Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assignment 3
Assignment 3
CON101/AS3
3
CON101 Assignment 3
Weighting: 35%
Learning outcomes
This assignment assesses the following learning outcomes:
LO3: Describe the relevance of key statutes and regulations to the NZ construction industry.
LO4: Explain the legal standing of the Treaty of Waitangi, establishing its impact on the
construction industry.
Instructions
• This assignment is divided into ten tasks. Submit all your answers in one document.
• Create a header with your name, student number and assignment number, and number
your pages.
• Write the name and number of the task you are answering.
Submission
Submit your work through the online assessment submission link. Upload your assessment,
then use the Save and Submit assessment buttons. You will get an electronic receipt and your
work is then logged and tracked through our system. Assessments emailed directly to
lecturers will not be accepted.
Please note:
This assignment has a suggested word count for each task. These are just
a suggested guide for the length of answer required.
To complete this task, you need to write an explanation in your own words about:
• what each of these two acts do
• what each of the two acts effect is on the construction industry and on construction
projects.
Word guide: 100+
[10 marks]
Task 1 0-2 marks 3-4 marks 5-6 marks 7-8 marks 9-10 marks
A written Poor attempt with An attempt at Good explanations Accurate Excellent
explanation of: little or no explaining what the of what the treaty explanations of what explanations of what
• what the Treaty explanation treaty was set up to was set up to do and the treaty was set up the treaty was set up
of Waitangi Act provided. do and when and when and why it was to do and when and to do and when and
1975 was set up why it was amended. amended. why it was amended. why it was amended.
to do
• when and why
The Treaty of
Waitangi Act
1975 was
amended
CON101/AS3
Task 2 0-2 marks 3-4 marks 5-6 marks 7-8 marks 9-10 marks
A written Poor attempt with An attempt at Good explanations Accurate Excellent
explanation of Part little or no explaining what the of Part 1, section 7 explanations of Part explanation of Part 1,
1, section 7 of the explanation treaty was set up to of the Heritage New 1, section 7 of the section 7 of the
Heritage New provided. do and when and Zealand Pouhere Heritage New Heritage New
Zealand Pouhere why it was amended. Taonga Act 2014. Zealand Pouhere Zealand Pouhere
Taonga Act 2014. Taonga Act 2014. Taonga Act 2014.
CON101/AS3
Task 3 0-6 marks 7-12 marks 13-18 marks 19-24 marks 25-30 marks
Resource
Management Act
1991
A written No or poor attempt A poor attempt at An attempt at A good explanation Explains fully what
explanation about: at explaining what explaining what the explaining what the of what the RMA the RMA does.
• what the RMA the RMA does. RMA does. RMA does. does. Clearly outlines the
does Doesn’t outline the Doesn’t outline all Attempts to outline a Outlines some differences in
• why there are differences in the differences in few differences in differences in council requirements
differences in the council requirements council requirements council requirements council requirements for RMA.
requirements of for RMA. for RMA. for RMA. for RMA.
the RMA for city Clearly explains how
councils and for No or poor Incomplete Attempts to explain Explains how to find to find out about
regional explanation of how explanation of how how to find out out about non-listed non-listed activities.
councils. to find out about to find out about about non-listed activities.
• what you must non-listed activities. non-listed activities. activities. Gives a clear account
do if the activity Explains the impacts of the impacts of the
you want to carry Poor explanation of Poor explanation of Begins to explain the of the Treaty of Treaty of Waitangi.
out isn’t clearly the impacts of the the impacts of the impacts of the Treaty Waitangi.
identified as Treaty of Waitangi. Treaty of Waitangi. of Waitangi.
either a permitted Lists four or more
or prohibited Lists four Acts that Acts that would
activity in the Lists none or one Lists two Acts that Lists three Acts that would impact the impact the
district or Act that would would impact the would impact the development of land development of land
regional plan. impact the development of land development of land that is on the that is on the
development of land that is on the that is on the foreshore with a foreshore with a
that is on the foreshore with no or foreshore with an good explanation of clear explanation of
foreshore with no or poor explanation of explanation of why why they would why they would
poor explanation of why they would
CON101/AS3
• how The Treaty why they would impact the they would impact impact the impact the
of Waitangi also impact the development. the development. development. development.
has an impact on development.
the RMA. what
section 8 of the
RMA is about.
• at least four Acts
that would
impact the
development of
land that is on
the foreshore of
Lake Rotorua
and explain what
effect each of
these Acts has.
CON101/AS3
Task 4 0-2 marks 3-4 marks 5-6 marks 7-8 marks 9-10 marks
The Building Act
2004
A written Provides no, to little Only provides a poor Either writes one Gives good Explains fully why
explanation about: explanation of the explanation of the part in full but with explanation of why the council came to
• Why the council three situations with three situations with less good the council came to their decision with
came to the little to no reference little reference to the explanations of the their decision with reference to the
decision. to the Building Act. Building Act other two parts or some reference to the Building Act.
only gives partial Building Act.
• What the
answers to all three
neighbour could Gives a clear account
parts.
do in that Gives a useful of what might be
situation to avoid Some reference to account of what done to avoid
demolishing the the Building Act. might be done to demolition of the
sleepout. avoid demolition of sleep out and how it
• How the sleepout the sleep out and might have been
might have been how it might have designed differently.
designed and been designed
built differently differently.
to avoid this
problem.
CON101/AS3
Task 5 0-2 marks 3-4 marks 5-6 marks 7-8 marks 9-10 marks
Health and Safety
at Work Act 2015
A written No attempt or poor An attempt at Good attempt at Good explanation of Excellent
explanation about attempt at explaining explaining the types explaining the types the types of harm explanation of the
what happens with the types of harm of harm regarding of harm regarding regarding site types of harm
an accident on site regarding site site accidents as site accidents as accidents as regarding site
including each of the accidents as identified by identified by identified by accidents as
following: identified by WorkSafe. WorkSafe but WorkSafe. identified by
WorkSafe. doesn’t cover WorkSafe.
• the types of harm
everything.
regarding site Explains one or two Good explanation,
accidents as No attempt or a poor of the actions not all the actions Clear, excellent
identified by attempt at explaining covered that need to Explains some of the covered that need to explanation about the
WorkSafe one of the actions be taken to notify actions covered that be taken to notify actions that need to
• the actions that covered that need to WorkSafe after a need to be taken to WorkSafe after a be taken to notify
need to be taken be taken to notify workplace accident notify WorkSafe workplace accident WorkSafe after a
to notify WorkSafe after a has occurred. after a workplace has occurred. workplace accident
WorkSafe after a workplace accident accident has has occurred.
workplace has occurred. occurred.
No timeline of how Good explanation of
accident has soon you should how soon you should Excellent
occurred and No timeline of how notify Work Safe Inaccurate timeline notify Work Safe explanation of how
how soon you soon you should after an incident. of how soon you after an incident. soon you should
should notify notify Work Safe should notify Work notify Work Safe
them after the after an incident. Safe after an after an incident.
incident. incident.
CON101/AS3
A written Poor attempt: Some information Most of the Good attempt. All or Excellent. All
explanation about: Minimal or no provided but information provided majority of the information provided
• the relevance of attempt at finding incomplete or is correct but could information provided about the due
the Companies required information. incorrect. be explained more is correct. diligence process and
Act 1993 to the clearly to Explanation is good responsibility of
construction demonstrate and and demonstrates Director is correct and
industry. understanding of some understanding thorough.
responsibilities. of responsibilities.
• the protections
the Companies
Act 1993 may
give, keeping in
mind that most
building
contractors and
designers are
small businesses
with 2–5 staff.
CON101/AS3
Task 9 0-2 marks 3-4 marks 5-6 marks 7-8 marks 9-10 marks
Electricity Act 1992
Plumbers,
Gasfitters, and
Drainlayers Act
2006
A written explanation Poor attempt: Little or Acceptable. Some Most of the Good attempt. Most of Excellent. The
about: no attempt to address information may be information is correct the information information clearly
the different classes of missing or incorrect. and demonstrates and provided is correct. identifies the duties
• what the
registration/licensing or The classes of understanding of the Explanation is good each class of
Electricity Act
limitations on tasks registration/licensing different classes of and identifies the registration/licensing is
1992 does
permitted. have been addressed registration/licensing. duties each class of permitted to undertake.
• what the Plumbers, but the limitations on registration/licensing is
Gasfitters and tasks permitted have permitted to undertake.
drainlayers Act not been adequately
2006 does covered.
• the effects of each
Act on the
construction
industry.
CON101/AS3