This article discusses a $1.5 billion natural gas project in Peru called Camisea. The project would extract natural gas from the Amazon jungle and transport it via pipeline to fuel Peru's capital city of Lima. Supporters argue the project will provide cleaner energy, economic growth, and tax revenue. However, some organizations oppose the project due to environmental and social concerns. Lobbying by Amazon Watch caused loans for the project from the Inter-American Development Bank and US Export-Import Bank to be delayed or denied. The project faces challenges developing infrastructure in the remote jungle and addressing critics who argue it threatens indigenous tribes and the environment.
Why Is Peru One of The 17 Countries of The World With The Most Freshwater Available Per Capita But Is Currently Among The Top 30 Countries That Suffer Water Stress and Scarcity
This article discusses a $1.5 billion natural gas project in Peru called Camisea. The project would extract natural gas from the Amazon jungle and transport it via pipeline to fuel Peru's capital city of Lima. Supporters argue the project will provide cleaner energy, economic growth, and tax revenue. However, some organizations oppose the project due to environmental and social concerns. Lobbying by Amazon Watch caused loans for the project from the Inter-American Development Bank and US Export-Import Bank to be delayed or denied. The project faces challenges developing infrastructure in the remote jungle and addressing critics who argue it threatens indigenous tribes and the environment.
This article discusses a $1.5 billion natural gas project in Peru called Camisea. The project would extract natural gas from the Amazon jungle and transport it via pipeline to fuel Peru's capital city of Lima. Supporters argue the project will provide cleaner energy, economic growth, and tax revenue. However, some organizations oppose the project due to environmental and social concerns. Lobbying by Amazon Watch caused loans for the project from the Inter-American Development Bank and US Export-Import Bank to be delayed or denied. The project faces challenges developing infrastructure in the remote jungle and addressing critics who argue it threatens indigenous tribes and the environment.
This article discusses a $1.5 billion natural gas project in Peru called Camisea. The project would extract natural gas from the Amazon jungle and transport it via pipeline to fuel Peru's capital city of Lima. Supporters argue the project will provide cleaner energy, economic growth, and tax revenue. However, some organizations oppose the project due to environmental and social concerns. Lobbying by Amazon Watch caused loans for the project from the Inter-American Development Bank and US Export-Import Bank to be delayed or denied. The project faces challenges developing infrastructure in the remote jungle and addressing critics who argue it threatens indigenous tribes and the environment.
Peruvian government : Organisation against / Reason : Lobbying by the greens Pluspetrol : Organisation for / Reason : Peru's government awarded a licence to develop the field to an "upstream" consortium. Amazon Watch : Organisation for / Reason : benefits are huge and that any social and environmental costs can be minimised Inter-American Development Bank : Organisation for / Reason : Because of the lobbying, led by Amazon Watch put off a decision on a $75m loan for the pipeline US Import-Export Bank : Organisation for / Reason : Because of the approval by the IDB might unlock another loan, of $200m, for the "upstream" consortium 2. Choose : 1, 2, 3, 5 3. Summary This article provides information about a $1.5 billion project, which if it goes ahead should turn Peru from an importer of fuel into an exporter called Camesea project. The first main idea of the article is about this project’s benefit. After negotiations, natural gas from the Amazon jungle looks finally set to reach Peru's capital by next August. Camisea has huge gas reserves, more than enough to supply Lima for many years. Besides, Camisea project is going to provide cleaner, cheaper energy for local consumers, as well as exports. According to the IDB, the project would add 0.8 percent a year to Peru's GDP over its 30-year life. It should generate tax revenues of up to $200m a year, and will help the poorest areas, the Peruvian economy minister said. Seeing many advantages from this project, many organisations have the actions in order to gain profits from it, which leads to the second idea : the actions of organisations. The first actions came from lobbying of Amazon Watch, after that it caused the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) to put off a decision on a $75m loan for the pipeline. Approval by the IDB also unlocked another $200m loan for the "upstream" consortium of the United States Export-Import Bank. Unfortunately, Camiseа itself is deep in the Peruvian jungle. Its opponents claim that the project threatens tribes of Amazon Indians, rare species and the rainforest and endanger marine.There are no access roads so workers and supplies are helicoptered in. Jungle will soon cover over the scars left by construction work. Lobbying by the greens has forced the government and the developers to take precautions. It makes Amazon Watch mad, they claim massive soil damage is taking place along the pipeline and they also oppose the planned location of the export terminals. These are close to the Paracas marine but in an area already damaged by industry. Without the loans, Camisea may still go ahead. But the project would take longer and might finish up having less money to spend on protecting the environment. Some organisations can help, but Peruvians think it should be for Peru to decide whether and how to make best use of its natural resources. 4. Best detail One of the details in the article that impress me is “Some organisations can help, but Peruvians think it should be for Peru to decide whether and how to make best use of its natural resources.” The reason is that it shows the right perspective on how to use the country's natural resources. Peru has many advantages in oil, but because of that advantage, many organizations and countries intend to use them in the name of benefiting people, but actually want to bring personal benefits. So they gathered to tear and use those resources, but in my opinion the best thing is to let the Peruvian people and the Peruvian government use them for their own purposes. That property belongs to their territory, they have the right to decide what to do and what to use for the best life of citizens. The government and the people know what they are lacking, what they need and will use them for the common goal of their country. If they need help, they will proactively ask other organizations and countries for help. However, that request for help should be from the government and people of Peru, not from the motives of other countries with bad intentions.
Why Is Peru One of The 17 Countries of The World With The Most Freshwater Available Per Capita But Is Currently Among The Top 30 Countries That Suffer Water Stress and Scarcity