Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SM 2 Unit
SM 2 Unit
SM 2 Unit
UNIT II
While in external analysis, three correlated environment should be studied and analyzed
Strategic managers must not only recognize the present state of the environment and their
industry but also be able to predict its future positions.
SWOT ANALYSIS
SWOT Analysis is the most renowned tool for audit and analysis of the overall strategic
position of the business and its environment. Its key purpose is to identify the strategies
that will create a firm specific business model that will best align an organization’s
resources and capabilities to the requirements of the environment in which the firm
operates.
In other words, it is the foundation for evaluating the internal potential and limitations
and the probable/likely opportunities and threats from the external environment. It views
all positive and negative factors inside and outside the firm that affect the success. A
consistent study of the environment in which the firm operates helps in
forecasting/predicting the changing trends and also helps in including them in the
decision-making process of the organization.
Strengths - Strengths are the qualities that enable us to accomplish the organization’s
mission. These are the basis on which continued success can be made and
continued/sustained.
Strengths can be either tangible or intangible. These are what you are well-versed in or
what you have expertise in, the traits and qualities your employees possess (individually
and as a team) and the distinct features that give your organization its consistency.
Weaknesses - Weaknesses are the qualities that prevent us from accomplishing our
mission and achieving our full potential. These weaknesses deteriorate influences on the
organizational success and growth. Weaknesses are the factors which do not meet the
standards we feel they should meet.
Organization should be careful and recognize the opportunities and grasp them whenever
they arise. Selecting the targets that will best serve the clients while getting desired
results is a difficult task. Opportunities may arise from market, competition,
industry/government and technology. Increasing demand for telecommunications
accompanied by deregulation is a great opportunity for new firms to enter telecom sector
and compete with existing firms for revenue.
Threats - Threats arise when conditions in external environment jeopardize the reliability
and profitability of the organization’s business. They compound the vulnerability when
they relate to the weaknesses. Threats are uncontrollable. When a threat comes, the
stability and survival can be at stake. Examples of threats are - unrest among employees;
ever changing technology; increasing competition leading to excess capacity, price wars
and reducing industry profits; etc.
SWOT Analysis provide information that helps in synchronizing the firm’s resources and
capabilities with the competitive environment in which the firm operates.
SWOT Analysis is not free from its limitations. It may cause organizations to view
circumstances as very simple because of which the organizations might overlook certain
key strategic contact which may occur. Moreover, categorizing aspects as strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities and threats might be very subjective as there is great degree of
uncertainty in market. SWOT Analysis does stress upon the significance of these four
aspects, but it does not tell how an organization can identify these aspects for itself.
There are certain limitations of SWOT Analysis which are not in control of management.
These include-
a. Price increase;
b. Inputs/raw materials;
c. Government legislation;
d. Economic environment;
e. Searching a new market for the product which is not having overseas market due
to import restrictions; etc.
1. Identify strengths – The analysis of the internal environment help to identify the
strengths of the firm. The internal environment refers to plans and policies of the
firm, its resources-physical, financial and human resources e.g. If company has
good relations with workers, the strength of the company can be identified
through the workers loyalty and dedication on the part of workers.
PEST analysis is an analysis of the political, economic, social and technological factors
in the external environment of an organization, which can affect its activities and
performance.
PEST or PESTEL analysis is a simple and effective tool used in situation analysis to
identify the key external (macro environment level) forces that might affect an
organization. These forces can create both opportunities and threats for an organization.
Therefore, the aim of doing PEST is to:
find out the current external factors affecting an organization;
identify the external factors that may change in the future;
to exploit the changes (opportunities) or defend against them (threats) better than
competitors would do.
Environmental Legal
Weather Anti-trust law
Climate change Discrimination law
Laws regulating environment Copyright, patents / Intellectual
pollution property law
Air and water pollution Consumer protection and e-
Recycling commerce
Waste management Employment law
Attitudes toward “green” or Health and safety law
ecological products Data Protection
Endangered species
Attitudes toward and support for
renewable energy
Gathering information is just a first important step in doing PEST analysis. Once it is
done, the information has to be evaluated. There are many factors changing in the
external environment but not all of them are affecting or might affect an organization.
Therefore, it is essential to identify which PEST factors represent the opportunities or
threats for an organization and list only those factors in PEST analysis. This allows
focusing on the most important changes that might have an impact on the company.
Threat of new entrants. This force determines how easy (or not) it is to enter a
particular industry. If an industry is profitable and there are few barriers to enter, rivalry
soon intensifies. When more organizations compete for the same market share, profits
start to fall. It is essential for existing organizations to create high barriers to enter to
deter new entrants. Threat of new entrants is high when:
Low amount of capital is required to enter a market;
Existing companies can do little to retaliate;
Existing firms do not possess patents, trademarks or do not have established brand
reputation;
There is no government regulation;
Customer switching costs are low (it doesn’t cost a lot of money for a firm to
switch to other industries);
There is low customer loyalty;
Products are nearly identical;
Economies of scale can be easily achieved.
Buying in large quantities or control many access points to the final customer;
Only few buyers exist;
Switching costs to other supplier are low;
They threaten to backward integrate;
There are many substitutes;
Buyers are price sensitive.
Threat of substitutes. This force is especially threatening when buyers can easily find
substitute products with attractive prices or better quality and when buyers can switch
from one product or service to another with little cost. For example, to switch from coffee
to tea doesn’t cost anything, unlike switching from car to bicycle.
Although, Porter originally introduced five forces affecting an industry, scholars have
suggested including the sixth force: complements. Complements increase the demand of
the primary product with which they are used, thus, increasing firm’s and industry’s
profit potential. For example, iTunes was created to complement iPod and added value
for both products. As a result, both iTunes and iPod sales increased, increasing Apple’s
profits.
We now understand that Porter’s five forces framework is used to analyze industry’s
competitive forces and to shape organization’s strategy according to the results of the
analysis. But how to use this tool? We have identified the following steps:
Step 1. Gather the information on each of the five forces
Step 2. Analyze the results and display them on a diagram
Step 3. Formulate strategies based on the conclusions
Step 1. Gather the information on each of the five forces. What managers should do
during this step is to gather information about their industry and to check it against each
of the factors (such as “number of competitors in the industry”) influencing the force. We
have already identified the most important factors in the table below.
Supplier power
Number of suppliers
Suppliers’ size
Ability to find substitute materials
Materials scarcity
Cost of switching to alternative materials
Threat of integrating forward
Buyer power
Number of buyers
Size of buyers
Size of each order
Buyers’ cost of switching suppliers
There are many substitutes
Price sensitivity
Threat of integrating backward
Threat of substitutes
Number of substitutes
Performance of substitutes
Cost of changing
Step 2. Analyze the results and display them on a diagram. After gathering all the
information, you should analyze it and determine how each force is affecting an industry.
For example, if there are many companies of equal size operating in the slow growth
industry, it means that rivalry between existing companies is strong. Remember that five
forces affect different industries differently so don’t use the same results of analysis for
even similar industries.
Step 3. Formulate strategies based on the conclusions. At this stage, managers should
formulate firm’s strategies using the results of the analysis For example, if it is hard to
achieve economies of scale in the market, the company should pursue cost leadership
strategy. Product development strategy should be used if the current market growth is
slow and the market is saturated.
FINANCIAL CAPABILITY:
These factors relate to the availability, usage, and management of funds and all allied
aspects that have a bearing on an organization capacity and ability to implement its
strategies.
MARKETTING CAPABILITY:
These factors relate to the pricing, promotion, and distribution of products or services,
and all the allied aspects that have a bearing on an organization capacity and ability to
implement its strategies.
Product related factors: variety, differentiation, mix quality, positioning,
packaging, etc.
Price related factors: pricing objectives, policies, changes, protection, advantages,
etc.
Place related factors: distribution, transportation and logistics, marketing channels,
marketing intermediaries, etc.
Promotion related factors: promotional tools, sales promotion, advertising public
relations, etc.
Integrative and systematic factors: marketing mix, market standing, company
image, marketing organization, marketing system, marketing management
information system, etc.
OPERATIONS CAPABILITY:
These factors related to the production of products or services, use of material resources,
and all allied aspects that have a bearing on an organization capacity and ability to
implement its strategies.
PERSNNEL CAPABILITY
Personnel capability factors relates to the existence and use of human resources and skills
and all allied aspects that have a bearing on an organization capacity and ability to
implement its strategies.
ORGANIZATIONAL APPRAISAL(Extra)
Internal analysis
1. VRIO framework
2. Value chain analysis
3. Quantitative analysis
a. Financial analysis (Ratio Analysis )
b. Non financial analysis (Employee turnover, absenteeism, market ranking, service
call rate, no. of patents registered per period, etc.)
4. Qualitative analysis
Comparative analysis
1. Historical analysis
2. Industry norms
3. Benchmarking
Comprehensive analysis
1. Key factor rating
2. Business intelligence system
3. Balance scorecard
Intangible assets are everything else that has no physical presence but can still be owned
by the company. Brand reputation, trademarks, intellectual property are all intangible
assets. Unlike physical resources, brand reputation is built over a long time and is
something that other companies cannot buy from the market. Intangible resources usually
stay within a company and are the main source of sustainable competitive advantage.
The two critical assumptions of RBV are that resources must also be heterogeneous and
immobile.
Heterogeneous. The first assumption is that skills, capabilities and other resources that
organizations possess differ from one company to another. If organizations would have
the same amount and mix of resources, they could not employ different strategies to out
compete each other. What one company would do, the other could simply follow and no
competitive advantage could be achieved. This is the scenario of perfect competition, yet
real world markets are far from perfectly competitive and some companies, which are
exposed to the same external and competitive forces (same external conditions), are able
to implement different strategies and outperform each other. Therefore, RBV assumes
that companies achieve competitive advantage by using their different bundles of
resources.
The competition between Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics is a good example of how
two companies that operate in the same industry and thus, are exposed to the same
external forces, can achieve different organizational performance due to the difference in
resources. Apple competes with Samsung in tablets and smartphones markets, where
Apple sells its products at much higher prices and, as a result, reaps higher profit
margins. Why Samsung does not follow the same strategy? Simply because Samsung
does not have the same brand reputation or is capable to design user-friendly products
like Apple does. (Heterogeneous resources)
Immobile. The second assumption of RBV is that resources are not mobile and do not
move from company to company, at least in short-run. Due to this immobility, companies
cannot replicate rivals’ resources and implement the same strategies. Intangible
resources, such as brand equity, processes, knowledge or intellectual property are usually
immobile.
VRIO FRAMEWORK
The VRIO frame work is the contribution of Barney who is created with the enunciation
of the resource-based theory.
VALUABLE: The organizational capabilities possessed by the firm that help it to
generate revenues by the capitalizing on opportunities and /or to reduce costs by
neutralising threats. Examples of valuable capabilities are : the ability to generate
amicable relationship with government or to provide high quality after –sale service to
customer.
RARE: The organizational capabilities that are possessed by the firm exclusively or just
by a few other firms in the industry .Examples of rare capabilities are :capability derived
out of an exclusive location or the presence of highly satisfied and motivated workforce.
ORGANISED FOR USAGE: The organizational capabilities possessed by the firm that
could be used through appropriate organizational structure, business processes, control
systems and reward systems that are present in the firm .Examples of a firm organized for
usage are : the availability of competent R& D personnel and research laboratories to
innovate new and improved products continually or the availability of potential business
partners who are competent and willing to integrate their information systems with that of
the firm .
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
“the superior performance of a particular company relative to other competitors in the
same industry or superior performance relative to the industry average.” “It can also be
defined as “anything that a particular company does better compare to its competitors in
the same industry.”
There are many ways to achieve the competitive advantage but companies mainly focus
on only two basic types of it: differentiation advantage and cost advantage. A company
that is capable of achieving superiority in cost advantage or differentiation advantage is
able to offer consumers products at lower prices or with higher degree of differentiation
and therefore, it become able to compete with its rivals.
TWO TYPES OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES
BMW is the best example of differentiation competitive advantage. BMW sets itself apart
from other through innovative products. Company also builds a consistent theme through
the product line and through its marketing slogan (i.e. The Ultimate Driving Machine).
This differentiation competitive advantage enabled BMW to pass Mercedes in unit sales
and dollar sales in the United States, which was a very difficult task since Mercedes had
held a significant lead in both.
Pulling it all together a company must understand its competitive advantage if it wants to
leverage it and as illustrated above BMW and Walmart understand the importance of
competitive advantage and increasing their share as well as profit rapidly.
Value Chain Analysis (VCA) A value chain identifies and isolates the various economic
value-adding activities (such as differentiating a product, lowering the cost, and meeting
customer’s needs quickly) that occur in some way in every firm. It portrays activities
required to create value for customers of a given product or service. Value chain analysis,
thus, offers an excellent means by which managers can find the strengths and weaknesses
of each activity vis-à- vis the firm’s competitors.
Primary Activities
Primary activities relate directly to the physical creation, sale, maintenance and support
of a product or service. They consist of the following:
Inbound logistics – These are all the processes related to receiving, storing, and
distributing inputs internally. Your supplier relationships are a key factor in creating
value here.
Operations – These are the transformation activities that change inputs into outputs that
are sold to customers. Here, your operational systems create value.
Outbound logistics – These activities deliver your product or service to your customer.
These are things like collection, storage, and distribution systems, and they may be
internal or external to your organization.
Marketing and sales – These are the processes you use to persuade clients to purchase
from you instead of your competitors. The benefits you offer, and how well you
communicate them, are sources of value here.
Service – These are the activities related to maintaining the value of your product or
service to your customers, once it's been purchased.
Support Activities
These activities support the primary functions above. In our diagram, the dotted lines
show that each support, or secondary, activity can play a role in each primary activity.
For example, procurement supports operations with certain activities, but it also supports
marketing and sales with other activities.
Procurement (purchasing) – This is what the organization does to get the resources it
needs to operate. This includes finding vendors and negotiating best prices.
Human resource management – This is how well a company recruits, hires, trains,
motivates, rewards, and retains its workers. People are a significant source of value, so
businesses can create a clear advantage with good HR practices.
Technological development – These activities relate to managing and processing
information, as well as protecting a company's knowledge base. Minimizing information
technology costs, staying current with technological advances, and maintaining technical
excellence are sources of value creation.
Infrastructure – These are a company's support systems, and the functions that allow it
to maintain daily operations. Accounting, legal, administrative, and general management
are examples of necessary infrastructure that businesses can use to their advantage.
Companies use these primary and support activities as "building blocks" to create a
valuable product or service.
Conducting a Value Chain Analysis
Identify activities: VCA requires a firm to divide its operations into primary and support
activity categories. Within each category a firm may typically perform a number of
discrete activities that may reflect its key strengths or weaknesses. At this stage managers
should desegregate what actually goes into various activities in a detailed manner.
Allocate cost: VCA requires manager to assign costs and assets to each activity, which is
totally different from what one finds in traditional cost accounting method.
Identify activities that differentiate the firm: Here managers should try to identify
several sources of differentiation advantage relative to competitors. Alex Miller has listed
some of these advantages.
Examine the value chain: Once the value chain has been described, managers should list
the activities that are important to buyer satisfaction and market success. Keeping costs
under strict vigil, offering value added service at each stage, doing things better than
rivals are all part of this strategy.
VCA is most effective when managers try to draw comparisons with key competitors and
improve the internal processes with a view to offer ‘value for money’ kind of services to
customers.
IFE (Internal factor evaluation) matrix is one of the best strategic tool to perform internal
audit of any firm. IFE is use for internal analysis of different functional areas of business
such as finance, marketing, IT, operations, accounts, Human Resources and others
depend upon the nature of business and its size.
INTERNAL FACTORS
Internal factors are the outcome of detailed internal audit of a firm. Every company have
some weak and strong points, therefore the internal factors are divided into two
categories namely strengths and weakness.
RATING
Rating is common word I hope you are aware of it, in IFE rating is the way out to
differentiate internal strengths and weakness. Internal weakness are further divided
in two categories namely minor weakness and major weakness same goes of the
strengths (minor strength and major strength)
There are some important point related to rating in IFE matrix.
Rating is applied to each factor.
Major weakness is represented by 1.0
Minor weakness is represented by 2.0
Minor strength represented by 3.0
Major Strength represented by 4.0
Major weakness needs company attention to change into minor weakness then
strength and finally major strength. As compared to major strength minor
weakness need little efforts of the company to change it into strength. The range of
rating start from minimum 1.0 which is worst and maximum 4.0 which is the best
factor of the company.
WEIGHT
Weight attribute in IFE matrix indicates the relative importance of factor to being
successful in the firm’s industry. The weight range from 0.0 means not important
and 1.0 means important, sum of all assigned weight to factors must be equal to 1.0
otherwise the calculation would not be consider correct.
WEIGHTED SCORE
Weighted score value is the result achieved after multiplying each factor rating with
the weight.
2. Assign a weight that ranges from 0.0 (not important) to 1.0 (all important) to each
factor. The weight assigned to a given factor indicates the relative importance of the
factor to being successful in the firm’s industry. Regardless of whether a key factor
is an internal strength or weakness, factors considered to have the greatest effect on
organizational performance should be assigned the highest weights. The sum of all
weights must equal 1.0.
4. Multiply each factor’s weight by its rating to determine a weighted score for each
variable.
5. Sum the weighted scores for each variable to determine the total weighted score
for the organization.
As you can see in this examples the total weighted score value is 2.80 which means
company internal position is better.
The EFE matrix is very similar to the IFE matrix. The major difference between the EFE
matrix and the IFE matrix is the type of factors that are included in the model. While
the IFE matrix deals with internal factors, the EFE matrix is concerned solely
with external factors.
External factors assessed in the EFE matrix are the ones that are subjected to the will of
social, economic, political, legal, and other external forces.
List factors: The first step is to gather a list of external factors. Divide factors into two
groups: opportunities and threats.
Rate factors: Assign a rating to each factor. Rating should be between 1 and 4. Rating
indicates how effective the firm’s current strategies respond to the factor. 1 = the
response is poor. 2 = the response is below average. 3 = above average. 4 = superior.
Weights are industry-specific. Ratings are company-specific.
Multiply weights by ratings: Multiply each factor weight with its rating. This
will calculate the weighted score for each factor.
Total all weighted scores: Add all weighted scores for each factor. This will calculate
the total weighted score for the company.
You can find more details about this approach as well as about possible values that the
EFE matrix can take on the IFE matrix page.
Benefits
Easy to understand. The input factors have a clear meaning to everyone inside or
outside the company. There’s no confusion over the terms used or the
implications of the matrices.
Easy to use. The matrices do not require extensive expertise, many personnel or
lots of time to build.
Focuses on the key internal and external factors. Unlike some other analyses (e.g.
value chain analysis, which identifies all the activities in the company’s value
chain, despite their importance), the IFE and EFE only highlight the key factors
that are affecting a company or its strategy.
Multi-purpose. The tools can be used to build SWOT analysis, IE matrix, GE-
McKinsey matrix or for benchmarking.
Limitations
Easily replaced. IFE and EFE matrices can be replaced almost completely by
PEST analysis, SWOT analysis, competitive profile matrix and partly some other
analysis.
Doesn’t directly help in strategy formation. Both analyses only identify and
evaluate the factors but do not help the company directly in determining the next
strategic move or the best strategy. Other strategy tools have to be used for that.
Too broad factors. SWOT matrix has the same limitation and it means that some
factors that are not specific enough can be confused with each other. Some
strength can be weaknesses as well, e.g. brand reputation, which can be a strong
and valuable brand reputation or a poor brand reputation. The same situation is
with opportunities and threats. Therefore, each factor has to be as specific as
possible to avoid confusion over where the factor should be assigned.
EFE matrix. Do the PEST analysis first. The information from the PEST analysis
reveals which factors currently affect or may affect the company in the future. At this
point, the factors can be either opportunities or threats and your next task is to sort them
into one or the other category. Try to look at which factors could benefit the company
and which ones would harm it.
You should also analyze your competitors’ actions and their strategies. This way you
would know what competitors are doing right and what their strategies lack.
IFE matrix. In case you have done a SWOT analysis already, you can gather some of the
factors from there. The SWOT analysis will usually have no more than 10 strengths and
weaknesses, so you’ll have to do additional analysis to identify more key internal factors
for the matrix.
Look again into the company’s resources, capabilities, organizational structure, culture,
functional areas and value chain analysis and recognize the strong and weak points of the
organization.
Weights and ratings are assigned subjectively. Therefore, it is a more difficult process
than identifying the key factors. We assign weights based on industry analysts’ opinions.
Find out what the analysts say about the industry’s success factors and then use their
opinion or analysis to assign the appropriate weights. The same process is with ratings.
Although, this time you or the members of your group will have to decide what ratings
should be assigned. Ratings from 1-4 can be assigned to each opportunity and threat, but
only the ratings from 1-2 can be assigned to each weakness and 3-4 to each strength.
IFE or EFE matrices have little value on their own. You should do both analyses and
combine their results to discuss new strategies or for further analysis. They are especially
useful when building advanced SWOT analysis, SWOT matrix for strategies or IE
matrix.