Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Final Presentation 08-06-06
Final Presentation 08-06-06
PRELUDE I
HISTORY II
ARCHITECTURE III
NAVLAKHA TEMPLE 01
GANESHA TEMPLE 02
RAMPOL GATE 03
CHHELESHWAR TEMPLE 04
VIKIA VAV 05
Ghumali is located in Jamnagar District (Lat, 21 53’ ; long 69, 46.75) It is 70 kms away
from Jamnagar and 6 kms from Bhanvad.
Once the magnificent capital of Saindhav dynasty has now shrunken to a as mall
village of a few unkempt huts and houses occupied by mix population like koli, harijan
etc. Except some farmer, the villagers are engaged as labour in factories and farms.
People of the village are living in dearth of their daily need.
The whole village is surrounded by wild bushes, babool trees and dust. It is a
desolated village.
Ghumali has no train connection – Nearest town is Bhanvad and nearest city is
Porbandar.
Roads leading to Ghumali from both the side’s are not in good shape.
History of Ghumali goes back to cir. 735 A. D. after collapse of Maitrak Kingdom
Saindhav emerges as a ruler of Western Saurashtra. It is assumed that Pusyadev was
a founder of Saindhav dynasty. He established his seat in Ghumali and ruled in
between 735 A. D. to 750 A. D. Saindhav kings ruled for 185 years. Last king of this
dynasty was Jaik. He was very brave and noble. He was on throne from 900 A. D. to
920 A. D.. No trace of Saindhav dynasty is found there after. Ghumali enjoyed its status
as capital during all this period.
There was a dark period of 70 years after 920 A. D. It comes to the light when Jethawas
came to rule over this region. Ghumali was the capital of their reign. Ranak Baskaldev
was the first king of Jethava dynasty. He came on throne in 989 A. D. Bhanaji was the
last ruler of Jethva dynasty. His rule ended in 1290 A. D. Ghumali was a capital for 555
years in medieval time. It seems that it might have been vibrating with live activities.
The magnificent remains present the picture that people were religious and happy.
People of different kind of sect might be celebrating the fairs and festivals at times.
After Bhan Jethava (1290 A. D. ) the decline of Ghumali started and it never regain its
prosperity of its glorious past.
There is no viable storey or archaeological evidence for the name `Navlakha’. There is a
traditional story that nine lakhs of rupees have been spent for its construction.
Considering the huge size of temple. The builder of this temple is also not known by any
Archaeological source or from old text. Though it’s not possible to construct such huge
temple without the patronage of ruler. It’s age can be determined only on the basis of
style and comparison of other dated temples.
This temple is dedicated to lord Shiv, hence the ruler must be disciple of Lord Shiv. After
careful observation and comparison of the other temples, Prof. Dhaky has opined that
this temple must be of last phase of 12th. Cent. A. D. Vikioji (ii) was ruler at this time.
There is a stepwell near Ghumali known as Vikia Vav. Vikioji was ruling in Ghumali in
1193 A.D. Navlakha temple also of the same period. In the absence of doubtless
evidence it is not unsafe to presume that this two magnificent structures were gift to the
people by Vikioji (ii).
3 Temporary approach roads for each monument to carry the Job Job Job 200000
matls etc.
4 Cap & Office matl required during w ork Job Job Job 50000
2 Chainpully blocks
3 T cap 4 nos 4 Nos 30000 120000
1 T cap 8 nos 8 Nos 20000 160000
3 Sliding jacks w ith horizontal & vertical combination 4 nos 5000 20000
4 Wooden ballies from 20 cm dia to 5 cm dia & 2.5 m to 6m Job Job 60000 60000
long
5 Mis. Materials like coir string, cotton roas w ire, ropes, shisham Job Job 50000 50000
w oods, troughts, buckets trekams, fabras, spindles, cosh,
storage tank etc.
Temple faces east. It stands on high jagati. (Platform) It is the highest jagati among the
other temples in Saurashtra, save Gop temple. There was a toran in front of entrance.
Toran is disappeared but two kumbhi (base) are there as an evidence of its existence,
Jagati was surrounded by asanpatt with kakshasan. Now some traces are visible.
Talman (Plan) of Navlakha temple re-sembles to the temples of Modhera and Somnath
where as Shikhar (spire) seems to be similar to Modhera and Sunak temples. The
temple is Sandhar type. Ambulatory path has three windows in three directions. Temple
consist of girbhgruh and rangmandap. Rangmandap has three entrance.
Temple is two storied. The pilasters are plain, but free standing pillars in central portion
and in antaral are ornate. This kind of carving on pillars are known in 12th. Century A. D.
There are 64 pillars and pilasters at ground floor, among them 22 are pillars and 42 are
pilasters. 48 different kind of sculptures are carved in stambhshirsha are a notable
features. This is very unique example.
Structural Analysis :
Length of the platform is 52.40 meters width is 29.8 meters and height is 2.82 meters.
Most of the lintels are cracked. Sara of the Stambha are deteriorated and frazzle.
Once the Shikhar with uru Shrung might have been looking very beautiful. Now its looks
ugly because of the disturbed stones.
In all, fifty percent of the temple is ruined. It is a mommoth work to conserve and restore
the temple.
Cracked lintels need to be removed and new should be placed as per the
original size and shape. (Plate No. 7)
After removing the load from upper part of ambulatory the roofing stones
frazzled and almost all frazzled and cracked should be removed and new
slabs should be placed.
PLATE NO.- 5B
PLATE NO.- 5A
PLATE NO.- 8
PLATE NO.- 7
GODDESS(DEFACED) GODDESS
GODDESS GODDESS
BLANCK GODDESS
FACING EAST
FACING WEST
5 Resetting the structure taken out in Item No. 4 600 cmt 3500 2100000
in L.C.M.
7 Resetting the structure taken out in Item No. 6 300 cmt 3500 1050000
incl. fastening of stones etc.
8 Prov. new ly dressed stone for missing and 270 cmt 17500 4725000
broken stones in item No.4 & 6 (Assuming
30% stones w ill be provided new )
10 Takinout & resetting of the flooring of the 540 Sqmt 3500 1890000
temple incl. prov. new ly plain dressed stones
flooring for missing portion.
7 New Cahinlink Fencing ( 1.8 mt. High) 325 Rmt 240 78000
It seems that some salvage repair is done in front part of shikhar to prevent further
damage. Door frame is also not original, however amalsarak is in a good shape but Kalas
in gone.
North side wall is repaired. West side of wall and Shkandha is eroded by wind force. South
side wall needs conservation.
Temple is small and Big stones are not used in building. Whole temple is constructed with
small stones like bricks.
Height of the temple is 10.37 meters and width of temple is 3.75 meters. Temples is
rectangular.
Choki a few meters away in front of temple is of 2.81 x 2.77 meters. Total height of choki
is 3.21 where as pillars are of 2.59 meters in height. Kuta over choki is disturbed
Asanpatta of choki is vanished.
Shikhar is defaced by erosion. All the stones need to be replaced by new stones.
Strength and compactness’ of stone should be tested in laboratory before use.
(Plate No. 1, 1A, 1B.)
Choki needs to strengthen giving proper treatment to the pillars. (Plate No. 3)
Kuta of choki should be conserved with original stones lying near to it.
Eroded stones from West and South side of wall be replaced by new stones.
North wall has developed a crack. The wall should be strengthen. (Plate No. 4)
PLATE NO.- 2
PLATE NO.- 1
6 Providing stone florring all around the temple 150 cmt 1200 180000
encl. 50% new ly dressed stones
7 Trail trench to cheques the foundation of the job job 50000 5000
temple
Rampol gate is a legendary name. No body knows the story behind, nor the archaeological
or literacy sources to know about the name.
Remains of gate gives a proof that it was an important city and capital of Saindhav kings.
The bracket is beautifully carved. The sculpture of vigorous Mahismardini attract the sight of
beholder. The elephant is a sign of prosperity where as a row of names indicates a
Saindhav rule.
Structure Analysis :
Though it is called a Ramapol gate nothing is seen except a beautifully carved bracket. So
called gate has 3 meters width. Upper portion of gate is gone.
There are three kumbhi other then the pillared brackets. There may be more doors then
usual one. The kumbhi 0.56 cms wide and 0.75 cms in height.
Identify the original stones lying around and replace in original place.
Complete the gate if original stones are recovered. (It can be determined after
removal of debris).
DETAIL OF SCLUPTURE
PLATE NO.- 2
2 Sorting out the temple stones, architectural members etc. Job Job 20000 20,000
useful for reuse in the restoration of the monument lying
nearby the monument premises.
4 Ressetting the same structure takne out on Item No.3 100 cmt 3500 350000
5 Providing new ly dressed stone for missing or broken portion 20 cmt 17500 350000
The temple suffered heavily by earthquake as well as by people. Stones of Jagati are taken
away by people. The whole temple is in dilapidated condition. Porch is gone. Fragments of
temple stones are lying scattered around.
The temple was a good example of Saindhav style. The Shikhar is broken but some
Karnkutas without lattic work are survived. Door frame is defaced. The pith of the temple
consist of Kharshila, jadambo, antari and jadambo. This is an advance stage of temple
architecture of the Saindhav period. Vedibhandh has kumbh, kalash, patt and Kapotali.
Mandovar is plain, but a gavatksh with idol at bhadra is there. Over the mandovoa most part
of the temple is disturbed.
Structural Analysis :
Jagati has Kharshila jadambo, antari, karnika, chhadya and again jadambo. Jagati measures
9.75 x 8.7 Meters. Vedibandh is made of kumbh, kalash, antarpatt and kapotah. Kumbh is
decorated with ardhratna motif. The garbhgruh measures 3.40 x 3.36 metere from inside.
Scattered stones should be collected and arranged for re use. (Plate No. 1)
Arrangement of the stone and identification should be done as per the advice of
archaeologist to save duplication of labour.
The whole temple, upto the jagati level should be dismantled. (Plate No. 1)
The temple should be re-constructed with dismantled and sorted out stones.
Mortar is not to be used. It can only be used from inside so that no outer
appearance is disturbed. This should be done only by experienced engineer.
A fence with gate to be provided around the temple at reasonable distance. This
can be useful for gardening.
DETAIL OF CEILING
PLATE NO.- 2
The step well is in a very neglected condition. Shrubs and small trees have placed their root
in the well. A new construction has emerged very near to kup. It is difficult to reach to the
entrance because of the enchroment.
Structural Analysis :
East facing step well is deep of 17.95 meters from ground level. Width of the stairs is 5
meters. 2.84 meters is the distance between all the five stories. There are 20 pillars and 20
pillasters excluding the pillars of mukhmandap. Mukhmandap has 12 pillars, Vedika asanpatta
and Kuksasana. The kumbhi is decorated with ardhratna motif. Total length of the well is 60
meters.
General clearance should be taken up all around the step well. (Plate No. 1, 1A)
Scattered stones need to be identified and arranged in a proper place. (Plate No. 2)
The stairs should be cleaned and fallen material should be brought out from the
well.
(Plate No. 3)
The broken horizontal projection in both the wall need to be replaced by new stone.
The stones of mandap are lying near to it. This should be re-erected. (Plate No. 4)
PLATE NO.-2
PLATE NO.- 1A
2 Removal of the stones fallen dow n in EQ of entrance and 20 cmt 500 10000
inside the vav.
3 Dismantling the existing structure of the entrance of the vav 40 cmt 900 36000
w hich is in dilapidated condition
4 Resetting the same structure taken out in Item No.3 40 cmt 3500 140000
5 Prov. New ly dressed stone formissing or broken portion or 50 cmt 17500 875000
eroded stones inside the vav
6 Taking out and resetting the floor of the entrance chow ky 30 sqmt 1200 36000
w ith new and old stones
7 Prov. Pointing and grouting to the w alls to strengthen the Job Job 30000
masonary
1 Construction of approach road approx. & steps (2.10 mt 3500 Sqmt 500 1750000
w ideX 1 km) and internal pathw ay by using local rough stone
2 Construction of borew ell & storage tank 1 job 15000 15000
3 Drinking w ater hut & toilet facilities 25 Sqmt 7500 187500
4 Electrial w orks 3134 sqmt 100 313400
6 Landscapping w ork 1631 Sqmt 200 326200
7 Security cabib & pump room 15 Sqmt 6500 97500
8 Chain link fencing 242 Rmt 240 58080
9 Stone Benches 15 Nos 10000 150000
10 Dust Bin 10 Nos 1000 10000
A legend is prevailed behind the name Sonkansari. There is a love story of maiden born in
Kanasara cast. A prince of state fall in love with her. It was not acceptable in those days.
However, the love wins and the story of their love became famous.
The temples are mainly divided into two groups No.1, 2 3 and then others. No.1 temple
facing east is largest. Other temples are smaller in comparison of the three east facing
temples. Temple No.4 & 5, facing west are in west row. No.6 faces north. Further at a
small distance in east No.7 and No.8 are located.
This is the largest temple among the group. It was sandhar ,standing on an oblong plan.
This is at the extreme left of the three temples facing east. The temple consists of
gndhmandap and gurbhgrih. It has compound wall with windows on three sides. Except
south-west corner the wall has suffered a lot. A very beautiful gavaksha on north wall is
collapsed.
The temple is Sandhar. The mandap and ambulatory with roof disappeared. Traces of
pillars of mandap were visible before a few years.
The temple has no basement mouidings, but the exterior wall has basement consisting of
Khuraka, Kumbha, Kalasha and kapotpalika.
Walls of the temple are plain. There is no deity in the cella, so it is difficult to say about the
dedication. There are no noteworthy features to discuss.
The spire is of five tire decorated with candrasalas. The sequence of tire is 5,4,3,2 & 1.
Karnakutas also present Amaksarak is at the top but kalash is lost.
The whole temple is built by small stones. Pillars of Sabhamandap(Closed hall) are
disappeared, but a pilaster insouth wall of ambulatory is seen. Pilaster is plain.
Exterior wall is 18.05 X 11.20 mtrs. Ambulatory space is south 1.83 , in west 1.90 and in
north 1.89./ Girbhgruh 5.57 mtrs in east and west. Width of wall in 1.3 mtrs. Opening for
the door is 1.58 mtrs.
Total height of the temple is 10.29 mtrs. Girbhgruh is hollow from top to bottom. Inner
height is 12.98 mtrs. Exterior wall though broken, the maximum height is 4.46 mtrs.
Kalasha, which is lost, but search to recover is needed, It can be replaced in original
place if found. In case of failure in search of kalash a stone should be placed to block
the hole. The new stone should be in shape of kalasha
The exterior wall should be completed. The height and course of original wall is in the
south-west corner. This should be taken as guide line. (Plate No. 1, 1A, 1B)
PLATE NO.-1C
PLATE NO.- 1A
This temple is situated at southern side of temple No.1. Temple is facing east. It is a
sandhar temple. The whole temple is disturbed. It seems that the original shape of spire is
changed since long. The temple stands on jagati hence a flight of steps is given to
mukhmandap. Extension to girbhgruh and both sides of wall are fallen. This is an
unfinished temple for unknown reasons. There are no sculptures not carving, only some
mouldings of vedica are seen at south side.
Strutctural Analysis:
The temple is longer in comparison to No.1. Except the length it cannot be compared with
No.1 temple because it is totally different on plan.
The length of the temple is 24.90 mtrs and width is 2.18 X 2.32 mtrs. Outer measurement
of girbhgruh is 3.40 X 3.30 mtrs. Width of ambulatory path is 0.92 mtrs.
The height of the temple is 6.29 mtrs including jagati. The height of girbhgruh from inside
is 4.92 mtrs.
The temple should be dismantled and reconstructed as per original plan and
elevation. (Plate no. 3)
PLATE NO.- 3
PLATE NO.- 2C
Among the three big temples, this is the third one. This is last in the row. Temple faces
east. This is a beautiful panchandka temple but surprisingly lacks carving. This is also
unfinished temple. The spire is triratha. A closed balcony is given on bhadra. The
noteworthy feature is phalana, which is provided to karna. Pro. Dhaky comments that, “This
being the earliest known example of the form which was to be universal and to develop
further in solanki temples”. Vedibandh is archic compared to tenth century temples. The
door frame is plain.
Structural Analysis :
The Temple eroded at vedibandh due to air and rain. Further the earthquake weakended
more. The cracks developed from top to bottom.
Temple measures 4.95 X 4.37 mtrs. The garbhgruh is square of 2.56 X 2.56 mtrs. The
doorway is 1.10 mtrs. The height from the outside is 9.41 mtrs and from inside it is 8.34
mtrs.
The temple has weakened from the top. It should be dismantled up to the phalana
and then reconstructed. (Plate No. 2, 2A)
PLATE NO.-2A
PLATE NO.- 2
There are 14 temples rather deri(samadhi) are located near to the main temples.
Some of them are transferred into the heap of stones due to earthquake. Other, those are
standing have no features to discuss. Most of the temples are square on plan and have a
traditional phansana shikhar. Somewhere it is decorated with candrashala in middle of the
spire. Usually there are seven tires of phanasana and then topped by pidhanphalak.
Structural Analysis:
Almost all of them are on square plan of different size. They are built by local stones.
Stones are small and dressed. It gives look like a brick. No more features to discuss.
All the temples should be demolished and reconstructed as per original plan.
(Plate No. 1 to 9)
10 Takinout & resetting of the flooring stones 300 Sqmt 3500 1050000
for all temples of the group w ith using old
and new dressed stones.
Main arrival hub for the entire group of monument at Ghumali will be close into
Navlakha Temple, however it is proposed that hap hazard and ugly encroachment near
Navlakha temple and also at Vikya Vav be removed. Tourist reception centre, toilet
facility, proper parking for buses and other vehicles, cafeteria and shops etc. are
suggested to be developed here and from this point linkages complete with signage
are to be forged to all other sites like – Son kansari group , Rampol gate, Chhleshwar,
Vikia Vav etc.
The link to Son kansari would involve quite a steep climb, consequently. The design of
treads, risers, surface treatment etc. has to be such that the climb is gentle and
smooth. Large landings after every 10 12 risers would ensure a bit of rest. Landings to
also incorporate sitting benches, shade trees etc. to allow one to sit and rest.
STONE BENCH