Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan Indonesia

Indonesian Journal of Medicine and Health

Journal homepage: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JKKI

The Examination of mecA gene in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus


aureus (MRSA) and inappropriate antibiotic use from healthcare workers
and communities in Banyumas
Metta Ayu Susanti1, Gembong Satria Mahardhika1, Lantip Rujito2, Anton Budhi Darmawan3, Dwi Utami
Anjarwati4*
1
Biomedical Master’s Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto, Indonesia
2
Clinical Genetic of Anatomy Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto,
Indonesia
3
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman-
Margono Soekarjo Hospital, Purwokerto, Indonesia
4
Microbiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto, Indonesia
Original Article
ABSTRAC T
A RTIC L E I N FO Background: Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has
become a major pathogene and its incidence continues to increase in
Keywords:
antibiotics, MRSA, various countries. The resistance to methicillin is caused by the mecA
healthcare workers, gene that encodes the expression of Penicillin Binding Protein 2a (PBP2a)
community so it has a low affinity for beta-lactam antibiotics. One of the factors that
*Corresponding author: can increase the incidence of MRSA is inappropriate antibiotics use.
dwi.anjarwati@unsoed.ac.id
Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify the presence of the
DOI: 10.20885/JKKI.Vol11.Iss3.art7 mecA gene in MRSA and compare the history of inappropriate antibiotics
History: use in healthcare workers and the community in Banyumas.
Received: November 4, 2019
Accepted: December 30, 2020 Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducting 120 samples from
Online: December 31, 2020 nasal swab. Isolates of MRSA tested by bacteriological examinations and
Copyright @2020 Authors. PCR of the mecA genes. History of antibiotic uses assessed by using a
This is an open access article questionnaire, then analysed descriptively and by using Fisher Exact test
distributed under the terms (SPPS, version 20).
of the Creative Commons At-
tribution-NonCommercial 4.0
Result: One sample of S. aureus from microbiology examination (0.83%)
International Licence (http:// was an MRSA nevertheless there was no mecA gene which was identified by
creativecommons.org/licences/ using the PCR method. A total of 66.1% of healthcare workers and 88,3%
by-nc/4.0/). of community use antibiotics inappropriately. The results show that there
is a statistically significant difference in the history of irrational use of
antibiotics (p˂0.05).
Conclusion: The number of community who use inappropriate antibiotics
was more than the health workers. Furthermore, one MRSA strain with a
negative mecA gene found in Health workers group.
Latar Belakang: Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) telah menjadi patogen utama dan
angka insidensinya terus meningkat di berbagai negara. Resistensi terhadap methiciline disebabkan
karena S.aureus memiliki gen mecA yang menyandi ekspresi dari Penicillin Binding Protein 2a (PBP2a)
sehingga memiliki afinitas yang rendah terhadap antibiotik beta-laktam. Salah satu faktor yang dapat
meningkatkan insidensi MRSA adalah penggunaan antibiotik tidak rasional
Tujuan Penelitian: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui keberadaan gen mecA pada MRSA dan
membandingkan riwayat penggunaan antibiotik pada tenaga kesehatan dan masyarakat di Banyumas.

257
Metode: Penelitian ini adalah penelitian cross- element in hospital care has the longest contact
sectional dengan jumlah sampel 120 yang with patient.7 Meanwhile in CA-MRSA, one of
didapatkan dari nasal swab responden. Isolat MRSA the risk factors is inappropriate antibiotic use.8,9
diperiksa menggunakan pemeriksaan bakteriologi
From the explanation above, the author saw
dan PCR gen mecA. Riwayat penggunaan
antibiotik didapat dengan menggunakan kuisioner, the need to do a study on examination mecA
kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif dan dengan gene on MRSA and history of inappropriate
menggunakan uji fisher Exact (SPSS versi 20). antibiotic use in healthcare workers in hospitals
Hasil: Satu sampel (0,83%) diidentifikasi sebagai and general population in Banyumas. This
MRSA meskipun dengan pemeriksaan PCR tidak study was needed as a depiction of antibiotic
ditemukan adanya gen mecA. Sebanyak 66,1% resistance carrier incidence based on antibiotic
tenaga kesehatan dan 88,3% masyarakat tidak
menggunakan antibiotik secara bijak. Hasil
exposure intensity. Therefore, author can give
menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan riwayat scientific information about the need to use
penggunaan antibiotik tidak bijak yang signifikan antibiotics appropriately to healthcare workers
secara statistik (Nilai p˂0,05). and general population.
Kesimpulan: Jumlah masyarakat yang menggunakan
antibiotik tidak bijak lebih banyak dibandingkan METHODS
tenaga kesehatan. Satu strain MRSA ditemukan pada Research design
kelompok tenaga kesehatan dengan gen mecA negatif.
This study was a cross-sectional study aimed
INTRODUCTION to picture mecA gene examination on MRSA and
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is gram- history of antibiotic use on healthcare workers
positive, coccus-shaped bacteria which is the and general population in Banyumas.
normal flora of human’s nares anterior and
Study subjects
skin.1 In 1961, S. aureus resistant to methicillin,
The sample was gathered from 120
or which is now known as Methicillin-Resistant
samples totally, which consist of 60 healthcare
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), was found. The
workers in Rumah Sakit TK III Wijayakusuma
resistance happened because S. aureus has
Purwokerto and 60 general population in RW 5
mecA gene which codes Penicillin Binding
Kelurahan Kranji Kecamatan Purwokerto Timur
Protein 2a (PBP2a) which has low affinity for
Kabupaten Banyumas. The inclusion criteria
beta-lactam antibiotics.2,3
were healthcare workers, defined as nurses who
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
worked at Rumah Sakit TK III Wijayakusuma
(MRSA) infection keeps on increasing in
Purwokerto, and general population in RW
many parts of the world. Methicillin-Resistant
5 Kelurahan Kranji Kecamatan Purwokerto
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is found to be
Timur Kabupaten Banyumas, between 30-55
the main pathogene in developing countries
years old, and were ready to be respondents.
and is one of the causes for Healthcare-
The age range was selected in relation to the
Associated Infections (HAIs).4,5 Asia is one of
age homogeneity of the two sample groups.
the continents with highest MRSA level, both
Meanwhile the exclusion criteria were those
from the community (CA-MRSA) and hospital
with upper respiratory tract infection and had
(HA-MRSA). The estimation number for MRSA
severe mental disorders and not cooperative.
is 28% in Hongkong and Indonesia.6 Previous
study in Banyumas region showed that 25%
Measurements
nurses in government’s hospital and 15%
The data on inappropriate antibiotic use
nurses in private hospitals were carriers of
was gathered using a modified questionnaire
HA-MRSA. One of the factors which increases
from Pulungan (2011).9 The validity test of
HA-MRSA incidence is a direct contact with the
the questionnaire using the Product Moment
MRSA carrier, where a nurse as an important
Pearson showed the value of all statement items

258
was > 0.361. This showed that all statement Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research Coorp), as
items were valid. Meanwhile, the Cronbrachs used in previous studies.14 Then, mecA gene
alpha value on the reliability test showed > 60 was amplified using the forward primer:
(reliable). This questionnaire had 6 questions 5’-TGGCTATCGTGTCACAATGC-3’ and the reverse
about antibiotic use in the last one month, the primer: 5’-CTGGAACTTGTTGAGCAGAG-3’.15
type of antibiotic used, how long they were used, DNA isolation mixture composition for 1 time
source and how the antibiotic was collected. solution was performed as follows:
The criteria of appropriate antibiotic used in Master Mix : 6,5 µl
this study based on Permenkes (2015): narrow-
Primer forward mecA : 1 µl (0.01 pmoles/ul)
spectrum antibiotic use, tight indication and
Primer reverse mecA :1 µl (0.01 pmoles/ul)
adequate dosage, interval and length of time
it was given.10 Wate : 3,5 µl
DNA Sampel :1 µl (7.50 ng/mL )
Laboratory analysis
Identification of S.aureus Denaturation initial was done in 94°C for
The sample was collected using nasal swab by 10 seconds, denaturation for 1 minute in 94°C,
inserting sterile cotton swab into respondent’s annealing for 30 seconds in 58°C, elongation
right nares anterior around 2 cm deep and for 1 minute in 72°C is maintained for 30 cycles,
rotated 3 times. The cotton swabs were then and the last elongation was done in 5 minutes
dipped into amies (OXOID) as transport media under 72°C, then the reaction was maintained
before being sent to Laboratory to be planted in in 4°C. The amplification product was visualized
MSA media and incubated for 24 hours in 37°C by electrophoresis using a 2% agarose gel. The
under anaerobic condition.11 Colony growth positive control was MRSA and negative control
result after 24 hours which were round, convex, was H2O in this study. Methicillin-Resistant
smooth-surfaced, and whitish with tender Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was identified
concentration were then selected.12 A Gram if gene mecA could be found in 304 bp.
staining examination was done to determine
the colony cell morphology of S. aureus which Statistical analysis
had a Gram positive cocci in grape-like clusters, Data analysis on examination mecA gene as
therefore, confirmed coccus shaped with Gram well as history of inappropriate antibiotic use
(+). Catalase and coagulase test was concluded on healthcare workers and general population
to determined the existence of S. aureus. was done by the help of a software called SPSS
ver.20 for windows. Fisher Exact test was
Identification MRSA performed to data analysis. Data resulted from
Assessment of antibiotic sensitivity was done the questionnaire then went into editing, coding,
using cefoxitin 30 µg by disc diffusion (Kirby entry, and cleaning process. Demographic data
Bauer) method. Based on Clinical Laboratory of the subyek such as gender, age, education
Standard Institute (CLSI) 2019.13 MRSA bacteria and profession was described in table form.
is identified if there’s restricted growth zone
<21 mm in diameter, which indicated that S. Ethical clearance
aureus was resistant to the antibiotic tested. The Medical Research Ethics Commission
of FK Unsoed stated that the research protocol
Identification of the mecA gene in MRSA by had complied with the ethical rules contained
PCR in the 2008 Helsinki Declaration and could
DNA from pure culture result from be implemented. Ethical Approval Ref:1491/
incubation in MSA media was extracted using KEPK/III/2019.
the protocol of Quick DNA Fungal/Bacteria

259
RESULTS respondents was 41-50 years (54.2%). Most of
In this study, the total sample was 120 people the education level of health workers in hospitals
consisted of 60 healthcare workers and 60 people is undergraduate, while in the community most
from general population. Demographic data are SMA. Professions in community vary, but the
was shown in Table 1. Gender was dominated largest number are housewives.
by women (77.5%). Age group of the most

Table 1. Respondent Demographics (N = 120)


N
Characteristics Healthcare
Community %
Workers
Man 21 6 22.5
Gender
Woman 39 54 77.5
30-40 29 7 30
Age (years) 41-50 27 38 54.2
51-55 4 15 15.8
No study 0 1 0.8
Elementary 0 11 9.2
Education Secondary 0 17 14.2
High 6 24 25
Bachelor 54 7 50.8
Employee 60 4 53.3
Entrepreneur 0 9 7.5
Profession Worker 0 5 4.2
Housewife 0 42 35
Farmer 0 0 0

Identification of S.aureus into golden yellow. Samples then underwent


Out of 120 samples examined, 53 samples gram test, catalase test, and coagulation test,
(24 healthcare worker samples and 29 general result for these tests can be seen in Table 2. It
population samples) showed colony growth can be concluded that there were 7 samples
result in MSA media as follow: big-round form, identified as S. aureus (5 healthcare workers, 2
smooth-surfaced, flat-edged, and they changed general population).
mannitol salt agar (Minipore corp.) media color

Table 2. Gram, catalase and coagulase examination results


Examination Result Healthcare Workers Community %
Positive 24 29 100
Gram
Negative 0 0 0
Positives 24 29 100
Catalase
Negative 0 0 0
Positives 5 2 13.2
Coagulase
Negative 19 27 86.8

260
Antibiotic Resistance Test growth zone ≤21 mm was identified as MRSA,
As many as 7 samples successfully identified which was shown in sample 1.20 with only
as S. aureus then underwent antibiotic resistance 10 mm restricted growth zone. The sample
test using cefoxitin 30 µg. Sample with restricted observation result can be seen in Table 3.

Table 3. Antibiotic Resistance Test


Sample Code Growth inhibition diameter Result
1.9 30 mm MSSA*
1.15 31 mm MSSA
Healthcare Worker 1.20 10 mm MRSA**
1.50 24 mm MSSA
1.51 30 mm MSSA
2.13 24 mm MSSA
Community
2.44 34 mm MSSA
*MSSA : Methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus; **MRSA: Methicillin Resistant
Staphylococcus aureus

Table 3 showed that, one strain of MRSA was (MRSA) sample was then examined for mecA
found in the healthcare group at the hospital. gene detection. The result show that absorbance
While S.aureus found in the community was in A260/A280 wavelength was 1.500 (dsDNA
sensitive to test antibiotics. concentration was 7.50 ng/ml). PCR examination
result on MRSA sample did not find any band in
Identification of the mecA gene 304 bp (Figure 1).
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Figure 1. The mecA gene. PC: Positive Control (Clinical MRSA


strain 3809); NC : Negative Control (H2O); S: Sample (MRSA 1.20)

History of Antibiotic Usage the last 1 month. Antibiotic used in the last 1
The questionnaire result showed that 15 month in healthcare workers group were
healthcare workers respondents and 7 general amoxicillin, cefadroxil, metronidazole, cefixime,
population respondents used antibiotics within and ciprofloxacin, while general population used

261
amoxicillin and cefadroxil. The questionnaire respondents and 88.3% general population
result show that the respondence mostly use respondents were shown to use antibiotics
antibiotics for inflammation and commond inappropriately. Bivariate analysis was done to
cold, followed by fever, urinary tract infection analyze differences in antibiotics use history
and upper respiratory tract infection. The between the two groups. The result showed
data show that 66.67% healthcare worker statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).

Figure 2. Inappropriate usage of antibiotic in healthcare workers (66.67%)


and in the community (88.3%).

Table 4. Analyze differences in antibiotic use history between the two groups
Antibiotic use history Healthcare workers Community p value
Appropriate 20 7
Inappropriate 40 53
Total 60 60 0.000

The number of communities who use and connective tissue, 9.3% from nasal swab,
antibiotics inappropriately was more than in 5.4% from urine, 4.1% from ears, and 1% from
the healthcare workers. The history of using sterile body fluid17. A nasal swab method for
appropriate or inappropriate antibiotics in both screening MRSA has a quicker turn around time
groups was statistically significant. rather than other bacterial culture methods,
with the result will available within 24 hour and
DISCUSSION given the high specificity method 93.9% (95%
In this study, there was found that only CI 90.0%–96.3%).18
seven positive S. aureus colonization out of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
120 nasal swab samples. S. aureus isolation was (MRSA) found in this study was from an ICU
not easy to do because it’s often contaminated nurse. Patients who underwent treatment in
with other normal flora like S. epidermidis and ICU had a higher role getting infected by MRSA
Staphylococcus haemolyticus from the group of with OR 3.0519. In this study, we found one
coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS).16 positive MRSA sample. Approximately 30% of
Specimen of this study obtained from the nasal human were MRSA nasal carriers.20 Methicillin-
cavity. The sample collection site has a role in S. Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal
aureus colonization. Study showed that 36.7% carrier is one of the most important risk factors
MRSA samples were collected from respiratory for S. aureus infection and infection can happen
system (tracheal aspiration, sputum), 24.8% if host’s body is in an immunocompromised
were collected from blood, 18.7% from skin condition. MRSA-positive patients which haven’t

262
been detected play a role as reservoir and workers. A pathway of the patient to buy an
potentially spread the bacteria to other people antibiotics without prescription was divided into
in the same ward and healthcare workers, they two routes. First, the illegal way. Patient tends
also contaminate medical equipment in hospital to received antibiotics without a prescription
which then function as transmission media of from doctor, and buy it from drug store. Second,
MRSA.21,22 the use of antibiotics left over from a previous
This study showed one MRSA strain from medications which they kept at home. Moreover,
bacteriological examination, while PCR inappropriate use of antibiotics especially
examination did not find the mecA gene from in general population was contribute to the
that strain. There were some studies that emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance.27
couldn’t detect mecA gene in MRSA as well. A There are some limitations in this study, which
study showed that out of 123 samples identified include other risk factors besides antibiotic use
as MRSA, 12 samples found negative mecA.23 A history which affect antibiotic resistance which
study in Spain showed that some MRSA strains hasn’t been researched in this study. Another
didn’t have mecA gene, methicillin resistance was limitation is the sample collecting place which
caused by mecC gene in SCCmecXI chromosome.24 was only from right nasal swab which makes S.
A study in Nigeria showed that failure to detect of aureus colonization gathered very limited, this
mecA gene in MRSA probably happen because of is a note for the author to gather sample from
β-lactamase hyperproduction which is probably other places next time to get more S. aureus
the mechanism causing the resistance. There is colonization. Antibiotic resistance was also only
a specific change in different amino acid which tested in plaktonic bacteria only, while resistance
happened in protein-binding proteins (PBPs potential in biofilm-producing bacteria and the
1, 2, and 3) cascade which can be the basis of probability of other gene beside mecA causing S.
resistance in MRSA.25 Study showed a plasmid aureus resistance were not studied.
carrying mecB gene as the cause of resistance.26
Another study showed that the icaA/D gene was CONCLUSION
found to be the cause of resistance in MRSA.14 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
In this study, we found that many of the (MRSA) percentage of healthcare workers in
healthcare workers in Wijayakusuma Hospital, Wijayakusuma Hospital, Purwokerto is 0.83%,
Purwokerto and general population of RW V while the community in Banyumas did not get a
Kelurahan Kranji Banyumas still use antibiotic positive sample of MRSA. In this study the MRSA
inappropriately to treat common cold which is sample did not show the positivity of the mecA
a contagious disease caused by influenza virus gene on PCR examination. The proportion of
and is a self-limiting disease. Antibiotics should inappropriate antibiotics uses in community
not be used in non-infectious diseases or in higher than in healthcare workers in Banyumas.
self-limiting diseases.10 This is where the role of
medical personnel is needed to give education CONFLICT OF INTEREST
about antibiotic use control to decrease the The authors declare that no competing
risk of antibiotic resistance. Continuous use of interests in this work.
antibiotic can cause antibiotic resistance through
a mechanism called selective pressure. When ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
the resistance bacteria reproducing rapidly, Thanks to Dr. Daniel Joko Wahyono M.Biomed,
in a short time that person will be filled with Prof.Dr. Saryono SKp., M.Kes, Dr.dr. Dody Novrial
resistance bacteria which makes antibiotic MSi.Med.SpPA for suggestion. This work was
treatment even harder.10,15 Table 4 showed that supported by Direktorat Riset dan Pengabdian
the number of community who use antibiotics Masyarakat (DRPM), Direktorat Jenderal
inappropriately was more than healthcare Penguatan Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan

263
Tinggi Republik Indonesia. PER/XII/2011 Pedoman Umum Penggu-
naan Antibiotik. Permenkes RI. 2011; Ja-
REFERENCES karta, Republik Indonesia.
1. Otsuka T, Yoshida K, Komiyama K, Ishika- 11. Santosaningsih D, Santoso S, Budayanti
wa Y, Zaraket H, Okazaki M. Prevalence of NS, Kuntaman K, Lestari ES, Farida H, et
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus au- al. Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus
reus among children in a region with con- harboring the mecA or Panton-Valentine
trolled antimicrobial use. Japan Journal In- leukocidin genes in hospitals in Java and
fection Disease. 2011; 64(5):436-8. Bali, Indonesia. American Journal Tropical
2. Deurenberg RH, Stobberingh EE. The evo- Medicine Hygiene. 2014; 90(4):728–34.
lution of Staphylococcus aureus. Infection, 12. Anggraini AD, Koendhori EB, Pramono H,
Genetics and Evolution. 2008; 8(6): 747- Wahyono DD. Polymorphism Analysis of
763. the Coagulase Gene in Isolates of Methicil-
3. Gordon RJ, Lowy FD. Pathogenesis of Meth- lin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with
icillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus AluI Restriction Sites. Health Science Jour-
Infection. Clinical Infection Disease. 2008; nal Indonesesia. 2017; 8(1):1–6.
46(2) : S350–S359. 13. Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute,
4. Flanders SA. Collard HR, Saint S. Nosocomi- Performance Standards for Antimicrobial
al pneumonia: state of the science. Ameri- Susceptibility Testing, 26th edition, Wayne,
can Journal Infection Control. 2016;34:84– US: 2018.
93. 14. Mahardhika GS, Susanti MA , Rujito L, An-
5. Girard. Prevention of Hospital-acquired In- jarwati DU. Detection Of icaAD Gene of
fections. Departement Community Disease Biofilm-Producing Staphylococcus aureus
Surveillance Response. 2017;2:72. Carriage Isolates Obtained From Health-
6. Chen CJ, Huang YC. New epidemiology of Care Workers And Healthy Communities In
Staphylococcus aureus infection in Asia. Banyumas, Indonesia. Journal of Biomed-
(Themed Section: New epidemiology of icine and Translational Research. 2020;
Staphylococcus aureus infections.). Clinical 6(1): 15-18.
Microbiology Infection. 2014; 20(7):605- 15. Kemalaputri DW, Jannah SN, Budiharjo
23 A. Deteksi MRSA (Methicillin Resistant
7. Anjarwati DU, Rujito L. Perawat Kesehatan Staphylococcus aureus) Pada Pasien Ru-
sebagai Karier Methicilin Resistant Staph- mah Sakit Dengan Metode Maldi-Tof MS
ylococcus aureus ( MRSA ) Di Rumah Sakit dan Multiplex PCR, Jurnal Biologi. 2017;
Pemerintah dan Rumah Sakit Swasta Ka- 6(4):51-61
bupaten Banyumas. Mandala Health. 2011; 16. Nismawati. Deteksi Methicillin Resistant
5(1) : 241-247 Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Pada Pa-
8. Hadi U, Duerink DO, Lestari ES, Nagelkerke sien Rumah Sakit Universitas Hasanuddin
NJ, Werter S, Keuter M, et al. Survey of an- Dengan Metode Kultur. Prosiding Seminar
tibiotic use of individuals visiting public Biologi, Fakultas Science dan Technology,
healthcare facilities in Indonesia. Inter- Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makas-
national Journal Infection Disease. 2008; sar. 2018; 4(7).
12(6):622-9 17. Cikman A, Aydin M, Gulhan B, Karakecili F,
9. Pulungan S. Hubungan Tingkat Penge- Kurtoglu MG, Yuksekkaya S, et al. Absence
tahuan tentang Antibiotika dan Penggu- of the mecC gene in methicillin-resistant
naannya Dikalangan Mahasiswa Non Me- Staphylococcus aureus isolated from var-
dis (Thesis). Medan: Universitas Sumatera ious clinical samples: The first multi-cen-
Utara, 2011. tered study in Turkey. Journal Infection
10. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indone- Public Health [Internet]. 2019; 12(4):528–
sia. PERMENKES RI NO 2406/MENKES/ 33.

264
18. Green BN, Johnson CD, Egan JT, Rosenthal gene. Journal Antimicrobiology Chemo-
M, Griffith EA, Evans MW. Methicillin-resis- therapy. 2014; 69(3):594-7
tant Staphylococcus aureus: an overview 26. Becker K, van Alen S, Idelevich EA,
for manual therapists. Journal of Chiro- Schleimer N, Seggewiß J, Mellmann A, et al.
practic Medicine.2013; 11(1): 64–76. Plasmid-encoded transferable mecb-medi-
19. Putra MIH, Suwarto S, Loho T, Abdullah M. ated methicillin resistance in staphylococ-
Faktor Risiko Methicillin Resistant Staph- cus aureus. Emergency Infection Disease.
ylococcus aureus pada Pasien Infeksi Ku- 2018;24(2):242–8.
lit dan Jaringan Lunak di Ruang Rawat 27. Voidăzan, S, Moldovan G, Voidăzan L,
Inap. Jurnal Penyakit Dalam Indonesia. Zazgyva A, Moldovan H. Knowledge, Atti-
2017;1(1):3. tudes And Practices Regarding The Use Of
20. Creech CB, Saye E, McKenna BD, Johnson Antibiotics. Study On The General Popula-
BG, Jimenez N, Talbot TR. One-year sur- tion Of Mureş County, Romania. Infection
veillance of methicillin-resistant Staph- and Drug Resistance. 2019;12: 3385–3396.
ylococcus aureus nasal colonization and
skin and soft tissue infections in colle-
giate athletes. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.
2010;164(7):615–620.
21. Cesur S, Yildiz E, Irmak H, Aygün Z, Kara-
koç E, Kinikli S DA. Evaluation of oxacillin
resistance screening agar and chromogen-
ic MRSA agar media for the detection of
methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus
aureus clinical isolates. Mokrobiyology
Buletine. 2014; 44(2):279–84.
22. Goyal A. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Sus-
ceptibility Pattern of Methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA] isolates at a
Tertiary Care Hospital in Agra, North India
– A systemic annual review. Journal Dental
Medicine Science. 2017;11(6):80–4.
23. Elhassan MM, Ozbak HA, Hemeg HA, Elme-
kki MA, Ahmed LM. Absence of the mecA
gene in methicillin resistant Staphylococ-
cus aureus isolated from different clini-
cal specimens in Shendi City, Sudan. Bio-
medical Resistance International. 2015;
2015(895860).
24. García-Garrote. Methicillin-resistant Staph-
ylococcus aureus carrying the mecC gene:
emergencein Spain and report of a fatal
case of bacteraemia. Journal Antimicrobi-
ology Chemotherapy. 2014;47:137–46.
25. Ba X, Harrison EM, Edwards GF, Holden
MTG, Larsen AR, Petersen A, et al. Novel
mutations in penicillin-binding protein
genes in clinical Staphylococcus aureus
isolates that are methicillin resistant on
susceptibility testing, but lack the mec

265

You might also like