Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Badel English Web
Badel English Web
Badel English Web
/
1
badel
block
zagreb
july 2012.
Impressum
2a City of Zagreb
8
The Lower Town, is the Zagreb downtown area and /
an urban and architectural entity planned, designed 9
and built mostly during the second half of the 19th
century and in early 20th century. Early descriptions
of Zagreb from 17th century, its presentations and
official documents from the 19th century all used
the name of Lower Town for a vast and poorly deve-
loped, mostly agricultural area in the lowlands situ-
ated at the foothills of two medieval settlements,
Gradec and Kaptol. from 1887 envisaged a considerable expansion of figure 03, regulatory plan of the eastern part of the lower town (1905.)
It will be a construction of the Southern Railway the city territory towards west, east and south
Station (today Western Railway Station) and the using the same orthogonal grid with larger blocks,
Zidani Most – Sisak railroad branching from the while the Lower Town was planned to have more
major Austrian Vienna–Trieste railroad in 1862 that public areas and larger concentration of public
will encourage plans for urban development of the amenities and buildings for institutions to reflect
Lower Town and its connection with urban cores modernization of the time.
created within the boundaries of historical juris- The Lower Town has gradually embraced major
dictions integrated into a Royal Borough of Zagreb amenities that could not be situated in the Upper
in 1850. Town for a long time because of insufficient space,
The Zagreb Regulatory Plan from 1865 planned including administrative, commercial, educational,
for the Lower Town to accommodate new central cultural and social institutions which were assigned,
functions and amenities that would ensure an inte- based on their importance, adequate locations at
grated and harmonic development of Zagreb as a the squares and in major streets. These were the
modern metropolis. The area encompassed by the buildings whose scale and style determined the
Regulatory Plan was almost double in size compa- architectural and representative value of the city’s
red to the than city territory, and it stretched to the cultural identity.
planned railroad running from Budapest (open in The Lower Town also became the largest residen-
1869). An orthogonal street grid was planned cre- tial zone in the city, with mostly uniform scales
ating rather large blocks, three major squares and and architectural style reflecting the period of
a large city park along the railroad, and a planned its development – historicism - and all its varie-
central railway station. Another Zagreb Master Plan ties. Merging with art-deco and early modernism image 03, part of the lower town – aerial view (2008.)
badel block
10
/
11
22
/
23
Croatia 154
Italy 103
Spain 64
Serbia 55
United States 39
Portugal 33 Indonesia 7
Russia 24 United Kingdom 6
Brazil 21 Austria 6
Netherlands 20 Hong Kong 6
Slovenia 17 India 6
BiH 16 Greece 6
NULL 15 Montenegro 4
Poland 13 Macedonia 4 Malta 1
France 13 Lithuania 4 Saint 1
Ukraine 10 Azerbaijan 3 Barthélemy
China 10 Pakistan 3 Other 2 New Zealand 1
Colombia 9 Canada 3 Germany 2 Ireland 1
Romania 9 Malaysia 2 Argentina 2 Albania 1
Mexico 9 Turkey 2 South Africa 2 Algeria 1
Chile 8 Åland Islands 2 Japan 2 Egypt 1
Bulgaria 8 Belgium 2 Andora 1 Iran 1
site was to provide all interested candidates with
more contextual and detailed information about
6 Competition Info this, for City of Zagreb, very significant location
and help them better prepare their project pro-
posals. The seminar addressed the competition
programme, the challenges and best practices
Open, on-line, one-stage, anonymous, ideas of industrial heritage revitalization, as well as
competition for the urban-architectural concept investor's expectations and plans related to the
design for the badel site redevelopment was site. Virtual guided tour through Badel block,
announced and officially opened for the partici- narrated by Ms. Marina Bagarić, PhD, was pro-
pants from all over the World on January 10, 2012. vided on Zagreb Society of Architects' web-site.
Beside the international character, the special fea- In total 2311 individuals from 99 countries showed
ture of the competition is that it was carried out their interes in Badel Block Competition by regi-
completely on-line, for the first time in Croatian stering for the Competition. 242 entries were
history of competitions. submitted, designed by 60 individual authors and
To evaluate the entries submitted, the organizer 182 project teams, involving in total 735 partici-
has appointed the following seven (7) persons to pants. The largest number of participants came
be members of the Competition jury: from Croatia (149), followed by: Italy, Spain, Serbia,
United States, Portugal, Russia, Brazil...
AAZoran Boševski, architect, Croatia, President
of the Competition jury
The jury reached the decision about the award-
winning and purchased entries unanimously, at
AAJadranka Veselić Bruvo, architect, Croatia,
Vice president of the Competition jury
the plenary session held on May 27, 2012.
AASilvije
Irena Matković, Msc, architect, Croatia
AAToma Plejić,
Novak, prof., Croatia
AA architect, Croatia
expert collaborators:
AAProf Anka Mišetić, PhD, sociologist, Croatia
AATamara Rogić, PhD, architect, Croatia
technical committee:
AAAna Dana Beroš, architect, Croatia
AAAzra Suljić, architect, Croatia
AAMarko Trzun, architect, Croatia
competition secretary:
AASanja Cvjetko Jerković, architect, Croatia
figure 16
figure 17
figure 18
figure 19
figure 20
32
/
33
figure 24
figure 27
figure 28
figure 25
figure 29
figure 34
figure 35
figure 36
figure 33
Equivalent purchase
prize, in the amount of
28.350,00 kn
37, 38, 39, 40
concept
Uncertain environments in which architecture
acts require contingent responses. Contingency
determines the potential of architecture. It
loads architecture with dormant ways-of-being
whose appearance cannot be determined a pri-
ori. Contingency forces us to approach the pro-
ject with the desire of uncovering the systems figure 37
(structures and dynamics) that give us the possi-
bility of being-different. Contingency is the fra-
mework for chance. Architecture should be able to
deploy contingent structures capable of hosting
chance and even encourage it. We propose a place
as an open field which forces users acting and
deciding as it deploys as an unstable system capa-
ble of promoting that chance; a system capable of
promoting conditioned changes in its structure
(gravitational, programmatic or expressive). This figure 38
is the task we assume: creating links and letting
new realities emerge through the establishment
of these connections.
jury's explanation
The entry investigates the alternative theoretical
framework to the established planning practi-
ses, that the jury recognized as highly valuable.
Proposing a solution that is always in ‘semi-
conflict’, it loosens the tensions introduced by
the evaluation through ‘architectural discourse’
(public – private, full – empty, high – low, etc.). figure 39 figure 40
figure 41