Accelerat ing t he world's research.

Analysis of Multi-Storey Buildings

With shear wall I- section girder in
two shape of building
IJIRT Journal

Related papers Download a PDF Pack of t he best relat ed papers 

Behaviour of Symmet rical RCC and St eel Framed St ruct ures Under Seismic and Wind Loading
Int ernat ional Journal of Lat est Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science -IJ…

An Approach t o Lessen t he St resses in Flat Slab for Eart hquake Zone IV

Markanday Giri

Comparat ive St udy on St eel Frame Building wit h and wit hout Damper
IJT RD Journal
 © November 2019 | IJIRT | Volume 6 Issue 6 | ISSN: 2349-6002

Analysis of Multi-Storey Buildings With shear wall I-

section girder in two shape of building

Aman Sharma1, Piyush Soni2

1,2
Dept. of Civil Engineering, RKDF College, Indore (M.P)

Abstract- Extinct earthquakes events demonstrate that, High-rise structures pose particular design challenges
a building with irregularity is vulnerable to earthquake for structural and geotechnical engineers, particularly
damages. So as it's essential to spot the seismic response if situated in a seismically active region or if the
of the structure even in high seismic zones to cut back
underlying soils have geotechnical risk factors such
the seismic damages in buildings. Objective: The most
as high compressibility or bay mud. They also pose
important objective of this study is to grasp the
behavior of the structure in high seismic zone III and
serious challenges to fire-fighters during emergencies
also to evaluate Storey overturning moment, Storey in high-rise structures. New and old building design,
Drift, Lateral Displacement, Design lateral forces. building systems like the building standpipe system,
During this purpose a 10 storey-high building on four HVAC systems (heating, ventilation and air
totally different shapes like Rectangular, H-shape, and conditioning), fire sprinkler system and other things
with shear wall without shear wall are used as a like stairwell and elevator evacuations pose
comparison we also using steel plates and I-section as significant problems. Studies are often required to
column as in building. The complete models were
ensure that pedestrian wind comfort and wind danger
analyzed with the assistance of STAAD.Pro 2015
concerns are addressed. In order to allow less wind
version. In the present study, Comparative Dynamic
Analysis for all four cases have been investigated to
exposure, to transmit more daylight to the ground and
evaluate the deformation of the structure. Results & to appear more slender, many high-rises have a
Conclusion: The results indicate that, building with design with setbacks.
severe irregularity produces more deformation than
those with less irregularity particularly in high seismic 1.2 Seismic behavior in high rise building
zones. And conjointly the storey overturning moment In large and populated cities, the need to have
varies inversely with height of the storey. The storey buildings with various operational demands has been
base shear for regular building is highest compare to
in-creased. To accommodate the multiple
irregular shape buildings. Due to providing steel I-
architectural requirements, the location, orientation,
section steel girder we provision of flexible building
and dimensions of the vertical and lateral load
Index terms- Rectangular Building, H- Shape of resisting elements vary every certain number of
Building, I-section steel girders stories. In such cases, a transfer floor is commonly
used to solve this persistent structural-architectural
1.INTRODUCTION conflict.
1.1 General
A high-rise building is a tall building, as opposed to a
low-rise building and is defined by its height
differently in various jurisdictions.
It is used as a residential, office building, or other
functions including hotel, retail, or with multiple
purposes combined. Residential high-rise buildings
are also known as tower block sand may be referred
to as "MDUs", standing for "multi-dwelling unit”. A
very tall high-rise building is referred to as a Fig. 1.1seismic behaviour on high rise building (a)
skyscraper. building sway on seismic condition in height (b)
seismic effect on beam bending moment

IJIRT 148801 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN TECHNOLOGY 203

 © November 2019 | IJIRT | Volume 6 Issue 6 | ISSN: 2349-6002

3.1 Shear Wall

In structural engineering, a shear wall is a vertical
element of a seismic force resisting system that is
designed to resist in-plane lateral forces, typically
wind and seismic loads. In many jurisdictions, the
International Building Code and International
Residential Code govern the design of shear walls.

Triangular (b) IS code based (c) Uniform

1.4 Types of Irregularities:

The irregularities are of following 2 types-
1. Plan Irregularities
2. Vertical Irregularities.

2. SEISMIC LOAD ON IRREGULARITIES

Seismic loading is one of the basic concepts of

earthquake engineering which means application of
an earthquake generated agitation to a structure, Fig. 3.5Placement of shear wall
earthquake's parameters at the site-known as seismic
hazard Geotechnical parameters of the site 4. DETAILS OF BUILDING FOR ALL TYPES
Structure’s parameters Characteristics of the
anticipated gravity waves. Sometimes, seismic load Table: - 4.1Details of Building
exceeds ability of a structure to resist it without being sr.no. Elements of Building Dimension
1 Length x width: 36m X 37m
broken, partially or completely Due to their mutual 2 Number of stories: 10
interaction; seismic loading and seismic performance 3 Support conditions: Fixed +pin joint
of a structure are intimately relate. 4 Storey height: 3- 30m
5 Grade of concrete: M20
3. ANALYSIS OF STRONG COLUMN AND 6 Grade of steel: Fe500
7 Size of columns from 1-10storey: 600mm x
WEAK BEAM BEHAVIOUR 600mm
8 Size of beams: 300mm x 500mm
An earthquake resisting building is one of that has 9 Depth of foundation : 2.5 m
been deliberately designed to remain safe and suffer 10 Seismic zones-II(0.16 )
11 Importance factor I: 1.0
no appreciable damage during destructive
12 Response reduction factor: 5.0
earthquake. However, during past earthquakes, many 13 Damping ratio: 0.05
buildings have collapsed due to failure of vertical 14 Soil type medium : II
members. Hence columns in the building should be 15 Height of parapet wall: 1 m
strong and stiff so as to sustain the design earthquake 16 Thickness of main wall: 200mm
17 Thickness of parapet wall: 115mm
without catastrophic failure. 18 Wall load : 0.200x20x(3.00-0.500)=10.2kN/m
19 Parapet wall : 0.115x20x1=2.3 kN/m
20 Slab weight : 0.130x25x1 =3.25 kN/m
21 Live load :2 kN/m2
22 Floor Finish: 1.5 kN/m2
4.1 Loadings Considered
1. Dead Load- floor load, Wall load, Parapet Load
as per to IS 875 (part1).
2. Live Load- 2 kN/m2 on all the floors.
3. Earthquake Load- As perIS 1893 (part-I):2002.
Fig 3.3: Ductile Chain Analogy

IJIRT 148801 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN TECHNOLOGY 204

 © November 2019 | IJIRT | Volume 6 Issue 6 | ISSN: 2349-6002

4.4. Load Combinations

Load combinations considered are as follows:
1. 1.5(DL + LL)
2. 1.5(DL + EQX)
3. 1.5(DL - EQX)
4. 1.5(DL + EQZ)
5. 1.5(DL - EQZ)
6. 1.2(DL +LL + EQX)
7. 1.2(DL +LL - EQX)
8. 1.2(DL +LL + EQZ)
9. 1.2(DL +LL - EQZ)

Fig. 4.13 contour plate of bending moment view of

Rectangular Building with Shear wall using R.C.C
shear wall

Fig. 4.9 isometric view Diagram of Rectangular Fig. 4.293D Rendered View of H- shape of building
Building with Shear wall using R.C.C shear wall with R.C.C Shear wall

5. PARAMETERS AND DIFFERENT ASPECTS

Fig. 4.10Deflected view of Rectangular Building
with Shear wall due to (DL+LL)
OF STUDY
5.1 Storey Drift
Controlling storey sway or inter storey drift of a
building is an important aspect because
1. It prevents pounding of adjacent buildings in
urban areas.
2. It controls plastic deformation of coupling beams
within the values that can be met.
3. It restricts damage to fragile non-structural
elements, which can be costlier than the building.
4. Drift limitation provide stability of individual
columns as well as the structure as a whole.
The storey drift M according to seismic code IS 1893
(part-I):2002 in any storey due to specified designed
lateral force with partial load factor of 1.0, shall not
exceed 0.004 times the storey height.

IJIRT 148801 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN TECHNOLOGY 205

 © November 2019 | IJIRT | Volume 6 Issue 6 | ISSN: 2349-6002

B.M. My 148.476 kn- 1712.895 124.054 kn-

m kn-m m
B.M. Mz 144.915 kn- 1645.590 108.360 kn-
m kn-m m

7. CONCLUSION

Within the scope of present work following

conclusions are drawn: all cases comparison in II
zone
We also have study about the drift and displacement
of any structure, it is a displacement of one story with
Figure 4.41 Story Drift respect to other story is called story drift but in case
of story displacement, it is a displacement of all story
6. RESULT PARAMETERS displacement with respect to base of structure.
1. For all the cases considered drift values follow
The performance of shear walls is assessed for High around similar path along storey height with
rise building with shear wall and without SW maximum value lying somewhere near about the
building having 10storeysfor different shape of sixth storey.
building in common earthquake zones II. The results 2. For all the models considered displacement
obtained from analysis are given in various tables and values follow around similar gradually
figures are as follows: But using (steel plate) shear increasing straight path along storey height with
wall and also using I-section column Section column maximum value at top storey.
in both types of building in case of III and VI case
here discussion about maximum bending moment , REFERENCES
shear force , axial force , drift of building and lateral
displacement of building respectively. [1] 2017, MohdJamaluddin Danish, “Static and
Dynamic Analysis of Multi-Storey Building with
6.1 Maximum BM, Maximum SF in Beam and the Effect of Ground and Intermediate Soft
Column Storey having Floating Columns”, International
Table 5.1 Load of combination for all Zone II in Journal for Scientific Research and
rectangular building Development, ISSN: 2321-0613, Vol. 5, pp 44-
Max B.M. And Shear Force of Beam 47.
Force Rectangular Rectangular Rectangular [2] 2017, Ms.Waykule S.B,Dr. C.P. Pise, Mr. C.M.
without SW with R.C.C. with steel Deshmukh, Mr. Y.P. Pawar, Mr S.S Kadam, Mr.
shear wall plate shear
wall
D. D. Mohite, Ms. S.V. Lale, “Comparative
B.M. My 1.413 kn-m 0.881 kn-m 0.442kn-m Study of Floating Column Of Multistorey
B.M. Mz 124.07 kn-m 81.370 kn-m 81.274kn-m Building By Using Software”, International
Shear 93.319 kn-m 97.030 kn-m 96.992 kn-m Journal of Engineering Research and
Force Fy Application, ISSN: 2248-9622, Vol. 7, pp 31-38.
Max B.M. And Shear Force Of Column [3] Amin Alavi, P. Srinivasa Rao., Effect of Plan
Forces Rectangular Rectangular Rectangular
Irregular RC Buildings in High Seismic Zone.
without SW with R.C.C. with steel
KN shear wall plate shear Aust. J. Basic &Appl.Sci., 7(13): 1-6, 2013.
KN wall in KN [4] Bureau of Indian Standards: IS-1893, part 1
Axial 4398 4009.66 4398.50 (2002), Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design
Force Fx
of Structures: Part 1General provisions and
Shear 62.884 358.259 436.681
Force Fy Buildings, New Delhi, India.
Shear 64.091 328.265 124.054
Force Fz

IJIRT 148801 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN TECHNOLOGY 206

 © November 2019 | IJIRT | Volume 6 Issue 6 | ISSN: 2349-6002

[5] Bureau of Indian Standards: IS-875, part 1

(1987), Dead Loads on Buildings and Structures,
New Delhi, India.
[6] Giordano, A., M. Guadagnuolo and G. Faella,
2008. “Pushover Analysis of Plan Irregular
Masonry Buildings”. Inthe 14th world
conference on earthquake engineering. Beijing,
China, 12-17.
[7] Guleria, Abhay. "Structural Analysis of a Multi-
Storeyed Building Using ETABS for Different
PlanConfigurations." Vol. 3.Issue 5 (2014):
1481-484. International Journal of Engineering
Research & Technology (IJERT). Web. 1 May
2014.
[8] Herrera, Raul Gonzalez and Consuelo Gomez
Soberon, 2008. Influence of Plan Irregularity of
Buildings." In the14th world conference on
earthquake engineering. Beijing, China, 12-17.
[9] M.R.Wakchaure, AnantwadShirish, RohitNikam,
“Study of Plan Irregularity on High-Rise
Structures”,International Journal of Innovative
Research &Developement, Vol 1 Issue 8 October
2012.
[10] Poonam, Anil Kumar and A. K. Gupta, “Study of
Response of Structural Irregular Building
Frames to SeismicExcitations,” International
Journal of Civil, Structural, Environmental and
Infrastructure Engineering Research and.
[11] AnupamRajmani, Prof PriyabrataGuha (2015),
“Analysis of Wind & Earthquake Load For
Different Shapes Of High Rise Building”,
International Journal Of Civil Engineering And
Technology (IJCIET), vol. 2 , pp.38-45
[12] BhumikaPashine, V. D. Vaidya, Dr. D. P. Singh
(2016), “Wind analysis of multistoried structure
with T shape and L Shape geometry”,
International Journal of Engineering
Development and Research, vol.3, pp.2321-9939
[13] B. S. Mashalkar , G. R. Patil , A.S.Jadhav
(2015), “Effect of Plan Shapes on the Response
of Buildings Subjected To Wind Vibrations”,
IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil
Engineering (IOSR-JMCE), pp.80-89
[14] Dr. K. R. C. Reddy1, Sandip A Tupat (2014),
“The effect of zone factors on wind and
earthquake loads of high-rise structures”, IOSR
Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering
(IOSR-JMCE), pp.53-58

IJIRT 148801 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN TECHNOLOGY 207