Professional Documents
Culture Documents
"The Cosmic Connection" Essay #1 Questions
"The Cosmic Connection" Essay #1 Questions
"The Cosmic Connection" Essay #1 Questions
1. The evolutionary trend that Sagan sees that eventually will lead to a global
self-identification due to these major reasons which are that with excessive development
of technology not only are they seen as a toxic substance towards the environment these
advancements are mainly for us humans. The majority of the humans in the world on a
global scale will eventually reach a point of extreme technology where the earth is no
longer needed so we live off to space or some form of futuristic idea. I believe someday
we will reach this point of time where the world will become self-identified due to the
2. Sagon firmly believes that genetics will ultimately be the greatest threat to all of mankind
including plants and other animals. Another reason he thinks that could risk the survival
of our world is the tiny physiological changes to mainly humans even though it’s thought
of as defects from genetics. The way I see it is that the greatest threat towards the survival
of our world, mainly us humans, is climate change, food security and poverty are the
main three I believe are gonna cause a major disaster in our survival.
3. One example of an organism Sagan believes is necessary to kill for the survival of
humans would be to become a vegetarian since in the minds of many others you can
practice having a diet to prevent from eating so much. On the other hand it’s necessary
for us to consume other organisms for our survival. I support his position because it
explains how us humans are supposed to live but at the same time take care of the planet
as a whole. We humans as a whole could make the decision to care for the issues that
involve humans not getting the right treatment which is the poverty part of every area in
the world.
4. I think that Sagan's ideas are more compelling as a whole due to the fact that his
explanations towards the difference between Thomas and Sagan’s thought process show
completely different opinions about how the world is affecting others around them. This
is especially true when the ideals of how we should take care of the planet is a major
factor for the future of mankind. I solely chose Sagan over Thomas mainly for the reason
that politics won’t affect the global standards compared to what the foods we eat will help
1. According to David Berreby the more exposed you are to a certain group of people at a
certain place you become accustomed to the way you think, believe, and self identify
society. In my case, I am referred to as an Asian which could mean multiple things such
as I could accidentally be called a different type of Asian like Japanese or Korean, when
I’m Chinese. This is commonly seen throughout the US especially when Asian hate is
still seen due to the 2019 covid pandemic that “started in China”. These are one of the
reasons that us humans have identified ourselves as whatever we surround ourselves with
2. Individual behavior doesn’t change your perspective on other things whereas if you were
to be interacting with new individuals that are new to seeing you, you’ll eventually learn
to adapt and listen to those around you which in turn changes your point of view on many
things. Whereas animals that are grouped together stay the same no matter how many
other animals are near them, they are still the same. Given my experience with meeting
new people, in my case students that are in the same situation as me that just graduated
high school and are just entering the life of adulthood as well as college.
3. Both essays are on edge with each other since they both talk about the disasters that us
humans have caused over the course of thousands of years. As an example from
Thomas’s essay there were people that treated each other as nothing less than animals.
Whereas Berreby’s explanations of humans are done overtime with the evolutions of
technological advancements for mainly the humans to use. Both in the end helped me see
the problems that humans in the future could cause to our planet no matter what the