Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Lab
Research Lab
Research Lab
Total hours/week: 2
Classroom etiquettes:
Teaching-Learning:
For any after class query students can take prior appointment and meet/contact the faculty as per
mutual availability.
Course Description This lab is designed to offer students an opportunity to develop an academic and professional ‘tool box’.
To accomplish this objective the students were given insights and experiences and challenges to help
them to cultivate their research prowess.
This course further extends the learning in Quantitative research methods in Psychology by introducing
students to the measurement and test construction. Students will be given opportunity to gain technical
knowledge in psychometric test construction and validation.
Course Objectives 1. To apply different levels of measurement and testing in tool construction.
2. Develop tools scientifically by using proper guidelines of item writing and analysis.
3. Standardize the tool using pilot study & statistical analysis package.
Knowledge 1. Describe major milestones in the history of testing.
Skill 2. Find reliability and validity of test scores and the quality of the items on a test.
Course
Outcomes
Attitude 3. Describe the importance of the item difficulty index and demonstrate its calculation and
interpretation.
4. Describe the importance of the item discrimination index and demonstrate its calculation
and interpretation.
SECTION II: WEEKWISE & UNITWISE DESCRIPTION
*S = Synchronous
*A = Asynchronous
Week Unit Topic(s) Details Synchronous Asynchronous Duration
(Online face-face class) (Post-class
Webex readings,
assignments, Hours
submission,
assessments)
Google
classroom /
Moodle
Week 1 Topic 1: Brief Lecture Reading 2
history of testing Class-room discussion. R-1:
Question and Answers. Reynolds, C. R.,
& Livingston, R.
Unit-1: . B. (2012).
Introduction to Mastering modern
Psychological psychological
Testing testing: Theory
and methods.
Pearson
Education.
Submission
Activity 1
(Quiz)
Submission
Activity 1 (Quiz)
Week 3 Unit-1: Topic 3: Types of Lecture Reading
Introduction to Tests, why use Class-room discussion. R-1:
Psychological tests; Assumptions Question and Answers. Reynolds, C. R.,
Testing and applications of & Livingston, R.
psychological B. (2012).
assessment Mastering modern
psychological
testing: Theory
and methods.
Pearson
Education.
Submission
Activity 1 (Quiz)
Week 4 Unit-1: Topic 4: Scales of Lecture Reading 2
Introduction to measurement; Class-room discussion. R-1:
Psychological Reliability and Question and Answers. Reynolds, C. R.,
Testing validity: introduction Presentations. & Livingston, R.
and types. B. (2012).
Mastering modern
psychological
testing: Theory
and methods.
Pearson
Education.
Reading
R-2:
https://byjus.co
m/maths/scales-
of-measurement/
Submission
Week 5 Unit-1: Topic 4: Reliability Lecture Reading 2
Introduction to –types and their Class-room discussion. R-1:
Psychological calculation. Question and Answers. Reynolds, C. R.,
Testing Presentations. & Livingston, R.
B. (2012).
Mastering modern
psychological
testing: Theory
and methods.
Pearson
Education.
R-2:
https://opentextbc
.ca/researchmetho
ds/chapter/reliabil
ity-and-validity-
of-measurement/
Reading
R-3:
https://www.ver
ywellmind.com/
what-is-
reliability-
2795786
Submission
Activity 1 (Quiz)
Week 6 Unit-1: Topic 4: Validity – Lecture Reading 2
Introduction to types and their Class-room discussion. R-1:
Psychological calculation Question and Answers. Reynolds, C. R.,
Testing Presentations. & Livingston, R.
B. (2012).
Mastering modern
psychological
testing: Theory
and methods.
Pearson
Education.
R-2:
https://opentextbc
.ca/researchmetho
ds/chapter/reliabil
ity-and-validity-
of-measurement/
Submission
Activity 1 (Quiz)
Week 7 Topic 1: Test Lecture Reading 2
Unit 2: Construction – Class-room discussion. R-1:
Test Stages: Defining the Question and Answers. Reynolds, C. R.,
Construction Test, Selecting a & Livingston, R.
and Scaling Method, B. (2012).
Standardizatio Mastering modern
n of Test psychological
testing: Theory
and methods.
Pearson
Education.
Submission
Activity 1 (Quiz)
Submission
Activity 1 (Quiz)
Submission
Activity 1 (Quiz)
Submission
Activity 1 (Quiz)
Submission
Activity 1 (Quiz)
Submission
Activity 1 (Quiz)
Submission
Activity 1 (Quiz)
Submission
Activity 1 (Quiz)
Submission
Activity 1 (Quiz)
Mention briefly the details of the activities and assignments. Provide the references of the reading materials.
An academic semester spans over 15 weeks.
(Please refer to the grading patter CIA-ESE for this course and enter details only in components that are applicable)
Mapping: A template to map the Learning Outcomes of the course against the components of assessment is given below:
Course Outcomes Components of assessment
CO 1 --NO--
CO 2 --NO--
CO 3 --NO--
CO 4 --NO--
(Use multiple tables for multiple CIAs and multiple components the CIAs)
Individual CIA-I: - Psychometric test development: Item development (15 marks) Group assignment
Assignment Details
(such as CIA I A Submission Deadline 5/02/22
and B/II/III)
Assignment Working in teams of 10-12 students each, students will develop a test and examine some of its psychometric
description: properties through data collection and analysis. Various aspects of this assignment will require group work
and data entry into SPSS. For this part students’ needs to:
Student’s task is to choose a variable and then construct an assessment tool (psychometric test) for
assessing it.
The items of the assessment tool constructed by you should follow the guidelines of test construction
as taught in the class.
Write the test items in clear and concise terms as taught in the class.
Theories, concepts, or ideas that underpin the selection of your variable.
Provide reference of the reading material that helped in selecting the Variable and its items.
Assessment CIA-II
Description
Assignment Students needs to collect data using the items constructed in the Phase-1.
description: Each group must collect data of minimum 50.
Evaluation
Rubric/s: Organization of Data Data is well organized Data is organized and Students’ data is very
(5) and clear in excel. clear but need some fixes messy and hard to
understand
1. Will be able to learn and conduct the steps involved in data analysis.
Learning
outcomes:
Good (4-5) Average (2-3) Below average (0-1)
Description of data set Excellent job describing Good job describing data Does not clearly tell
(5) data set: what are the set: answers some of reader where the data are
data; who compiled the those questions, but only from, who compiled it,
data set; who is covered about half. etc.
in the data set, etc.
Answers every
reasonable question
someone could have
about the data set itself.
Evaluation Analysis (5) Excellent: well, thought ok but not great No explanation or no
Rubric/s: out analysis; reasonable clear explanation
and thoughtful; well
done analysis.
Presentation of analysis Table is easy to follow, Table are their but as Table is missing or is
(table or graph) (5) clearly presented clearly present as in the presented in a very
“good” criteria. jumbled way.
Written Explanation of Excellent: Written Written explanation has no explanation or no
analysis. (5) explanation is clear, easy moments of clarity, but clear explanation
to follow, complete, and also has moments of
makes sense confusion; occasionally
difficult to follow logic