新闻是为了⼈⺠服务，⽽不是当权者。当新闻媒体的服务对象不是⼈⺠时，事实将会

⾛向⿊暗，消亡。现在，我们处在流媒体时代的中⼼，我们可以获取到我们想要的任
何信息，这也造成了信息漏洞，⼈⼯智能的算法，配合来⾃政府或公司的利益，操控
了⼈⺠的思想。就以美国举例，每次的⼤选，尤其是当今，电视台都会起到⼀个作
⽤，操控舆论⾛向，从⽽引导总统当选。新闻在操控舆论⾛向上更是，报道逐渐的政
治化促进了极端主义的产⽣，⺠主在这样的系统之下只会不复存在。媒体，新闻的⼒
量是巨⼤的，它们可以让⼀个国家的党派百家争鸣，混乱⾄极。在当下全球的新型冠
状病毒肺炎疫情的传播，让新闻媒介变得越发的重要，传播防疫⼼理还是传播“⾃由”
在社会舆论和利益的压迫下，让那些公司很难决定。让我们回到最开始，当⼈们获取
消息的⽅式还是报纸时，出版的⾃由权就如当今的情况⼀般，被政府所管控，阻⽌⼈
们获得真相，但只有真相才能帮助我们认知，才能帮助我们决定，才能帮助我们获取
⾃由。我认为第四权的重要性不亚于利益，因为只有真实的信息才能引领⼈们⾛向正
确的，光明的未来，⼈⺠是这个世界的组成体，因此，世界的决策权应当在⼈⺠⼿
中，⽽不是在政府⼿中。当然，正如⼀款叫“不予播出”（“Not For Broadcast”)的游戏
⼀样，新闻也应当拥有专业性，严谨性，时效性，⽽在那款游戏中展现的，新闻充满
了娱乐性，就如现在的许多媒体都在为博⼈眼球，从⽽获取收视率⽽把许多重要的新
闻放下，并播放⼀些舆论⼋卦，此时，新闻便没有了意义。但是，除了外界因素以
外，新闻⽹也应该做好⾃身，应以中⽴的⻆度报道，揭示⼀个个故事，如果报道充满
了歧视性，那么这篇报道其实则本身也不符合新闻的定义，⽽更像是是充满个⼈主义
的阐述，新闻界应该联合起来，共同促使⼈类社会进步，⽽不是反过来，攻击对⽅，
且这些攻击只是建⽴在服务政府或党派的基础上的。我不想批判任何⼀家媒体，我也
认为新闻业的未来是极为美好的，只是，我们需要有⼈捍卫那新闻的权利和⾃由，捍
卫第四权，让⼈⺠了解故事真相，清晰世界⾛向。
News is for the service of the people, not the rulers. When the news media serves
someone other than the people, the truth will go dark and die out. Now that we are at
the centre of the streaming media era, we have access to any information we want,
and this has created information gaps, arti cial intelligence algorithms that, in
conjunction with interests from governments or corporations, have manipulated the
minds of the people. In the United States, for example, every election, especially today,
television plays a role in controlling the direction of public opinion to guide the president
to be elected. The news plays an even shaping role in in uencing public opinion. The
gradual politicisation of reporting promotes extremism and democracy will only cease
to exist under such a system. The power of the media, of the press, is immense; they
can make a country partisan and chaotic in the extreme. In the current global epidemic
of the Covid-19, the press is increasingly important, and it is dif cult for companies to
decide whether to disseminate the anti-epidemic mentality or the "freedom" of the
epidemic when public opinion and interests are pressured. Let's go back to the
beginning, when people were still receiving information through newspapers, the right
to freedom of publication was, as it is today, controlled by the government, preventing
people from getting the truth, but only the truth can help us know, can help us decide,
can help us get freedom. I believe that the Fourth Estate is no less essential than pro t
because only truthful information can lead people to a right and prosperous future, and
that people are the constituents of the world, and therefore the world's decisions
fi

fl
fi
fi
 should be in the hands of the people, not the government. Of course, like the game
Not For Broadcast, the news should be professional, rigorous and timely, but in that
game, the news is full of entertainment, just as it is now. Many media outlets are putting
down many important headlines and broadcasting opinion gossip to gain attention and
thus ratings, at which point the news has no meaning. However, in addition to external
factors, news networks should also do their part by reporting from a neutral
perspective, revealing a story that, if it is discriminatory, does not in itself meet the very
de nition of journalism, but is more like a statement of individualism, and the presses
ought to join together to promote the progress of human society, not the other way
round, attacking each other, and these attacks are only based on serving the
government or the party. I don't want to criticise any of the press, and I think the future
of journalism is extremely promising, it's just that we need someone to defend the right
and freedom of the press, to defend the Fourth Estate, to let people know the truth
about stories and to clarify where the world is going.
fi