak acid
-Long polymer chains tangle to each other which prevent their
penetration to dentinal tubule
-Freshly mixed cement has a pH of 0.9-1.6[acidic]
-This might result in mild inflammation that resolves within 10
– 20 days
-GIC showed greater inflammatory response than ZoE but less
than Zn phosphate cement & other cements[Garcia et al,1981]
-Pulp response to GIC is favourable
It is used to protect mechanical/traumatic exposure of healthy
pulp
58
2.FLUORIDE RELEASE
3.FLUORIDE RECHARGE
4.THERMAL PROPERTIES
-GIC[CTE:10-14] 0.15-0.35
-TOOTH[CTE:11.4] ---
-ENAMEL 0.18
-DENTIN 0.47
65
5.ESTHETICS
OVERVIEW:
-GIC has got a degree of translucency because of its glass filler
particles
TRANSLUCENCY
*GIC has a degree of translucency
*Because its filler is a glass[opaque]
*Because of slow hydration reactions , GIC take
atleast 24 hrs to fully mature
*Early contamination with water reduces translucency
*Dark shades are less translucent
*GIC remain unaffected by oral fluids
67
-#OPACITY
*Also termed as CONTRAST RATIO[CR]
*If CR=1-MATERIAL IS OPAQUE
*If CR=0-PERFECTLY TRANSLUCENT
*To match ENAMEL CR<0.55
*GIC CR<0.9
MISC. PROPERTIES
RECENT
ADVANCES
70
*POWDER
-Glass:17.5%
-SILVER:82.5%[Particle size of silver is 3-4 micron mtr
*LIQUID
-Aq. Soln of copolymer of acrylic acid & / maleic acid:37%
-Tartaric acid:9%
72
-DISADVANTAGES:
*Poor resistance to abrasion
*Resistant to burnishing
*Poor esthetics
73
GLASS CERMET
*CONTRAINDICATIONS:
A]Ant.restoration
B]Areas subjected to high occlusal
loadings
*PROPERTIES
#Strenght:
-Both tensile & compressive strength
is greater than conventional GIC
#MOE:
-Relatively lower than conv.GIC
#ABRASION RESISTANCE
-Greater than that of conventional
GIC due to silver particles
incorporation
75