Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Liu 1996
Liu 1996
CATALYSSI
AG
: ENERAL
ELSEVIER Applied Catalysis A: General 137 (1996) 167-177
Abstract
Isomerization of small alkanes is compared over two bifunctional catalysts with similar
concentrations of metal and acid sites and similar strengths of Brcnsted acid sites. The catalytic
performance and the kinetic parameters are significantly different for P t / H - M o r and P t / Z r O 2 - S O a
catalysts. Under conditions where n-butane isomerization is rapid over P t / Z r O z - S O 4 , it is
undetectable over P t / H - M o r . The apparent activation energy of n-pentane isomerization is
significantly higher over the zeolite based catalyst. These differences can be rationalized in terms
of different pore geometries: in the one-dimensional pore system of mordenite the rates of
monomolecular reactions are single file diffusion controlled; as a result, bimolecular processes
such as isomerization via intermediate dimer formation are all but impossible. Likewise, hydride
ion transfer, which is the chain propagation step in alkane reactions via carbenium ions, is
sterically inhibited in micropores and replaced by a process involving Pt-proton adducts.
Keywords: zirconia (sulphated); Platinum promotion; Mordenite; Micropores; Kinetic parameters; Single file
diffusion; Alkane isomerization; Bifunctional catalysis; Collapsed bifunctional sites; Platinum-proton adducts
1. Introduction
" Corresponding author. Tel. ( + 1-708) 4915263, fax. ( + 1-708) 4671018, e-mail
wmhs@casbah.acns.nwu.edu.
ics. The environmental problems with the regeneration of theses catalysts have
also revived interest in halogen-free isomerization catalysts. Bifunctional cata-
lysts, in particular Pt/H-Mordenite, are halogen-free alternatives currently
employed though they are less active, requiring a temperature above 520 K.
The mechanism for skeletal isomerization of small alkanes has been studied
extensively in liquid superacids and is found to proceed via a protonated
cyclopropane intermediate [1,2]. For C5+ hydrocarbons, this path avoids the
energetically prohibitive stage of a primary carbenium ion. In the case of butane,
however, opening of the protonated methylcyclopropane ring to a carbocation
with i s o - C 4 s t r u c t u r e inevitably leads to a primary carbenium ion. Therefore,
skeletal isomerization of butane was reported to be negligible under conditions
where C5+ hydrocarbons swiftly isomerized in strong liquid acids. Likewise,
over the solid catalyst Pt/A1203-SiO 2 the isomerization rate of n-butane at 573
K was found to be much slower than that of n-pentane [3].
Hsu et al. reported that ZrO2-SO4-based catalysts, and in particular Fe,
M n - Z r O 2 - S O 4, were superactive for n-butane isomerization [4]. Adeeva et al.
showed that the acid sites of these catalysts are not stronger than the Br~nsted
sites in acid zeolites or the Lewis sites in y-alumina [5]. By using isotopically
labelled n-butane and kinetic analysis it was further shown that over unpromoted
ZrO2-SO4, Fe, Mn promoted ZrO2-SO 4, and P t / Z r O 2 - S O 4 (Pt-SZ) catalysts
the isomerization of n-butane to i-butane is a bimolecular process, involving
intermediate formation of butene and an adsorbed C 8 entity [6,7]. In contrast,
the isomerization of n-pentane over the same catalyst appears to mainly use a
monomolecular pathway with only a small contribution of a parallel bimolecular
mechanism [8]. These findings reveal a strong similarity of the basic chemistry
that determines acid catalyzed alkane reactions in liquid acids and over solid
acid catalysts. An unsolved problem is, however, the striking difference in
catalytic performance between the bifunctional solid catalyst Pt-SZ and zeolite
based catalysts, such as Pt/H-mordenite (PtHMor) with roughly the same
numbers of acid and exposed Pt sites and similar acid strength of the Brc~nsted
acid sites.
In the present study, the catalytic isomerization of n-pentane and n-butane
over Pt/H-Mordenite (PtHMor) is studied under the same conditions and in the
same reactor that was used for similar work with Pt-SZ, with the objective to
identify and rationalize the differences in the kinetics and the reaction mecha-
nism over these solid acid catalysts.
2. Experimental
The preparation of the Pt-SZ catalysts was as previously reported [7]. PtHMor
samples were prepared by ion exchange of ammonium mordenite (LZ-M-8,
UOP, lot# 13744-24, Si/A1 = 8) with aqueous solution of Pt(NH3)4CI e. ICP
H. Liu et a l . / Applied Catalysis A: General 137 (1996) 167-177 169
analysis showed that the Pt-SZ catalyst contained 0.38 wt.-% Pt and 1.8 wt.-%
S. The PtHMor catalyst contained 0.45 wt.-% Pt. The catalytic data were
collected in a microflow reactor at 11 bar total pressure as described in Ref. [7].
The partial pressures of H 2 and the alkanes were adjusted by controlling the
flow rates of the feed components. In one series of experiments over Pt-SZ, the
partial pressure of one feed component was varied at a constant overall flow rate
while the partial pressures of the other reactants were kept constant by adapting
the helium make-up. The reaction orders in hydrogen and n-pentane or n-butane
were then determined from the resultant changes in the conversion and produc-
tion rates. The effluent was analyzed by on-line gas chromatography with a 50
m × 0.2 mm capillary column of PONA (Hewlett-Packard) attached to a FID
detector. The production rates of hydrocarbons were normalized to mole num-
bers of n-pentane or n-butane per gram catalyst per second (mol (gcat)-! S-1).
The reactant and products of methane, ethane, propane, butane, i-pentane,
n-pentane, and hexane were assigned as C l, C 2, C 3, C 4, i-Cs, n-C 5, and C 6,
respectively.
3. Results
n-Cs c o n v e r s i o n
i. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • - - . . . . . . . ~'''''l''vrv'" t~ * 1. . . . . . . r'l*"l*r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i-C~ f o r m a t i o n
lO -7
2
10-8 C 1"-C2+C3 f o r m a t i o n
J
----~---2~22-2_2--- ~_'''_ -~222:22222- -- -~---
C~ f o r m a t i o n
| ! t ' ! : I ' I , I , I ! I ~ I ' I ~ | !
10-9
0 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Time on Stream hr
Fig. 1. n-Pentane conversion with time on stream over PtHMor. Total flow rate = 10 cm 3 g - J s -~ . Total
pressure = 11 bar: p(n-C 5) = 0.054 bar, p(H 2) = 2.2 bar, He balance. T = 479 K.
lower, viz. 92 and 72 kJ/mol, respectively. The values of the kinetic parameters
are compiled in Table 2.
It is possible to describe the Arrhenius data for n-pentane isomerization over
50
"
C.o sel.
i A A & & Ik & & & A A A & & & & ik & A A & A & &
40
©
i C~ sel.
- + + + - + + + + + + -= - + + + + + -t- + + + +
>
30
7- n-C 4 conv.
20
C~ sel.
10
I i-C 4 sel.
C 5 sel.
t-
O ~ ' v'v v v ~ ' v v v v v v v ' r ' l r YT T Y T T ' I r YY !
0 i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 1 1 12 13
T i m e o n S t r e a m / hr
Fig. 2. n-Butane conversion with time on stream over PtHMor. Total flow rate = 10 cm 3 g - ~ s - ~. Total
pressure = 11 bar: p(n-C s) = 0.054 bar, p(H 2) = 2.2 bar, He balance. T = 544 K.
H. Liu et al./Applied Catalysis A: General 137 (1996) 167-177 17t
Table 1
Reaction o f n-pentane and n - b u t a n e over solid acid catalysts at 4 7 9 K
Catalyst PtHMor Pt-SZ
Reactant n-Pentane n-Pentane n-Butane
Selectivity / %
CH 4 +C2H 6 - 3.04
CH 4 +C2H 6 +Call 8 2.28 1.76 -
C3H 8 - - 1.78
i-C4Hj0 - - 94.8
i-C4Hlo +n-C4Hi0 0.85 2.71 -
i ' C s H l0 96.9 91.6 0.22
n-CsHio - - 0.13
Hexanes 0 3.9 -
P(total) = 11 bar.
a C r a c k i n g rate = total c o n v e r s i o n rate - isomerization rate.
PtHMor with two linear segments which intersect near 487 K, as shown in Fig.
3. The apparent activation energies thus determined are 111.8 kJ mol-1 in the
range of 4 6 2 - 4 8 7 K and 54.7 kJ m o l - I in the range of 4 9 6 - 5 2 3 K. This
behavior possibly indicates single file diffusion in the one-dimensional pores of
mordenite.
3.3. Reaction orders in hydrogen and n-alkane
The variations in the rates of n-pentane conversion and product formation
were measured while changing the hydrogen pressure in the range of 2.2-6.1
Table 2
Kinetic p a r a m e t e r s o f n-alkane isomerization over solid acid catalysts
Alkane n-Butane n-Pentane
Parameter
nil2 -- 1.19 --0.15 --0.89
nalkane h- 1.58 + 1.06 + 0.53
Eapparent/kJ mol - i 92 72 145
Temp. r e g i o n / k 479-503 443-479 450-479
-12
-13
-14 \
\
m
-15
-16 i J
1000 / T
Fig. 3. n-Pentane conversion over PtHMor as a function of temperature. Total flow rate = 20 cm 3 g - ' s - ~.
Total pressure = 15 bar: p(n-C 5) = 0.15 bar, p(H 2) = 1.5 bar, He balance. T = 462-523 K.
bar at a constant n-pentane pressure and while changing the n-pentane pressure
in the range of 0.036-0.073 bar at a constant P(H2). The reaction temperature
for all these data is constant, viz. 479 K. The results for the PtHMor catalyst are
depicted in Figs. 4 and 5; (results for the Pt-SZ catalyst were published
previously [7].) The reaction orders are listed in Table 2.
-14.50
~ conversion
-15.50
-16.50
Z"
-17.50
=
O
-18.50
-19.50
-20.50 C4 f o r m a t i o n
-21.50
l ~ E f r I
-22.50
0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00
In (p(H2))
Fig. 4. n-Penmne reaction rate over PtHMor as a function of hydrogen pressure. Total flow rate = 10 cm 3 g -
s - ~. Total pressure = 11 bar: p(n-C 5) = 0.054 bar, p(H 2) = 2.2-6.1 bar, He balance. T = 479 K.
H. Liu et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 137 (1996) 167-177 173
-14.50
n-C 5 conversion
• w
-15.00
-16.00
-16.50
e-.
o -17.00
-17.50
2
e-
-18.00
C 1+C2 +C3 formation
-18.50
-19.00
C Af o r m a t i o n
-19.50
I I I ', 1
-20.00
-3.50 -3.00 -2.50
In ( p ( n - C s ) )
Fig. 5. n-Pentane reaction rate over PtHMor as a function of n-pentane pressure. Total flow rate = 10 c m 3 g - '
s - i. Total pressure = 11 bar: p ( n - C 5) = 0 . 0 3 6 - 0 . 0 7 3 bar, p ( H 2) = 2.2 bar, He balance. T = 479 K.
All lines in the In rate vs. In p(H 2) graph, taken at a constant n-pentane
pressure of 0.054 bar, are linear and have negative slopes. The reaction orders in
hydrogen of n-pentane conversion and the formations of i-pentane, butane, and
(C l + C 2 + C 3) are - 0 . 8 9 , - 0 . 8 8 , - 2 . 3 , and - 1.2, respectively. The orders
in hydrogen are generally more negative at higher H2/n-C 5 ratios.
The rates of n-pentane conversion and product formation increase with an
increase in the n-pentane pressure. All lines in the In rate vs. In p(n-C 5) graph
are linear and have positive slopes, except for the formation of butane, which is
independent of the n-pentane pressure within experimental error. The rate of
n-pentane conversion has an order in n-pentane of + 0.53; the formation rates of
i-pentane, butane, and (C~ + C 2 + C3), have orders in n-pentane of +0.54, 0,
and + 0.23, respectively. The orders in n-pentane change little with the H J n - C 5
ratio; only the order in butane formation becomes - 0 . 6 1 at high H2/n-C 5.
4. Discussion
The most striking result of this work is the huge difference of these catalysts
in the isomerization of butane. The Pt-SZ catalyst is very active, PtHMor is
virtually inactive under the same conditions. In contrast, the isomerization rates
of n-pentane over these catalysts are quite comparable; the conversions differ by
174 H. Liu et al./Applied Catalysis A: General 137 (1996) 167-177
will be roughly 2.5 nm. This matches the conditions for which single file
diffusion applies.
The opening of the main channel in mordenite is 6.5 × 7.0 ,~2 wide, whereas
the minimum kinetic diameters for n-butane and i-butane are 4.3 and 5.0
respectively [16]. In such one-dimensional pores two-way traffic is difficult or
impossible; transport of molecules through the channels resembles the 'string of
pearls' situation described by KS_rger et al. [9]. For this geometry a higher than
intrinsic activation energy is predicted at low temperatures; at higher tempera-
tures, when the physisorption is small, the activation energy will approach the
intrinsic value. It therefore seems plausible to attribute the exceptionally high
apparent activation energy over PtHMor in the low temperature regime to the
limitation by single file diffusion in the one-dimensional mordenite channels.
The higher rate of n-pentane isomerization over Pt-SZ is thus caused, at least
partially, by the more favorable geometry of this catalysts system.
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References
[1] D.M. Brouwer and H. Hoogeveen, Progr. Phys. Org. Chem., 9 (1972) 179.
[2] D.M. Brouwer, in R. Prins and G.C.A. Schuit (Editors), Chemistry and Chemical Engineering of
Catalytic Processes, Sijthoff & Noordhof Publ., Alphen a.d. Rijn, 1980, p. 173.
[3] F. Chevalier, M. Guisnet and R. Maurel, in G.C. Bond, P.B. Wells and F.C. Tompkins (Editors),
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Catalysis, London, The Chemical Society, 1977, p.
478.
[4] C.-Y. Hsu, C.R. Heimbruch, C.T. Armes and B.C. Gates, J. Chem Soc., Chem. Commun., (1992) 1645.
[5] V. Adeeva, T.W. de Haan, J. J~inchen, G.D. Lei, V. Schiinemann, L.J.M. van de Ven, W.M.H. Sachtler
and R.A. van Santen, J. Catal., 151 (1995) 364.
[6] V. Adeeva, G.D. Lei, W.M.H. Sachtler; Appl. Catal. A, 118 (1994) LI 1-LI5.
[7] H. Liu, V. Adeeva, G.D. Lei and W.M.H. Sachtler, J. Mol. Catal., 100 (1995) 35.
[8] H. Liu, G.D. Lei and W.M.H. Sachtler, Appl. Catal. A, in press.
[9] J. K~irger, M. Petzold, H. Pfeifer, S. Ernst and J. Weitkamp, J. Catal., 136 (1992) 283.
[10] Chr. Rodenbeck, J. K~irger and K. Hahn, J. Catal., 157 (1995) 656.
[11] Z. Karpifiski, S. Gandhi and W.M.H. Sachtler, J. Catal., 141 (1993) 337.
[12] B.T. Carvill, B.A. Lemer, B.J. Adelman, D.C. Tomczak and W.M.H. Sachtler, J. Catal., 144 (1993) I-8.
[13] B.A. Lerner, B.T. Carvill and W.M.H. Sachtler, Catal. Today, 21 (1994) 23.
[14] P.E. Eberly, J. Phys. Chem., 67 (1963) 2404.
[15] B.T. Carvill, PhD Thesis Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA, December 1993, p. 143.
[16] D.W. Breck, Zeolite Molecular Sieves, Structure, Chemistry, and Use, Wiley, New York, 1974, p. 636.
[17] E. Iglesia and J.E. Baumgartner, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 75 (1993) 993-1006.
[18] R. Kopelman, Science (Washington), 241 (1988) 1620.
[19] W.M. Sachtler and Z.-C. Zhang, Adv. Catal., 30 (1993) 129.
[20] T.J. McCarthy, G.-D. Lei and W.M.H. Sachtler, J. Catal., in press.